Trump’s FBI and ICE agents arrested Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Duggan in her courtroom and led her away in handcuffs because she sent a defendant out a back door. Trump officials said the judge was helping the defendant evade arrest, and they demonstrated that “no one is above the law” ( except Donald Trump). Critics said that Trump’s Department of Justice made a mockery of the law by arresting a judge.
See the comments of this Wisconsin Appeals Court judge who told CNN the Trump administration was sending a message to judges everywhere to bend to the will of the Trump administration. He was “appalled” that Judge Dugan was publicly humiliated, and that the director of the FBI Kash Patel posted a tweet of her being led away.
Judge Dugan told the agents that they should return with the correct warrant. One agent rode in the same elevator with the man sought by the Feds, but made no attempt to arrest him.
The New York Daily News editorial board said:
The FBI arrest of a Milwaukee local judge on felony counts related to immigration enforcement is an unwarranted and dangerous escalation by the Trump administration.
For the FBI to arrest someone at their workplace, they usually have to have been charged with something especially dire. For Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan, this offense was allegedly refusing to hand defendant Eduardo Flores Ruiz, who had just had a hearing before the judge, over to an ICE task force that showed up in her courtroom. Dugan was charged with two federal felonies and taken into custody, which FBI Director Kash Patel gloated about on social media.
Attorney General Pam Bondi, for whom advancing the MAGA movement’s political agenda supersedes ensuring the equal and fair administration of justice, went on TV to say: “no one is above the law.” Aside from the dissonance of serving under a president who was only able to evade extremely serious federal charges by being elected to the White House, Bondi either doesn’t realize or doesn’t care that Dugan was in fact attempting to ensure the integrity of the legal process.
Flores may have been guilty of his misdemeanor charges, or he may not. The point of the proceedings before Dugan was to establish that and, if appropriate, what his punishment should be. Because of ICE’s detention, that won’t happen, which is bad for Flores, bad for any alleged victims — who won’t see justice — and bad for the larger community as immigrants and their families begin to see the courthouse as a dangerous place to be.
Having ICE at the courthouse means immigrants won’t report crimes, assist law enforcement, or show up for their own court hearings, which makes everyone less safe, not to mention completely undercuts the baseline American ideal of due process, not something that Bondi and her cadre seem to hold in very high esteem.
It’s ironic that Dugan was charged with “obstructing a proceeding” when the only people obstructing an official proceeding here were the task force that showed up to take Flores into custody. This task force, per the government’s own criminal complaint, consisted of just one ICE agent plus one Customs and Border Protection agent, two FBI agents and two DEA agents.
We wonder if six federal agents, four of whom are not in immigration-focused agencies, could have found a better use of their time than detaining a single person at a courthouse. Now, more federal resources will be wasted on this fiasco as the government tries to move forward with a prosecution of a sitting judge whose alleged crime was simply letting a defendant walk through a different hallway.
Patel, Bondi and Trump are overplaying their hand, especially as the president’s immigration policy approval keeps dropping amid public outrage over authoritarian assaults on due process and separation of powers. Going to war with the judiciary is not going to end well, especially given the volume of federal judges, including Trump-appointed and conservative judges and the Supreme Court’s own conservative majority, that are questioning the administration’s power grab.
Federal judges aren’t likely to look favorably on this flagrant assertion of power in arresting a popular county-level counterpart just for not letting her courtroom become an ICE staging ground.

Those ICE agents should have been held in contempt of court for obstruction of an official proceeding. Do what Trump does and counter-sue. Name the agents and the DOJ. Also sue Bondi and Patel for defamation. Litigate. Litigate. Litigate.
LikeLike
Yes! Yes! litigate.
What Bondi and Patel did was shameful.
LikeLike
LG: The law school Pam Bondi graduated from must be very, very proud. I wonder if any of them can rescind diplomas based on their tearing up the Constitution. CBK
LikeLike
Pam Bondi has a diploma marked:
SDT.
Servant of Donald Trump.
LikeLike
Diane: It might be a good time to invest in kneepads. CBK
LikeLike
There is a movement to get her disbarred in Florida for going against the 9-0 SCOTUS decision. Her bar number is: 886440 in case anyone wants to file a complaint:
https://www.floridabar.org/public/acap/filing-a-complaint/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwJ71HdjbGNrAnvUcWV4dG4DYWVtAjExAAEeBmalORbAPpzXF28hErYooFUwZzF2jxIRRZVmG0YqF6SxDVDn1tppYDvz6X0_aem_enTQLjauqpMsFKBSEK6llQ
LikeLike
LG: Thank you for the link. I’ll pass it on. CBK
LikeLike
To know what’s coming next from the sadistic sociopath all we have to do is see what Hitler did step-by-step. That doesn’t mean all the steps will match. They might be out of order.
The ENABLING ACT may be next.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-enabling-act
The only difference at this time is Key-Fact 2
US judges are challenging the convicted rapist, fraud and felon’s Executive Orders.
The BIG question now is will the dictator love succeed in arresting elected Democrats in Congress and any Republans that have voted against him (there are still a few we can count on the fingers (forget the thumb) of one hand.
According to some sites, the Enabling Act moment has already been checked off the list.
America’s Enabling Act moment: Congress’ coming denouement and the Reichstag test
https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-enabling-act-moment-congress-104504245.html
The Democrats’ Enabling Act: Senate votes to fund Trump’s dictatorship
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/03/15/wlmv-m15.html
LikeLike
Thank you for this!
LikeLike
To know what’s coming next from the sadistic sociopath all we have to do is see what Hitler did step-by-step. That doesn’t mean all the steps will match. They might be out of order.
The ENABLING ACT may be next.
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/the-enabling-act
The only difference at this time is Key-Fact 2
US judges are challenging the convicted rapist, fraud and felon’s Executive Orders.
The BIG question now is will the dictator love succeed in arresting elected Democrats in Congress and any Republans that have voted against him (there are still a few we can count on the fingers (forget the thumb) of one hand.
According to some sites, the Enabling Act moment has already been checked off the list.
America’s Enabling Act moment: Congress’ coming denouement and the Reichstag test
https://www.yahoo.com/news/america-enabling-act-moment-congress-104504245.html
The Democrats’ Enabling Act: Senate votes to fund Trump’s dictatorship
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/03/15/wlmv-m15.html
LikeLike
We have been sold a lie to begin with: “There are three coequal branches of government.”
The branches are NOT coequal, have never BEEN coequal, and were never MEANT to be coequal. Garry Wills makes this point in his book, A Necessary Evil.
Wills points out that no one at the Constitutional Convention ever claimed equality between the branches. The concept of “coequal branches” was not a goal or an end. But someone, somewhere started this nonsense, and we are raised from childhood to believe it. And it’s bullshit.
There is a hierarchy to the branches: The Judiciary has the least power, the Executive is second in power, and the Legislative branch has the greatest power. Look at the amount of power the legislature has – all laws originate there, as do impeachments. And Congress, and no one else, has the purse strings. The Executive has the job of ensuring the laws are executed, but it cannot change or void the laws (except by veto, and even there the legislature can override the president’s veto). Only Congress can declare war. Finally, the courts interpret the laws enacted by Congress. Structurally, Congress has the greatest power.
We, the citizens, have meekly bought into this “coequality” myth. It’s understandable because in America’s schools, this is what we are taught. And it’s a lie.
It is past time Congress resumed its proper place, at the top of the structure. We have, over 200 years, sleepwalked to our current dilemma. Because Trump should be afraid of Congress, not the other way around. Congress must remind Trump that they, not he, decide what the laws will be, and won’t be. Congress, not Trump, has the sole power to declare war. Congress, not Trump, decides whether to spend a penny on anything. And Congress, not Trump, sets the agenda.
LikeLike
Well said!!!
LikeLike
Here’s How to Impeach Trump:
POINT 1: Our Constitution does NOT anywhere give the President of the United States any authority to write “executive orders”.
POINT 2: Our Constitution specifically says in Article 1, Section 1, that ONLY CONGRESS can make laws by saying: “ALL LEGISLATIVE POWERS herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.”
POINT 3: Our Constitution does not authorize Congress to delegate — to give away — any authority to the President or to anyone to make law. This is “THE CONSTITUTION’S NONDELEGATION DOCTRINE”.
POINT 4: THE CONSTITUTION says in Article 2, Section 1, that “The Executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.”
POINT 5: The word “executive” comes from the Latin word “exsequi,” which translates as “to carry out”. So, an “executive” is someone who carries out orders or follows through on a plan made by others, as in “the soldier executed his orders.”
POINT 6: At the Constitutional Convention of 1797 in which the Constitution was written by delegates from the original states, Connecticut delegate Roger Sherman explained that the Constitution created the Presidency as “nothing more than an institution for carrying the will of the Legislature [Congress] into effect.”
POINT 7: THE CONSTITUTION, in Article 2, Section 3, COMMANDS that the President “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed [carried out].”
POINT 8: The meaning of the constitutional title “Executive”, combined with the Constitutional Convention definition of the President’s duty, plus the Constitution’s command on the President contained in Article 2, Section 3, mean that the President can only CARRY OUT the laws made by Congress, NOT CREATE OR CHANGE LAWS by so-called “executive order”.
POINT 9: Because so-called “executive orders” are not authorized in our Constitution, and because our Constitution gives ALL LAWMAKING AUTHORITY TO CONGRESS ALONE, and because our Constitution commands the President to faithfully carry out the laws made by Congress,
THEREFORE, any so-called “executive order” that reverses or in any way changes or limits a law passed by Congress is a violation of our Constitution’s command that the President “shall take care that the Laws be faithfully executed [carried out]” and is therefore AN IMPEACHABLE OFFENSE.
LikeLike
Trump swore an oath at his inauguration to defend and protect the Constitution. Has he ever read it?
LikeLike
In all my years of practice, I never knew a judge who would tolerate a defendant being arrested and taken out of their court in handcuffs. Any officer who tried would likely be found in contempt.
People appearing in court are essentially immune from seizure in the courtroom itself. And any judge knows that any defendant who is arrested in court will never cooperate with law enforcement again.
The most significant contact I had with an undocumented migrant was when I was called to Chicago’s Area Four Detective Division. When I arrived I talked a Violent Crimes detective who had an immigrant who wanted to speak with me. The immigrant had been living under the radar for years, minding his own business and keeping his head down.
But he had seen a murder, and believed justice needed to be done. So he said he would give a statement, and make an ID, if we didn’t bring INS into it. We agreed. And a murder was cleared, and a family’s questions were answered.
I’d still take that deal any day. And it was not really unusual: most of the undocumented I encountered were just working like dogs and sending their pay to Mexico to support their families left behind. They weren’t criminals and they had no ill will toward anyone.
LikeLike
If the undocumented are going to deported for showing up to do their civic duty, they will be less likely to report crime or appear as a witness which will contribute to more crime. It’s more the cycle of the right wing hypocrisy. They are the law and order party that ignores the rule of law.
LikeLike
correct! The trumpists want to make everyone criminalize their behavior so they can then say loudly: these people are criminals!
LikeLike
It’s a reign of terror now. It is not simply law enforcement. It’s cruelty, and the inability to see what’s in front of them.
LikeLike
Jsrtheta,
We are seeing actions and policies in this administration that are shocking. In my lifetime, I have never seen a President with such an ironclad control of Congress. They don’t complain when he usurps their Constitutional authority. Nor can I remember a Justice Department that was so willing to serve the President, not the American people, with the possible exception of John Mitchell and Nixon.
LikeLike
not have I ever read of such. I am holding my breath.
LikeLike