This is a fascinating article about an “academic” organization with shallow roots but a prestigious name. It was created in 2022. It confers awards on award-worthy recipients and on fringe academics. Its purpose seems to be to add luster to the latter.
Take the recent Trump nominee to lead the National Institutes of Health:
On October 24, an organization called the American Academy of Sciences and Letters (AASL) honored Stanford University Professor and health economist Dr. Jay Bhattacharya with its Robert J. Zimmer Medal for Intellectual Freedom.
Announcing the award, the group praised the professor for “resolutely” resisting “enormous pressure to compromise his scientific findings” and risking “his own personal and professional self-interest, repeatedly, without hesitation, to take a stand for the public’s right to unrestricted scientific discussion and debate.” A few days later, The New York Post picked up the story, running it with the headline, “Scientist who battled for COVID common sense over media and government censors wins top award.”
“Few in the media seemed eager to attend a ceremony last week in Washington, D.C., where the prestigious American Academy of Sciences and Letters was awarding its top intellectual freedom award,” the article began. “The problem may have been the recipient: Stanford Professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.”
It is true that Bhattacharya is a controversial figure for his contrarian stance on the COVID-19 pandemic. He first burst onto the national scene in 2020 as the co-author of an inaccurate and bias-prone, but influential, seroprevalence study that significantly underestimated the dangers of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Later, he was one of three authors of The Great Barrington Declaration, awidely rebuked document that outlined the failed pandemic herd immunity strategy embraced by the Trump administration. Since then, the professor has been a go-to expert for Republican politicians and right-wing groups working to politicize public health and government efforts to control COVID. He has taken to claiming that he was censored by the federal government for his views and even unsuccessfully sued the Biden administration over his claims.
Bhattacharya has also cultivated alliances with anti-vaxxers. Last month, a health policy symposium he organized at Stanford came under fire for featuring a number of them along with minimizers and lab leak enthusiasts. He spoke at the Robert Kennedy Jr. campaign’s vice presidential announcement, has been proposedby RFK Jr. for a leadership role in CDC, and is currently listed on Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again website as a potential pick for director of the National Institutes of Health.
But Bhattacharya’s reputation is not the only explanation for the lack of media attention given to the award ceremony, which took place in the vaunted Library of Congress. Another is the fact that the AASL is largely unknown. The group only emerged in 2022, fueled by the private family foundation of an investment fund CEO. A closer look at AASL and its origins and activities provides a disturbing window into how wealthy business interests are working to reshape academia in support of their agenda.
You should read the rest of the article. Can money buy prestige? Read on.
AASL borrows prestige by honoring well-known figures in the arts, sciences, and letters, then confers prestige on rightwing academics who have been scorned by the mainstream.

This guy’s wife improperly helped him recruit affluent parents to be part of his “random” covid study. And when a science journalist reported on this true fact, he made it his mission to publicly accuse her of “going after his family” to give his rabid, violent anti-science fans a reason to launch threats against her.
He is a kindred spirit of Trump – with the exact same moral center, so his award is well-earned. I have found that when you look closely at all the people Trump has empowered, they have always been bullies, mean girls, or their wannabe followers who gladly do the bullies and mean girls’ dirty work for a little praise. The wannabes include those who sat in their basement, wishing the mean bully who made their life miserable would just realize they were a kindred spirit.
LikeLike
This strategy is similar to one used by Steve Bannon to “hack” the mainstream media by getting a story into the front pages of the NY Times. Bannon created the non profit, “non partisan” innocuous sounding Government Accountability Institute with money from the Mercers. Legally the GAI was non partisan and did produce some objective investigations. Then Schweizer and Bannon used that credibility to weaponize a dishonest hit job on the Clinton Foundation. Schweizer wrote the book “Clinton Cash” which falsely accused Hillary of getting government approval for the sale of a US uranium mine to Russia to benefit a Clinton Foundation donor. None of that was true but the NYT and WaPo signed exclusive deals with Bannon and Schweizer to publish excerpts. That was how Hillary went overnight from very high approval ratings as one of the most admired women in the world.. to “Crooked Hillary”.
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2017/08/21/how-steve-bannon-played-the-mainstream-media/
LikeLike
Trump knows nothing about anything. But he knows what he likes: Easy, though false, “scientific” information that confirms his desire to minimize unpleasant, and politically dangerous, responses to public health crises.
Thus he will trumpet (no pun intended) false claims that put him in a good light. The only fear he has is that “best” (though bogus) practices will result in political damage to himself.
He doesn’t care if YOU die. As long as HE’s still viewed as the hero.
The Great Barrington Declaration was, of course, the “medicine show” he had been praying for.
LikeLike
The extreme right Christian Nationalists, the Ku Klux Klan’s rebirth by another name, that makes up most if not all of FELON47’s fascist MAGA cult is very creative at inventing catchy misleading titles to fool their willingingly ignorant base into ignoring what’s really happening.
If the January 6, 2021, TRAITOR, archieves his toxic goals to destroy the US Constitution and it’s democracy, turning the “land of the free” into an enslaved workers paradise, that’s really a slave-wage prison for the poor working class without health care and benefits and never enough to live a comfortable life, they’ll end up suffering longer, after the malignant narcissist gets rid of those of us who saw through his scam first and refuse to pledge loyalty to that scum sucker.
LikeLike
The number of Kool-Aid drinkers on here continue to amaze me. Setting aside the merits or lack thereof of the AASL, the fact that people are so comfortable dividing academics between “right wing” and everyone else, proves the right-wing argument.
Labeling anyone who does not follow the “elite” and yes, for lack of a better word “left-leaning” point of view as “extreme,” “Fascist,” “Christian Nationalist,” or whatever label some people put on others is childish and not helpful. Of course there are those on the right that do it as well, including Trump, and they are equally guilty.
The vast majority of these “right-wing” academics identified in the article are mainstream academics, well regarded within their fields. Isn’t higher education supposed to be about considering diverse perspectives without labels that lead to judgement and at times near banishment of certain perspectives. I could list many examples of this, but I don’t think that is necessary.
Ideologically left of center political perspectives have dominated academics since the 1950’s. Today it has become a profitable industry on both sides. Perhaps it is time for academics, those that are supposed to be the intellectually independent creaters of knowledge should learn to act like they actually care about independent knowledge creation, not pushing a political agenda of hate.
LikeLike
These “academics”, who are NOT in any way “mainstream”, are a bunch of cranks. They are laughingstocks in their fields. They only worship “the markets”, and the death and impoverishment they favor is quite real. Faced with the proven realities of COVID, they found some “free market” arguments that, of necessity, would result in death for, at the least, thousands.
To them, death is a cheap price to preserve their profits.
LikeLike