Oliver Darcy was senior media critic for CNN, when he left to start his own Substack, called Status. There he reports on the latest buzz.
Here he writes about the moral collapse of the mainstream media in the Second Coming of the Convicted Felon. Despite the many admonitions by scholars of authoritarianism not to “obey in advance,” the media is normalizing the new Trump regime. Yesterday Trump unleashed a blizzard of executive orders and rescissions of Biden policies. Just a few: Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accord (again) and from the World Health Organization. He declared that the Gulf of Mexico is now the Gulf of America. He rolled back Biden’s limit of $2,000 per year for the cost of prescription drugs for those on Medicare and Medicaid. He pardoned the J6 criminals, even those who violently assaulted police officers.
He wrote:
Four years ago, moments after Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election, Jake Tapper delivered a blistering sermon about Donald Trump’s legacy live on CNN. He looked into the camera and bluntly described Trump’s four years in office as a “time of cruelty,” a “time when truth and fact were treated with disdain,” and an “era of just plain meanness.”
“It must be said, to paraphrase President Ford: For tens of millions of our fellow Americans, their long national nightmare is over,” Tapper concluded, ending his unsparing mini-monologue.
That Jake Tapper was nowhere to be found on Monday as Trump was sworn back into office, becoming the 47th president of the United States. Instead, appearing on CNN was a Tapper incapable or unwilling to deliver the type of no-holds-barred commentary that sent his star soaring during Trump’s first administration.
As he narrated Monday’s proceedings, Tapper, CNN’s lead Washington anchor, glossed over how Trump was twice-impeached and a convicted felon. He made no mention about how the Capitol Rotunda was stuffed with right-wing extremists and conspiracy theorists. Instead, Tapper largely avoided delivering any commentary that might be perceived by the MAGA movement as inflammatory. Outside the physical body, the Tapper of 2025 shared little in common with the pugnacious Tapper of 2020.
To be fair to Tapper, he was not alone. In fact, Tapper embodies a larger trend gripping the news media, which has tamped down its once aggressive posture toward Trump. The appetite for hard-hitting reporting and stinging analysis has dissipated in the c-suites of several major news outlets, with executives wary of offending the new president and the muscular movement he leads.
That was all reflected in Monday’s inauguration coverage. Across the entire television news landscape, the reporting on Trump’s inauguration lacked firepower. The profession’s stable of news anchors and correspondents who branded themselves as truth-telling journalists willing to hold power to account were present on screen, but their fervid spirit had unmistakably evaporated. It was like the invasion of the body snatchers — familiar faces delivering the news, yet devoid of the passion and conviction that once defined them, as if their former selves had been hollowed out.
It’s not like there wasn’t plenty to discuss. Trump repeated lies about the January 6 insurrection, claimed the 2020 election was rigged, and falsely alleged the Democrats tried to rig the 2024 election, among other things. He welcomed conspiracy theorists to the inaugural ceremony, such as Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Vivek Ramaswamy, andRobert F. Kennedy Jr. And he put on display how he had bent the most powerful figures in Silicon Valley to his will.
In other words, it was a highly abnormal affair to watch. But the way in which television news outlets covered it — with the exception of MSNBC — was out of sync with that reality. Most of the commentary focused on the years-old traditions and ceremonies of Inauguration Day, which in turn framed the events as fairly ordinary.
A search of closed captioning revealed that most networks almost entirely avoided using terms like “twice-impeached” or “convicted felon” when discussing Trump during the hours and hours of special coverage offered to viewers. In fact, no one on the Mark Thompson-led CNN (which found time to interview an outside expert about Melania Trump’s outfit choice) used either of those terms a single time, according to the closed captions search that I conducted. Yes, really. That important context was somehow missing from broadcasts of Trump’s resurgence to power.
After years of sounding the alarm about the very real threats that Trump poses to America’s bedrock democratic principles, and after years of watching Trump and his allies wage a historic disinformation war on the country, the on-air coverage was muted and failed to meet the moment. Even Trump took notice, lauding the press for its coverage. “Maybe the fake news is changing,” Trump said.
The dose of coverage the country was treated to on Monday is likely a sign of what is to come. Billionaire owners like Jeff Bezos and corporate parents like Warner Bros. Discovery have signaled that they want their outlets to be less hostile to the MAGA movement. They do not wish to be the so-called #Resistance. They would much rather be allies of the president, particularly while they have high-wire business matters before the federal government.
Which means that at a time when Trump, by all accounts, poses more of a threat than ever, the news media is less willing than ever to treat him to the tough coverage the moment calls for. It’s a troubling shift that will have far-reaching consequences for the country. And, frankly, it’s just bad journalism.

Broadcast, online or print, hardly a profile in courage to be found.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Media’s Trump normalization is complicity: Inauguration headlines should read: “Felonious Hate-Mongering Protector of Billionaire Wealth and Christian-Nationalism Ascends to Power in the US Threatening Democracy, Peace, and Human Rights.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
. . . and they are leaving those (prior) colleagues who still stand (up) to stand out. But thanks for posting this–I didn’t watch and didn’t know how bad it was . . . I mean, the World Health Organization?
I guess Bezos and his buddies saw “Democracy dies in darkness” as a mandate to turn off the lights. CBK
LikeLike
Media should be known as the “quake” news.
LikeLike
I was totally shocked a couple days ago when the NYT used most of their front page to inform readers that it was an absolute fact that the polls prove that they public totally loves Trump’s policies, even if they didn’t love Trump. What policies, you may ask? Well,the NYT really didn’t want to go into details, but suffice to say that their polling proved that the public didn’t mind Trump deporting undocumented immigrants who were dangerous criminals, and totally liked that children would no longer be forced to change their gender just because they expressed a passing belief that they were a different gender. I am pretty sure that way down at the end was some vague mentioning of some unimportant issues that the public didn’t agree with Trump on, but obviously if there were policies that Trump proposed that the public didn’t love, those policies were really too unimportant to focus on. What IS newsworthy and needed to be amplified on the NYT’s front page is that the public loves Trump’s policies even if they don’t love Trump! Nothing to worry about,folks!
“Support for Trump’s Policies Exceeds Support for Trump” NYT 1/18/2025
The irony is that every person quoted in that article was repeating exactly the same talking points that every person quoted in thousands of pre-election “news” articles was saying! What a coincidence! It proves that the NYT is simply reporting the true news that Trump’s policies are perfectly normal! And the Democrats hate working people and did nothing for them in 4 years, unlike Trump who offers the policies they love, even if they don’t love Trump.
Institutions like the so-called liberal media that normalize Trump and manufacture consent are NOT going to save democracy – they are going to destroy democracy by giving the imprimatur of “liberal media” approval to authoritarian/neo-fascist rule.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s going to be a long four years, and I’m sure there will be endless complaints about how the “mainstream media” is “normalizing” Trump by failing to write the stories that we might prefer them to write or how we might prefer them to be written.
My first piece of advice is to avoid cable news entirely as a general matter, unless there is some extremely important breaking news for which live coverage with video is critical. Other than that, avoid it. 24/7 cable news has always been and will always be idiotic. These people are paid to talk *nonstop* about stuff that has already been talked about nonstop. It’s a recipe for boring and stupid commentary, it’s inherently uninteresting, and it’s a waste of your time.
My second piece of advice would be to consider the breadth of coverage that the most prominent mainstream “print” publications provide each day, and not to get too hung up on the stories here or there that rub us the wrong way. Take a step back, inhale, and look at the big picture. By my very rough count (which surely is an undercount), just *today* the New York Times has published at least 37 stories relating to Trump’s new presidency. Below is link to a pictorial representation of that coverage — a lot of important stories about a wide range of topics, mixing original reporting with live commentary and opinion pieces. When I hear the usual whining about how awful “mainstream media” is, I sometimes imagine a world without it — a world filed with talking heads, social media scrolls, and substacks of commentary with no original reporting — and after a few moments I’m thankful it still exists. We should enjoy it while it lasts, because we’ll miss it when it’s gone.
https://imgur.com/a/3lDLSqW
LikeLike
Interesting take.
And, I guess we could apply your advice to “enjoy it while it lasts” to lots of other aspects of our civic lives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I used to have a feeling that was like an awareness that things were falling apart. A curmudgeon’s outlook, some said. Starting sometime around 2016, it changed to an awareness of the rate at which things are falling apart, and specially, an awareness that that rate was continuously increasing. Like falling into a black hole, metaphorically speaking.
LikeLike
Specifically, not specially.
LikeLike
Change is accelerating incredibly and people are grasping for easy answers. Authoritarians seem to be taking advantage -here and around the world.
LikeLike
Hadn’t planned on seeing any of the regal proceedings, and that is what it was, a royal extravaganza that is befit the new King of the World-King CONVICTED FELON tRump, but a friend was in town on business and we went to a local tavern that had it on the TV. Luckily the sound wasn’t up or I would have had to spend money to listen to music.
As one who doesn’t have nor watches any TV (except the occasional baseball or hockey-Let’s Go Blues game) it was very surrealistic to see the day’s proceedings. Even without the sound it was as if the tRump campaign had bought and paid for the media coverage so obsequious, brown-nosing, ingratiating, etc. . . . Ineffinsane. Maybe instead of “sane washing” it should be Ineffinsanewashing” except substitute everyone’s favorite “F” word for effin.
Yes, the USofA is indeed a full-fledged kakistocratic oligarchy now.
Oh, and so much for law and order Rethuglicans, eh!
LikeLike
Or perhaps Insane Washing is a better descriptor.
LikeLike
I don’t have the attention span any longer to watch a full hockey game. But I have a phone app that sends me alerts when there is a “close game”—defined as either a tie or a one-goal game—with 5 minutes left. Great way to watch hockey for the attention-impaired!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I watch the whole game but I’m usually hoarse at the end from shouting at the Blues “Shoot the Fu#$%^& Puck”. . .they hardly ever listen. As I only watch (haven’t had TV for 15 years or so) when I go down to the local tavern, where most don’t have a clue about hockey, people look at me like I’m nuts.
LikeLike
Imagine if we failed to have the NYT writing 100 stories amplifying the very important and very legitimate outrage that “very good people” (i.e. people who blame Dems for everything bad and credit them for nothing good) feel because those terrible Democrats are once again supporting something that is a grave danger to our country (open borders! CRT! DEI! Advocating sex change surgery for children!) “There they go again” reports the NYT, writing another dozen news stories about voters who are outraged at Dems because the Dems refuse to stop doing those terrible things that outrage every good person in America that the NYT can find!
If the Republicans are outraged, the NYT knows that the Dems need to be castigated for not doing what they should be doing to stop that outrage. How dare Kamala not admit that Biden’s economic policies were a complete an utter failure — no wonder the NYT had to write a couple hundred stories featuring the views of the good Americans who are outraged about that and outraged that the Dems have done nothing for 4 years to help working folks.
Anyone who reads the NYT can be reassured that there is nothing to worry about because no real Americans feel any outrage at all the interesting changes that Trump has already made that the NYT has dutifully reported. Don’t you know that the anti-Trump NYT is saving democracy because they mentioned in passing that an anti-Trump partisan with reasons that may or may not be valid doesn’t agree with the many people who say that Trump’s policies will make America great again! Yep, that is the kind of anti-Trump reporting that will save democracy for sure.
In short, one only has to read the NYT news pages to know that there is absolutely nothing to worry about! The problem isn’t the very popular (the NYT tells us) policies that Trump is enacting which may or may not make America great (no one knows for sure). The problem isn’t Trump embracing Elon Musk, who expresses his love for German far right racist and xenophobic parties and gives the Heil Hitler salute. The problem is when people like us express outrage when Musk and Trump “troll” us.
What would America do if Trump and Musk and the right wing mediasphere couldn’t keep reminding America that “even the liberal NYT” agrees with us that extreme outrage at Democrats is valid (and should be the subject of at least 100 stories a month) but outrage at Trump is invalid AND it is that unwarranted outrage we feel that is causing alll the problems!
Maybe people wouldn’t be so easily gaslit by right wing lies if the so-called liberal NYT wasn’t also reporting the news as if those right wing lies were true. And then victim blaming! It’s us! It’s our outrage! Not Trump! The NYT has seen the enemy, and the enemy is us! It’s the outrage expressed by people like us who see what Trump and Musk are doing and are appalled.
If only we were right wing Trump supporters who blamed Dems for everything. Then our outrage would be the most important story of the year, and validated in dozens of news stories a week in the liberal NYT. But since we criticize Trump, it’s all our fault that Trump is in power. That’s why we should be grateful every day for the “perfect” news coverage in the NYT that presents our outrage correctly as ridiculous and unnecessary and very, very harmful to democracy.
Orwellian.
LikeLike
They’re just showing themselves to be “Good Germans”. It’s quite pathetic, but not surprising. We’re a nation of ignorant, entitled, selfish, incurious dolts.
LikeLike
My only comfort is that for most of my life, I lived in a pretty damned good country.
LikeLike
I agree, Jsrtheta. I have to stay healthy so I can live to see a return of decency, compassion, competence, and people dedicated to the good of all in public life.
LikeLike
It’s what we have to go through to get there. I can’t think of a more shattering time. There seems overall a very “meh” attitude toward citizenship, let alone compassion.
Not a healthy state of affairs. At all.
LikeLike
Must not be the same country I’ve been living in where death and destruction by the USofA has been non-stop since I was born. Can you say Arbenz, Mossadegh, Viet Nam, Cambodia, Laos, Central America, Allende, the Shah, and so many more atrocities committed against other supposedly free countries and peoples.
LikeLike
No one promised Eden. I am pretty clear-eyed about the nation’s failings.
But I am also clear-eyed about its strengths, which are many and unparalleled. And I see the people striving to realize its ideals.
I have noticed on the internet a trend to attack, degrade and dismiss America’s strengths. Almost invariably, a string of horror stories get trotted out to prove points the posters have trumpeted. I am not disputing most of these posts.
But I am not alone in loving the American experiment. Maybe you should give it a try. Looking at everything from only one perspective is no way to go through life.
LikeLike
“Maybe you should give it a try.”
Ha, ha ha ha ha. I’ve lived here most of my life.
Oh I have but with open eyes and experience of living abroad-I turned 17 while studying in Mexico and turned 18 living in Peru.
One way to put it is that I am a true patriot, not an American nationalist, with a nationalist being one who believes and acts “my country right or wrong”. A true patriot looks at the country and sees the flaws and tries to ameliorate them accepting the good and understanding the bad.
LikeLike
I’ve never been a “my country, right or wrong” guy either.
You don’t know me, Duane. Like, at all.
LikeLike
It always bears repeating that Trump is a filthy soulless Kremlin asset so his job is to slowly (as possible) transform us into Hungary. This is why Tucker was extolling Orban early on Fox “news”. The Billionaires row at inauguration is just an explicit representation of what is less blatant in Russia. RepubliQans are now full blown anti-democracy anti-American lawless nazi Christo-fascists who prefer Putin and his authoritarianism to our Constitutional Republican democracy.
LikeLike
I kept waiting & hoping that at least one, if not all of the Democrats seated behind Trump during his inauguration tirade, would have stood up & walked out. They shouldn’t have attended in the first place, but once idiot started to spew his insults & lies about the past 4 years, they should have all gotten up & walked out. What would they have to lose? Hillary & Bill, Obama, George & Laura Bush? Nothing to lose. Kamala & Doug? Why show him any respect after all that he said & did? Joe & Jill? They’re done with politics. What a perfect & final FU to him after all he did to them. But no. Democrats have to show their respect for the office & traditions & norms of the past that Trump trampled over. Michelle Obama was the only one to stand up for every bad but true thing she said about him. They all needed to reject Michelle’s now trite statement about “when they go low, we go high”. The sooner Dems learn to ignore that lofty claim, the sooner they just might have a chance against Trump & MAGA.
LikeLike
They have nothing to lose.
Democratic officeholders should be fighting Trump every step of the way. They should not ever miss the chance to point out just how idiotic he is. If they’re not going to be warriors, they should step down.
LikeLike
Loved2teach:
I wish they had walked out rather than listen to his flood of lies and insults.
He is vulgar, crass, no-class.
LikeLike