The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 holds up Arizona as a shining exemplar of what education should be in every state. Vouchers for all, rich and poor alike. Everyone choosing the kind of school or home school they like. Happiness reigns. Or so they claim.
In several articles, ProPublica has taken a close look at what’s happening in Arizona. It’s not a pretty picture. Open the link to read this article in full. It was written by Eli Hager of ProPublica, published there and on the Raw Story website.
The reality is ugly. Arizona does have universal vouchers, but most are used by well-to-do families whose children were already enrolled in private schools. About 60,000 of Arizona’s 1.3 million students use vouchers. Clearly, the vast majority of the state’s students attend public schools. Meanwhile, Arizona’s state budget has exploded because of the added cost of paying everyone’s tuition at private schools. And the public schools are underfunded, ranked 48th in the nation for per-pupil spending.
One afternoon in September, parents started arriving for pickup at Title of Liberty Academy, a private Mormon K-8 school in Mesa, Arizona, on the eastern outskirts of Phoenix.
Individually, the moms and dads were called in to speak to the principal. That’s when they were told that the school, still just a few months old, was closing due to financial problems.
There would be no more school at Title of Liberty.
Over the course of that week, more parents were given the news, as well as their options for the remainder of the school year: They could transfer their children to another private or charter school, or they could put them in a microschool that the principal said she’d soon be setting up in her living room. Or there was always homeschooling. Or even public school.
These families had, until this moment, embodied Arizona’s “school choice” ideal. Many of them had been disappointed by their local public schools, which some felt were indoctrinating kids in subjects like race and sex and, of course, were lacking in religious instruction. So they’d shopped for other educational options on the free market, eventually leading them to Title of Liberty.
One mom had even discovered the school by window shopping: It was in the same strip mall as her orthodontist’s office, next to a ChinaPalace, and she’d noticed the flags outside with Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints imagery. (The school was not formally affiliated with the church.)
An LDS member herself, she was soon ready to start paying tuition to the school from her son’s Empowerment Scholarship Account — a type of school voucher pioneered in Arizona and now spreading in various forms to more than a dozen other states. ESAs give parents an average of over $7,000 a year in taxpayer funds, per child, to spend on any private school, tutoring service or other educational expense of their choice.
Yet Arizona’s ESA program provides zero transparency as to private schools’ financial sustainability or academic performance to help parents make informed school choices.
For instance, the state never informed parents who were new to Title of Liberty and were planning to spend their voucher money there that it had previously been a charter school called ARCHES Academy — which had had its charter revoked last school year due to severe financial issues. Nor that, as a charter, it had a record of dismal academic performance, with just 13% of its students proficient in English and 0% in math in 2023.
When it was a charter (which is a type of public school), these things could be known. There was some oversight. The Arizona State Board for Charter Schools had monitored the school’s finances and academics, unanimously coming to the conclusion that it should be shut down.
Yet just a month after the board’s decision, ARCHES was re-creating itself as a renamed, newly religious private school, simply by pivoting to accept voucher dollars.
In other words, it was closed down by a public governing body but found a way to keep existing and being funded by the public anyway, just without the standards and accountability that would normally come with taxpayer money.
Arizona does no vetting of new voucher schools. Not even if the school or the online school “provider” has already failed, or was founded yesterday, or is operating out of a strip mall or a living room or a garage, or offers just a half hour of instruction per morning. (If you’re an individual tutor in Arizona, all you need in order to register to start accepting voucher cash is a high school diploma.)
There is “nothing” required, said Michelle Edwards, the founder and principal of ARCHES and then of Title of Liberty, in an interview with ProPublica. It was “shocking how little oversight” the state was going to provide of her ESA-funded private school, Edwards said.
According to charter board members as well as parents and family members of her former students, Edwards is a well-intentioned career educator who cares deeply about children. But she has repeatedly struggled to effectively or sustainably run a school.
She said that when she first transformed her charter school into a private school, she and her team called up “every agency under the sun” asking what standards the new school would have to meet, including in order to accept voucher funds. For example, what about special education students and other vulnerable children — would there be any oversight of how her school taught those kids? Or instructional time — any required number of minutes to spend on reading, writing, math, science?
State agencies, she said, each responded with versions of a question: “Why are you asking us? We don’t do that for private schools.”
“If you’re gonna call yourself a school,” Edwards told ProPublica, “there should be at least some reporting that has to be done about your numbers, about how you’re achieving. … You love the freedom of it, but it was scary.”
This school year, ProPublica has been examining Arizona’s first-of-its-kind “universal” education savings account program. We are doing so both because other states have been modeling their own new ESA initiatives after this one, and also because President-elect Donald Trump has prioritized the issue, most recently by nominating for secretary of education someone whose top priority appears to be expanding school choice efforts nationwide. (And Betsy DeVos, his first education secretary, was and remains a leading school voucher proponent.)
These programs are where the U.S. education system is headed.
In our stories, we’ve reported that Arizona making vouchers available even to the wealthiest parents — many of whom were already paying tuition for their kids to go to private school and didn’t need the government assistance — helped contribute to a state budget meltdown. We’ve also reported that low-income families in the Phoenix area, by contrast, are largely not being helped by vouchers, in part because high-quality private schools don’t exist in their neighborhoods.
But the lack of any transparency or accountability measures in Arizona’s ESA model is perhaps the most important issue for other states to consider as they follow this one’s path, even some school choice supporters say.

Diane: What I fail to understand is why a parent would be okay with the very idea of no transparency. It makes me wonder about these parents being a kind of second-generation watershed flowing from what went wrong in the decades of public education that such parents underwent.
I’m not blaming public education, but rather the negative forces that played into the planning of its destruction. I think we are witnessing what was “successful” about those forces.
Mixed with the religious elements that are not tempered by secularity, science, including the social sciences, history (including religious), and critical thinking, all of the elements of a retribalization are running through Arizona’s ideas about educating their children.
And that can only set the stage for more conflict and (false) justifications for violence, if not now, then surely for later. CBK
LikeLike
“What I fail to understand is why a parent would be okay with the very idea of no transparency.”
“Seems we have a failure to communicate. . . . Don’t need no big GUBMINT butting into my bizness, especially since it is xtian oriented.”
LikeLike
Duane: Exactly that. . . . CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you may have met some of these folks, Duane. Hope you are braving the snow.
LikeLike
Oh, yes, I know too many tRump cultistas. Some day this insanity will end. I just hope I’m still around to see the outcome of our present dilemma. I’d love to be around in 50 years (were my body to not be so stupid) to see how it all washes out.
Was supposed to be going camping today/tomorrow but our annual freeze out (we started winter camping in Boy Scouts back in the 60s) got frozen out. Got around 8-12 inches depending on many variables so the roads have not been passable where we were heading. Not to mention very low nighttime temps around zero. That hasn’t stopped us before but each year it gets harder to enjoy.
Us old farts aren’t quite as bold as when we were younger. Best time to camp/fish. . . wintertime, especially with snow on the ground, falling all around while catching some fish. People think we’re nuts but standing in the water is warmer than standing in the air.
The snow sure is beautiful, though!
LikeLike
Winter camping in the southeast is generally miserable due to rain. When you got snow, we got much needed rain.
I completely get the old timer thing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Universal vouchers are no reasonable solution to providing a “thorough and efficient” form of public education, and Arizona is living proof of its failure. A patchwork of amateur operated schools that lack educational expertise, fiscal management skills, a lack awareness of the legality of what they are providing and zero regulation regarding the health, safety and academic achievement of students is an accident waiting to happen. Libertarian authoritarians do not care about the future of our young people and the collective success of our nation. They simply do not want to pay their fair share of taxes. In fact, ignorant people are easier to control, and perhaps it is part of the rationale for this destructive, reckless plan. Dividing and conquering is a strategy as old as time. Education should not be driven by political zeal and special interests. Education should be carefully planned and implemented by trained professional educators.
LikeLike
Some libertarian lunk heads believe that there should be no public schools whatsoever. Why should the public pay for the education of other people’s children. Education should be the responsibility of the parents through home schooling or private schools not publicly funded schools (according to the libertarian dogma). Libertarianism is a sickness of the spirit and a bane on this nation. It’s really about greed and selfishness. The GOP and libertarians, perfect together.
LikeLike
As Carol Burris wrote in The Progressive, the goal of the “reform movement” is to eliminate public schools and, in time, public funding. Every parent will pay to educate their children.
LikeLike
Homeschool co-op offers enriching curriculum | Sun Community News SCHROON | With homeschooling being on the rise nationally, a group of area parents (who double as dedicated educators) have created a unique organization that has allowed their kids to reap the rewards of a more traditional classroom setting, while remaining faithful to the homeschooling model.
Here is a disturbing trend as well. From the article, “Though both her mother and father were teachers in the public school system, they weren’t keen on the agendas being taught in the schools, and believed they could do a better job at home.”
As a teacher for over 20 years, I never saw an agenda that I had to teach.
In contrast, here is the agenda that they follow. NYS LEAH NYS LEAH Statement of Faith | Christian Homeschooling Organization
LikeLike
“I never saw an agenda that I had to teach.”
I taught the Spanish curriculum of the school/district. But there is the “hidden curriculum” that is promulgated and as a teacher I tried to expose. Adminimals didn’t like that exposure.
LikeLike
Thanks, I guess, for that revolting bigoted statement by the home schoolers.
LikeLike
I have to teach an agenda. A right-wing agenda that requires teachers to teach American exceptionalism (really, it’s in our core) and that the US is a “compound Constitutional republic. That last one is Utah state law.
LikeLike
What is a compound Constitutional Republic? Exceptionalism? Does that mean everyone except those that were discriminated against?
LikeLike
“Empowerment Scholarship Account” is deceptive enough, but I don’t think is nearly as misleading as what it’s called here in New Hampshire: Education Freedom Account.
LikeLike
William,
Vouchers are seldom called vouchers. There is a long list of euphemisms for them.
LikeLike
When my father retired in the 80s, my parents moved to Arizona so I spent a lot of time there. I was a classroom teacher up north then and I typically went there at least twice a year, during my vacation time. Public school teachers there did not have to be certified then. I don’t know for sure if that has changed or not, but it always struck me as being consistent with their view of themselves still being “the wild west” –so none of this surprises me today…
LikeLike
BTW, I don’t know what it’s like there today, but back then, at local grocery store chains in AZ, people could easily buy guns. That was shocking to me since guns were banned in my northern city for decades, until not long ago when gun enthusiasts sued and won –though they still don’t allow grocery stores to sell guns around here.
LikeLike
I used to teach at a private school. It had been a mission school in 1908, bringing education to a remote region. By the time I got there, it was obsolete, but, being believed of its alumni, had redefined its mission to be helping children who had not been successful in more traditional settings. Many of the children there would have been lost in a comprehensive high school of that era, so I thought we were helping public schools by what we were doing.
Many of the students had moved often. I recall a girl who had moved 17 times. The children often verbalized the difficulty created by the constant changing of their peer group. All children need some sort of stability. When I began teaching at the school where I was to teach 34 years later, I found a stability that had been in place in the community for several generations, even though consolidation had been necessary due to a drop in student population.
I cannot imagine a system that introduces more instability into young people’s lives than the constant disruption advocated by proponents of privatization. If you want to train students to be willing to move about their whole lives, this sounds like a way to do it. If, on the other hand, you want to help a community, public schools sound like a way to do that.
LikeLike
Public schools are generally reliable and accountable. Some large urban systems offer far more “choice” than any mom and pop voucher school or a one-size-fits-all charter school. NYC and some other cities offer schools that address the challenges of unhoused students. But even in effective and efficient public schools, they may not be able to fully meet the demands of some students such as severely impaired or emotionally disturbed students. In some states public school districts occasionally pay the tuition for those students to attend a specialized school, but at least those schools must meet certain standards of accountability from the state so students can receive an appropriate education. They do not just throw caution to the wind or ignore vulnerable students.
LikeLike
The legal questions keep nagging at me. Supposing a child is seriously injured through school negligence– say ignoring clear hazards, like defective equipment, lack of supervision during events, et al. Under typical state law– whether it’s a private school or not, you can sue the school for damages. A public school will settle. If it’s a deep-pocketed private entity (like a Catholic school, or perhaps a well-endowed chi-chi private school), they will settle.
If it’s a small christian school (as a majority of voucher schools are), one successful suit could cause them to fold without even being able to pay the full damages. Voucher law in many states is hands-off: no vetting, no monitoring, no state standards: they’re private schools and they– and their voucher students– are on their own.
But what if it’s a voucher school in a universal voucher program such as Arizona’s? The AZ $7500 voucher covers 75% of AZ’s average public school per-pupil funding– and likely 90%, perhaps 100% of many private schools’ funding per pupil. So… are such schools really private schools? Doesn’t really look, move & quack like a duck if all or nearly all of its funding is provided by the public.
Several states have declared charter schools to be legally part of the public school system, and subject at a minimum to Constitutional provisions such as 14th Amendment; in some contexts they continue to be allowed to behave as non-state actors. [SCOTUS refused to review the Peltier case (June 2023), allowing lower court ruling that school violated 14thA to prevail.]
Perhaps I’m assuming too much, but it seems likely the reasoning behind such rulings is that the public is paying the bills, thus bears at least part (if not all– and if not, why not?) of the legal liability. The same should apply to vouchers which cover the public’s cost of “private” schools, no?
LikeLike
Just a comment on the dollars and cents. Being a rather math-challenged type, I always have to boil it down to $/¢ to get perspective.
In 2015 4% of AZ schoolchildren attended private school; today it’s 4.6%, or 60k students.
Therefore in 2015, 52k pupils attended private school at no cost to the state. Today, 60,000 attend private school @ $7,500 each: = + $450million cost to the state. A 4% increase to the state’s $11billion public school budget. In round numbers, that very roughly corresponds to the declared costs of the program so far, so we’re in the ball park. [Costs in 2023 said to be $700 million total, with $385million of that due solely to expansion of the voucher program to “universal.”]
Where’s that 4% coming from? Has AZ raised its state taxes? hahaha. Govr Katie Hobbs has been sounding alarm bells & trying to get legislature to dial back the program since she came into office in ’22– no luck. They’re scrounging it up from wherever in state gen funds they can find it, no doubt chipping away at other state programs.
LikeLike
From the AzMirror: says # enrolled in vouchers is 83,000.
More than 1 million in public schools.
Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs is urging Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Horne not to move forward with a plan to automate the approval process for some of Arizona’s school voucher program reimbursements.
The Arizona Department of Education announced last week that it plans to clear a backlog of reimbursement requests from families who use the state’s universal school voucher program by automatically reimbursing 85,000 purchases of up to $2,000, with plans to audit them later.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
SUBSCRIBE
The announcement came as the department struggled to deal with a backlog of over 89,000 reimbursement requests. The total cost to automatically reimburse the vast majority of them would be approximately $170 million, Hobbs said in a Thursday statement.
In a letter sent to Horne on Thursday, Hobbs pointed to instances when money from the voucher program, formally known as the Empowerment Scholarship Account program, was misused. She specifically cited the recent indictment of two people who don’t even live in Arizona for an ESA fraud scheme in which they applied to the program with the names of fake children and then used the money for personal living expenses.
The ESA program works by giving the parents of participating students a debit card that can be used to pay for various educational costs, or reimbursing the parents for those costs. The costs can include private school tuition, homeschooling supplies or the money can be saved for college.
“The people of Arizona expect their elected officials to be strong stewards of their taxpayer dollars, not to enable fraudulent spending,” Hobbs said in the letter.
Horne in a press release last week said that if post-reimbursement audits show that money was used improperly, that it can be “clawed back.”
Supporters of Horne and the ESA program backed the decision by pointing out that the Arizona Department of Education has operated in this manner in the past, conducting risk-based audits after reimbursements are made. However, the state’s ESA program has ballooned since that time.
The program originated in 2012, but was expanded in 2022 from serving a limited group of about 12,000 students who met specific criteria to a universal program available to all of the state’s roughly one million K-12 students. There are currently more than 83,000 students enrolled, according to the Department of Education.
In a press release Thursday, Horne shot back at Hobbs saying that this year’s state budget included the provision for the Arizona Department of Education to move to this style of audits of the program. The provision does not prevent the department from investigating ESA voucher expenses for suspected fraud.
“The method we are instituting, known as risk-based auditing, is specifically provided for in the budget statute that the Governor signed last session,” Horne said in the press release. “Maybe she should start reading what she signs.”
In his response, Horne went on to say that the program is “among the most accountable” in the state. He added that the backlog problem originated after the governor signed a bill that allows private school tuition to be paid under the reimbursement system instead of using a third party vendor, which contributed to the backlog, according to Horne.
“Implementation of this course of action is a complete dereliction of ADE’s responsibility to ensure the appropriate use of public funds,” Hobbs said. “You must reconsider these actions and propose a solution to administering the ESA program that does not give a blank check for even more rampant fraud.”
The ESA program has been a point of contention between Republicans, who championed the expansion and laud it as a successful example of school choice for other states to follow, and Democratic leaders as costs to maintain the program have skyrocketed and have led to major budget battles in the state.
https://azmirror.com/briefs/hobbs-calls-for-end-to-school-voucher-programs-automatic-reimbursement-plan/w
LikeLike
Great details, thanks Diane
LikeLike