Brian Deer is a journalist who recently published a book about anti-vaccine activists. In an opinion piece in the New York Times, he described how very dangerous Robert F. Kennedy is. If he should be confirmed as leader of the department of Health and Human Services, Deer predicts, he will surround himself with other quacks and vaccine deniers. Recently, he writes, Kennedy has been trying to obscure his radical views against vaccines by talking about food safety. Don’t be fooled. He does not trust science, and his stance on vaccines is dangerous.
In November 2019, when an epidemic of measles was killing children and babies in Samoa, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. — who in recent days became Donald Trump’s pick to lead the department of Health and Human Services — sent the prime minister of Samoa a four-page letter. In it, he suggested the measles vaccine itself may have caused the outbreak.
He claimed that the vaccine might have “failed to produce antibodies” in vaccinated mothers sufficient to provide infants with immunity, that it perhaps provoked “the evolution of more virulent measles strains” and that children who received the vaccine may have inadvertently spread the virus to other children. “Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any assistance,” he added, writing in his role as the chairman of Children’s Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group.
At the time of his letter, 16 people, many of them younger than 2, were already reported dead. Measles, which is among the most contagious diseases, can sometimes lead to brain swelling, pneumonia and death. For months, families grieved over heartbreaking little coffins, until a door-to-door vaccination campaign brought the calamity to a close. The final number of fatalities topped 80.
I was in Samoa during that outbreak as part of my more than 16 years of reporting on the anti-vaccine movement. The cause of the outbreak was not the vaccine, but most likely an infected traveler who brought the virus from New Zealand, which that year had had the biggest measles outbreaks in decades, especially among that country’s Indigenous and Pacific Islander communities. Migration and poverty were likely factors in a sudden spread of measles in Samoa and New Zealand. But, as an editorial in The New Zealand Medical Journal reported, so too was a factor that Mr. Kennedy specializes in: “increasing circulation of misinformation leading to distrust and reduced vaccination uptake.” Samoa’s vaccination rates had fallen to fewer than a third of eligible 1-year-olds.
Vaccine skepticism has ballooned worldwide, and Mr. Kennedy and others who back him have encouraged it. Americans may be well aware that their possible future health leader holds dangerous beliefs about vaccines. The consequences of his views — and those of his orbit — are not merely absurd but tragic.
In my reporting, parents have mentioned fearing vaccines after watching “Vaxxed,” a 90-minute documentary, which had also toured countries such as New Zealand. The film, focused on unproven allegations, was released more than three years before the Samoa measles outbreak. Among much else, it claimed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had committed fraud.
Two of the filmmakers — Del Bigtree and Andrew Wakefield — are buddies of Mr. Kennedy. The director, Mr. Wakefield, is a former doctor whose medical license was revoked in his native Britain in 2010 amid charges of ethical violations. One of the producers, Mr. Bigtree, became Mr. Kennedy’s presidential campaign communications chief.
In the years before the documentary was released, I revealed, in a series of articles, evidence that Mr. Wakefield’s research in the 1990s had been rigged at a London hospital to make it look as if the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine was linked to autism. This research was retracted in 2010. Mr. Kennedy certainly didn’t seem fazed by Mr. Wakefield’s professional downfall. “In any just society, we would be building statues to Andy Wakefield,” he yelled, for instance, from a platform he and Mr. Wakefield shared at an event in Washington, D.C., a few days before he sent his letter to Samoa.
Reports say Mr. Kennedy is reviewing résumés for his possible Health and Human Services Department empire. He’s reportedlyeyeing Dr. Joseph Ladapo, a Florida health official who has questioned the safety of Covid vaccines. I’d say Mr. Bigtree may get a role; Mr. Wakefield is trickier, given how discredited he is, even in the United States. But there are plenty of others in Mr. Kennedy’s circle whose claims ought to concern everyone.
Consider Sherri Tenpenny, a doctor who has been declared by Mr. Kennedy as “one of the great leaders” of the anti-vaccine movement. She has falsely claimed that a “metal” attached to a protein in the Covid shots was making their recipients magnetic. “They can put a key on their forehead and it sticks,” she told Ohio state lawmakers in June 2021. “They can put spoons and forks all over them and they can stick.” I could pluck plenty more outrageous characters from Mr. Kennedy’s circle over the years, including veteran AIDS denialists.
In recent days, Mr. Kennedy appears to have tried to change the conversation around his vaccine views to focus on America’s junk food diets. But his views on vaccines shouldn’t be forgotten. In January 2021, speaking to a gathering of loyalists in Ohio, he outlined a three-point checklist that had to be met for him to consider a Covid vaccine. First, he said, “you take one shot, you get lifetime immunity.” Second, side effects are only “one in a million.” Third, “herd immunity” is achieved at 70 percent public uptake — after which, he stipulated, “nobody in this society” ever gets the disease again.
“If they came up with that product,” he said, “I’d be happy to look at it.”
His audience laughed. But it’s not funny.

Avian flu can morph into a new COVID, with the incoming administration filled with anti-vaxxers we can be facing a worldwide Spanish flu epidemic… of course a 78 year old, overweight, no exercise regimen might not survive
LikeLike
Peter,
That 78-year-old obese guy will get vaxxed. Secretly.
LikeLike
Remember the hopeful days when he had covid? Good times.
LikeLike
Ah, yes. And I remember when Mitch McConnell refused to impeach him after Jan 6 and said, “we have seen the last of Trump. No need to impeach him.” Oy, was he wrong! And we all pay.
LikeLike
Maybe his romantic entanglements with RFK will become public
LikeLike
Which is why I plan to continue to isolate most of the time with only a few supply runs, and necessary visits to dentists and doctors.
The economy is losing a lot of money from us who still isolate most of the time.
I used to eat out four or five times a week and go to a movie theater at least once or twice a week. That meant more driving and more gasoline consumption. I used to fill up the tank every two weeks. Now it’s twice a year.
LikeLike
Of course he and his family will get vaxxed.
LikeLike
O, for the days when rational people were in charge. Were they? Ever?
LikeLike
They seem to forget that herd immunity was a total failure in Sweden which had a much higher death rate from Covid than the rest of Scandinavia. https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-03-31/sweden-covid-policy-was-a-disaster
LikeLike
Oh, they haven’t forgotten. They are just betting that those who get ill and die will be Black or brown.
LikeLike
TOW,
Their supporters will get ill and die. The rest of us will take the vaccine.
LikeLike
As long as we’re allowed to get vaccines. There’s a lot out there saying that these clowns could bungle the testing or approval so much that vaccines will see major delays.
LikeLike
If Trump and Biden had tried “herd immunity” there would have been many more deaths.
LikeLike
…and yet he was happy to be photographed holding a McDonald’s burger in T’s plane, in order to pass T’s “loyalty test” requiring would-be acolytes to violate their standards publicly in order to maintain favored status. How does he maintain any credibility when he’s made it clear he’s willing to break with his own claimed principles for personal gain?
LikeLike
Lenny,
It’s called “groveling.”
LikeLike
One doesn’t “trust” science; instead, one is to always be skeptical, question, experiment, and test. How many boosters have you gotten… so far?
LikeLike
James.
I felt that the word “trust” was the wrong choice in relation to science. I take it back.
What you have to trust is that scientists were skeptical, tested alternative hypotheses, and tested again before reaching a conclusion–and remained open to the possibility that their conclusion is wrong.
LikeLike