Repeat after me: The school choice movement began in response to the Brown Decision of 1954.
School choice was a euphemism for using public dollars to fund segregation academies for whites, to enable them to escape anticipated desegregated schools.
Steve Suitts wrote an excellent book about the history of school choice, called Overturning Brown: The Segregationist Legacy of the Modern School Chhoice Movement.

I reviewed the book in The New York Review of Books. The review was titled “The Dark History of School Choice.”
Now, ProPublica reports, southern states are using voucher money to fund the same segregation academies founded in the 1950s and 1960s.
The latest ProPublica report begins:
On May 14, the final day for submitting new bills in the Mississippi Legislature, a bold new package of them landed on the desks of Mississippi lawmakers. The plans called for the creation of a voucher program that paid for students to attend private schools.
A few weeks later, in the heat of mid-June, the governor urged lawmakers to support the $40 million program, promising it “will bear the sound fruit of progress for a hundred years after this generation is gone.” Public school support would continue, he assured. But vouchers would “strengthen the total educational effort” by giving children “the right to choose the educational environment they desire.”
It was 1964.
Key backers of the move included a group of white segregationists that had formed after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled state-mandated public school segregation unconstitutional.
Across the South, courts had already rejected or limited similar voucher plans in Alabama, Louisiana, Virginia and Arkansas. But Mississippi lawmakers plowed forward anyway and adopted the program. For several years, the state funneled money to white families eager for their children to attend new private academies opening as the first Black children arrived in previously all-white public schools.
Now, 60 years later, ProPublica has found that many of these private schools, known as “segregation academies,” still operate across the South — and many are once again benefiting from public dollars. Earlier this week, ProPublica reported that in North Carolina alone, 39 of them have received tens of millions in voucher money. In Mississippi, we identified 20 schools that likely opened as segregation academies and have received almost $10 million over the past six years from the state’s tax credit donation program.
At least eight of the 20 schools opened with an early boost from vouchers in the 1960s.
“The origins of private schools receiving public funds were with the segregation academies,” said Steve Suitts, a historian and the author of “Overturning Brown: The Segregationist Legacy of the Modern School Choice Movement.”
Most private schools receiving money from the voucher-style programs exploding across the country aren’t segregation academies. But where the academies operate, especially in rural areas, they often foster racial separation in schools and, as a result, across entire communities.
Despite the passage of decades, most segregation academies across Mississippi remain vastly white — far more so than the counties where they operate, federal private school surveys show. Mississippi is the state with the highest percentage of Black residents.
At 15 of the 20 academies benefiting from the tax credit program, student bodies were at least 85% white as of the last federal private school survey, for the 2021-22 school year. And among the 20, enrollments at five were more than 60 percentage points whiter than their communities. Another 11 were at least 30 percentage points whiter.
In 1964, the White Citizens’ Council was among those pushing for the voucher plan. The pro-segregation group was founded in the Mississippi Delta town of Indianola in the 1950s by Robert “Tut” Patterson, who sought to “save our schools if possible” from integration and “if that failed, to develop a system of private schools for our children.”
For Patterson, it was personal. His family, including a young daughter who would start school that fall, lived on what he called a “plantation” with 35 Black families. As he later told an interviewer, “We took care of them. We practically lived with them. We loved them. We tended to them, but I didn’t want to mingle my children with them.”
Vouchers. This is the education idea that Republicans have been pushing for 30 years. This is the policy that is now universal in half a dozen red states. This is the main policy idea of the next Trump regime.
Segregation returns, funded by the taxpayers.

Vouchers are terrible public policy. Vouchers are used to underwrite segregation, and they allow the affluent to get a subsidy at the expense of public schools to pay for private schools these parents already can afford to support. To put it bluntly, vouchers are a public scam. Public funds should not be used to pay off segregation academies or the education of affluent students while they can simultaneously drain the budgets public schools that serve all students. Public schools are the common schools that should be the responsibility of the state, and the public should not be compelled to pay for other people’s private education options. Why should public school students lose funds to pay for the education of students that never attended public schools?
School choice aligns with the GOP’s intention to promote segregation. It does not explain how so many corporate Democrats jumped on the school choice bandwagon. The whole market based notion of education was simply a front for segregation. Privatization started with a trickle of charter schools, but it ends with a flood of universal vouchers that enable the theft of public funds for private purpose. We can expect the Trump administration to push for some type of national universal voucher. Instead of investing in and improving the schools that are foundational to a functioning democracy, too many political leaders from both parties turned their backs on public schools and pursued a disgraceful national folly known as “school choice,” which when carried out to its extremist conclusion will cause a number of public schools to collapse like a host from a parasitic invasion and dramatically increase the number of segregation academies.
LikeLike
“many of these private schools, known as “segregation academies,” still operate across the South — and many are once again benefiting from public dollars
. . . .
At 15 of the 20 academies benefiting from the tax credit program, student bodies were at least 85% white as of the last federal private school survey”
Segregation sure ain’t what it used to be.
Do these schools actually exclude non-white students? Apparently not, based on the quote above. Sounds like they are just disproportionately white. If low diversity makes a school a “segregation academy,” a huge number of public schools in the city I live in are segregation academies that receive public funding.
LikeLike
FLERP, are there any public schools in your city that are 85% white?
Segregation academies are private schools that choose their students.
Are any such schools receiving public $$ in your city?
LikeLike
Yes, there are several. Even though only 15% of the students in the whole city system are white.
LikeLike
Gotta say, Bi-partisan support for charter schools helped pave the way for current rise in vouchers by endorsing the idea that schooling is a personal rather than collective good.
LikeLike
Arthur,
I have been warning since 2010 that charters were the first step on a slippery slope toward vouchers.
Charters popularized the idea that schools were a consumer choice, not a civic responsibility.
I remember Jeb Bush speaking at the Republican convention in 2012. He said that people should pick their school the way they buy milk in the grocery store: 4%, 2%, 0%, chocolate, soy, almond….
The same people who support vouchers now supported charters then. DeVos turned Michigan into a haven for for-profit charters; Koch; Jeff Yas; Waltons.
LikeLike
I expect it from the GOP. It’s infuriating that Dems from Clinton through Obama and beyond repeat the same choice narrative.
LikeLike
A major reason why Congress won’t cut the $440 million they give every year to expand charter and open new ones: key Democrats either like the charters in their district or they like the campaign contributions from the charter industry.
Hakeem Jeffries supports charters.
George Miller of CA used to be chair of the House Education Committee. Now retired. He got contributions from Democrats for Education Reform, very wealthy Wall Street crowd.
LikeLike
Diane: Money is the Big Blinder.
In any case, there is a huge insight missing among “even democrats” (Obama included) which concerns the essential relationship between public education and democracy as a political system. They just don’t seem to “get it.” CBK
LikeLike
Diane and Authur Camins: I think that if we look at the movements of mind that occurred between WWII and now, two linked forces slowly occurred at once.
First, there was a gradual loss of consciousness in masses of people. . . from being fully aware of the existential meaning of political freedom that Hitler et al made so clear for anyone with a brain in the early decades after the war and,
Second, internal forces (influenced from the outside also), some deliberate and intentional, and some just shifts away from a vigilant understanding of “democracy watch,” especially in education, working to fill the vacuum of that loss of awareness as a cultural consciousness of the political meaning of freedom receded but was still “taken for granted.” <–and there is the vacuum: “we” love our freedoms but have not taken vigilant care of them by making sure as national policy (in public or other kinds of education) that “the people” understand what freedoms are and how to preserve them should we want to keep them.
As you and Arthur have said, even our best politicians in the democratic party seem unaware of how losing that consciousness of the political life we take for granted at the national level was setting us up for where we are now. Whatever else occurred, I think this loss and situation are central to what happened as this election swept over the country.
In the long fight between political ignorance and political knowledge, ignorance finally won–people, even leaders who claim to love freedom, speak from inside that vacuum, predictably along with those others who understand, but choose fascism anyway and for many nefarious “reasons.” One doesn’t understand or care about privatization of education; the other wants it badly.
The Supreme Court decision and “situation” I think also signaled a huge step in pushing freedom into its already prepared grave.
Whether “we” can climb out of that grave with the political life that we still have in us is the new question.
I have often thought of the U.S. Constitution as the Mona Lisa of political expressions, as luminous and transcendent, as is the painting to those who appreciate art. What a shame to lose the best that human history has to offer. CBK
LikeLike
I have a colleague who taught in the Mississippi Delta a few years ago, and they were rationing toilet paper at the time. When a child needed the restroom, the teacher would ask, “Number one or two?” Then the teacher would tear off an amount of toilet paper from a roll in the classroom, and hand it to the child. And now they want vouchers…
LikeLike
I hope the kids were taught to wash their hands afterwards.
LikeLike