Yale University, one of the nation’s most elite institutions, has dropped its policy of no-test scores for admissions. Instead, it will require students to submit one of four standardized tests when they apply. The elite universities were flooded with applicants last year, and some were able to accept only 3-5% of applicants. Last year, 57,465 students applied for admission; only 3.7% were accepted.
My guess is that the re-introduction of standardized test scores will discourage some from applying and will immediately disqualify those with very low scores.
The Yale Daily News reported:
After four years of a test-optional policy allowing applicants to decide whether to submit test scores, applicants to Yale’s class of 2029 must submit standardized test scores.
Under Yale’s text-flexible admissions policy, applicants may select one or more types of tests from a list of four options — SAT, ACT, Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate. Those who choose to send AP or IB scores are required to include results from all subject exams that they have taken…
Among peer institutions, Yale stands out for its test-flexible admissions policy for the class of 2029. Of the other seven Ivy League institutions, Harvard, Brown and Dartmouth require the SAT or ACT. Princeton, Columbia, the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell are still test-optional for the current admissions cycle…
John Yi ’13, associate director of the Office of Undergraduate Admissions, believes the test-flexible policy helps the University communicate that “academic preparation is a core component of our admissions process, but that there is not a one-size-fits-all exam that communicates that strength.” Whichever tests applicants choose to send, they are only part of a “much broader puzzle” among other components of applications….
Yale College received 6,754 early applications to the class of 2029, a 14 percent decrease from early applications from the previous year. This group of applicants will be the first to be evaluated under Yale’s test-flexible policy. ..
Yi wrote to the News that under test-optional admissions, Yale saw a “large increase” in applications from students without test scores whose other application elements — transcript, recommendations and personal essays — also “lacked evidence” that they were prepared to succeed at Yale.
On the other hand, he emphasized that the test-required policy prompted applicants to view testing as the “single most important factor” because everyone had to submit the same tests, discouraging applicants with lower test scores who would be great Yale students. With a test-optional policy, it is “easy” for applicants to imagine that test scores are “completely extraneous” to the review, he wrote.
“I would reassure students that the standardized testing piece is far less interesting to us than all the other components of the application,” Yi wrote. “Each student’s context is unique, and the test-flexible policy is designed to help them shine their brightest in the admissions process — not to trick or trap them.”

Several other schools went back to test scores last year. This is because of studies showing the no-test policy was having a paradoxical impact on lower income students. Tests were the leveler for kids from poorer schools that did not have a great many choices of AP classes or Advanced and IB classes. This put those students at a disadvantage since the many students (some times as low as high as 65% at the elite schools) who were not reporting scores had an academic resume full of APs and other activities and opportunities that made them shine more than students without resources. As well, test averages were inflated at these schools because only the kids with super high test scores were submitting them. Paradoxically, the lack of test scores was helping the full paying richer kids more than the poor kids. Test scores are considered a leveler now for poor kids.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If someone really wants an undergraduate degree from one of the prestigious research universities, it is much easier to get in as a transfer student.
If a student wants a degree from an institution that nurtures students, the students are better off going to a college that hires faculty on the basis of their teaching instead of their publications.
LikeLike
Absolutely–and thanks for saying so. I had the good fortune to attend Hampshire College–exactly the kind of institution your comment implies. Again, thanks for this.
LikeLike
Good news.
LikeLike
Those different test options aren’t even the same types of instruments! If I need to take my temperature, I might opt for a digital, manual, or infrared thermometer, but I’m sure as heck not going to use a tape measure.
LikeLike
And the joke is on. . .
those applying.
LikeLike
I used to be with you on the testing, but I really do think that there needs to be some kind of entrance/aptitude test for college admission. I don’t think the current SAT or ACT should be those tests! Having 2 in the college system right now has opened my eyes! There are many kids who don’t want to be there, many who don’t need to be there (trade school) , and many who aren’t ready to be there….but College and Career Ready was the mantra of that decade and Common Core lowered the bar on “learning”.
College is now the new High School at most State Schools. Grades are based on attendance, group projects, homework and a few quizzes thrown in for good measure. Books aren’t read anymore and even text books (now on-line) are rarely cracked open/used. It’s more of a certificate mill for most students at an ungodly cost to parents or to the students who have to repay loans.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LisaM, I agree with so much of what you’re lamenting here. I would also add to it that many universities have turned themselves into adolescent resorts with climbing walls, water slides, swimming pools with “dive-in” movies, luxury apartment-style dorms, gourmet food, etc.
Of course, this junk costs lots of money, and the student “customers” have the debt to show for it.
If it will open for you, here’s an interesting 2014 article with examples.
There’s also an interesting book that, while somewhat dated, is still relevant called “The Five Year Party.” Although the author definitely has an axe to grind, he brings up many important points; I even used his red flags when I was looking for a faculty position.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Joe….Paywalled article (so I can’t read it) but I got “the messaging” when we went to look at some colleges.
You may want to look up the the Griggs V. Duke Power verdict to see how that decision has powered the Eduflation problem that we have today. Basically, Duke Power was slapped for discriminatory practices (good thing!), but the EEOC got greedy and went after aptitude tests which screened out people who weren’t meant for certain jobs….and they won (not such a good thing). Industry and big business then decided to use a college education as a sort of “screener” in lieu of the aptitude tests…..driving college admissions for every job and career. Just remember that not too long ago, the only people who went to “college” were Doctors, Lawyers, Chemists, and some other niche careers and the Liberal Arts were for the wealthy. It’s an interesting point of view and very relevant to the problems we have today in higher education.
LikeLike
Grades are as much bullshit as standardized test scores. Always have been and always will be.
LikeLike
https://lawliberty.org/a-novel-plan-to-reduce-student-debt/
LikeLike
LisaM, Thanks for informing me of Griggs v. Duke Power. I’ve been reading about predictive validity (or lack thereof) of different tests, and this case looks very interesting.
LikeLike