Alexandra Petri is the humorist for The Washington Post. In her column, she endorsed Kamala Harris. She called her column “It Has Fallen to Me, the Humor Columnist, to Endorse Kamala Harris for President.” This is why I didn’t cancel my subscription to The Washington Post. I want to see many ways the opinion writers devise to torture Jeff Bezos.
She wrote:
The Washington Post is not bothering to endorse a candidate in the 2024 presidential election. (Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin and the founder and executive chairman of Amazon and Amazon Web Services, also owns The Post.)
We as a newspaper suddenly remembered, less than two weeks before the election, that we had a robust tradition 50 years ago of not telling anyone what to do with their vote for president.
It is time we got back to those “roots,” I’m told!
Roots are important, of course. As recently as the 1970s, The Post did not endorse a candidate for president. As recently as centuries ago, there was no Post and the country had a king! Go even further back, and the entire continent of North America was totally uninhabitable, and we were all spineless creatures who lived in the ocean, and certainly there were no Post subscribers.
But if I were the paper, I would be a little embarrassed that it has fallen to me, the humor columnist, to make our presidential endorsement. I will spare you the suspense: I am endorsing Kamala Harris for president, because I like elections and want to keep having them.
Let me tell you something. I am having a baby (It’s a boy!), and he is expected on Jan. 6, 2025 (It’s a … Proud Boy?). This is either slightly funny or not at all funny. This whole election, I have been lurching around, increasingly heavily pregnant, nauseated, unwieldy, full of the commingled hopes and terrors that come every time you are on the verge of introducing a new person to the world.
Well, that world will look very different, depending on the outcome of November’s election, and I care which world my kid gets born into. I also live here myself. And I happen to care about the people who are already here, in this world. Come to think of it, I have a lot of reasons for caring how the election goes. I think it should be obvious that this is not an election for sitting out.
The case for Donald Trump is “I erroneously think the economy used to be better? I know that he has made many ominous-sounding threats about mass deportations, going after his political enemies, shutting down the speech of those who disagree with him (especially media outlets), and that he wants to make things worse for almost every category of person — people with wombs, immigrants, transgender people, journalists, protesters, people of color — but … maybe he’ll forget.”
“But maybe he’ll forget” is not enough to hang a country on!
Embarrassingly enough, I like this country. But everything good about it has been the product of centuries of people who had no reason to hope for better but chose to believe that better things were possible, clawing their way uphill — protesting, marching, voting, and, yes, doing the work of journalism — to build this fragile thing called democracy. But to be fragile is not the same as to be perishable, as G.K. Chesterton wrote. Simply do not break a glass, and it will last a thousand years. Smash it, and it will not last an instant. Democracy is like that: fragile, but only if you shatter it.
Trust is like that, too, as newspapers know.
I’m just a humor columnist. I only know what’s happening because our actual journalists are out there reporting, knowing that their editors have their backs, that there’s no one too powerful to report on, that we would never pull a punch out of fear. That’s what our readers deserve and expect: that we are saying what we really think, reporting what we really see; that if we think Trump should not return to the White House and Harris would make a fine president, we’re going to be able to say so.
That’s why I, the humor columnist, am endorsing Kamala Harris by myself!

Good for A. Petri. 💙👍🏽💙
Democracy Dies in Their Wallets: When Oligarchs Buy the News From Bezos to Musk, America’s richest are using media control to shape politics and grow profits..
https://hartmannreport.com/p/democracy-dies-in-their-wallets-when-ec9?utm_source=substack&publication_id=302288&post_id=150774045&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&utm_campaign=email-share&triggerShare=true&isFreemail=true&r=3lis4&triedRedirect=true
Bezos and Musk have shown their hand.
LikeLike
Slightly off topic. To my knowledge no major TV networks, (CBS, ABC, NBC) have ever endorsed any candidate. The various late night stars of these networks have certainly made their disdain for Trump well known, mocking him and satirizing all his bloviations and lies. The evening news shows of these networks have made no endorsements either. Just a random observation.
LikeLike
Print media has always taken a stance. Most cities are/were 2 newspaper cities – one leans left/progressive and other conservative. Network TV news is news. They do not have oversight editorial position or daily editorials.
Walter Cronkite talking about Viet Nam is a rare exception. It was like Bill Russell throwing an elbow. Do it once. That makes a statement.
LikeLike
The hysteria over the Washington Post not endorsing a presidential candidate in 2024 shows how in-the-bubble this blog and most others on the Left are. The WP has lost over 500,000 subscribers since 2020 – half of its subscription base. I still have my $40/year subscription, but I don’t look at the WP much these days because it is mind-numbingly repetitive. 95+% of the political articles are reflexively anti-Trump, anti-Republican, anti-conservative. I’ve heard those same arguments many times before; I don’t waste my time just having my existing views reinforced, and I don’t like any journalism that deliberately conceals information that doesn’t advance the preferred narratives of the writers, e.g. Biden’s obvious cognitive decline.
The current version of the WP is written by partisan left-wing writers for a left-wing audience – the New York Times already has the vast share of that market. 30+ years ago I traveled often to D.C. for work, and I paid a quarter every day to read the print edition of the WP. It was center-left in those days, but conservatives and moderates weren’t immediately and constantly put off by strident partisanship. That’s why the subscriber numbers for the WP have greatly declined, and endorsing or not endorsing will have no meaningful effect on its future business success or failure.
LikeLike
Where to begin? “Liberals” as you call us may or may not be in a bubble. But if so, we recognize there are at least 2 bubbles in one big one: U.S. “Right-wingers” believe there is only one bubble: theirs. For everyone else, change or leave.
As for cognitive decline not being a hot news item covered justifying not reading WAPO? Yes. Biden is old – good old regular old.
Trump? Well, if he’s cognitively “sharp” with no decline, then the hate filled, racist rhetoric is even scarier. If he’s 100% “on his game” and these are his 100% genuine beliefs… and WAPO is afraid to say it, we’ve got real problems. (And, if it’s all game show host buffoonery, then shame on y’all in the “no endorsement” category or voters without a conscience for letting him get away with it).
LikeLike
“The case for Donald Trump is “I erroneously think the economy used to be better? I know that he has made many ominous-sounding threats about mass deportations, going after his political enemies, shutting down the speech of those who disagree with him (especially media outlets), and that he wants to make things worse for almost every category of person — people with wombs, immigrants, transgender people, journalists, protesters, people of color — but … maybe he’ll forget.”
This pretty much encapsulates what the Trump supporters who believe they are not racist, xenophobic, or anti-LGBTQ say when they explain why all the racist, xenophobic, anti-LGBTQ hate spewed by Trump doesn’t bother them — they erroneously think the economy used to be better. Or they are saving America from evil immigrants from garbage countries who supposedly kill and eat your pets and rape and murder your daughters and sisters.
Trump’s MSG rally was what he and his ilk have been doing the entire campaign. Fomenting hate with lies.
LikeLike
Dear Mr. Bezos:
We’ve read the explanation you published this evening for your decision to kill The Washington Post’s presidential endorsement.
We don’t believe you. At all.
We don’t think this is about encouraging news neutrality or building trust or fighting disinformation or competing against indie media.
You know why?
Because you did it 11 days before the election, after your editorial board came to a conclusion and drafted an endorsement, after your senior brass gave a green light internally.
If this were somehow about principle, you could have nixed the endorsement before the general election began.
Hell, you could have done it the day Pres. Biden stepped aside as an understandable moment for a reset.
But you didn’t.
You claim major newspaper endorsements largely don’t matter in a presidential election.
And honestly, I’m inclined to somewhat agree. I think their influence is overrated.
Unless it’s an outlet endorsing their perceived ideological opposite (ex: NYT or WaPo for Trump, WSJ or New York Post for Harris), it doesn’t matter a whole lot.
Although it’s quite curious you claim to believe WaPo’s presidential endorsements are too impotent to matter in elections, yet too powerful over public attitudes to be allowed to continue.
That doesn’t make sense.
But it’s also missing the point.
People aren’t angry at you because we think Vice President Harris will somehow lose based on WaPo not endorsing her.
We’re furious because you, one of the richest people in the world, bought one of the leading newspapers in our country–a storied bulwark against censorship and corrupt governing–and abused that power to kill the autonomy of the staff of that newspaper.
You have subverted the free press right before a presidential election in which one of the candidates is aggressively totalitarian in outlook, and you now pretend to be surprised at the shock and outrage.
We do not trust you.
We now find it very difficult to trust your newspaper despite the many excellent journalists who work there.
And we believe you either ultimately care only about your own greed OR you are dangerously incompetent regarding the importance of a free press.
Maybe both.
In any case, I’m glad I cancelled my subscription, and there’s no way in hell I’m paying for The Washington Post while you still own it.
LikeLike