When Donald Trump appeared recently in Milwaukee, he described his plan for the future of the Department of Education. It’s not quite the same as the scenario in Project 2025, which envisions the total elimination of the U.S. Department of Education. Trump imagines it as a “department” with only two employees: A Cabinet Secretary and a secretary.
The severely shrunken Department would focus solely on the three Rs and would somehow mysteriously have the power and personnel to prevent public schools across the nation from teaching anything connected to “woke.” That is, anything related to race, gender, or social justice. How this fictional Department would impose bans on curriculum when federal law prohibits any federal interference in curriculum is not explained. Actually, it’s nonsense.
Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling writes in The New Republic about Trump’s vision for the federal role in education:
Donald Trump has fleshed out his Project 2025–inspired Department of Education plan, and it involves handing the reins and lofty responsibilities of public school administration over to a group of people with all the time in the world: parents.
“I figure we’ll have like one person plus a secretary,” the Republican presidential nominee told a crowd in Milwaukee Tuesday night. “You’ll have a secretary to a secretary. We’ll have one person plus a secretary, and all the person has to do is, ‘Are you teaching English? Are you teaching arithmetic? What are you doing? Reading, writing, and arithmetic. And are you not teaching woke?’
“Not teaching woke is a big factor,” Trump continued. “We’ll have a very small staff. We can occupy that staff right in this room, actually I think this room is too large. And all they’re going to do is they’re going to see that the basics are taken care of. You know, we don’t want someone to get crazy and start teaching a language that we don’t want them to teach.”
Not only do parents already have enough on their plates without trying to run the public school system, it’s likely that Trump has a specific group of parents in mind to direct education policy.
The goals he lays out are startlingly akin to the policy points of the far-right “parents’ rights” group Moms for Liberty, who hosted Trump as the keynote speaker at their annual conference in September. Moms for Liberty has recently ingratiated itself significantly into national politics and was listed as a member of Project 2025’s advisory board.
In the same speech, Trump also drew attention to the amount of real estate occupied in D.C. by Department of Education buildings, plotting that the dissolution of the federal agency would allow “somebody else to move in.”
“They’re run by the state, and run by the parents, because in Washington—you know half of the buildings, such a large number, every building you pass in Washington says Department of Education,” Trump said. “You’re gonna have a lot of vacant space. Now we can have maybe somebody else move in.”
Trump’s proposal to dismantle the Department of Education wholesale is nearly identical to Project 2025, despite his campaign spending months trying to distance itself from the 920-page Christian nationalist manifesto.
Fact check: Trump exaggerated the size and physical space occupied by ED. The U.S. Department of Education is smaller than any other Cabinet department; it has 4,400 employees. It occupies a building at 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC. It rents space at 555 New Jersey Avenue, NW. it does not occupy all or most or many buildings in DC.

No surprise. Trumpsy hates those who critically think.
That dumpster knows he’s dumb and wants citizens as stupid as he is!
He wants total control over everyone and everything…NO QUESTIONS.
He’s stupid. He should be called, “Donnie, THE DUNCE.”
LikeLike
His Plan For Education includes an indoctrination that makes this behavior ACCEPTABLE in a Democracy.
COVID-19 tore through the world in 2020. Everywhere a shortage of tests. Then Prez DJT. Secretly sent coveted tests to Russian President Vladimir Putin for his personal use!
Washington Post 10/8/24
LikeLike
Trump’s delusional statements about education at A MAGA rally event was easily debunked in this BLOG. Other delusional statements have likewise been easily debunked; eating dog and cats, come to mind. My worry is that so many still listen and will vote for him! Question: Do rational arguments that debunk his delusional statements legitimate them in the minds of his constituents? Questions are being asked of mainstream media about the normalization of lies! Are delusional statements also being normalized?
LikeLike
My response to Trump’s remarks is the same as Trump’s when he was told Mike Pence was in danger on January 6th. Who cares? We cannot believe anything that Trump says. The only thing we know for sure is that if Trump wins, nothing will be good for the Department of Education or public schools.
LikeLike
My opinion: Fact Checking and rational arguments don’t matter. When hard core MAGA supporters look at Media Posts about Trump’s Delusional Lies they don’t consider the arguments. They pay attention to who makes the arguments – dems, libs, “the gov.” illegals, etc. Rational arguments seen as attacks only serve to strenghen MAGA resolve as they defend of their man. A many who in Evangelical spaces is seen as a savior, someone who will deliver them against their “enemies” who broght the fear and injustices they believe exists in their lives.
LikeLike
On 60 Minutes last night, we got a glimpse of how at least some MAGA people think. Two people connected with the Arizona Maricopa election debacle were asked why they still believe that Trump won the election and that he was cheated out of it.
One said that she had a mission that is mandated from her own personal belief and from God. Another in a meeting echoed the “from God” idea, and another wanted to hang people who contradicted her.
The other side of the argument was that she didn’t believe in government officials or left-wing judges . . . and no respect for anything that looked like the rule of law. “Each individual” should look at the evidence for themselves . . . she didn’t say what was supposed to happen when people disagreed.
It’s a prescription for the anarchy that Trump and the Bannon gang want and that the 2025 people are inviting, whether they know it or not.
And I suppose the rest of us, without concrete evidence, are supposed just believe that God is informing these people’s thoughts . . . and that it’s not confusion inspired by their own adolescence (acting with zeal on uninformed, undeveloped, and un-tempered desires and fears) or delusion, or a toxic combination of both, mixed again with racism. So then there is thoughtless arrogance to add to the mixture.
If I were God, I’d be mortified with embarrassment. CBK
LikeLike
In other words, there is no plan. Like the mythological replacement for Obamacare, it is an ethereal and marginally extant piece of fecal matter floating in the string theory of Trump’s perception, which appears to be in deterioration.
LikeLike
Very off topic, but some very strange stuff has been going on in Chicago.
https://www.politico.com/newsletters/illinois-playbook/2024/10/08/the-mayors-jacked-up-presser-00182823
LikeLike
Here’s the clip from yesterday’s press conference, where Johnson shouted down a reporter who what the temerity to ask the newly appointed board members whether they supported the (high interest) loan that Johnson wants the board to approve to fund a new CTU contract. (The previous board, also appointed by Johnson, refused to fire the school system CEO, who refused to sign off on the loan. The board then resigned en masse, allowing Johnson to appoint a new board that presumably would fire the schools CEO and replace him with someone who would approve the loan.)
https://x.com/benbradleytv/status/1843378713708376447?s=46&t=vV_4bJ7GuABaalzetJofQA
Really crazy stuff. (And yet somehow not as crazy as what’s going on in NYC government right now.)
LikeLike
Wow, Chicago’s new Mayor sounds a lot like Mayor Bloomberg, who turned NYC public education over to his pal who knew nothing about education Cathie Black, and even his previous chancellor, lawyer Joel Klein, knew very little about public education.
Do you think Chicago’s Mayor is acting as strange as Mayor Bloomberg when it comes to public schools? I agree with you about the strangeness of mayors like Bloomberg, who ordered public schools to turn over their valuable free space to a charter network his billionaire pals liked – a charter network that at the time was giving out of school suspensions to over 20% of the 5 and 6 year old Black children whose parents mistakenly enrolled them in a charter only interested in teaching the students who were well-behaved AND could be academically successful despite having inexperienced teachers who believed a 5 year old student who wasn’t learning fast enough was “bad” and needed to be punished.
Nice we agree that Mayors should not do “strange” stuff that does not seem in the best interest of children, but in the best interest of something else.
LikeLike
Weird comment but ok.
LikeLike
To the uneducated, this sounds like a damn good plan. Another example of the Dunning-Kruger effect that John Cleese has been going on about. “a cognitive bias wherein unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than is accurate” owing to “a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their ineptitude”. Stupid people have no idea how stupid they are. Idiocracy is right around the corner people. What am I talking about. It’s arrived.
LikeLike