Jennifer Rubin was a solid conservative journalist and lawyer who was hired by the Washington Post to express the conservative view on politics in a column called “Right Turn.” After Trump’s election, she became increasingly critical of him and eventually reversed her ideology. She is today one of the most incisive critics of the MAGA movement. In this column, she chastises Prominent Republicans for remaining silent in this election.
She writes:
One of the most uplifting parts of last week’s Democratic convention was the presence of so many Republicans, such as former Illinois congressman Adam Kinzinger and former Georgia lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan. Both decided to put country over party and self.
“I know Kamala Harris shares my allegiance to the rule of law, the Constitution and democracy, and she is dedicated to upholding all three in service to our country,” Kinzinger said. “Whatever policies we disagree on pale in comparison with those fundamental matters of principle, of decency and of fidelity to this nation.” Likewise, Duncan said, “Let me be clear to my Republican friends at home watching: If you vote for Kamala Harris in 2024, you’re not a Democrat. You’re a patriot.”
The day after the convention, a dozen former lawyers from the three Republican administrations before Donald Trump’s published a letter endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris. They wrote, “Trump’s attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power after losing the election proved beyond any reasonable doubt his willingness to place his personal interests above the law and values of our constitutional democracy.” They argued that returning Trump to office “would threaten American democracy and undermine the rule of law in our country.” Then, a four-star general who served under President George W. Bush and hundreds of former Republican staffers endorsed Harris.
So, the question remains: Where are the rest of the Republicans who understand Trump is an existential threat to democracy? Most of the big names still refuse to follow Kinzinger and Duncan’s lead.
Former president George W. Bush must be in a witness protection program; he has virtually disappeared. Former Wyoming congresswoman Liz Cheney courageously stood up to Trump when he tried to stage a coup. But, sorry — if you pledge to do everything possible to prevent Trump’s return to power, you have an obligation to endorse Harris, the only person who can beat him.
Former New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who shredded Trump in the primaries, previously objected to endorsing President Joe Biden because of Biden’s age. (“President Biden, in my view, is past the sell-by date.”) What is his excuse now for refusing to endorse the new, 59-year-old Democratic nominee?
Paul Ryan, a Fox board member and former speaker of the House, was quoted in May as saying, “Character is too important for me. … [The presidency] is a job that requires the kind of character [Trump] doesn’t have.” But Ryan too lacks the nerve to support the only viable alternative. When he rationalizes his refusal to endorse a Democrat on the grounds that he differs on “policy,” he is telling us that preserving democracy is not a high policy priority for him.
The list goes on: H.R. McMaster (actually commending Trump’s foreign policy in the Atlantic!), Jim Mattis, Condoleezza Rice. Moral cowardice, or craving for access in future Republican administrations, seems to have silenced even those most vocal on America’s defense of Ukraine and other allies. History will not treat them kindly.
Certainly, getting some Republicans to refrain from voting for Trump is helpful. But if they are as devoted to democracy and as committed to the international world order as they say, there is no moral argument for refraining from going the rest of the way to endorse Harris, especially after such a robust affirmation of her foreign policy views.
Biden gave up the presidency for the sake of our democracy. Can’t these Republicans give Harris their votes?

Cowards reveal who they are by their actions or lack thereof.
Traitor Trump’s actions and words reveal he’s a coward. Why can’t he just shut up and be a silent coward.
LikeLike
MAGA Republicans have turned politics into a blood sport. Right wing media amplifies this extreme partisanship. This week I watched Bill Maher’s interview with Nancy Pelosi. She was reflecting on her long career and how politics have evolved. Prior to the election of right wing extremists politicians of differing views could be civil and find common ground. Today there is a great acrimonious mistrust and refusal on the part of the extremists to compromise as well as a pervasive undercurrent of violence in the GOP. Extremists in the party take their cues from Putin and Orban instead of Washington and Lincoln. I can remember seeing people wearing T-shirts with “Better Red than a Democrat.” Under Trump the GOP has so lost its way that it is more supportive of fascism than democracy. Real patriots will will support the Harris Walz ticket. Real cowards will remain silent. No policy difference is more important than the rule of law and democracy itself.
LikeLike
Far too many Republicans lack the a moral and ethical code high enough to stand up against Trump. Good Outstanding Character, based on high moral and ethical codes, is something that is totally missing in today’s Republican Party. Cowardly Republicans today are examples of the people our cities that stand by while a person is beaten to near death or worse and take videos to put on the internet. These same cowardly Republicans are probably the same ones that stood around on the school yard playground and watch a bully beat up the class nerd just because he is smart.
Republicans should to be totally ashamed of what and who they are today. Cowards who lack moral and ethical courage to do what is obviously right for the people of the United States.
LikeLike
Simple answer. They pray for a trump collapse and their own return. Supporting Harris would effectively shut them out of any hate democrats votes. It’s about them, not all of us.
LikeLike
I thoroughly enjoyed Rubin’s characterization of W. as being in the witness protection program.
I do long for the era when W. was considered the worst President. Ah, for the good olde days!
LikeLike
Today the NYT did another one of their “news” articles that (unfortunately for supporters of public schools) may appear to many readers as “unbiased”, and “fair and balanced”, because it includes some mild criticism within an article that casually presents as FACT a completely false narrative of what a right wing organization is in order to make them normal and appear more credible as an organization. Folks here may have an easier time seeing the bias because the right wing organization is Moms for Liberty. A group of “conservative” women, and anyone reading the NYT article would have no reason to think they are extremist, because the NYT presents Moms for Liberty as just a normal, grassroots organization representing what so many suburban women care about. And Trump listens to their concerns, and while they don’t like it when Trump insults women, these suburban moms are so glad and appreciate that Trump shares their concerns about family. They are regular moms so “charmed” by Trump.
And it is articles like these that present Moms for Liberty as something it is not.
“Conservative Moms, Charmed by Trump, Would Rather Avoid His Misogyny: Former President Donald J. Trump spoke at a convention of the Moms for Liberty in Washington”
“It was the Joyful Warriors summit thrown by a bunch of agitated parents known as the Moms for Liberty, a conservative activist group that was founded during the Covid pandemic. The group, which has more than 130,000 members across the country, has become quite influential in Republican politics.
Their parental preoccupations were made apparent by the programming and pamphleteering on display. There were panels called “What Does It Mean to Abolish the Department of Education?” and “Moms Know Best: Protecting Kids from Secret Gender Transitions in Schools.” There was literature on child sex trafficking and on the damage wrought by Covid-era school closures, and there were copies of a book titled “Take Two Aspirin and Call Me By My Pronouns: Why Turning Doctors Into Social Justice Warriors is Destroying American Medicine.”
[Notice the inference that this is a grassroots organization of 130,000 (presented as fact!!!) mothers upset at the wokeness forced on kids in public schools. Notice that Moms for Liberty is presented as “influential in Republican politics” – implying that Republican politicians are listening to the real concerns of all these moms, when this group was formed as a PR organization to promote whatever false controversy the Republican politicians want amplified because they think it will help them get elected! Politicians aren’t “listening” to grassroots concerns, they created those concerns as a political stunt. It’s no longer politically advantageous for Moms for Liberty to mention abortion, so they don’t.]
More NYT “facts” about Moms for Liberty to reinforce the narrative that Republican politicians are LISTENING to the hundreds of thousands of suburban women – coincidentally the narrative that Republican politicians like!:
“their summit on Friday made for a good case study. It was PACKED with the sort of voters Mr. Trump hopes can help him win in November: fired-up suburban women.
“These are women that have largely never been political,” Tiffany Justice, the group’s co-founder, said. “They’re people who, in the busiest time of their lives, realized that they needed to get involved in politics.”
[Nowhere in the article is any background given on Tiffany Justice, the “co-founder” and I had to find a local news story about how terrible she was during her stint on a local school board to learn what a political hack she was)
“It was an interesting time for Mr. Trump to address a women’s group, given that lately he has been attacking Vice President Kamala Harris in ever more misogynistic ways. ……
Asked what she thought about Mr. Trump posting this, Ms. Justice stammered, “You know what, I think that, uh, a lot of people say a lot of things. And we’re focused on the issues that are hurting American voters.”
And what does the NYT inform readers is what suburban moms care about:
“There is a reason Mr. Trump mentions the issue of transgender athletes at pretty much every rally he speaks at — it is a powerful, motivating one for many parents, and he knows it. He understood that this was what the Moms for Liberty wanted to hear him riff about probably more than anything, and so, he did.”
This supposedly huge organizations had all of 600 people at this national conference — and from the photos I doubt there were 600 moms who weren’t already connected to Republican politics.
It is true that the NYT article presents some of the right wing views of Moms for Liberty accurately and critically, just like it presents some of the Republican right wing views accurately. But the entire article NORMALIZES Moms for Liberty and creates a false narrative that this is a grassroots organization of more than 100,000 moms who had been too busy for politics before but were very upset about these issues and the organization was created to make politicians listen to their concerns. And Trump listens!
When the truth is that the organization was created by the billionaires behind those right wing politicians to push exactly the false narrative the NYT article presented — that Republican politicians like Trump are just RESPONDING to the strong feelings that these suburban moms have about these issues because those Republican politicians care! And of course, Democrats do not care about family or kids or education at all.
LikeLike
^
This is a quote from the NYT, which shows how Trump’s craziness is normalized by the NYT:
“Ms. Justice wanted to draw out his softer side. She asked him about fatherhood. He told a story about how his daughter Ivanka Trump (“beautiful girl, beautiful everything”) gave up her clothing company (“you remember the Ivanka line? She was making so much money with that thing — it was so hot”) to go into government, but then got a ton of bad publicity. “It’s much easier to be a Democrat. Let me put it that way,” he said.
“Tell us about your mom a little bit,” said Ms. Justice.
Mr. Trump talked about how much he loved his mother and how she came from Scotland. “Did you know that some of the biggest, smartest, most brilliant leaders come from Scotland, and nobody talks about it?” he asked. “Or, at least their parents came from Scotland.” They laughed some more.
He had the roomful of women charmed.”
FYI, here is how The Guardian reported what Trump actually said:
“Donald Trump at Moms for Liberty says Ivanka ‘hired millions of people’”
FIRST PARAGRAPH:
“Donald Trump has claimed that when he was president he wanted to appoint his daughter, Ivanka, as America’s ambassador to the UN but she opted to instead to work on job creation and hired “millions of people”.
The Republican nominee for president in 2024 made the bizarre comments during a “fireside chat” on Friday night in Washington at the annual gathering of Moms for Liberty, a national nonprofit that has led efforts to get mentions of LGBTQ identity and structural racism out of classrooms.
In a long, zigzagging and at times incoherent conversation, Trump ricocheted between topics including his parents’ marriage, Scotland, his reality TV show The Apprentice, Elon Musk (“a super genius guy”), his debates against Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and his upcoming contest with rival Kamala Harris, whom he described as a “Marxist” and “defective person”.
At one point the 78-year-old reflected on the career of his daughter Ivanka, who was a senior adviser in the first Trump administration but has been largely absent from the campaign trail this time. She was “making so much money” from her fashion brand, he claimed, but then gave it up to join him in politics.
Trump recalled: “I said, you would be a great ambassador to the United Nations, United Nations secretary – there’d be nobody to compete with her. She may be my daughter but nobody could have competed with her, with her rat-rat-rat you know she’s got.”
“She said, daddy, I don’t want to do that, I just want to help people get jobs. She would go around – not a glamorous job – but would go around to see Wal-Mart, to see Exxon, to see all these big companies to hire people and she had hired, like, millions of people during the course of her stay.”
The co-founder of Moms for Liberty, Tiffany Justice, sitting on stage with Trump, did not challenge his extraordinary suggestions that Ivanka had the requisite experience to serve at the UN or that she was responsible for hiring millions of people.
Justice did repeatedly press an anti-trans agenda. Trump argued that transgender women should not be allowed to play in women’s sports and said access to gender-affirming health care should be restricted. He repeated a false rightwing talking point that Olympic women’s boxing champion Imane Khelif is trans; Khelif was in fact assigned female at birth.
Trump went to make another wildly misleading claim: “But the transgender thing is incredible. Think of it. You kid goes to school and comes home a few days later with an operation. The school decides what’s going to happen with your child and you know many of these childs [sic] 15 years later say, what the hell happened? Who did this to me? They say, who did this to me? It’s incredible.”
He added that school boards have become “like dictatorships” hostile to the desires of parents, echoing conservative frustration that bubbled over in public meetings during the coronavirus pandemic. “I’m for parental rights all the way. I don’t even understand the concept of not being.”
Trump added: “The parents truly love the kids … You have to give the rights back to the parents.”
Often unprompted, Trump also kept circling back to his favourite topic: immigration. He said of migrants crossing the southern border illegally: “It’s crazy. Our country is being poisoned. And your schools and your children are suffering greatly because they’re going into the classrooms and taking disease, and they don’t even speak English.”
The Republican nominee went on to offer a lengthy and discursive defence of his recent visit to Arlington National Cemetery, which he has been criticised for turning into a campaign photo opportunity. Trump insisted that he was there at the invitation of the families of 13 US service members killed in Afghanistan and they asked to take pictures with him. A member of the audience shouted: “Thank you for respecting our veterans, Mr President!”
Thank you for actually practicing journalism, The Guardian, since the NYT stopped doing that long ago.
LikeLike
Small consolation that Professor Mo Cunningham predicted just this:
https://www.masspoliticsprofs.org/2024/08/30/editorial-advisory-on-moms-for-liberty-national-summit/
LikeLike
Wow, even the far better Guardian article didn’t mention the connection between Moms for Liberty and Project 2025. And the NYT completely normalized it as a group of 130,000 suburban moms who just have more conservative views that the radical public schools.
Can you imagine the lack of credibility Moms for Liberty would have if the NYT actually LED with the information that Trump spoke to a group funded by the people who funded the Project 2025 project and their co-founded and leader sits on the Project 2025 Advisory board?
Can you imagine if a reporter actually ASKED Tiffany Justice about her connections to Project 2025 and then reported on whether her answer was “evasive” or “misleading” or some other word to inform readers that she could not be trusted?
Nope, Tiffany Justice is presented as just the leader of conservative grassroots organizations of moms who really care about their kids.
They are a front masquerading as a grassroots organization representing suburban moms, and their talking points come from the right wing. Suddenly they don’t care about “students being taught to hate America” in history, and ACCORDING TO THE NYT, these conservative women now care about school covid closing, sex trafficking of minors, minors getting sex change operations without their parents’ permission, and the “social justice warriors” who are forcing schools to go against parents’ wishes and use the wrong gender for students, thus damaging them psychologically although they may not realize it for 10 years.
Just suburban moms who are so happy that FINALLY a politician like Trump cares about kids, and whether he is a little uncouth pales in comparison with how much Trump cares about parents and kids.
LikeLike
The NYT has already had to make one correction to its story normalizing Moms for Liberty (necessary in order to normalize Trump and legitimize and amplify the lie that Trump is advocating the policies that so many suburban women voters care about)
A correction was made on
Sept. 1, 2024:
An earlier version of this article incorrectly said that a local chapter of Moms for Liberty had accidentally quoted Adolf Hitler in a newsletter. The group, which later issued an apology, was aware that the quote was from Hitler when the newsletter was published.
NYT: Hey, no biggie, this group we cite to normalize a fake grassroots group that supposedly represents 130,000 suburban women didn’t “accidentally” quote Hitler, they intentionally did, but the rest of our story normalizing this group is very valid.
It turns out there is another mistake in the NYT’s attempt to push the right wing narrative that Moms for Liberty is just suburban women who are disgusted with Dems who just don’t care about families and kids — it turns out they presented a NJ woman who has been a registered Republican since 2008 as being a Democrat until the pandemic lockdowns – likely because it helped support the right wing talking point that Dems don’t care about these things and that’s why so many women are rejecting the Dems and embracing Trump even if his being insulting to other people bothers them a little.
LikeLike