Historian Heather Cox Richardson weaves together the events of the past few days and demonstrates the submission of the Republican Party to one angry man. At the Republican National Convention, the party’s elders were notably absent. No Bush or Cheney; no Romney. Trump put his daughter-in-law, Lara, in charge of the Republican National Committee. It’s the Trump party now, and he controls all its levers of power. Note below that he hasn’t stopped hawking merchandise, even in the middle of his campaign. If you can open a tweet, this is an example of Trump turning his campaign into a money-maker for himself.
She writes:
…Trump began the day by posting an advertisement for the fourth “series of Trump digital trading cards,” or NFTs (which are unique digital tokens) featuring heroic images of Trump. People who buy 15 or more of them—at $99 apiece—get a physical trading card as well. Trump said that the physical card has a piece of the suit he wore at the presidential debate, and Trump promises to sign five of them, randomly. Up to 25 people who buy $25,750 worth of the cards with cryptocurrency will be invited to a gala next month at his Jupiter, Florida, golf club.
In the ad, Trump made it a point to emphasize his enthusiasm for cryptocurrency, an emphasis that dovetails with Trump’s recent promotion of an “official” cryptocurrency project. He linked to a Telegram channel run by his sons Don Jr. and Eric that, at the time, was called “The DeFiant Ones” but has been renamed “World Liberty Financial.” While there is little public information about the project, the channel has almost 50,000 subscribers.
Hawking merchandise was an odd move for a presidential candidate, and it suggested his focus is elsewhere than on the election. Also today, Trump announced that he plans to make former Democrats Robert Kennedy Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard, both of whom have endorsed him, honorary members of his transition team. Kennedy told right-wing personality Tucker Carlson that he would “help pick the people who will be running the government…”
And then, this evening, Quil Lawrence and Tom Bowman of NPR explained the story behind the surprising photos of Trump on Monday giving a thumbs-up over a grave in Arlington National Cemetery. The reporters wrote that “[t]wo members of Donald Trump’s campaign staff had a verbal and physical altercation Monday with an official” at the cemetery, where “[f]ederal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities.” When a cemetery official tried to prevent Trump campaign staff from entering the section where the grave was located, “campaign staff verbally abused and pushed the official aside.” A Trump campaign spokesperson said the official who tried to prevent the staff from holding a political event in the cemetery was “clearly suffering from a mental health episode.”
The elephant in the room these days is that most Republicans, along with many pundits, are pretending that Trump is a normal presidential candidate. They are ignoring his mental lapses, calls for authoritarianism, grifting, lack of grasp on any sort of policy, and criminality, even as he has hollowed out the once grand Republican Party and threatens American democracy itself.
It’s hard to look away from the reality that the Republican senators could have stopped this catastrophe at many points in Trump’s term, at the very least by voting to convict Trump at his first impeachment trial. At the time, Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said, “Out of one hundred senators, you have zero who believe you that there was no quid pro quo. None. There’s not a single one.” Republican senators nonetheless stood behind Trump. “This is not about this president. It’s not about anything he’s been accused of doing,” then–majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told his colleagues. “It has always been about November 3, 2020. It’s about flipping the Senate.”
When the Framers wrote the Constitution, they did not foresee senators abandoning the principles of the country in order to support a president they thought would enhance their own careers. Assuming that lawmakers would jealously guard their own power, the Framers gave to the members of the House of Representatives the power to impeach a president. To the members of the Senate they gave the sole power to try impeachments. They assumed that lawmakers, who had just fought a war to break free of a monarch, would understand that their own interests would always require stopping the rise of an authoritarian leader.
But the Framers did not foresee the rise of political partisanship.
In the modern era, extreme partisanship has led to voter suppression to keep Republicans in power, the weaponization of the filibuster to stop Democratic legislation, and gerrymandering to enable Republicans to take far more legislative seats than they have earned. The demands of this extreme partisanship also mean that members of one of the nation’s major political parties have lined up behind a man whom, were he running this sort of a campaign even ten years ago, they would have dismissed with derision.
Finally, devastatingly, the partisanship that made senators keep Trump in office enabled him to name to the Supreme Court three justices. Those three justices were key to making up the majority that overturned the nation’s fundamental principle that all people must be equal before the law. In July 2024 they ruled that unlike anyone else, a president is above it.
In May 2016, South Carolina Republican senator Lindsey Graham famously observed: “If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed…….and we will deserve it.”

Trump is a two-bit husker and marketeer, and the GOP stands behind him while he lines his pockets like any other celebrity on the Home Shopping Network. His very presence cheapens what it means to run for the highest office in the land.
“But the Framers did not foresee the rise of political partisanship.”
If Harris and Walz win the election, they need to work on creating more guardrails so that a con artist and convicted felon cannot run for the presidency. They need create an explicit code of conduct for members of The Supreme Court and Congress. They need to pass a voting rights bill. There is much work to do, and I hope Harris and Walz get to do it. Democracy is fragile, and we cannot afford to lose it.
LikeLike
You are so right. Trump uses the presidency to make money. He is more interested in selling his Trump branded stuff than in being president.
LikeLike
Retired teacherSadly none of that can happen without a landslide defeat for Republicans. Structurally because of the Connecticut Compromise our history of Slavery and gerrymandering in those States. That is almost off the table. Richardson details how the ” South Won the Civil War” And the myths associated with the American West. 6 Senate votes that should be 2 . My congressional District has more or as many people as North Dakota or Wyoming and near the population of South Dakota. My County larger than all 3. The best chance we had for substantial change was 2008. Obama for many reasons was not the person capable of bringing it. Sadly I am not certain he wanted to see change at all. On another note Trump did not change the Republican party they have been the same since 1964. He just ripped the mask off.
LikeLike
“Trump is a two-bit husker and marketeer. . . . “
I’m sure many Nebraskans are not happy that the CONVICTED FELON would be a husker. Did you mean huckster?
LikeLike
Why would Heather Richardson lower herself to quote Lindsey Graham?….the toadiest trump _ss kisser of all.
LikeLike
Lisa, to show what a hypocrite Lindsey is.
LikeLike
That whole 180 degree turnaround three weeks after 1/6/21, when McCarthy kissed the ring of his fuhrer at Mar-A-Lago, to Graham then reversing himself after declaring himself done with Trump hours after the Capitol sacking was such a sickening display of maggot-level sycophancy unseen in American history.
LikeLike
It is really obvious that Trump has created a temporary populist version of the GOP built out of the discontent of the tea party. The other day he bragged that “people call me a populist like that was a bad thing.”
The only thing is, he does not have policy that is sympathetic to the economic needs of his constituency. Thus he appeals to shared grievances in order to win votes. He depends on the continued practice of suppressing opposition votes rather than courting new votes. Soon this will die off.
It might be this election.
LikeLike
“Soon this will die off.”
I don’t believe so. The xtian nationalist theocrats have many more coming after him in their attempt to turn America into an xtian theofascist state. They aren’t dying off that soon. There’s another decade at least of those folks trying to destroy your and my freedoms.
LikeLike
Another comment lost in WP netherland.
LikeLike
NoThing in moderation, Duane
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yikes! Poor Republicans! I wouldn’t want to be remade in Donald’s image. I’ve seen him in tennis shorts.
LikeLike
Well, at least he doesn’t leak oil down the sides of his face.
LikeLike
He just leaks orange juice.
LikeLike
Minnesota Congressman Dean Phillips ran in the Democratic primaries against Joe Biden; he cited Biden’s cognitive decline as his reason for doing so. June 27 proved Phillips was correct despite the effort of almost all journalists to conceal the reality from the public.
Last week Phillips made a comment that pertains to this posting. He said that behind closed doors a large majority of Congressional Republicans say that Trump is very uninformed, erratic, lazy, basically utterly unfit to be President. But in public they defend him because they are rightfully afraid that GOP primary voters will punish them for speaking ill of Trump. Phillips also remarked that most Democrats in Congress said – behind closed doors – that Joe Biden was in no physical shape run for President again, let alone serve another four year term. But Democrats stayed quiet because they feared political reprisals for speaking the truth.
The moral of the story: don’t count on elected politicians being courageous enough to risk their own careers by being truthful to voters if doing so might damage those careers.
LikeLike
And don’t count on most people to see the obvious when doing so means jettisoning a cherished belief.
LikeLike
We would rather be ruined than changed. We would rather die in our dread than climb the cross of the moment and let our illusions die.
Auden
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack,
I think that the nature of “reprisal” in the two parties is very different. In the GOP, angering the Trump base may have dangerous consequences. Anyone so foolish as to criticize Trump can expect to be harassed by telephone, email, or personal confrontation. Given the number of violent insurrectionists and militiamen in Trump’s circle, people are right to be afraid.
Reprisals from Biden? In what way? Many people called on Biden to step down and not one of them experienced any reprisal.
I saw an interview with Biden after he said he would not run again, and he was cogent, thoughtful and fully on point. From the debate, I took away that he had slowed down.
But on his worst day, he was saner and sharper than Trump.
LikeLike
Some elected Democrats called on Biden to step down – AFTER the disastrous June 27 debate. Only a handful of elected Democrats said anything before then because they feared being challenged in Democratic primaries this year or in the future. Democratic leaders in Minnesota told Dean Phillips that his political career was finished for publicly speaking the truth about Biden’s condition. But even after June 27, not even 20% of Congressional Democrats publicly called on Biden to step aside. Nancy Pelosi did what was necessary to give the Democrats a good chance of winning in this year’s presidential race.
People who still don’t recognize the serious cognitive impairment that Joe Biden has right now justify Bob’s sentence: “And don’t count on most people to see the obvious when doing so means jettisoning a cherished belief.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack,
No Democrat suffered reprisal for calling on Biden to step aside. No ine. Not one. There was no reprisal against Dean Phillips for challenging Biden.
Furthermore, while I agree that Biden showed his age, I do not believe he was mentally unfit. I saw his press conference after the NATO conference, and he spoke intelligently and with deep knowledge. Sure, his voice was halting but there was nothing wrong with his brain.
LikeLike
Please do go on and tell us about Biden’s “serious cognitive impairment”, Dr. Jack. Neurologists who have missed what you have diagnosed from your tv want to know why you thought Biden was a cognitive vegetable unfit to be president in his long post-NATO press conference, and at his interviews, and when he stepped aside in a way that insured there was no “disarray” in Kamala being acclaimed as the new nominee within 24 hours.
Biden was suffering the typical age-related slowdowns which impacted his ability as a CANDIDATE to be able to mount a strong campaign. The people who have been making the claim that Biden was too cognitively impaired to govern properly since he declared for president in 2020 have been proven to be liars for more than 4 years. I am glad Kamala replaced him, but I – and many people across the country – have never agreed with the liars who have been saying Biden was cognitively unfit to be president since 2020.
What is odd is that you are drawing parallels between Trump and Biden that don’t exist and missing that Trump and Biden are OPPOSITE examples.
No one is questioning that Trump has the ability to CAMPAIGN — since campaigning requires no work, no need to worry about lying or spewing nasty epithets or encouraging violence. There hasn’t been a single Republican leader questioning Trump’s ability to campaign.
What Trump completely lacks is any cognitive ability to do the job of president. In truth, Trump lacked the cognitive ability to run a business, which is why his businesses went into bankruptcy so often, and Trump would have been nothing if his real estate “empire” hadn’t been propped up by Russian money.
There have been lots of cognitively fit older people who have good judgement and good decision-making abilities, and do an excellent job overseeing those who work for them and inspiring them to do their job well. Even if they do not have the stamina to vigorously campaign for office. Biden is one of them.
And there are other cognitively UNFIT folks who have the energy to vigorously campaign but are cognitively unfit to make any decision impacting another person, let alone impacting an entire country. Trump is one of them.
Why make false equivalencies?
LikeLike
NYCPSP,
Exactly my thoughts.
Biden was not cognitively impaired, the evidence being the events where he spoke unscripted (NATO press conference).
Trump is unfit, mentally and morally.
LikeLike
^^If anyone here wants to accuse Kamala Harris of being part of a cover-up to hide that Biden was a cognitively unfit vegetable who had no business being president, and our country was in severe danger every minute Biden is in office, then they should not vote for Kamala and should do all they can to defeat her. I hope no one here is buying into that smear of Kamala. She knew Biden was slowing down but she also knew Biden was doing a good job as president because he wasn’t cognitively unfit. Biden was slowing down, but his wisdom and political acumen and judgement was still excellent and Kamala knew that and felt no need to lie and claim that Biden was a cognitive vegetable just to please those who wanted him gone.
LikeLike
Why do you insist upon putting extreme statements into people’s mouths–attributing to them (oh, excuse me, to “anyone”) a string of absurdities that no one here ever uttered except some Repugnican trolls?
LikeLike
Is Jack Safely a Republican troll? I was responding to this comment he wrote:
“People who still don’t recognize the serious cognitive impairment that Joe Biden has right now justify Bob’s sentence: “And don’t count on most people to see the obvious when doing so means jettisoning a cherished belief.”
If you are making the point that I shouldn’t respond to him because he is a troll, then you are probably right. I shouldn’t have bothered.
LikeLike
In her interview with CNN Harris spoke highly of Biden, his judgment, experience, intelligence and integrity.
LikeLike
Democrats did not remain quiet and a whole slew of Democrats called on Biden to step down.
Such as: Scott Peters, Jim Himes, Marie Perez, Greg Stanton, Ed Case, Brad Schneider, Hillary Scholten, Peter Welch, Earl Blumenauer, Pat Ryan, Joe Manchin, Mark Takano, Sherrod Brown, Gabe Vasquez, Morgan McGarvey, Betty McCollum, Kathy Castor, Zo Lofgren, Greg Landsman, Martin Heinrich, Jared Huffman, Marc Veasey, Chuy Garcia, Marc Pocan, Jon Tester, Jamie Raskin, Adam Schiff, Mike Levin, Brittany Pettersen, Eric Sorensen, Mikie Sherrill, Adam Smith, Angie Craig, Mike Quigley, Seth Moulton, Raul Grijalva, Lloyd Doggett, etc.
LikeLike
Not one of those Democrats suffered reprisals.
How many Republicans called on convicted felon to step down? His mental deficit and moral depravity are there for all to see.
LikeLike
When did this supposed cognitive decline occur. In his very first press conference it became obvious that when it came to giving cute (!!!!) spontaneous answers to questions, he was a Public Relations disaster. But while those may be the qualities required to be a candidate for President dealing with the American populace. The majority of whom can not tell you who their own Congressman is ,nor how which party in congress has voted on the issues that effect their daily lives. Is that the requirement for preforming well in the highest office in the land . I think not. The President does not wave a magic wand or should not unless of course he is an autocrat, willing to use the police state to enforce his will. He appoints cabinet officers and advisers to push a policy with almost all decisions based on long discussions with those advisors . The 3 AM. call was a Clinton campaign ploy . It has almost never happened. Not even when a false radar signal showed a Russian missile strike, was Carter woken in the middle of the night. More important than the snap answer to a reporter is the well thought out speech delivered to the American people and the World. And the policy that President tries to pursue. On that account Joe Biden has been superb. Not that it will be appreciated by the majority of the Americans. From college students who were given debt relief twice only to have it blocked by the Republican Courts . To woman who vote for abortion rights and then Republican politicians who take away those rights . To Teamsters in the Central States Pension plan and many Union Construction workers whose pensions were rescued from severe cuts and higher fees ,by Biden and Democrats. Who will then vote for anti union politicians seeking to destroy those Unions. Far better to vote for the guy who can tell them he has the best genes when asked a question about economic policy.Or more importantly they are better than a person of color.
LikeLike
Well said and beautifully written. We as Americans are on a precipice that could mean a strong forward moving country or the end of America as we have known it
LikeLike
Interesting piece from a stellar writer with one correction: “But the Framers did not foresee the rise of political partisanship….”
Not quite. Didn’t George Washington explicitly warn against the formation of political parties (“factions”) in his farewell address? Even the rancor between federalist loose constructionists and their anti-federalist counterparts upon ratification of the Constitution looks like garden-variety political partisanship.
LikeLike