Dean Obeidallah is a lawyer, journalist, blogger, and comedian. In this insightful post, he explains why J.D.Vance represents the worst of MAGA. I have included only one of his many links, so open his article if you want to see them all.
He writes:
Convicted felon Donald Trump made it official Monday that his 2024 vice-presidential running mate is Ohio GOP Senator JD Vance. Before we talk Vance’s alarming record, let’s take a step back to examine how we got here. The reason Trump needed to pick a new running mate was because his former Vice President Mike Pence had rebuffed joining Trump’s attempted coup in 2020. As Pence—who refused to endorse Trump in this election– stated in 2023, “the American people deserve to know that President Trump” asked him to not just reject votes but “essentially to overturn the election.”
In response to Pence’s refusal, Trump tweeted during the Jan 6 attack at 2:24PM that, “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution.” From there the crowd surged—as documented during the Jan 6 hearings—and chants of “Hang Mike Pence!” could be loudly heard. As former White House staffer Cassidy Hutchinson testified before the Jan 6 committee, Trump’s chief of staff at the time Mark Meadows said in response to those chants on Jan 6 that Trump “thinks Mike deserves it.”
That is why Trump needed to pick a new VP. His last refused to put Trump over the Constitution –as Pence has said–and in response Trump almost had his supporters kill him.
Trump won’t have that problem with the soulless Vance whose North Star is saying and doing whatever it takes to secure power. This is the same Vance in 2016 who literally wrote a warning that Trump could be “America’s Hitler,” called Trump “reprehensible” and “a total fraud” for exploiting his supporters as he declared himself a “Never Trumper.” Vance even refused to vote for Trump in 2016, instead casting a ballot for third party candidate Even McMullin.
But that all changed when Vance decided to go into politics and seek the 2022 GOP nomination for Senate in Ohio. Vance scrubbed his documented criticism of Trump and in 2021 apologized for offending the man who had waged a coup attack and incited the Jan 6 terrorist attack just months before. With Trump’s backing, the Yale law school graduate and author of “Hillbilly Elegy” won the GOP Senate nomination and made it to the Senate.
We now have a clear picture of Vance–who is far more dangerous than many are aware. Let’s go through some of the key concerns:
- Vance is an election liar who will 100% support Trump’s next coup attempt. Vance—who claimed the 2020 election was “stolen from Trump”–declared in February that if he were in Pence’s place on Jan 6, he would have done exactly what Trump had asked. Vance stated he would’ve allowed the “multiple slates of electors” adding, “and I think the U.S. Congress should have fought over it from there.” That means despite no court rulings justifying tossing out votes, Vance would have supported throwing out 81 million votes because Trump asked him to do that.
- Vance has despicably downplayed the Jan 6 attack—even as to the threat posed to Mike Pence. In May, Vance ridiculed the idea that Pence was in danger on Jan 6, saying, “I’m truly skeptical that Mike Pence’s life was ever in danger. I think politics and politics people like to really exaggerate things from time to time.” The reality is the opposite, but Vance needed to show Trump his loyalty. Vance has also spread lies that the Jan 6 attackers are political prisoners who have been held without being charged and—like Trump–has raised money to help the Jan 6 attackers. That is akin to raising money for Al Qaeda operatives after 9/11.
- Vance has called for the criminal prosecution of a journalist—and his wife—for criticizing Trump: In December, Vance wrote a letter (you can read here) to the DOJ that demanded a criminal investigation into journalist Robert Kagan. What was Kagan alleged crime in Vance’s mind? He had written an op-ed for The Washington Post that warned the United States faces the possibility of a “dictatorship” if Trump is returned to the White House. Vance specifically asked, “Will the Department of Justice open an investigation into Robert Kagan for potential violations of 18 U.S.C. § 241, 18 U.S.C. § 2383, or any other federal criminal statute?” Those are the crimes for conspiracy to incite a rebellion.
Vance also targeted Kagan’s wife writing, “It is my understanding Robert Kagan’s wife, Victoria Nuland, is a senior administration official charged with reviewing our nation’s most sensitive national security information…I am curious to know whether, in the view of the State Department, Victoria Nuland’s close relationship with her husband might compromise her judgment about the best interests of the United States.”
Here, Vance is making it clear he will support Trump’s efforts to target media outlets critical of Trump–and even their families—with criminal prosecutions and other consequences. There is zero doubt Vance would support Trump using the FCC to investigate media outlets not sufficiently supportive.
Vance supports Trump’s pledge to use DOJ to punish his political enemies: Vance has not only lied that Biden has weaponized the DOJ to target Trump, just weeks ago he endorsed Trump’s vow to appoint a special prosecutor to target Trump’s political opponents. Vance stated on Meet The Press, “I think what Donald Trump is simply saying is we ought to investigate the prior administration,” adding, “All he’s suggesting is that we should investigate credible arguments of wrongdoing.”
Vance has made it clear that he would join in Trump’s efforts to make himself the king he dreams of becoming. I can predict with great certainty that if Trump wins and seeks a third term in violation of the 22nd Amendment, Vance will 100% be on board.
Beyond Vance’s commitment to be a co-conspirator in Trump’s authoritarian dreams, there’s also Vance’s far right and bigoted views on a range of issues. He has peddled the racist “Great Replacement Theory” that Democrats want immigrants to “replace” white Americas. And recently he claimed that DEI programs that foster diversity are actually about “pushing racial hatred,” meaning in his view they are anti-white.
On reproductive rights for women, Vance has referred to abortion as “murder” and campaigned against the Ohio ballot measure to enshrine reproductive freedom in his state. As a Senate candidate, he rejected exceptions even for rape, saying, “I think two wrongs don’t make a right.” Vance added, showing his disdain for woman: “It’s not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term; it’s whether a child should be allowed to live even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society.” Actually, it is about women being forced to carry a fetus to term against their will because Vance wants to impose his religious beliefs as law.
On LGBTQ issues, The Advocate’s new article says it all, “J.D. Vance’s horrendous record of homophobia and transphobia.” Vance has opposed marriage equality being codified as law, opposes laws that bar discrimination against the LGBTQ community, and targeted the transgender community. He has even called people supporting LGBTQ rights “groomers,” tweeting in 2022, “I’ll stop calling people ‘groomers’ when they stop freaking out about bills that prevent the sexualization of my children.
The more you read about Vance, his words and record, the more you understand how dangerous he is. JD Vance is one more glaring reason why we must defeat Trump this November!

How can Vance be worse than Trump when all we’ve heard for 8 years now is that Trump is uniquely, singularly evil – Hitler, Putin and Satan all wrapped together? But now you’re admitting there is worse than Trump, which is what we on the left warned you about when Biden was selected. Or are you just trying to set the stage for 2028 and another “YOU CAN’T VOTE THIRD PARTY, THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ELECTION OF OUR LIVES!!!!”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dienne, I don’t get your logic. Yes, it’s possible to have a man who is worse than Trump, a man who is (like Trump) a Putin lover, a man who (like Trump) will give Netanyahu the green light to do whatever he wants, but he’s worse than Trump in that he’s a zealot about abortion (Trump has no views and used to be pro-abortion and probably paid for a few). Vance is a deeply ideological misogynist, whereas Trump is transactional and will do whatever suits his needs at the moment.
You “warned” us about Biden? Really you did. He turned out to be the best President since LBJ. He passed a slew of important legislation despite having a razor-thin majority in the first two years, and a renegade House in the second two. He was always blocked by Machin and Synema.
As you know, Bernie Sanders endorsed his re-election.
I forget why you warned us about Biden. He has been a superb president.
LikeLike
Tell that to the 60% of the population that lives paycheck to paycheck. Tell that to the people who are choosing among food, medicines or rent. Tell that to the people who have already lost everything to medical debt, student loan debt, job loss, etc. Tell that to the people working minimum wage who can’t afford housing. Just because your luxury life hasn’t been negatively impacted by Biden’s policies doesn’t mean no one’s life has. The people who were doing well before Biden are doing great now – congratulations. But the people who weren’t are doing far worse. Just because they sweep the homeless off your streets doesn’t mean they’re not there.
LikeLike
Ah, yes, Dienne, the poor and homeless will do far better under Trump than in a Harris administration. You think Trump will try to forgive student debt; Biden did and the Republicans unanimously opposed him. Nonetheless, he used executive orders to relieve the debt of 5 million students.
Biden increased aid to education. Trump wants to turn Title 1 and special ed funding into bloc grants that can be used for anything, including vouchers.
Trump doesn’t care about poor people or working people. He throws them red meat but it’s only rhetorical.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But Trump, but Trump, but Trump. Yawn. Get a new line. That one was old 8 years ago.
LikeLike
Hello, Dienne. Trump is running for President. He’s ahead in the polls. Eight years ago, you said the same thing: stop talking about Trump. We do have the right to talk about Trump or anything else. We don’t need your approval.
LikeLike
JD Vance is smart enough actually to carry out his insane plans. But like Trump, he has no real values. Or, rather, he pretends to have whatever values will advance his position in the world today. So, like Trump, a psychopath. The whole “He is worse than Trump” thing is, of course, ridiculous. We have no idea if that is so or how that could be so. Trump was, through incompetence and ignorance, incapable of carrying out the worst of his ideas (like shooting asylum seekers and creating concentration camps). Vance? Who knows. He is certainly smarter than Trump and a completely amoral opportunist. But then, the paperweight on my desk is smarter than Trump is. –Bob “in league with Gaetz” Shepherd
LikeLike
“JD Vance is smart enough actually to carry out his insane plans.”
So, Trump isn’t. Thank you.
LikeLike
Dienne, there are signs that Trump learned enough from his utter failure in the first term to appoint goosesteppers like Stephen Goebbels Miller in his second. So, given that, even given his breathtaking ignorance and stupidity and incompetence, a second Trump presidency would be disastrous. How many Americans died unnecessarily because of Trump’s criminal, willful mishandling of the pandemic? How many Kurds died because Trump abandoned them?
LikeLike
Bob “in league with Gaetz” Shepherd….how’s it feel to be part of the “special” club? At least you weren’t called a fascist or a Nazi.
LikeLike
Being called in about 50 posts a Gaetz clone is as close to being called a Fascist or a Nazi as one can get. There are few people in our public life as despicable as he. –“Bob the New York Times-style Kamala Hater” who has FROM THE BEGINNING argued that the cognitively challenged Joe Biden, bless his heart, should step aside for, wait for it, Kamala Harris.
One cannot make up stuff this ridiculous. And when I repost the argument I have been making all along, I get accused to revisionism.
Here’s what I think happens: people are so unused to encountering actual reasoning that they just skim over it and don’t think about it and then, because of that, don’t remember it clearly or even partially. Actual reasoning ONE HAS TO THINK THROUGH, and I have come to the conclusion that a great many people have almost zero experience actually doing that–actually attempting to follow, step by step, a complex argument. |
Here’ for example, is what I have said about Kamala Harris FROM THE BEGINNING OF ALL THIS: She will be the nominee. It is almost certain that she will be. Why? Because when the President resigns, the VP becomes President, and when the President chooses not to stand for reelection, the VP becomes the presumptive nominee and typically gets the President’s endorsement. And in this case, this VP would increase the Democratic voter base and inspire enthusiasm because she appeals to disaffected groups like young people, black people, and white suburban women. I argued and still argue that she would keep every single Biden voter AND ADD THOSE VOTES OF THE DISAFFECTED, thus increasing the Democrats’ chances of defeating Trump. This has been my argument from the beginning, and there was an enormous pile on when I made it.
And, OF COURSE, this is JUST WHAT HAPPENED, JUST WHAT IS HAPPENING. I think that anyone who had actually stopped to think through my argument would have seen the soundness of it. Instead, the pile on. I must be a secret Gaetzian Kamala Hater.
Aie yie yie.
LikeLike
I also argued from the beginning of this that if for some reason Democratic establishment leaders tried to go around Harris, as many here were predicting, that this would become clearly impossible because of the great hue and cry from Democratic voters about the sexism and racism of passing over the presumptive nominee. For this reason alone, I argued, from the beginning, that just wasn’t going to happen.
LikeLike
I argued from the beginning that Democrats could not pass over the presumptive nominee (because of her VP position) without alienating CORE DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUENCIES due to the racism and sexism of doing so. No one–I repeat no one–actually engaged any planks in my argument with evidence that I was wrong. NO ONE. And now people are reimagining what I have been saying all along is these freaking bizarre ways. He must be pro-Gaetz! He must be trying to tank Kamala. It’s outrageous. Oh, and this one: He’s all about the “I told you so.” Rather than, he cares about the argument and it being understood.
LikeLike
Sorry, Lisa. Yes, I know. This is exactly what happened to you when you expressed concern about your daughter’s issues with gender identity. The pile-on, as if there were no subtleties at all to this issue, no variations in its expression and outcomes. I’m sorry you were subjected to that.
LikeLike
Bob, I agree with you that Kamala is a terrific choice. For the record, Diane Ravitch can vouch that days ago I already posted about being “happy to eat crow” about being wrong about how fast the Dems would unite around Kamala instead of having the open convention and 1000 “dems in disarray” articles for the next month.
But I quote CBK:
“I figured, based on our earlier conversations and the similar “stuff” here, that an “I was right” was coming. And there it is–at least about Kamala becoming the nominee, but about “cognitive decline” . . . I don’t think so and I don’t mind saying: I don’t know.
If I were you, and if I were riding on that horse, however, I’d get off as quick as possible because it is terribly unbecoming of an otherwise knowledgeable and interesting guy.”
Bob, you have used the words “COVER-UP” (by the Dems in the White House) more than once, with regard to Biden’s fitness for office. And THAT is where you and Matt Gaetz are in agreement.
LikeLike
Carefully organizing and choreographing a frail, cognitively challenged person’s schedule so that the people won’t catch onto how serious the problem is is a cover-up. Same thing happened in Reagan’s second term.
Déjà vu.
LikeLike
You just LOOOOOOOOVVVVEEEEEDDDD that bit from CBK, didn’t you? Had to quote every word of it, every delectable morsel of that utter bs. ROFL.
I notice that you did not quote my reply. What a surprise.
LikeLike
How many more died of COVID because Biden ended COVID precautions in order to re-open the economy? How many died because of Biden’s crime bills, bankruptcy bill, support for Iraq, refusal to pass M4A, etc? And I won’t even reiterate the horrors in Israel that Biden is facilitating. Trump will be terrible. Biden has been terrible. The only way out of this mess is to stop rewarding terrible.
LikeLike
This comment, Dienne, is utterly bizarre. Totally looney tunes.
LikeLike
Yes, this blog has been struggling with facts for a long time now. I’ve done my best to show you the truth, but it’s an uphill battle when all evidence is “Russian propaganda”. I led the horse to water, but….
LikeLike
Yes, Dienne, what you believe is “facts,” others’ beliefs are spurious. You are always right, anyone who disagrees with you is wrong. Got it.
LikeLike
Amazing that Biden – and not the Republicans – is single-handedly responsible for all that harm. Do you also believe Biden has done nothing good that the Republicans would not have also done?
There is a vast difference in one party only being able to make a slight improvement in people’s lives, and another party who is making people’s lives much worse AND blocking the party who is trying to make things better from doing many of the things that would make things better.
“A little better with many problems still unfixed” is NOT the same as A LOT WORSE. And things got a lot worse for many people under Republican rule. You have a choice to alleviate the suffering a little bit or make the suffering worse. If you see no difference between those choices, that’s on you.
Are you voting for Kamala or not? Why are you even here? Do you hope to convince more people that letting Trump win again is some principled stance? It isn’t. It is turning your back on all the people who are going to have it a lot worse. And it is ignoring the threat to democracy that the Republicans now express out loud.
LikeLike
Bob writes: “Carefully organizing and choreographing a frail, cognitively challenged person’s schedule so that the people won’t catch onto how serious the problem is a cover-up. Same thing happened in Reagan’s second term. Déjà vu.“
Just one nuance (of many) you miss here is about all the possibilities about WHY. (Staff also hid FDR’s frailties); but again, why . . . because they knew the wheelchair would affect the quality of his presidency? OR was it because of some other more political concern that had little or nothing to do with is work as president–and in the context of huge numbers of voters who loved him?
The short answer could be that hiding occurred because they know a large group of voters choose candidates on the basis (I repeat) of optics and stereotypes, and the other side usually jumps on that train with their store of exaggerations without hesitation.
So that your assumptions about “frail, cognitively challenged,” etc., are not the only assumptions that can account for hiding in such cases; and yet you act like they are the only ones.
And again, Biden’s later speeches and press conference belie your oversimplified ideas and assumptions about cognitive decline–especially that press conference–who else in the world could have had the experience and intellectual wherewithal to respond in such a way? and especially when he knew he was under attack for being in “cognitive decline.”
Also, as I remember the arguments, others here remained open about cognitive decline, but did not want to over-reach in their knowledge claims–giving evidence of real reason to be “off” in the debate. But your assumptions must be the case, regardless, and then you go on to interpret others who merely claim not to know, as being “in denial.”
I call that sloppy thinking. CBK
LikeLike
Reagan had Alzheimer’s disease, which clearly affects a person’s cognitive abilities, and no one has ever suggested Biden has Alzheimer’s. Reagan couldn’t give a press conference because he was getting entire US foreign policies wrong, not mixing up a name. Biden took an hour of questioning about foreign policy. Even Republican FBI Director Christopher Wray refused to bite when he testified under oath that he saw no sign of this supposed cognitive decline in his interactions with Biden.
If anything, Biden seems more likely to have some movement symptoms similar to Parkinson’s. People with Parkinson’s, like Michael J. Fox, and Janet Reno – (who was diagnosed just 2 years into her 8 year term) are not necessarily cognitively affected for a very long time. Just like people with ALS (Stephen Hawking) are not necessarily cognitively affected. Just like FDR’s “frailities” that kept him wheelchair bound didn’t preclude him from being a good president. It isn’t a “cover-up” to minimize the times that a person affected physically would face obstacles — we all do that to people we know out of courtesy. Biden wasn’t in hiding — the public could see that he was more frail physically. There was no “cover-up”. Dems who wanted him to step down were concerned about Biden having the stamina for a campaign and they were concerned about how the much amplified PERCEPTION that Biden’s physical decline and debate performance “proved” that Biden had been a cognitive vegetable for years would hurt his re-election campaign.
No Dems who thought Biden’s age-related slowdown made him a problematic candidate for re-election have ever said that Biden has been cognitively unfit to do his job for years, nor have any Dems who wanted Biden to step aside as the NOMINEE even whispered to the NYT that Biden is cognitively unfit to continue to do his job for the next 6 months. That is almost exclusively what REPUBLICANS are saying, not Dems.
Matt Gaetz and the Republican party are the ones who have started the drumbeat that Biden’s severe cognitive failings have been covered-up and that Biden needs to step down right now because he is unfit for office right now and has been for years.
Matt Gaetz, during his questioning of FBI Director Wray, tried to imply that Congressman Adam Schiff thought Biden was so cognitively impaired that Schiff did not think Biden was currently capable of running the country and THAT’S why Schiff wanted Biden to step aside. But it was a lie. It’s the Republican lie to say that prominent Democrats all thought Biden is cognitively unfit to be president, but saying that lie makes it seem like a bi-partisan “truth” that the White House (including Kamala Harris) was involved in a cover-up and Kamala can’t be trusted.
The narrative pushed by the Republicans – that Biden has been cognitively unfit for years with the White House covering it up — has never been what the Dems who wanted him to step down were saying. Conflating the two is problematic and gratuitously damaging to Kamala.
LikeLike
I don’t find the assertion that Vance is worse than Trump ridiculous at all. First of all, this is an opinion piece that tries to point out how dangerous the ideas that Vance promotes are as well as the lengths he is willing to go to to gain power. If he can manage to keep his role as presumptive V.P., he could very possibly become president. Whether we agree with whether Vance is worse or potentially worse than Trump is really not terribly important. We denigrate him as”weird,” or not as bad as Trump, at our own peril.
LikeLike
Trump was BAD and his election gave us a right wing Supreme Court that has spurned norms and precedent and made it possible for the next Republican president – whether it is Trump, JD Vance, or someone even worse – to do great harm. And has made it more difficult for progressives to elect their candidates.
Diane Ravitch, and many people here, warned this person in 2016 that when there is an open seat and a Supreme Court is tied 4-4, it is wrong to say that which party wins the presidency doesn’t matter. It did matter. It did make things a lot worse for our country.
Our country – even with Trump or Vance – would be a lot safer if the Supreme Court was not completely co-opted by the far right. (Before anyone tries to scapegoat RBG, her stepping down earlier would NOT have changed the fact that the Supreme Court was tied 4-4 in 2016 with an open seat on the line and who filled that open seat would change the direction of the Supreme Court. I hope no one is desperate enough to argue that there is no difference between the far right controlling a 5-4 Supreme Court majority and the progressives controlling a 5-4 Supreme Court majority because it is a fact that there is a difference, and our country would be much safer from Trump or Vance if the Supreme Court was currently a 5-4 progressive majority.)
Elections matter. Having Biden in office the last 4 years mattered. Treating one another with respect matters. Making snarky insulting comments because you don’t like being challenged matters.
Will this person vote for Kamala or be pushing narratives about how she just isn’t good enough because she is an evil Democrat? I hope dienne77 will vote for Kamala this year.
LikeLike
Corruption can only, attract, corruption, I just hope that the, voters are, intelligent enough, to vote wisely, come November…
LikeLike
Trump wants to retire to the White House so he can play golf and bilk his cult. Vance would then be left to implement Project 2025 with his buddies at the Heritage Foundation.
LikeLike
Paul, you are right. He gets the spotlight and Vance takes all the briefings that Trump found boring.
LikeLike
One thing that gives me a little hope is that for whatever reason, Trump wields some kind of seductive appeal to a certain type of person, and there are a LOT of that type of person. All reports are that those folks don’t find Vance appealing. Since I find Trump skin-crawlingly repulsive in every way, I can’t remotely understand the appeal, so I don’t see the distinction, but this is what I’m hearing.
But is Vance really more ideological than Trump (who, true, has no ideology whatsoever except whatever wins him the admiration of his loutish mob)? After all, Vance completely reversed his position on Trump, which makes it clear he has no principles or values and is taking the expedient, self-interested route.
LikeLike
Oligarch: So, JD, what do you think about the whole Space Elevator concept? Do you approve?
JD: Well, that depend. What does each option pay, from Absolutely Opposed to Wholeheartedly Embrace?
LikeLike
cx: JD: Well, that depends. What does each option pay, from Absolutely Opposed to Wholeheartedly Embrace, on a Likert Scale?
LikeLike
Trump is a mass kidnapper. He stole children as young as babies from their parents by the thousands.
Trump is an attempted murderer. He ordered his Secretary of Homeland Security to order the Border Patrol TO SHOOT unarmed, innocent asylum seekers.
Trump committed mass negligent homicide by the hundreds of thousands by pretending that Covid was no big deal, discouraging social distancing and the use of masks, telling people that it was just a flu or whatever, encouraging the use of fake remedies, failing to get to work early to create field hospitals and to distribute protective gear to healthcare workers and ordinarily people. Why? Because his son-in-law, Slender Man, told him that treating Covid like a crisis would temporarily depress the economy and so hurt Trump’s reelection chances. In other words, Trump caused hundreds of thousands of Americans to die to serve his own benefit.
Trump is a traitor to his country who abandoned our allies, the Kurds, to be slaughtered and who unilaterally withdrew from the Open Skies and INF treaties at the very time when his handler, Putin, was fielding hypersonic nuclear missiles that could reach the US in 11 minutes.
Trump is a serial sexual predator and an adjudged rapist.
Trump has spent a lifetime in criminal activity, running cons like his fake university and his fake children’s charity and laundering money for Russian mobsters.
Well, it’s a tall order to be THAT bad, but Vance has a whole career ahead of him. So far, he has just proved himself to be a sexist and a shape-shifting opportunist.
LikeLike
You want to take the measure of a person? Consider this:
(3) Facebook
LikeLike
BOB: In moderation. CBK
LikeLike
Well, in the meantime, perhaps you and NYC PSP could work up a nice Radix malorum est Bob joint screed.
LikeLike
Bob: Broad brushing again? CBK
LikeLike
Uh, no. In none of the aforementioned cases was I “broad brushing.” If eight out of ten children want the chocolate ice cream, it is not “broad brushing” to say that the chocolate ice cream is popular. ROFL.
LikeLike
Bob: More to the point, if three people agree on one thing, it does not mean they agree on everything. CBK
LikeLike
Don’;’t see the relevance of this. But enough on this topic, don’t you agree?
LikeLike
Bob: You put me together with two others here, as if we were all clones who thought the same thing, in this case, about you. That was the point of my note: “More to the point, if three people agree on one thing, it does not mean they agree on everything.”
But if you really don’t understand what I am saying, then it MUST BE irrelevant. CBK
LikeLike
Must be my cognitive decline that kept me from understanding that. ROFL. Thanks for the explanation, CBK. However, I know that you are a one-off original! xoxoxox! –Bob
LikeLike
Bob: My earlier note is STILL in moderation. CBK
LikeLike
CBK,
Sorry. Your comment is no longer in moderation. I was getting ready to drive to the Catskills to see my youngest grandchild in a play. Rushing to get out the door.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Diane . . . sounds like a wonderful day, and thank you. CBK
LikeLike
I haven’t been on in a while and I don’t want to get involved with the back and forth.
what I do want to say is that I was shocked to see Biden in such a state at the debate. He was so vibrant for the Stare of the Union address. He looked ill and should not have been allowed on the stage.
While his voice is weak, his mind is still sharp based on the interviews I watched. I’m not sure why his health declined so quickly but I would still have voted for him rather than Trump.
I spent more than one sleepless night worrying.
I stopped watching the news because I didn’t want to hear Biden is too old, Biden is, …, but nothing about Trump
Then Trump got shot and it was all rah, rah Trump (I won’t tell you what I thought, but you can guess). Then Vance was announced as VP and the Convention. I thought Trumps speech, at least the beginning part, was over the top, but the rest was kind of weird and it put me to sleep. Still it was Trump, Trump, Trump. Needless to say I was walking around with a pit in my stomach.
Every Sunday during our church service there is a time for silent prayer and each week it is always the same – please God, don’t let Trump become President. Then Biden stepped down, Kamala stepped up and I had the feeling God was answering my prayer.
Now it’s rag, rah Biden and Kamala, Kamala, Kamala and I have hope and I’m sleeping through the night.
As far as JD is concerned, he is obviously an opportunist. It’s hard to predict what he will do if he became President because we don’t know where his heart truly lies. Ultimately it will depend upon which people are appointed to make the decisions and do the work – Trump is basically a figurehead, a erratic, irrational man who using his gut instead of his head for decision making. JD doesn’t have the experience or knowledge base to do the job and would rely on those advisors Trump and his cronies appointed.
I suppose it comes down to attitude. Trump and JD are in it for the power, Biden wants what is best for the country.
Currently the USA is beating the pants off not just our enemies, but also our allies. We are best in the military and the economy. Yes, there is inflation, but that is a result of Covid. If Trump gets into power and institutes the economic policies he is suggesting, we will long for the simple times when inflation was our biggest worry.
There is so much disinformation (perhaps we should call them lies) out there, that we shouldn’t be surprised that some people think Biden did a lousy job and Trump is a hero. I suggest that if you read this blog and are still a Trump supporter, you do a little digging to discern myth from reality. Listen to what Trump is promising – it scares me. Read Project 2025 – that scares me even more. If that is the world you want to live in, I’ll pray for you.
Sorry this is so long and thank you for letting me vent.
LikeLike
FLERP,
Excellent. My thoughts and feelings exactly!!
LikeLiked by 1 person