Senator Bernie Sanders issued a report lambasting the billionaires who are funding the voucher movement. It’s good that someone in Washington, D.C., is paying attention to this mean spirited effort to shift public money to private and religious schools. As scholar Josh. Owen has repeatedly demonstrated, voucher schools have been a disaster for low-performing kids. The main beneficiaries are students from wealthy families whose children are already enrolled in no public schools. Texas is not mentioned in the Sanders release, but billionaires DeVos, Yass, and native Texan billionaires used their wealth to oust anti-voucher Republicans.
Common Dreams reports:
Sen. Bernie Sanders released a report Tuesday detailing how right-wing billionaires are bankrolling coordinated efforts to privatize U.S. public education by promoting voucher programs that siphon critical funding away from already-underresourced public schools.
The report notes that last year, the American Federation for Children (AFC)—an organization funded by former Trump Education Secretary Betsy DeVos—”ousted state lawmakers in Iowa and Arkansas who resisted proposals to subsidize private education in states and passed expansive private school vouchers.”
Aided by millions of dollars in funding from DeVos and her husband, “AFC’s political affiliates and allies spent $9 million to win 277 out of 368 races to remove at least 40 incumbent lawmakers,” the report adds.
The DeVos family is hardly alone in using its wealth to undercut U.S. public education. The Bradley Foundation, which has been knee-deep in efforts to privatize education in Wisconsin and across the country, spent $7.5 million in 2022 “to fund 34 state affiliates of the State Policy Network to push conservative policy agendas, including privatizing education, and $8.3 million to building a youth movement to ‘win the American Culture War.'”
“The Koch-sponsored group, American Encore, has funneled substantial amounts into state governor races and ballot initiatives around the country, including more than $1.4 million to elect Arizona’s former governor Doug Ducey in 2014 (who led the efforts to create the nation’s first universal private school voucher),” the report adds.
“For too long, there’s been a coordinated effort to sabotage our public schools and privatize our education system. Unacceptable.”
The analysis also names billionaires Jess Yass of Susquehanna International Group, Richard Uihlein of Uline, and Bernard Marcus of Home Depot, all of whom have recently donated to the School Freedom Fund—a PAC that supports voucher programs and shuttering the U.S. Education Department.
School voucher programs disproportionately benefit wealthy families, analyses have shown, while undercutting the goal of serving all students within a community.

Nice to see someone giving us the truth besides NPE
LikeLike
“Republican’s efforts to villify educators, ban books, and censor what is taught in the classroom are blatant attempts to erode trust in the nation’s public schools and justify diverting hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars away from public education.”
The attacks of public education are politically motivated in order to legalize the theft of billions of dollars from public education and divert public funds into private pockets. If Trump regains The White House, Bernie Sanders will no longer be leading the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee in the Senate. Some Trump toady will be in charge of fleecing money from the common good in order to line the pockets of the wealthy. All budgets for public services and social safety nets will be at risk.
LikeLike
Bernie knows!
LikeLike
I often agree with Sanders, and, of course, his stand against vouchers is no different. However, the weakness of Bernie Sanders is that he prefers to be a lone crusader. Since his rise to national prominence in 2016, he has failed to build a coalition that can promote his policies. The key to political success is developing a following that carries out the platform. When Sanders declared himself a “democratic socialist” in 2016 it was a breath of fresh air. Now it is evidence of being tone deaf to political acumen. Yes, we need to be all about public schools. However, if Sanders can’t garner an army to enthusiastically promote these American values, then once again the windmill wins.
LikeLike
A Middle Way: Socialism, Capitalism, and Social Democracy | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
Thank you Bob. I agree with your premise in this writing. My point about Sanders is that his “John the Baptist” crying in the wilderness remains little more than a side show because he seems unable or unwilling to garner forces that could actually realize his vision. Yes, AOC is a capable disciple, but the recent set back for Jamal Bowman is evidence that the progressive influence is precarious if it remains vulnerable to mainstream disinformation. The sad part about what we are facing today is that falsehood works against progress. I applaud Sanders for his willingness to step into the void of “Red States” to push his agenda. However, if he is unable to build a movement within those conservative communities, then his efforts will fade. I have begun a meager project of attempting to use my work as a practitioner in promoting public schools. I am not the scholar that you are, but I have come to believe that the voice we are not hearing is of those who do the work (Perhaps a little part of Marx’s vision of a self governing proletariate). I have developed a website, bonneresque.blog, that I invite you to peruse. I am in the process of adding a piece a week that it is a combination memoir/advocacy. I have been working on numerous projects over the last two years including a novel about a school that is currently being edited. I would be interested in your feedback.
LikeLike
Oh, my! I am delighted to hear that you have started a site, Paul. I so look forward to your comments, and I think that you are right about Sanders’ failure to kick off a movement.
Here’s the BIG question: how to Social Democrats/Democratic Socialists reach blue collar folks in the U.S. and get them to stop voting against themselves and to start voting for themselves for a change–for big change?
LikeLike
Being a lifelong southerner, I think there has to be a concerted effort within the progressive movement to engage with Republican states. Yes, right winged zealots will do all that they can to discredit the movement, but what we in the South see now is an Eastern establishment that has dismissed much of the South and midwest by refusing to engage culturally or intellectually. I realize this sounds like a generalization, but whenever I listen or read from those who have a voice, there is a significant disconnect from what they believe to be Southern thought and what is happening on the ground. One way to begin to cross this divide is to make an intentional effort to promote progressive voices from the South. To broadcast, publish, and promote their thinking. There is profound intellectual diversity in this country, yet the airwaves are New York/DC centric. Most cities in the Southeast are progressive to a significant degree. Yet those of us in these cities feel as if we live on an Island. As an example, I recently listened to Chris Hayes podcast where he interviewed Jasmine Crockett. In this interview Hayes came across shocked that Crockett attended Rhodes College in Memphis and he described it simply as a Southern Christian college also attended by Amy Coney Barrett. This left the impression that miraculously Crockett came out of a conservative institution to become a vocal progressive out of Texas and the “Christian South” as if that could never happen. The fact is that Rhodes College is a highly regarded private liberal arts university not a school like Liberty University or Bob Jones. There are many small private liberal arts colleges in the South with Christian affiliation that are actually academic gems. I attended one: Sewanee. This conversation revealed to me an ignorance about the intellectual legacy in the South that has spawned literary greats, prominent leaders (not limited to the Lost Cause), and numerous scientists. Even in Alabama there is a consistent vote of around 40% democratic. This is in a political environment where most of the electorate no longer participates in elections. The work of Stacy Abrams in Georgia should be a model promoted by the Democratic Party. However, the national party is more content to simply try to win in places where they tend to win. We are not only divided through political thought but through regional isolation. Progressives are ceding too much to ignorance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Paul,
Jess Piper in Missouri says the same. She lives on a farm. She says most local races are uncontested. As a Dem, she has no one to vote for.
LikeLike
Here in Dekalb County, GA (Atlanta) We had an election where two thirds of the races were unopposed. One of the consequences of the loss of local media outlets is that most of our governance is anonymous.
LikeLike
Well said, Paul.
LikeLike
Paul: I live less than an hour from Sewane. When I was a boy, I was desperate to go there for college. Beautiful spot, I have had many friends who have taught there and graduated from there.
LikeLike
For the Socialism-Curious Only! | Bob Shepherd | Praxis (wordpress.com)
LikeLike
Post the link to your site, Paul!
LikeLike
Here it is…https://bonneresque.blog/
LikeLike
Thanks, Paul
LikeLike
Three comments:
And one suggestion to make things easier for you: You can find free public domain art to use on your site at Wikimedia Commons. Simply follow the directions for citing the work when you use it, if that’s required for a particular piece.
LikeLike
Thanks Bob. The visuals I am using are either student work, my own art, or my photos. I’m trying to make this a journey through my experience.
LikeLike
And you have done a magnificent job. It’s very personal. But sometimes you might want something that is not ready to hand.
LikeLike
I disagree. It’s evident that Sanders has had Biden’s ear on many issues, especially those related to Sander’s chairmanship on the HELP committee.
LikeLike
When a country is NOT behaving like the one we were taught to believe in, when the main beneficiaries are the wealthy, when the main policy drivers are the APPOINTED, demonizing the “Fruit” of the system, does NOT change their “Standing”, granted by the system. Detailing Who is bankrolling the system, IGNORES an obvious reality: DEMOCRACY is not a commodity to be bought or sold. If the words of teachers were somehow running the show, we wouldn’t be in this shit show. It should be obvious why no one can change (fill-in) mind. There’s no mind to change…
LikeLike
Thank you! The whole billionaire thing is out of hand. Billionaires have the money to throw around and buy power and influence. Of course! What were we thinking? See my detailed comments at https://nathanielsmith.substack.com/p/billionaires-and-our-national-life/.
LikeLike
I recorded and watched Sen Sanders’ committee hearing a couple weeks ago on the challenges faced by teachers. The other committee members from both parties brought supporters of testing and privatization to speak. Bernie wasn’t fooled, it seems. He was a thoughtful and polite listener and questioner, but not so gullible.
LikeLike
I’ve often reflected on how different our country would be had RFK (Sr., of course!) become president. Same for Sanders. Both focused on issues of the many, not the desires of the powerful.
LikeLike