Veteran teacher Nancy Flanagan explores the question of who is trying to destroy our public schools. She nails some of the loudest critics, who have personally benefitted from public schools. She doesn’t explore why they are trying to annihilate the schools that educated them, but that may because we know what the privatization movement has to offer: money. There is a gravy train overloaded with munificent gifts from Betsy DeVos, the Waltons, Charles Koch, Michael Bloomberg, and a boatload of other billionaires. They can endlessly underwrite anti-public school organizations that offer well-paid jobs.
On the pro-public education side, it’s hard to find big spenders or highly compensated jobs. The two big unions have resources, all of which come from the dues of their members. They do not have the funds to support the numerous grassroots groups that are found in every state. Most, if not all of the state and local groups, operate on a shoestring; typically, their employees are volunteers. They do not have six-figure jobs for someone who tweets and writes statements. No one who works for a state “Save Our Schools” group makes big money.
The Network for Public Education is the biggest pro-public education groups; it has 350,000 people who have signed up to support it, but there is no membership fee. NPE has one full-time employee and a few part-timers.
So, Nancy Flanagan asks, just who is trashing public schools?
She writes:
Get ready for a big dump–a deliberately chosen word–of anti-public education blah-blah over the next five months. It’s about all the right wing’s got, for one thing–and it’s one of those issues that everybody has an opinion on, whether they went to public school. have children in public schools, or neither.
Public education is so big and so variable that there’s always something to get exercised over. There’s always one teacher who made your child miserable, one assigned book that raises hackles, one policy that feels flat-out wrongheaded. There’s also someone, somewhere, who admires that teacher, feels that book is a classic and stoutly defends whatever it is—Getting rid of recess? The faux science of phonics? Sex education that promotes abstinence? —that someone else finds ridiculous or reprehensible.
Not to mention—teaching is the largest profession in the country, So many teachers, so many public schools, so much opportunity to find fault.
In other words, public education is the low-hanging fruit of political calculation. Always has been, in fact.
A few years back, when folks were going gaga over Hillbilly Elegy, seeing it as the true story of how one could rise above one’s station (speaking of blahblah)—the main thing that irritated me about ol’ J.D. Vance was his nastiness about public education. Vance has since parlayed a best-seller that appealed to those who think a degree from Yale equates to arriving at the top, into a political career—and putting the screws to affirmative action, in case anyone of color tries to enjoy the same leg-up he did.
J.D. Vance’s education—K-12, the military, Ohio State—was entirely in public institutions until he got into Yale Law School. He doesn’t have anything good to say about public ed, but it was free and available to him, a kid from the wrong side of the tracks. When I read Rick Hess’s nauseating interview with Corey DeAngelis in Education Week, I had a flashback to ol’ J.D., intimating that he achieved success entirely on his own, without help from that first grade teacher who taught him how to read and play nice with others.
DeAngelis says:
I went to government schools my entire K–12 education in San Antonio, Texas. However, I attended a magnet high school, which was a great opportunity. Other families should have education options as well, and those options shouldn’t be limited to schools run by the government. Education funding should follow students to the public, private, charter, or home school that best meets their needs. I later researched the effects of school choice initiatives during my Ph.D. in education policy at the University of Arkansas’ Department of Education Reform.
So—just to clarify—Corey DeAngelis went to public schools K-12, for his BA and MA degrees (University of Texas), as well as a stint in a PUBLICLY FUNDED program at the notoriously right-focused University of Arkansas. That’s approximately 22 years, give or take, of public education, the nation-building institution DeAngelis now openly seeks to destroy.
I’m not going to provide quotes from the EdWeek piece, because anyone reading this already knows the hyperbolic, insulting gist—lazy, dumb, unions, low bar, failing, yada yada. He takes particular aim at the unions—although it absolutely wasn’t the unions—shutting down schools during a global pandemic. He paints schools’ turn-on-a-dime efforts to hold classes on Zoom as an opportunity for clueless parents to see, first-hand, evidence of how bad instruction is. He never mentions, of course, the teachers, students and school staff who died from COVID exposure.
Enough of duplicitous public school critics. My point is this:
The people who trash public education—not a particular school, classroom or curricular issue, but the general idea of government-sponsored opportunity to learn how to be a good, productive American citizen—have a very specific, disruptive ax to grind:
I got what I needed. I don’t really care about anybody else.
This goes for your local Militant Moms 4 Whatever on a Mission, out there complaining about books and school playsand songs and health class. It’s not about parents’ “rights.” It’s about control. And never about the other families and kids, who may have very different values and needs.
It’s about taking the ‘public’ out of public education. And it’s 100% politically driven.
OPEN THE LINK TO FINISH READING THE ARTICLE!

Thanks for the boost, Diane. Corey DeAngelis’s minions have been going crazy on The Platform formerly known as Twitter– calling me a “union mouth” (as if) and an “old hag.”
But gee– how can you get a complete education, from kindergarten through a terminal degree, in public institutions, then try to eradicate them?
We’re living in strange times.
I always appreciate showing up in your blog, and hearing what your readers have to say.
LikeLike
Thanks, Nancy. I too call Twitter by its rightful name: Twitter.
Corey DeAngelis works for Betsy DeVos. True, he benefited from public institutions. He hates them. It’s pathological. Or self—hatred.
LikeLike
And when you are demeaned by a swarm of Corey’s minions on Twitter, it means you got them where it hurts.
LikeLike
Correction: “DeAngelis says:
“I went to GUBMINT schools my entire K–12 education in San Antonio, Texas.‘”
LikeLike
Hahhahahhahhaha
LikeLike
Government schools? The majority of public schools in this country are run by local school boards, which are elected in most cases. The schools themselves are managed by the superintendent, principals and other administrative staff. They are not government schools they are public schools.
LikeLike
When these critics of everything public agree to abandon their Social Security and Medicare, I’ll take them seriously.
Except for billionaires. They don’t need anything from the government except tax cuts.
LikeLike
Right! And imagine if thy didn’t have to pay taxes for public schools. More tax savings for the oligarchy.
The end game is that families will eventually be responsible for funding their children’s educations instead of the community at large.
Also as I have noted many times, vouchers are the worst form of socialism. It’s a redistribution of wealth from the childless to families with children. Fascinating how flexible their politics are.
LikeLike
“They are not government schools they are public schools.”
Yes, they are government schools. Now, they are not run by a federal agency but by the local school board which is a public body as you point out. That does not negate that they are “government schools”.
The authorizing document for those government public schools is each state’s constitution. . . hence they are government schools.
I’m not sure why you would want to say that they are not government schools. Please explain.
LikeLike
“Government” need not, ought not be a dirty word.
LikeLike
“I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.’ I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to”
choose whether to sit down at the government table of brotherhood or choose to sit down at a government-funded private table of not brotherhood.
Pretty sure that’s how that speech went, right?
LikeLike
I agree with Nancy Flanagan! Thank you, Nancy, you are correct. 👍👍👍.
LikeLike
Those billionaires are working together now, but if they succeed, they will turn on each other and who will pay the price once that happens?
ANSWER: Those who live in poverty and are considered middle class will pay, caught between billionaires turned into feudal warlords after national governments are gone or powerless to stop them as they divide up the United States and then the world into fiefdoms.
LikeLike
there is enough truth in this essay to tie the entire privatebitchoshere up in knots.
LikeLike