Florida’s six-week ban on abortion went into effect today.
A reader who calls him/herself Quickwrit posted the following excellent thoughts about anti-abortion laws:
THE NINTH AMENDMENT that gives Clarence Thomas the constitutional right to live in an interracial marriage also gives women the constitutional right to abortion: The 9th Amendment says that rights, like the right to interracial marriage and the right to abortion, do not have to be stated in the Constitution in order to be constitutional rights because The Ninth Amendment says: “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”
The current Supreme Court ruling on abortion not only violates the 9th Amendment, it violates the religious rights of many citizens. The ruling is supportive of the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church to which the six majority Justices belong.
The Bible gives commandments on a very, very long list of more than 600 laws on everything from divorce to gluttony or stealing — yet the Bible says nothing about abortion. Why is that? If abortion was even as important as gluttony and stealing, it would have been mentioned in the Bible.
Out of more than 600 laws of Moses, which includes the 10 Commandments, NONE — not one — comments on abortion. In fact, the Mosaic law in Exodus 21:22-25 clearly shows that causing the abortion of a fetus is NOT MURDER. Exodus 21:22-25 says that if a woman has a miscarriage as the result of an altercation with a man, the man who caused miscarriage should only pay a fine that is to be determined by the woman’s husband, but if the woman dies, the man is to be executed: “If a man strives with a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet there is no harm to the woman, he shall be punished according to what the woman’s husband determines and he shall pay as the judges determine.” So, the miscarriage is treated like the destruction of property, not murder.
There are Christian denominations that allow abortion in most instances; these Christian denominations include the United Church of Christ and the Presbyterian Church USA. The United Methodist Church and Episcopal churches allow abortion in cases of medical necessity, and the United Universalist Association also allows abortion.
Most of the opposition to abortion comes from fundamentalist and evangelical Christians who believe that a full-fledged human being is created at the instant of conception. But that is a religious BELIEF and religious beliefs cannot be recognized by the government under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of our Constitution. Moreover, the belief that a fetus is a human person, complete with a soul, is a Christian interpretation of the Jewish Bible — the Old Testament. But, Jewish scholars whose ancestors wrote the Old Testament and who know best what the words mean say that is a wrong interpretation of their writings.
Christians largely base their view that a fetus is a complete human being and that abortion is murder on the Jewish Bible’s Psalm 139: “You knit me together in my mother’s womb…You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion as I was woven together in the dark of the womb. You saw me before I was born.”
But who better to translate the accurate meaning of Psalm 139 than the Jews who wrote it? And Jewish scholars point out that Psalm 139 merely describes the development of a fetus and does not mean that the fetus has a soul and is a person. In fact, the Jewish Talmud explains that for the first 40 days of a woman’s pregnancy, the fetus is considered “mere fluid” and is just part of the mother’s body, like an appendix or liver. Only after the fetus’s head emerges from the womb at birth is the baby considered a “nefesh” – Hebrew for “soul” or “spirit” – a human person.
The idea that full-fledged human life begins at conception is a sectarian religious belief that isn’t held by the majority of religions, including a number of mainstream Christian religions.
Therefore, any local, state, or federal law that holds that full-fledged human life begins at conception is unconstitutional because such laws are made in recognition of an establishment of religion and violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
THE COURT BENDS THE FACTS: The University of London scientist whose research is cited by the Supreme Court in its ruling to take away abortion rights says that his research has been misinterpreted by Justice Alito and the Supreme Court’s activist conservative majority. Neuroscientist Dr. Giandomenico Iannetti says that the Court is ABSOLUTELY WRONG to say that his research shows that a fetus can feel pain when it is less than 24 weeks of development. “My results by no means imply that,” Dr. Iannetti declares. “I feel they were used in a clever way to make a point.” And Dr. John Wood, molecular neurobiologist at the University, points out that all serious scientists agree that a fetus can NOT feel pain until at least 24 weeks “and perhaps not even then.” Dr. Vania Apkarian, head of the Center for Transitional Pain Research at Chicago’s Feinberg School of Medicine, says that the medical evidence on a fetus not feeling pain before 24 weeks or longer has not changed in 50 years and remains “irrefutable”.
LIFE OF WOE: In its 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling upholding abortion rights, the Supreme Court set “viability” — the point at which a fetus can survive outside of the womb — as the dividing line after which some restrictions can be imposed on abortion rights. The pending ruling by current activist conservative majority on the Court will do away with the concept of viability, yet even with all of today’s medical miracles to keep a prematurely born or aborted fetus alive, of all the tens of thousands of cases, 90% OF FETUSES BORN AT 22 WEEKS DO NOT SURVIVE, and data shows that the majority of those that manage to be kept alive live the rest of their lives with a combination of BIRTH DEFECTS that include mental impairment, cerebral palsy, breathing problems, blindness, deafness, and other disorders that often require frequent hospitalizations during their lifetimes.

The anti-abortion people are absolutely using religious arguments and also distort scientific findings to support those religious arguments. These arguments are rooted in the false doctrine that life is sacred, which these people are using for political reasons because they do not really believe that. If they did, they would oppose the death penalty on those grounds, and they are completely opposed to that stance, being big fans of the death penalty, again reaching into the Hebrew Bible for support.
LikeLike
if we deny that life is sacred, will we not come to believe that the individual is subservient to the will of any power that exists?
I propose that all life is sacred, not just human life, but the life that blooms and grows, the life that crawls and grazes and predates. If we hold life to be sacred, we will understand the gravity of inevitability having to see the taking of that life.
Do not take this as support for abortion bans, it is meant to support the idea that anything in our world has a place in it, and understanding that place is important in its own way. This includes the fetus. It includes the coneflower. It includes everything.
LikeLike
Steve, they believe that the life of the fetus is sacred, but living people are not.
LikeLike
Great post, Democracy!
LikeLike
Interesting analysis. If our SCOTUS weren’t so partisan and biased, reasonable justices would likely come to the same conclusion that you outline. Even using The Bible as a guideline, it does not justify the extreme rejection of a woman’s body autonomy in red states. The radical right seeks to control women. The irony is that so many of these right to life supporters also support the death penalty.
LikeLike
Quickwrit: I think I recall this post and commented on it then. I was and am in agreement. I do not see how we can avoid the ninth amendment so often.
LikeLike
Abortion is outlawed in order to keep a permanent underclass in this country whose only option is the Armed Forces, being sent off to fight wars for resources that benefit only the ruling classes who cash in said resources to keep this system alive and viable for them and them only.
LikeLike
Although I seldom reject a class argument . KISS applies here. Abortion bans are for thee not for me.
LikeLike
Vice President Harris quoted herself today, in Florida, on the topic of abortion. She reminded the audience that she was a member of the Judiciary Committee, and as such she questioned Brett Kavanaugh.
Spoiler; Brett could not.
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/09/06/kamala-harris-kavanaugh-hearing-abortion-rights-sot-vpx.cnn
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eloquently stated!
LikeLike