Howard Blume of the Los Angeles Times writes about union complaints that arts funding approved by voters is being misused.
Blume writes:
Powerful unions have joined forces with former Los Angeles schools Supt. Austin Beutner to call for state intervention to stop what they allege is the misuse of voter-approved funding to expand arts education in California.
In a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state officials, Beutner and the unions claim that some school districts are taking funding, approved by voters in November 2022 to expand arts education, and are using it for other purposes. This year that funding totals $938 million.
The unions that signed the letter are California Teachers Assn., the largest state teachers union, and CFT, the other major statewide teachers union. Also signing the letter are the largest unions in the L.A. Unified School District: Local 99 of Service Employees International Union, which represents the greatest number of non-teaching school employees, and United Teachers Los Angeles, the second-largest teachers union local in the nation. Other unions include Teamsters Local 572, which also represents L.A. school district workers, and the teachers union for Oakland Unified.
“Some school districts in California are willfully violating the law by using the new funds provided by Prop. 28 to replace existing spending for arts education at schools,” the letter states.
Under the new law, the money must be used by schools to increase arts programs and each school can decide how best to add on to their programs. The arts windfall is drawn from the state’s general fund — at an amount equal to 1% of all money spent on schools serving students in transitional kindergarten through 12th grade. Thus the money is ongoing and will generally increase each year.
The letter lists no specific examples and does not name districts that are suspected by unions of being in violation of the law. Beutner said there is concern that whistleblowers could become targets for retaliation.
The unions and Beutner are calling on the state to require that districts certify within 30 days “that Prop. 28 funds have not been used to supplant any existing spending for arts education at any school.” In addition, the signatories want the state to require school districts to list “additional arts and music teachers” employed by each school district in the current school year and “how that compares” to the prior year.

At least the money is not going to private jets for school officials.
The arts are always jilted in the game of romance and school funding.
LikeLike
Romance?
Wouldn’t lust, craving, greed, libidio, et al, be closer to the truth. What do they use private jets for?
LikeLike
Romance is a major motive force behind the arts. No fair youth, no dark lady, no Shakespeare’s sonnets. No Beatrice, no Vita Nuova and no Divine Comedy. No Maude Gonne, very little lyric poetry from W. B. Yeats. Yeats created for her and about her some of the most breathtakingly beautiful poetry ever written, including “Cathleen ni Houlihan,” “The Folly of Being Comforted,” “No Second Troy,” and “Among School Children.” Astonishingly, Gonne rejected Yeats for an army lout who beat her. Clueless.
LikeLike
I had the phrase “All’s fair in love and war” in mind. Hence romance and school funding, the latter being analogous to war. Apparently so.
LikeLike
The letter lists no specific examples and does not name districts that are suspected by unions of being in violation of the law. what they allege is the misuse of voter-approved funding.
“The initiative allocates money for 15,000 new positions, almost doubling the current number of certified teachers who provide visual and performing arts instruction in California’s public schools. Given existing hiring difficulties due to an ongoing teacher shortage compounded by understaffed arts education offices at the district level. A recruitment effort of this scale will require both short- and long-term strategies to attract and hire new teachers to the profession. Currently, California relies on a myriad of nonprofit organizations to supply non-credentialed “teaching artists”. The exact path for the recruitment, hiring and retention of thousands of arts teachers is still unclear.”
Ballot box budgeting, without a clear plan of action or implementation, quacks like another state mandate. The need to mandate arts education demonstrates the impact of a fetish with test scores, to the exclusion of the arts. No doubt, a California standards based art textbook, edited by the finest, will follow…
LikeLike
LAUSD is trying to claim that the funds are being used properly. I am absolutely certain that they are not. I know that for K-5 arts education the district simply replaced the general funds for the arts with prop 28 money. The lausd K-5 arts program did not grow this year as this bond intended it to. Schools got the same amount of arts teachers that they did the previous year. There has been no talk of hiring more teachers with the money. LAUSD arts admin are now saying that the money is being used properly. I’m sure some higher up told them to say this and they are only saying it to keep from losing their job. I’m hoping that the public exposure of this malfeasance will cause the district to spend the money properly and the arts will grow as the bond intended.
LikeLike
Austin Beutner should be a case study on how to grow a conscience. He was a powerful and connected corporate reformster. Then, he led LAUSD through a teachers strike that demonstrated widely held community solidarity in support of public education, and led LAUSD through a deadly pandemic, taking great care to save lives and schools while his corporate buddies fought his every move. He became good. It’s possible to change.
LikeLiked by 1 person
School board rep Scott Schmerlson put prop 28 on the agenda on the school board’s budget meeting June 18. The same day the LA times came out with this story. LAUSD is violating the law on arts education spending, former Supt. Beutner and unions allege The district budget person and Supt. Carvallo explained that the district had a different interpretation of prop 28 and that the money was not supplanting, but supplementing the arts budget. Austin Beutner’s clear intent with prop 28 was that the district use the money to hire additional arts teachers and the district clearly didn’t do that. I’m a K-5 theatre teacher and all the elementary schools got the same or less number of arts teachers that they did the previous year. The district is defending itself, saying they actually spent more on the arts this school year, than the previous year. 4 teachers spoke and made a compelling case that the district had obviously misused the prop 28 money. One teacher/parent cited the example of her child’s school district outside lausd as an example of how the money should have been spent by lausd. I was surprised to see that the majority of the school board is supporting the district’s decision. When Scott Schmerlson started asking questions of the budget director Jackie Goldberg interrupted and explained that the district had not used the money to supplant the arts budget. Here’s a video of the meeting: The prop 28 discussion begins at 2:44:26 June 18, 2024 – 9am Regular Board Meeting including Budget and LCAP
LikeLike
The latest story https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-06-21/lausd-adds-30-million-amid-allegations-that-it-shortchanged-arts-programs?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR0RQVHhUAKKKVAEbkqQZQDwBYlPI9QxVZSaIvP24riJ32z-xh0j-vG0v7E_aem_ZmFrZWR1bW15MTZieXRlcw
LikeLike