Heather Cox Richardson displays the value of learning history in order to understand the world today. In this post, she reviews the facts about the Trump campaign’s connection to Ukraine in 2016. The one important point she overlooked is the change in the Republican platform of 2016, made at the request of the Trump campaign. The 2012 Republican platform stated the Party’s support for Ukraine. That section was deleted in 2016.
She wrote:
Although few Americans paid much attention at the time, the events of February 18, 2014, in Ukraine would turn out to be a linchpin in how the United States ended up where it is a decade later.
On that day ten years ago, after months of what started as peaceful protests, Ukrainians occupied government buildings and marched on parliament to remove Russian-backed president Viktor Yanukovych from office. After the escalating violence resulted in many civilian casualties, Yanukovych fled to Russia, and the Maidan Revolution, also known as the Revolution of Dignity, returned power to Ukraine’s constitution.
The ouster of Yanukovych meant that American political consultant Paul Manafort was out of a job.
Manafort had worked with Yanukovych since 2004. In that year, the Russian-backed politician appeared to have won the presidency of Ukraine. But Yanukovych was rumored to have ties to organized crime, and the election was full of fraud, including the poisoning of a key rival who wanted to break ties with Russia and align Ukraine with Europe. The U.S. government and other international observers did not recognize the election results, while Russia’s president Vladimir Putin congratulated Yanukovych even before the results were officially announced.
The government voided the election and called for a do-over.
To rehabilitate his reputation, Yanukovych turned to Manafort, who was already working for a young Russian billionaire, Oleg Deripaska. Deripaska worried that Ukraine would break free of Russian influence and was eager to prove useful to Vladimir Putin. At the time, Putin was trying to consolidate power in Russia, where oligarchs were monopolizing formerly publicly held industries and replacing the region’s communist leaders. In 2004, American journalist Paul Klebnikov, the chief editor of Forbes in Russia, was murdered as he tried to call attention to what the oligarchs were doing.
With Manafort’s help, Yanukovych finally won the presidency in 2010 and began to turn Ukraine toward Russia. In November 2013, Yanukovych suddenly reversed Ukraine’s course toward cooperation with the European Union, refusing to sign a trade agreement and instead taking a $3 billion loan from Russia. Ukrainian students protested the decision, and the anger spread quickly. In 2014, after months of popular protests, Ukrainians ousted Yanukovych from power and he fled to Russia.
Manafort, who had borrowed money from Deripaska and still owed him about $17 million, had lost his main source of income.
Shortly after Yanukovych’s ouster, Russia invaded Ukraine’s Crimea and annexed it, prompting the United States and the European Union to impose economic sanctions on Russia itself and also on specific Russian businesses and oligarchs, prohibiting them from doing business in U.S. territories. These sanctions were intended to weaken Russia and froze the assets of key Russian oligarchs.
By 2016, Manafort’s longtime friend and business partner Roger Stone—they had both worked on Richard Nixon’s 1972 campaign—was advising Trump’s floundering presidential campaign, and Manafort was happy to step in to help remake it. He did not take a salary but reached out to Deripaska through one of his Ukrainian business partners, Konstantin Kilimnik, immediately after landing the job, asking him, “How do we use to get whole? Has OVD [Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska] operation seen?”
Manafort began as an advisor to the Trump campaign in March 2016 and became the chairman in late June.
Thanks to journalist Jim Rutenberg, who pulled together testimony given both to the Mueller investigation and the Republican-dominated Senate Intelligence Committee, transcripts from the impeachment hearings, and recent memoirs, we now know that in 2016, Russian operatives presented Manafort a plan “for the creation of an autonomous republic in Ukraine’s east, giving Putin effective control of the country’s industrial heartland, where Kremlin-armed, -funded, and -directed ‘separatists’ were waging a two-year-old shadow war that had left nearly 10,000 dead.”
In exchange for weakening NATO, undermining the U.S. stance in favor of Ukraine in its attempt to throw off the Russians who had invaded in 2014, and removing U.S. sanctions from Russian entities, Russian operatives were willing to help Trump win the White House. The Republican-dominated Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 established that Manafort’s Ukrainian business partner Kilimnik, whom it described as a “Russian intelligence officer,” acted as a liaison between Manafort and Deripaska while Manafort ran Trump’s campaign.
Now, ten years later, Putin has invaded Ukraine in an effort that when it began looked much like the one his operatives suggested to Manafort in 2016, Trump has said he would “encourage Russia to do whatever they hell they want” to NATO allies that don’t commit 2% of their gross domestic product to their militaries, and Trump MAGA Republicans are refusing to pass a measure to support Ukraine in its effort to throw off Russia’s invasion.
The day after the violence of February 18, 2014, in Ukraine, then–vice president Joe Biden called Yanukovych to “express grave concern regarding the crisis on the streets” and to urge him “to pull back government forces and to exercise maximum restraint.”
Ten years later, Russia has been at open war with Ukraine for nearly two years and has just regained control of the key town of Avdiivka because Ukrainian troops lack ammunition. President Joe Biden is warning MAGA Republicans that “[t]he failure to support Ukraine at this critical moment will never be forgotten.”
“History is watching,” he said.

Remember when we were all laughing at Romney for saying that Russia was the world’s worst geopolitical threat?
LikeLike
FLERP, yes. Romney was right. I wonder who he will vote for? I wonder who Nikki Haley will vote for in the privacy of the voting booth?
LikeLike
I have said this before and will say it again. I was living in Massachusetts when Romney was governor. He was a governor for all the people. He worked across the aisle. He compromised. He created Romneycare, which became Obamacare. He did.
LikeLike
It will be interesting to see what Romney does in the election. His career as a politician is over. Who will he endorse?
LikeLike
He definitely won’t endorse Trump. If he didn’t last time, he won’t this time.
LikeLike
When Trump ran in 2026, Romney wanted to be his Secretary of State. In 2020, he was a loyal party member. Now he is a free man, retiring from the Senate. Maybe he will be silent.
LikeLike
Romney did not endorse Trump in 2020 and also said he didn’t vote for Trump.
LikeLike
What period are you referring to?
LikeLike
2012 campaign. Correction, he said “foe,” not “threat.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiESef92pUs
LikeLike
I wasn’t.
LikeLike
In 2012, didn’t Romney say that Russia was our #1 geopolitical foe? Oddly, in 2022, after Putin invaded Ukraine, Romney seemed to walk back characterizing Russia as “#1” foe. He downgraded Russia to just being “a geopolitical adversary, poking us where they can”.
Did Romney temper his former extremely strong criticism of Putin because of the GOP embrace of Putin?
CNN 2/27/22:
“Asked on Sunday by CNN’s Dana Bash about the 2012 exchange, Romney asserted that China is currently the greatest threat to the U.S. “long term.” But he also backed up his statement on Russia in the wake of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s Thursday invasion of Ukraine.”
“They are a geopolitical adversary, poking us where they can,” Romney said.
“Romney said Sunday that he doesn’t look back and “worry about what is said during a political campaign,” but he does have concerns about “president after president” — including Obama, George W. Bush and Donald Trump — “who were resetting relations with Russia, hoping as they looked in the eyes of Vladimir Putin they could see a responsible person.”
“John McCain was right. He said he looked into Vladimir Putin’s eyes and saw the KGB,” Romney said of his late former Senate colleague from Arizona. “And that’s what we’re seeing: a small, evil, feral-eyed man who is trying to shape the world in the image where once again Russia would be an empire. And that’s not going to happen.”
Romney’s speech on the Senate floor this month to urge his colleagues to approve aid for Ukraine was brilliant. Romney was highly critical of Putin and explained the consequences of not giving aid, without deeming Russia “worst” or 2nd or 3rd or 4th worst.
But when Romney said Russia was “the #1 foe”, Putin had temporarily stepped back from being president (still held power as prime minister) and Medvedev was president and actually negotiating with the US in shared interests, including to lessen the proliferation of nuclear weapons.
One plausible theory as to why Putin decided he wanted to be president again in 2012 is he though Medvedev was too friendly to the west.
Russia was always a geopolitical adversary and especially under Putin, a serious threat. But how much bolder did Putin become when the 2016 election of Trump (with help from the Russia troll farms) gave him a Putin-friendly GOP? How much bolder will he become?
But there was a brief time in 2009-2012 where it looked possible that Russia could move toward real democracy. Perhaps it still was unlikely, but more possible compared to today, led by an authoritarian Putin who simply murders are political rivals and crushes dissent.
Trump’s role model.
LikeLike
You and Professor Richardson, Diane. Two national treasures.
LikeLike
I wish that Americans generally knew this stuff. But the sad fact is that Trumpanzees don’t read.
LikeLike
Trumpers don’t believe anything they read that challenges the greatness of their cult leader. The Branch Davidians felt the same about David Koresh. And the members of the Jonestown cult lined up to drink the Kool-Aid. Don’t confuse them with facts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly more than Trumpanzees don’t read. And if you read it to them they still wont believe it.
LikeLike
It’s all a social media scroll.
LikeLike
And if they read, they wouldn’t be able to understand what they had read. Part of being an educated adult is keeping abreast of foreign affairs. People should not need Professor Richardson or Tom Hartman or Diane Ravitch to provide such backstories, but they do.
LikeLike
I am one of those people. The thing is, history is so broad that details about the more minute aspects of it are soon lost in new details in those of us who are mortal. Historians in journalism keep reminding us of the important details in the stories that tie together the narrative of how modern events bury their roots in a very relevant past. This is what I love about history. There is always the new detail that brings into focus some part of the story. The more I read, the more I realize how profoundly ignorant I am.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Roy, that’s the mark of an educated man, when you realize how much there is to learn, and how little you know.
LikeLike
So, Roy, you will appreciate this story. Years ago, I owned a small eduational publishing house. I was excited about document-based questioning as a pedagogical technique, so I informed my employees that we were going to do a DBQ series for middle-school and high-school. I called a meeting and informed them that I was going to appoint internal fact checkers AND hire external ones. We were going to fact check the heck out of these books to ensure that they were right.
And then we ran up against actual history, with its contradictory sources, its gaps in the record, its clearly false interpretations by partisan historians, it’s debasement by mythologizing in textbooks. And so it became clear that a lot of this would be preponderance of the evidence stuff. And concentration on what a particular document says as opposed to whether that is true (that being a whole other level of analysis).
However, it think it really sad that people don’t follow current events enough to know what happened in Ukraine, to know how the revolution came about that made it no longer a Russian puppet state. This is not so much history as current events, and it turns out that vast numbers of American adults not only don’t know much about history but don’t know much about what’s going on right now. I wonder what percentage of American adults, right now, could tell you what job Blinken has or name the last two presidents of Russia.
LikeLike
You definitely do not exemplify the level of ignorance that I’m talking about, Roy. CLEARLY NOT.
LikeLike
Bob: one of the modern techniques of tyranny that was very evident in the run-up to the election of Trump was the endless supply of reported crises of various types. There were the welfare Cadillacs to worry over, the rise in crime, documented as it was on the 6:00 news, the list was endless for 40 years. It drove out the stories about Ukraine for the common man. After all, a guy that spends a whole day working hard rarely gets a chance to think about current events. It’s a couple of hours after supper and you are asleep in a chair if it’s a normal day. Then there is the Trump presidency, when there seems to be crisis after kerfuffle, something they wrote about the Nazi rise in Germany.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Trump term was exhausting. He stirs constant chaos.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Strangely enough Welfare was down from 13 million recipients in 1995 to 3 million in 2016. As for crime as it went down when people were asked about crime their response in surveys was it was rising. Now I don’t know how FBI statistics apply to the situation in different states. So I will only speak about NYC . In 2016 crime and especially murders in NYC were near historical lows not seen since reliable records started being kept after WW2 . A place they reached the following year as everyone thought deBlasio had ruined the progress Bloomberg had made. If by ruined you mean the lowest crime rates on record I guess he stunk. Try telling that to Trumpanzees but it don’t end there. The average person feels the same. Where are those ideas generated?
Trump may not have been wrong about everything. I had been loathe to criticize
main stream media while he was attacking them but his attacks were not totally without merit. Bad news sells! Have you heard that murders since the second half of 2021 have been heading down , have you heard that NYC with a 23% drop in murders so far this year after an 11% drop last year is on pace to break that post WW2 low murder record this year.
You wont !
Media coverage of Crime in NYC dropped dramatically the day after the House was lost to Right Wing Republicans in NY Suburbs. And not just on Fox.
The day Biden won the Election the overwhelming majority of Republicans declared the Biden economy sucks. Two and a half months before he took office. And the Media narrative has done little but reinforce their belief.
Unemployment being at record lows don’t count !
Real Median Wages being ahead of inflation don’t count!
Spending on Travel leisure and entertainment and discretionary goods being at record levels don’t count!
Morning in America in 1984. Unemployment 7.6% and inflation 4.3% and prices never came down. Today Unemployment 3.7% inflation 3.1% don’t count!
Stock markets being at record levels don’t count!
We are told: Why aren’t prices coming down is the main concern of the American people. After the media hyped inflation till Corporate America took the cue and created it with record breaking profits.
The American people do not read and reading multiple accounts and questioning what you read is what is called for . That is not going to happen!
LikeLike
Joel: thanks. All great points. Bleeds it leads journalism is killing us.
Bob: your story of trying to confirm truth is the reason historian writers are often accused of writing stilted prose.
LikeLike
Roy Turrentine
My undergrad degree was in Anthropology. One thing you learn early on is that each Anthropologist / Historian claims to have found the missing link . Truth be told it is not a tall tree(a line) but a bushy one with hundreds of branches sometimes going back and forth. The general direction is clear.
Most of our historical and current analysis can not be done with simple answers. So multiple things can be true at the same time. Unfortunately simple people want simple answers and the truth is often complex. Whether we are talking about the views of the Framers or our current economic situation. Trade can be a benefit for most Americans and a disaster for Americans who are in Manufacturing and beyond in blue collar jobs. Jefferson can be a brilliant Philosopher with high ideals and a slave owning child rapist at the same time. It is when we seek to deny these things that we get in trouble.
As you say each new detail that comes out
alters the way we perceive things.
“The more I read, the more I realize how profoundly ignorant I am.”
LikeLike
“By 2016, Manafort’s longtime friend and business partner Roger Stone—they had both worked on Richard Nixon’s 1972 campaign—was advising Trump’s floundering presidential campaign, and Manafort was happy to step in to help remake it.”
The line between Nixon and Trump is fascinating. An article in Politico chronicled the 1960 attempt by the Nixon campaign to challenge the election he lost to Kennedy. Many of the same techniques Trump used in 2020 were tried in 1960, and only discarded because Nixon feared what his whining might do to a future campaign. Trump’s connection to Roy Cohn, the guy that helped McCarthy places him squarely in the company of old communist hunters whose real goal was personal power and the communist issue was the immediate means.
LikeLike
History is watching and so should Democrats. If they had anything like a strategy, Democrats would take off the gloves and accuse the GOP of being Russian sympathizers. With the future of democracy on the line, Democrats should use connections and patterns to discredit the sneaky, corrupt, anti-democratic right wing extremists and build confidence in Biden’s leadership.
LikeLike
I am soooooo with you, retired. The Democrats are going to high road/namby pampy their way into another loss if they don’t freaking take the gloves off from now through the election. I’m mixing my metaphors. You know, like Shakespeare.
LikeLike
Obama and all the other leaders of western democracies collectively deserved to be awarded The Neville Chamberlain Trophy for Collective Cowardice when they failed to compel Putin to withdraw from Crimea in 2014.
In 2014, when Putin seized Crimea he justified the seizure by claiming that the people there were ethnic Russians and belonged with Russia — just like Hitler had invaded the Sudetenland region of the nation of Czechoslovakia in 1938, claiming that the people there were actually Germans and belonged with Germany.
Instead of defending Czechoslovakia, the western nations of Europe, plus England, fell all over themselves concocting “The Munich Agreement” that let Hitler keep what he had stolen.
Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who was one of the “leaders” who signed the Munich Agreement, declared that the Agreement would bring “peace for our time” — but when Winston Churchill read the Agreement, he gravely noted: “You were given the choice between war and dishonor. You chose dishonor — and now you shall have war.”
Churchill was right: Hitler had no intention of stopping with the takeover of Czechoslovakian territory — Hitler had declared that his goal was to re-establish the former German Reich, just like Putin has declared that he wants to restore the former Soviet Union empire. Hitler called his empire “TheThird Reich” and less than 12 months after the “peace-for-our-time” treaty was signed, Hitler launched World War II to create the Reich Empire, because to Hitler the Munich peace agreement only showed the weakness and fearfulness of Western nations.
Putin saw the west’s failure to take physical action against his seizure of Crimea the same way Hitler saw the Munich Agreement. And, like Hitler, Putin didn’t stop with Crimea — and he won’t stop even with seizing all of Ukraine: Putin has already declared that Lithuania is “a threat” to Russia. Little Lithuania is next on Putin’s list. But Lithuania is a NATO member…”and now you shall have war.”
Or, of course, NATO can just let little Lithuania fall to Putin because “it isn’t worth it.” That would not only be the end of NATO, it would be the beginning of Putin’s conquest of Europe, the end of America’s leadership, and it would sink the U.S. economy.
If America and European democracies fail to immediately arm Ukraine with everything it needs to drive Putin out of all Ukrainian territory — including Crimea — Putin won’t stop, and there will be a far, far wider war.
U.S. Army General Patraeus, who also served as the Director of the CIA and knows what’s really going on in this world, points out that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is “as right versus wrong as it gets in this world. Here we have a brutal, unprovoked invasion at the orders of a kleptocratic leader who denies Ukraine’s right to exist. And keep in mind that Putin won’t stop there. [Driving Russia out of Ukraine] is in our cold, hard national interest.”
And yet, Putin’s Pals in the House of Representatives would rather play politics instead of pay attention to our nation’s interest. They are traitors to America’s national interest.
LikeLiked by 1 person
collectively deserved to be awarded The Neville Chamberlain Trophy for Collective Cowardice when they failed to compel Putin to withdraw from Crimea in 2014.
AMEN!!!!!
LikeLike
Biden should bomb the Kerch Strait Bridge into oblivion right now. Oh, and announce that the name Navalny was written on the side of every bomb.
LikeLike
Thank you, Quickwrit!!! This is so perfectly said and so important, one of the wisest pieces I have read on the subject of this war.
LikeLike
I have always held that Chamberlain got a bad rap. All of Europe failed when they allowed the re-militarization of the Rhineland. Even before that, the unreasonable terms of the Versailles Treaty all but assured an economic catastrophe and a political crisis. The US failed to assume its world responsibilities, led by isolationist spirit in the wake of an unpopular war. Poor Neville had a few choices, and whiffed on all of them, but he was not alone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the 1930s, the Republican Party was isolationist. Then they had to send their sons to Europe to stop Hitler. After WW2, they realized that the best security consisted of multilateral agreements. Trump doesn’t like multilateral agreements. He wants to tear apart the architecture of the past 75 years.
Underneath his views is a question: why is he so deferential to Putin? Does Putin flatter him? Is he still hoping to build a Trump Tower Moscow? Or does Putin have something on Trump? No rational American would embrace a brutal dictator as Trump embraces Putin.
LikeLike
Trump has been a Russian asset for a long, long time. This seems, to me, obvious.
LikeLike
Diane: it is interesting to think about exploding mythology in the wake of WWII. The isolation myth you mention is one. The Hitler/Stalin non-aggression pact blew up the myth that Russia was some idealistic experiment. The mid-twentieth century was a myth busting time
LikeLike
Quickwrit,
Thank you for taking the time to spell out the consequences of placating Putin.
LikeLike
YESSSS!!!!! Quickwrit is a bright and decent person. I wish that his or her post, here, were read by every American!!!
LikeLike
Well said! Ignoring or appeasing dictators never works, and they inspire other like-minded despots.
LikeLike
Another parallel, QW and RT: In both cases, with Hitler and Putin, both telegraphed CLEARLY beforehand what they planned to do–to capture large amounts of others’ territories to create a Greater Germany and a Greater Russia.
LikeLike
In other words, they both told people what they were going to do, and people didn’t believe them.
LikeLike
Trump has a way of saying exactly what he will do. Except that he mixes it with things he never intends to do. He will build the wall and Mexico will pay. Well, no. Did not do that. But he did appoint judges for the purpose of getting rid of roe.
LikeLike
Putin is everywhere, literally.
Putin was involved in Brexit to weaken the EU.
“Putin’s Plot Against ‘Great’ Britain – And How He Got Away With It
Peter Jukes tracks Vladimir Putin’s long war against the West and the allies he has found in the pro-Brexit establishment in the plot to derail Britain”
Putin became an Ally of Venezuela’s dictator early on. Before that happened Venezuela was one of the most prosperous democracies in South America. Today, it’s a failed nation with millions fleeing the country. Many of them headed for the US.
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/25/688658697/putin-backs-maduro-as-kremlin-critics-cheer-u-s-support-for-venezuelas-oppositio
Brazil is a member of BRICKS – an alliance of nations brought together to replace the US dollar as the world’s leading currency. Putin even tried to convince China do dump the US treasuries it owns in an attempt to crash the US economy. China said no.
“The acronym “BRIC” (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) was first used by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill to describe the four economies that could, if growth were maintained, dominate the global economy by 2050.”
Putin has meddled in Brazilian and Argentina’s politics.
I think this list could be a lot longer. We already know how much Putin is meddling in US elections.
I think Putin is the world’s number one enemy of democracies and has earned a nuclear strike on the location where he sleeps. I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t sleep in the same bed or location two nights in a row making sure he doesn’t set up a predictable routine.
LikeLike
Alas, the U.S. can’t purchase a victory in its proxy war against Russia in Ukraine. In a war of attrition, ammunition can’t be utilized by soldiers that no longer exist. As it has been said, “War doesn’t determine who’s right. War only determines who’s left.” Willing to fight against Russian aggression to Ukraine’s last conscripted soldier, the few remaining Americans willing to parrot U.S./NATO talking points must pivot from begging for more dollars to finding those to blame for failure. When will U.S./NATO allow Ukraine to negotiate for peace?
LikeLike
RUSSIA WILL BE UTTERLY DEFEATED. IT HAS ALREADY BEEN EXPOSED AS A PAPER TIGER. THIS IS WHAT DECADES OF KLEPTOCRACY RESULTS IN. IT HAS LOST SO MANY SOLIDERS THAT IT IS NOW BEING FORCED TO EMPTY ITS PRISONS AND SEND THE CRIMINALS, UNTRAINED, TO THE FRONT. MONSTROUS. STUPID. INEPT.
THE RUSSIAN MAURADERS AND RAPISTS MUST AND WILL BE DRIVEN OUT OF EVERY SQUARE NANOMETER OF UKRAINE, INCLUDING CRIMEA AND THE DONBAS.
LikeLike
It’s very clear that there exists Kompromat severely damaging to the Putin puppet in master Vlad’s safe.
LikeLike