Gary Rubinstein has been following the ups and downs of New York’s highest scoring charter school chain: Success Academy. Every year, the grades 3-8 test scores at the chain are through the roof. But Gary noticed that the high school students at Success Academy do not take Advsnced a regents exams as they do at the New York City’s highest performing high schools.
Success Academy is a charter network with about 40 schools in the New York City area. They are known for their high standardized 3-8 test scores. Though it has been proved that their test scores are somewhat inflated by their practices of shedding their low performing students over the year and also by, at some schools, focusing exclusively on test prep in the months leading up to the tests, they still have these test scores to show their funders and the various charter school cheerleaders.
In June there was an article on the website of something called Albany Strategic Advisors, some kind of consulting firm about how well middle school students at Success Academy performed on four of the New York State Regents exams: Algebra I, Living Environment, Global History, and English. The last sentence of the second to last paragraph explains that these results are important because “Taking the exams in middle school allows students to take more advanced college preparatory courses in high school.”
These ‘more advanced college preparatory courses in high school’ include 10 other courses that have Regents exams including Geometry, Algebra II, Chemistry, Physics, US History, and Spanish. The minimum requirements for getting what is called ‘a Regents diploma’ in New York is one math Regents, one science Regents, one Social Studies Regents, and the English Regents. But to get an ‘Advanced Regents diploma’ you need all three maths and all three sciences and one foreign language Regents. Most competitive high school have their students take these other Regents which are known to be fairly straight forward tests with very generous curves.
About 8 years ago I noticed that there were no Regents scores for any of the other 10 exams in the Success Academy high school. Then 6 years ago I found that some of their students actually were taking some of the more difficult Regents but they were doing very poorly on them. And now, 6 years later, I checked up on them again to find that in the three Success Academy high schools which enroll a total of about 1,100 students from grades 9 to 12, they again do not have any scores for any of the Regents that are typically taken at competitive schools.
So why does this matter?
Well, Success Academy has spent eighteen years carefully cultivating their image. They want families to think that they have the highest expectations and that families should trust them to educate their children because those higher expectations will lead to those students learning the most. And we all know about their 3-8 state tests in Math and ELA. But it is pretty ‘odd’ that their students don’t take the more difficult Regents. The most likely reason for this is that Success Academy only wants information public that makes them look good and avoids any action that could reveal public data that reveals that they do not live up to their reputation. So I believe that they don’t allow their students to take the Regents because they believe that the scores on those Regents won’t be as impressive as their 3-8 state test scores compared to other schools. If I am right then this is an example of Success Academy choosing to preserve their inflated reputation over giving their students the opportunity to challenge themselves on these competitive exams.
Please open the link to finish the article. Nobody does this kind of close review better than Gary Rubinstein.

Good morning Diane and everyone,
There are no regents exams in ANY foreign language in NY. Students take an exam that is approved by NYSED but these are not regents exams made by State Ed. as they used to be. I believe NYSED hasn’t made foreign language regents exams since 2012.
LikeLike
Mamie, that shows their priorities, sadly.
LikeLike
“ Carefully cultivating their image & inflated reputation.” Wow! Not even a cultivation but rather an outright Manipulation & Distortion. Rubinstein follows them over time. And sees how they strategically & diabolically remove all reference to those tests & scores. Their “success” is a multi-year series of omissions. Left out are scores, students who they exclude and expel, faculty who are silenced for truth-telling, Donor contributions, political agendas. Just goes on and on. But Rubinstein is documenting a Playbook Here. Disaster Capitalism at its finest.
LikeLike
Because they’re gaming the system? Or as the characters on “The Wire” would say, “juking the stats”? Just asking.
LikeLike
Juking the stats is one version of gaming the system.
LikeLike
When education becomes a commodity, owners will distort and spin their messaging to make the company seem terrific. The main goal is to always protect the brand and the bottom line just like Boeing is doing now.
LikeLike
Exactly. That’s what the world of privatized education will look like. One marketing lie after another. New super improved BPA-free high-school education with natural scents and scrubbing bubbles! Get your child’s while supplies last!
LikeLike
Success is a fraud like most charter schools, they do in house testing and cheat and if a kid is not up for it they removge them. Charters are bullshit!
LikeLike
The NYC public schools under Mayor Bloomberg and Chancellor Klein’s leadership of the Department of Education (DOE nee BOE) cooked the books to make test results appear good, especially in election years. Charters have no monopoly on removing kids from the test population or distorting scores to look good.
LikeLike
Another reason why these tests should be eliminated.
I once did a graph over decades of the cut scores for ELA and Math tests in New York. They jumped around like gerbils on methamphetamines. What was going on? Well, the state of New York was setting the cut scores high in years when the state department wanted to inflict some new magical educational elixir on the state (See how low the scores are? We need this fix!) and where setting them low in years when they wanted to show that their magical elixir was working. And the feds accepted these cooked numbers with no questions asked. An utter scam. And New York has not been alone in perpetrating it.
LikeLike
Bob,
You are so right about manipulation of the “objective” data tests provide. I, too, have long traced the vertigo-inducing ride that annual NYS testing has put students, teachers, schools and the general public on. The testing program and the spinning of the results have been an ongoing, disastrous roller coaster.
LikeLike
Bob,
You are so right in your description of cut scores for New York State tests. When I was writing “Death and Life of the Great American school System,” I reviewed the fluctuating cut scores. For those who don’t know what a cut score is, it’s the point where the test is graded. A-F, 1-4, Proficient or Basic.
I was astonished to see that on some tests a student could get 37% of the questions right yet get a good score.
In 2009, Mayor Bloomberg was running for a controversial third term (the city Charter had a two-term limit); a close friend of the Mayor led the state Board of Regents. The scores were outstanding. Lots of pundits hailed “the NYC Miracle.” The Mayor was re-elected. The Regents brought in two testing experts who found major flaws. At the next round of annual tests, the scores went down.
LikeLike