Leonie Haimson is a tireless advocate for better public schools and reduced class sizes. She leads a small but powerful organization called Class Size Matters. I am a member of her board (unpaid, of course, as she is).
CSM is powerful because Leonie is tireless. She attends meetings of the City Council, the Panel on Education Policy (I.e., the Board of Education); she testifies at City Council hearings and goes to Albany to testify when the education committees meet. She finds lawyers to work pro bono and files lawsuit to seek more funding for the schools. She works with parent groups to support or oppose the latest decision by the mayor. She meets with elected representatives. She writes op-Ed’s for the local press. She almost single-handedly collapsed Bill Gates’ inBloom, which hoped to collect personally identifiable information about every student in every state. She scrutizes the budget of the NYC public schools, even more intensely than those who are paid to do it. She once blocked a bad deal that saved the city $600 million, by exposing the sordid record of the contractor.
The elected officials in Albany are now considering whether to renew mayoral control of the public schools. Michael Bloomberg persuaded the Legislature to give him control soon after he was elected in 2001. He promised all sorts of miraculous improvements. He would be accountable, he said.
Leonie testified recently at a hearing on mayoral control and explained that mayoral control did not increase accountability. In fact, it decreased accountability. No one listened to parents. One of Bloomberg’s chancellors (his second, who lasted only 90 days) mocked parents who expressed their grievances at a public hearing.
The mayor hired a lawyer with no experience in education to be the schools’ chancellor. He did not trust educators and surrounded himself with people from the corporate sector.
The mayor had a majority of appointments on the city’s “Panel on Education Policy,” a toothless replacement for its Board of Education. When the members of the Panel threatened to reverse one of his decisions, he fired the disobedient appointees on the spot and replaced them with others who served his wishes.
The mayor could do whatever he wanted, regardless of the views of teachers, parents, students, communities. Beloved public schools that served the neediest of students were closed and replaced with small schools that did not accept the neediest of students. He opened scores of charter schools that were free to reject or exclude students they did not want, then crowed about their test scores. (Now a private citizen, Bloomberg continues to give hundreds of millions to charter schools; no big deal for him, as his assets exceed $60 billion).
Leonie stands on a solid foundation of knowledge, experience, and persistence. Sometimes I think she wins battles because the electeds don’t want her to pester them anymore.
She is the undisputed champion of reduced class sizes.
More power to her!

Leonie should have a desk in the new chancellor’s office, just to make sure they know right from wrong
LikeLiked by 1 person
Peter, great idea!
LikeLike
I’m afraid this is probably a done deal. Governor Hochul has her marching orders from the cravenly corrupt and children be damned. This despite the majority of speakers against mayoral control at the performative town halls.
LikeLike
They never give a crap about what the parents say at those things. It’s all pro forma.
LikeLike
I am grateful for everything Leonie does and as a public school parent I am very grateful she works tirelessly to make schools better.
However, the issue of Mayoral control isn’t as straightforward to me as good or bad. What replaces Mayoral control? A single elected board? Many different boards? There were a fair number of issues with elected boards, too. People outside of NYC often do not understand how vast the system is — even Los Angles seems small. And Los Angeles demonstrates how hard it is to elect pro-public school candidates when some candidates for these little known school board positions have huge dollars behind them.
Ultimately the person running the school system is whoever the Mayor or school board appoint as Chancellor. Cathy Black left because her ineptitude directly reflected on the Mayor. Getting a board (especially a divided one) to act is more difficult.
LA County, with their elected school board, chose Alberto Carvalho, the pro-reform candidate that de Blasio tried to hire who changed his mind and unceremoniously quit when he realized he wouldn’t have free reign to promote the DFER agenda. How much harm is he doing in LA, and would it be easier to pressure a progressive LA Mayor to replace him with a pro-public school superintendent or the school board elected by the public (with help from billionaires funding campaigns)?
I may agree with Leonie’s position, but I am not sure what replaces Mayoral control in a city with five separate and vastly unequal boroughs.
LikeLike
May I presume to urge the engaged commentators in the fora to make a financial contribution to this excellent organization?
LikeLike
Mark, great idea. Class Size Matters operates on a tiny budget. There is a grad student paid part-time. CSM could use contributions to continue its effective role as a watchdog.
LikeLike