It’s worth subscribing to the Orlando Sentinel just to read Scott Maxwell. His commentary on Florida politics is priceless. This one asks: “Why not ban voting altogether?”
He writes:
A common trait among Florida legislators, especially those in positions of power, is that they think they’re really smart. Usually smarter than they are. And definitely smarter than you.
It’s not completely their fault. Many live inside bubbles filled with staffers and lobbyists who constantly tell them they’re brilliant. (And attractive. And hilarious joke-tellers.) Plus, they’re surrounded by a bunch of other politicians. So it’s a low bar.
I mention all this because Republican legislators are resuming one of their long-running crusades, trying to make it harder for you to set the policies and priorities you want in the state in which you live. And they do so because they think you’re too dumb to be trusted — at least when it comes to changing state laws.
See, if 50.1% of voters put a politician into office, that politician usually believes voters have demonstrated the wisdom of Solomon.
But if 60% of you vote for something they dislike — like medical marijuana or a higher minimum wage — then they’re convinced you don’t understand what you’re doing. You’re an idiot. So the politicians want to protect you from yourself.
Republican lawmakers began this crusade about two decades ago. Florida voters had already used the constitutional amendment process to demand things like smaller class sizes — and it really ticked off lawmakers.
So the politicians teamed up with deep-pocketed donors, like Publix and the Florida Association of Realtors, to fund a campaign to raise the threshold for future amendments from 50% to 60%. And it worked.
But the politicians and special interests had a problem: You people — the annoying voters — kept on voting for things they disliked by margins of 60% or more.
So now GOP lawmakers want to raise the bar to 66.7%.
You already live in a state where the minority rules. Now they want to make it the superminority.
This is why I think it would be simpler if these guys were just honest about what they really want — for you people not to vote at all.
Just let them run the show. They’re smarter. And they will protect you from your own bad ideas … like quality pre-K programs for all.
Voters should play as little of a role as possible in democracy. That’s the basic idea from Rep. Rick Roth, a Republican from Palm Beach, perhaps by way of Pyongyang or Havana.
Roth is the sponsor of the bill to raise the amendment threshold to 66.67%. And he has a lot of support within his party. Almost all of the Republicans in the State House supported Roth’s bill last year. It was the Senate that said no.
House Republicans called their 67% bill an effort to demand “broader support.” Yet would you like to guess who didn’t receive “broader support” at the polls? Most of the legislators who supported this bill.
Local reps Doug Bankson, Tom Leek, Rachel Plakon, Susan Plasencia, Tyler Sirois and David Smith were all among the House Republicans who voted for the supermajority requirement for issues but fell short of that in their own personal campaigns. They, of course, still felt quite comfortable taking office.
Give those guys a 51% victory, and they consider it a mandate. But a 63% vote for Fair Districts? Well, you dumb voters just didn’t understand what you were doing.
Many lawmakers also claim the amendment process should be tougher because the Florida Constitution is some sort of sacred document whose hallowed words should not be altered by mortal men — an argument that is a total crock. The Florida Constitution wasn’t handed down to Moses on a mountaintop thousands of years ago. It was last ratified in 1968 when the Beverly Hillbillies was still on TV.
And lawmakers themselves have tried to ram all sorts of half-baked ideas into the constitution in recent years, including a non-binding rant against Obamacare they wanted to insert in 2012.
That they find worthy of inserting into our state’s supposedly sacred constitution. But not restoring civil rights to former felons.
The reason Roth’s push to make the amendment process tougher is getting extra attention this year is that GOP lawmakers are extra nervous about abortion. All over America, moderate Republicans are uniting with Democrats and independents to pass laws guaranteeing the right to abortion access.
Kansas particularly freaked these guys out. When they saw that nearly 60% of voters in that very conservative state supported abortion rights, they knew they needed to change the rules in Florida so that 60% would no longer be considered a victory.
If you can’t win the game on the field, move the goal posts.
But again, it seems like it’d be simpler for these politicians just to ban voting altogether.
Instead of moving the threshold of victory from 50% plus one — which it’s been since the beginning of time — to 60% and then 67% and then who-knows-what later on, just tell citizens they can’t vote anymore.
After all, the politicians are obviously smarter than the rest of us. Just look at the deft way they’ve handled property insurance and things like unemployment benefits.
Citizens, with their silly notions about democracy, fairness, civil rights and quality education, just tend to get in the way.
smaxwell@orlandosentinel.com

Florida Republicans are crap, of course, but are Florida Democrats better? After all, they just canceled their primary and anointed Biden. And Democrats in general are constantly trying to kick third parties off the ballot and shame anyone for voting anything but Democrat. Seems to me that that not wanting you to vote except for them thing is fully bi-partisan.
LikeLike
What legislation have Florida Democrats passed to limit the right to vote?
LikeLike
Disingenuous question and you know it, Diane. Democrats haven’t been in power. That doesn’t mean that they’d be better than Republicans. As I just said, they canceled their primary and anointed Biden. Doesn’t seem very … democratic, does it? Doesn’t bode well for their commitment to democracy.
LikeLike
They canceled their primary and anointed Biden.
You are correct about this. AND it’s NOT OK.
LikeLike
Who is running against Biden in the Democratic primary?
LikeLike
Newsom. Unannounced. And unassisted by a formal debate hosted by the DNC.
LikeLike
Marianne Williamson, RFK Jr. and Dean Phillips are running in the primary. Now, you’d probably say they’re not serious contenders anyway and I’d be inclined to agree, but then, why not hold a primary and let Biden beat them honestly?
There’s also the fact that the DNC made it clear that any establishment Dems who tried to primary Biden would lose their funding – not very democratic, hm?
And there’s the fact that the DNC successfully sued in court to say that they are a private organization that can select their own candidate regardless of the will of the voters – again, not very democratic, I’d say.
And finally there are indications that Gavin “homeless sweeps” Newsom is being positioned to sub in for Biden at the last minute. My guess is sometime around the convention TPTB conveniently start acknowledging Biden’s obvious failing health, he takes the fall for the Gaza genocide (which will be abundantly clear by then) and Newsom is anointed in his place. Now, I’ll freely acknowledge that this last paragraph is all speculation but exactly no one will be surprised if it actually happens.
LikeLike
RFK Jr. is not running in the Democratic primary. He is running as an independent.
I’m all for holding a party primary in Florida.
Not holding one is not equivalent to striking Black voters off the voting rolls or redistricting so that three Black Congressional districts are eliminated.
LikeLike
How about a bill allowing the Flor-uh-duh House to set the amendment threshold retroactively, after the people have their silly “vote”? And requiring that voter ID cards be validated by the membership coordinator of a megachurch? How about having selected members of the DeSantis Revolutionary Guard check IDs and church attendance records at polling places to ensure that voters are registered Repugnicans? And what are women doing at the polling places, anyway? Shouldn’t they be at home baking Toll House cookies or something?
LikeLike
Fair districts amendment — the Republicans ignored it after the 2010 election. When it was challenged, they said we can’t change the boundaries so close to the election; it would be unfair to our soldiers overseas. So the gerrymandered districts survived until the next election.
Our lapdog legislature tried to create fair districts after the 2020 census, but caved to Governor DeSantis who, I believe, wants to set up an excuse for SCOTUS and/or the Florida Supremes to invalidate that part of the Florida Constitution.
Smaller class size — the lapdogs got around that by measuring class size one day a year. Bring in a few extra teachers that day, and alakazam, you’re made the number.
Restoration of voting for felons who have finished their terms in prison — the lapdogs added that they must pay all court costs, restitution, and fines. If a former felon registers, the governor’s secret police will come after them, even if the governor’s election board told the local supervisor of elections that there was no problem.
Florida Constitution, article IX: “The education of children is a fundamental value of the people of the State of Florida. It is, therefore, a paramount duty of the state to make adequate provision for the education of all children residing within its borders. Adequate provision shall be made by law for a uniform, efficient, safe, secure, and high quality system of free public schools…”
The lapdogs defined corporate charters as public for purposes of funding, but not for purposes of uniform, efficient, safe, secure, or high quality. Ditto vouchers.
The Florida Supreme Court told the lapdogs that their plan to have corporate taxes go to private schools was illegal, so they changed that to a dollar-for-dollar tax credit for such donations. When unions and others objected, the court said they had no standing. Yep, not only can the lapdogs do whatever they want (or whatever the governor or their corporate masters want), but you can’t necessarily sue them when they blatantly disregard the constitution.
Abortion — the court is likely to rule soon that “viability” is too confusing a word for Florida voters to understand, so that amendment won’t even make it to the ballot in 2024.
Even if it does, the lapdogs will try to whittle away the right by, I dunno, maybe requiring fingerprints and a birth certificate from the pregnant woman, requiring her to watch sixteen hours of “education” videos, forbidding the placement of a clinic within seventeen miles of a school, and instituting a tax on reproductive service providers not affiliated with a church.
LikeLike
Without real checks and balances the governor and the legislature will continue to churn out anti-democratic policies at will. They will tailor policies to support their authoritarian agenda.
LikeLike
It is a fact that there is no intelligence test required for Congress. Yelling, tantrums, wanting to fight people, and no respect for decorum. Plus, just “making up stuff” as they go along. Well, you know, cuz WEe BEE sew dumm. Oaths don’t apply, providing for domestic tranquility and the common good for ALL people, well, one would have to read, comprehend, and completely understand the application of The Constitution.
LikeLike
Woman, man, person, camera, tv
One of the hilarious things about Trump’s recollection of this dementia test that he moronically took for an IQ test is that he clearly didn’t remember the words because no test would have one differentiate between a person, on the one hand, and a woman or man on the other. Each item in the list would be distinct, and the test in question presents these as pictures. So, a picture of a woman or of a man would be a picture of a person. Trump is such an idiot that he screwed even that up. However, I never heard anyone in the media point this out.
LikeLike
I have long thought that this is one thing our founders REALLY screwed up on. They did not foresee a time when people of the level of ignorance and stupidity and of Boebert and Greene and Trump and Tuberville would hold high office. If they had, they would have insisted on something like the examinations that the Chinese gave for millennia as prequalification for Civil Service. We should be able to insist that people serving in Congress be able to do basic math, know basic science and history and civics, and have some reasonable degree of cultural literacy.
LikeLike
I agree, Bob. A simple solution: those who run for office should be required to pass the state high school exams.
LikeLike
I think it would be great fun to design a basic knowledge test for prospective high-level U.S. politicians. And lay down the challenge: are you willing to take this and share your score? I would propose that it have the following parts:
US History
Civics and Political Science
Business and Economics
International Law
Basic Mathematics
Basic Science
Defense
LikeLike
It’s hilarious listening to Trump answer a question about something like the nuclear triad or tariffs. He responds exactly as he does to questions about what passages from the Bible he particularly loves. Complete evasion because he is utterly ignorant about almost everything.
LikeLike
We could also use some protection from the evil and educated like DeSantis and Cruz among others.
LikeLike
DeSantis and Cruz seem to me proof that one can go through our system, including through supposedly top-tier universities, and NOT get an education. It’s shocking, really, what dullards these guys are. I haven’t a clue how this could be so, but it is.
LikeLike
Diane wrote: “A simple solution: those who run for office should be required to pass the state high school exams.”
That may appear to be a simple solution (it’s not-see retired teacher’s comment below about Cruz/Desantis) but illustrates the fact that even on the left side of the political spectrum, there are those willing to use falsehoods and harmful practices such as standardized testing if they think it suits their agenda.
Doing so would only serve to further entrench the standards and testing malpractice regime. But hey, if our side wins because of that it’s good, eh?
LikeLike
I don’t think we should impose stuff on children that we can’t do ourselves. My hunch is that the 8th grade math test would weed out most of the legislators.
LikeLike
Duane doesn’t think that one can validly test for any intellectual accomplishment. It’s an utterly indefensible stance. Yes, the current state-mandated tests are invalid. But that doesn’t mean that one can never validly test for any intellectual accomplsihment. ROFL. Utter lunacy from that crank Wilson that leads to people dismissing ALL critiques of these tests as fringe lunacy like that.
What a tragedy.
LikeLike
I think that is exactly what Dangerously DeRanged DeSantis wants, no more elections in Florida. Tiny Thickset Traitor Trump wants the same for the United States, since he’s already cheating like a mafia Don to make sure he wins in 2024, with no more US Constitution and elections after that — unless he’s the only candidate on the ballot.
LikeLike
Thom Hartman recently wrote a summary of the history of Republican attacks on the right to vote. He traces the history into the post-Reagan ascendancy that has continued until today. An interesting point is about Indiana and the beginning of this technique.
LikeLike
It’s not just Floriduh or Texas. This is becoming a widespread policy of the GOP. They know their policies aren’t popular and a trying to do an end run around democratic rule. Ohio, Tennessee, Mississippi, Louisiana, and of course, where it all began under Scott Walker, Wisconsin.
More clashes are expected. Louisiana Gov.-elect Jeff Landry takes office in January and has promised to confront the state’s largest city, New Orleans. He already has created a committee led by a local GOP political donor and businessman to address public safety and other issues there. He has threatened to withhold state funding for the city’s water infrastructure until the DA agrees to prosecute women who violate the state’s abortion ban by seeking the procedure.
No paywall:
https://wapo.st/3Guim6T
LikeLike
Speaking of Wisconsin, the fake electors of that state have settled a lawsuit and agree that Biden won the presidential election of 2020:
MADISON, Wis. — In a legal settlement Wednesday, the 10 Republicans who signed official-looking paperwork falsely purporting Donald Trump won Wisconsin in 2020 have agreed to withdraw their inaccurate filings, acknowledge Joe Biden won the presidency and not serve as presidential electors in 2024 or in any election where Trump is on the ballot.
The first, but likely not the last:
Special counsel Jack Smith has been investigating the attempt to overturn the 2020 results for the Department of Justice, while some state and local prosecutors are conducting their probes of the GOP electors. Prosecutors in Michigan and Georgia have filed felony charges against some Republican electors, and state probes are underway in Arizona, Nevada and New Mexico.
As to consciousness of guilt, it seems they anticipated a shootout:
The records also show the Republicans tried to keep their meeting out of the public eye, changing which room in the state capitol they met in to avoid passing the office of a Democratic lawmaker whose staff might recognize them. They brought a four-man armed security team with them, according to the text messages.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/12/06/wisconsin-trump-fake-electors-lawsuit/
LikeLike
If you want to read a list of nonsense, read about ALL the accomplishments that Trump did while in office. This was sent to me by a Trump lover. What is unbearable, is that there are MAGATS who actually believe this CRAP.
https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2021-01-19-the-complete-list-of-president-trumps-accomplishments/
LikeLike