Peter Greene writes here about the demand by Christian nationalists to rewrite history to their satisfaction. Whatever promotes the religion of their choice is good, whatever contradicts it must be left out. They want fairy-tale history.
Greene writes:
Recently Oklahoma’s education Dudebro-in-Chief Ryan Walters went on another tear, this time warning textbook publishers that they’d better not try to sell any wokified textbooks in Oklahoma.
“If you can’t teach math without talking about transgenderism, go to California, go to New York,” he told Fox News Digital. He even sent out a letter, just so they’d know. “Listen, we will be checking for these things now. Do not give us textbooks that have critical race theory in them.”
Walters said lots of things. Maybe he’s auditioning for a media spot. Maybe he wants to be governor. Maybe he’s just a tool. But he says all sorts of things like “In Oklahoma, our kids are going to know the basics. We want them to master it. We want them to do exceptionally well academically. We’re not here for any kind of Joe Biden’s socialist Marxist training ground.”
But somewhere in this conversation, Walters lays out a succinct summary of our nation’s history as he believes it should be taught.
“So as you go through, you talk about the times that America has led the free world, that we have continued to be that light. We’ve done more for individual liberty than any other country in the history of the world. And those belief systems that were there in place, it allowed us to do it. You’ve got to talk about our Judeo-Christian values. The founders were very clear that that was a crucial part of our success. Then you go through and you evaluate. Are these times we lived up to our core principles? You’ve got to be honest with kids about our history. So you talk about all of it, but you evaluate it through the prism of our founding principles. Is this a time we lived up to those principles?”
Most of the elements of the christianist nationalist version of US history are here. American exceptionalism– the light that led the free world, the very most ever done for individual liberty. A nation founded on Judeo-Christian values.
With that as a foundation, it’s safe to note some of the lapses, all of which are framed as an aberration, a lapse from our foundation and certainly not part of it (take that, you 1619 project-reading CRTers). In the CN view, every good thing that ever happened is because of our God-aligned nature, and every bad thing is in spite of it, quite possibly because Wrong People were allowed to get their hands on some power.
There are plenty of implications for this view of history. One of the biggest is that these folks simply don’t believe in democracy, because democracy allows too many of the Wrong People to get their hands on power. As Katherine Stewart puts it in her must-read The Power Worshippers—
It [Christian nationalism] asserts that legitimate government rests not on the consent of the governed but adherence to the doctrines of a specific religious, ethnic, and cultural heritage.
Or, as she quotes Gary North, a radical free-market libertarian christianist who developed the Ron Paul Curriculum,
Let us be blunt about it: we must use the doctrine of religious liberty to gain independence for Christian schools until we train up a generation of people who know that there is no religious neutrality, no neutral law, no neutral education, and no neutral civil government. Then we will get busy in constructing a Bible-based social, political, and religious order which finally denies the religious liberty of the enemies of God.
The idea of individualism is also important in the CN view of US history. There’s no systemic anything–just the work of either good or bad, Right or Wrong individuals. And if everything is about the individual, then your problems are strictly your problems; your failures are all on you, not on society or community (the village has no responsibility to raise your child). That emphasis on the individual runs all through the Hillsdale 1776 curriculum, both original flavor andthe Jordan Adams stealth version.
The rejection of systemic views of society and history matters. It goes along with the view that we pretty much fixed racism in the 1960s (even we got a little too socialist in the process). From which we can conclude that all attempts to talk racism now are just attempts to grab power with made-up grievances.
To take another angle– the underlying idea of the Classical Education that is so popular with the CN crowd is that there is One Objective Truth. Back in classical times, great thinkers understood this Truth, but the 20th century brought a bunch of relativistic thought and the evil notion that there are different, subjective truths. But our Founding Fathers knew the Truth and encoded it into the Constitution and our founding principles, and as long as we are led by people who follow that Truth, which is somehow both a Christian Truth and an American Truth, we are okay. People who don’t follow that Truth are a threat to the integrity and fiber of our country; consequently, they have to be stopped.
People who claim that history is complicated, that our founders were complicated, that humans are complicated–those people are just trying to confuse the issue, to draw others away from understanding The Truth.
Please open the link to finish the article.
Let me add that I don’t want to go back to 1776. The guys who wrote the founding documents were brilliant, but not on subjects like slavery and women’s rights.
In Oklahoma, our kids are going to know the basics. We want them to master it. For instance, we want them to make sure that pronouns like it agree with antecedents like basics.
Come on down to our “Race to the Top of Mount Zion Enrollment Jubilee” in the old K-Mart parking lot this Saturday and sign yore kids up for Bob Shepherd’s Real Good Cowboy Okie School. You can use yore Oklahoma State Scholarships to pay for it, and so its absolutely FREE!!!! No longer due you havta send yore children to them gobbermint schools run by Socialists whar they will be taut to be transgendered! We offer compleet curriculems, wrote by Bob’s girlfriend Darlene herself, including
World HIS-story (from Creation to the United States of Dimocrat Babylon to the Rapshure)
Political Science (We thank you, Lord, for Donald Trump; the Second Amendmint; and protecting our Borders from invading hoardes of rapists and murderers)
English (the offishul langwidge of the United States, and the langwidge the Bible was wrote in)
Science (the six days of creation; how to make yore own buckshot; and how Cain and Abel used to ride dinosaurs while shootin they own buckshot)
Economics (when rich people get tax brakes, that makes you richer)
And much, much more!!! Plus, you don’t havta worry yore hed about safety, cause all are teachers is locked and loaded!
Bob’s Real Good Cowboy Okie Skool, located across from Bob’s Gun and Pawn right next to Wild Wuornos’s Adult Novelties.
It’s been real good runnin’ this here skool. Free innerprize! So much better then tryin to live on Darlene’s disability! Make America Grate Agin!
BTW, Thomas Jefferson wrote in his diary, of George Washington:
I know that Gouverneur Morris, who pretended to be in his [Washington’s] secrets & believed himself to be so, has often told me that Genl. Washington believed no more of that system than he himself did.
I’m starting to wonder if the great Hamilton versus Jefferson debate has ended. Separating church and state, unfortunately along with the freedom to either enslave or tax without representation, used to be a Jeffersonian thing, for better and for worse. But now, supporters of freedumb are opponents of, who twist out of shape Jefferson’s Bill of Rights. The CRT crocodile outcry is all backwards and upside down.
All backward and upside down. Exactly. Exactly right.
Bassackward
The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received: were I a Roman Catholic, perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not, if I were to vow at all, it should be to build a light-house. –Benjamin Franklin, after surviving a shipwreck
Thanks, Bob. You can always be counted on to present us with tomes of wisdom. Many of the founding fathers were rationalists, even if some of them like Franklin, a Quaker, were loosely Christian.
I watched “Rustin” yesterday from the Obamas’ production company. It was worth watching with good performances, and it was informative about a little known social justice warrior that play a big part behind the scenes in the civil rights movement. Rustin was a Black, gay Quaker from Westchester, PA. He was a tireless, human rights worker who organized the march on Washington, but he never really got accepted because of who he was. Right wing Christians are not on the high road of morality if they can align themselves with Trump and authoritarianism.
even if some of them like Franklin, a Quaker, were loosely Christian
Very well said, RT. Yes, that’s the most accurate formulation. After I’m gone, if someone asked the question, “Was Bob Shepherd a Christian?” the answer would be, “It depends.” I was raised in a Protestant fundamentalist church until the age of about 10. At the age of 9, I had a crisis of faith due to an argument with my aunt about dinosaurs (“The Devil put those bones in the ground to fool people like you,” she confidently told me). This led to lots of fear-filled soul-searching on my part, and eventually I decided that no God who would punish me for asking sincere questions was worthy of my allegiance. Since then, I have devoted a LOT of time and energy over the years to studying the Hebrew and Christian scriptures (canonical and noncanonical) and those of a great many other religions. I have spent enormous amounts of time learning about various theologies and religious philosophies. I usually know the Bible better than believers do. But I am also conversant with a LOT of non-Hebrew and non-Christian religious texts and history. I also know a LOT about cults, having run afoul of these early on. I am sometimes accused on this platform of being an atheist. I am not. I don’t think atheism a defensible position and will happily explain why, at length, if given an opportunity to do so.
So, same with our founders. They had a wide variety of religious and nonreligious inclinations that changed throughout their lifetimes. And many of them (Washington is a good example) were extremely wary about saying what they actually thought about religion given the times in which they lived and the opprobrium and sometimes even criminal penalties that were heaped upon nonbelievers.
Thanks for the suggestion, RT!
I knew Bayard Rustin. He was a brilliant and highly ethical Quaker. He spent time in federal prison during World War 2 because he was a Quaker. After the war, he said that if he knew what Hitler was doing, he would not have been a pacifist. A finer man I’ve never known.
That’s what made me think about Rustin’s life. He was forced into the shadows because of his sexuality. He was more moral and ethical than lots of religious hypocrites in the right wing.
“The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason.” –Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard’s Almanack
I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the Roman Church, by the Greek Church, by the Turkish Church, by the Protestant Church, nor by any Church that I know of. My own mind is my own Church. –Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
Priests and conjurors are of the same trade. –Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
Whenever we read the obscene stories, the voluptuous debaucheries, the cruel and tortuous executions, the unrelenting vindictiveness with which more than half the Bible is filled, it would be more consistent that we call it the word of a demon than the word of God. It is a history of wickedness that has served to corrupt and brutalize mankind; and, for my part, I sincerely detest it, as I detest everything that is cruel. –Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
The view of classical antiquity held by these folks on the Christian Reichwing in America is a comicbook, funhouse mirror distortion. A good antidote for that that is the following book, which shows just how unreasonable the Greeks often were, in contradiction to the myth:
A great read. Highly recommended.
None can doubt, given the evidence, that the USCCB and Catholic Conferences want taxpayer cash for Catholic schools. Coming to the game late, evangelicals, who have weaponized their churches for political gain, also want tax money for their Christian schools.
AP News, 4 days ago, “Soon after US bishops inside a Baltimore hotel approved materials on how Catholics should vote in 2024 elections….”
The voter guide is called, “forming consciences for faithful citizenship. ” It doesn’t tell Catholics who to vote for. It directs in other ways.
To the extent that Christian nationalists and the Catholic Church align with the Koch political and social vision and/or the fascist cause, Americans can deduce amount of impact by reviewing wins.
I don’t know if Maurice Cunningham thinks the Catholic Church is apolitical or partisan. At some point I might have cared since he is part of a new group focused on media reporting. Today, Nancy McLean sent out an e-mail introducing the group. With an overwhelming majority of Leonard Leo’s picks on SCOTUS and the public believing the exclusionary narrative about protestant Christian nationalists, it’s past the point that it matters much. Commenter Greg’s diminished hope resonates with me.
The number of people gaslighting for protected religious sects has no upward limit.
I haven’t a clue what you are saying.
The phenomenon of the closet atheist or agnostic is quite common and has been throughout history. Few were the souls brave enough, during most of the time when the Christian church as ascendent in Europe, to profess disbelief publicly or even, in many cases, privately, for the church had a bad habit of torturing and murdering nonbelievers. Kant and Descartes, for example, both were led to extremely skeptical positions by their philosophies, but both then felt compelled to tack on a little religion at the end to protect themselves. Or consider Jabba the Trump, fav of the evangelical set. He is the EMBODIMENT of each of the seven deadly sins.
pride, check (he’s a malignant pathological narcissist)
greed, check (fake universities, casinos, stealing from children’s charities, faking the value of his properties and of his net worth, and on and on)
wrath, check (just listen to one of his rally speeches these days–one vindictive promise after another)
envy, check (he so wishes he could be a big boy dictator like Putin and Duterte and Kim and the others he admires from afar)
lust, check (can I hear a chorus of Stormy Weather up in here?)
gluttony (ALL THOSE CHEESEBURGERS!)
and sloth (all that executive time, all those golf trips, one failed business after another)
And his staff report that he made fun of evangelicals like Pence the Dense and those who did the laying on of hands with him in the Oval Office behind their backs “They actually believe that shit,” he is quoted as saying.)
The most disturbing part of all of this is that none of what these dominionists espouse is Biblical or Christian. When Mike Johnson said his governing model was the biblical Christian republic, such a thing does not exist in scripture. It is also ironic, and scary, that conservatives project what they call Judeo-Christian values while promoting anti-semitism. The only real commentary in the Bible on governance is how misguided, corrupt, and evil autocratic empires are. What we are seeing is the typical theocratic promotion and exploitation of ignorance for the means of power. This perspective exists in the history of all religions. The good news is that the greatest weapon against this from within faith is the concept of justice and mercy that continually struggles against human greed and avarice. However, this can only be pursued through an insistence on transparency and light.
“. . . and scary, that conservatives project what they call Judeo-Christian values while promoting anti-semitism.”
What’s scary is that you might believe that statement. First I know of no conservatives who promote anti-semitism. That’s a rather extreme statement on your part. Please show us examples that illustrate your statement.
Now are there people who to promote anti-semitism? Of course, but more like some, not many. An interesting take on anti-semitism: https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/11/17/when-anti-anti-zionism-becomes-anti-semitism/
You seriously don’t know of any antisemitic conservatives? Do you not remember Donald Trump talking about the “good people on both sides” in Charlottesville? That is, the Nazis (with their torchlight parade and their chant “Jews will not replace us”) and those opposed to the Nazis? And see this:
https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-stats-of-us-anti-semitism-a-new-survey-has-some-clear-and-dismal-data/
One could go on all day and night listing examples of antisemitic garbage from various Reichwingers. All the attacks on Jews by mass shooters in recent decades have been by rightwing nutcases–people who identify as conservative, white Christians.
Seriously, I don’t know of any conservatives like that. Now there are a bunch of regressive xtian reactionaries but I don’t consider them conservative.
Once again it comes down to whose language are we using. They may call themselves conservatives but they aren’t. Call them what they are. . . reactionaries.
You are correct in saying that those who call themselves Conservatives in the U.S. today don’t want to conserve anything. They are not CONSERVEatives. They are DESTRUCTatives.
Duane,
Are you making a similar point about conservatives that has been made about
liberals? For example, not all liberals make/support policy against the poor. High profile neoliberals who promoted unfettered capitalism, people like John Podesta and Bill Clinton, were labeled liberal and received votes from people in a party considered to be liberal.
If your point is as I think it is, the bigger issue is which party’s politicians are more likely to advance the agenda you favor. Some conservatives talk about preserving personal liberty. Democratic politicians at this time in history appear to be supporting personal rights.
I’ve said nothing about the liberal designation.
But no doubt that those whom you mention are to the right of center and certainly not very “liberal.”
Our traditional liberal/conservative dichotomy has become meaningless as the American political spectrum is now so far right that those Dims, aside from the true progressives who are shunted away from any power whatsoever, who call themselves liberals are on the right side of center.
There are few true liberals these days. We need to call the various factions what they are, not the self-imposed and demanded monikers they on both sides use.
Or this: https://www.counterpunch.org/2023/11/20/were-the-biblical-prophets-anti-semitic/
Tucker Carlson spewed white replacement theory almost every night he was on Fox. Antisemitism is a significant trope of Christian Nationalists (Jewish space lasers anyone?) Elon Musks nonsense. You’re trolling is tiresome…
Trolling. . . really? You missed the point of my postings. See my response to Robert above about using their bastardized language. Then, please explain how my posting two interesting articles, one by a Jewish thinker and the other who, for decades, has been fighting for economic justice for all is “trolling.”
From the first: “Since when is fervent Zionism a litmus test for being Jewish? What pope made that rule? Who the ___are you to tell me I am or am not a Jew?” S Eisenman
or
“Netanyahu’s actions and claims for religious sanctification for them are the antithesis of the original Judaism. His Likud government rejects the ethic of the Jewish Bible as much as America’s Christian evangelists reject the message of Jesus.” M. Hudson
Read them and learn a little.