Heather Cox Richardson points to Donald Trump’s plain-spoken fascism. Believe him.
She writes:
In a speech Saturday in Claremont, New Hampshire, and then in his Veterans Day greeting yesterday on social media, former president Trump echoed German Nazis.
“In honor of our great Veterans on Veteran’s Day [sic] we pledge to you that we will root out the Communists, Marxists, Racists, and Radical Left Thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our Country, lie, steal, and cheat on Elections, and will do anything possible, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America, and the American Dream…. Despite the hatred and anger of the Radical Left Lunatics who want to destroy our country, we will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.”
The use of language referring to enemies as bugs or rodents has a long history in genocide because it dehumanizes opponents, making it easier to kill them. In the U.S. this concept is most commonly associated with Hitler and the Nazis, who often spoke of Jews as “vermin” and vowed to exterminate them.
The parallel between MAGA Republicans’ plans and the Nazis had other echoes this weekend, as Trump’s speech came the same day that Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman, and Jonathan Swan of the New York Times reported that Trump and his people are planning to revive his travel ban, more popularly known as the “Muslim ban,” which refused entry to the U.S. by people from some majority-Muslim nations, and to reimpose the pandemic-era restrictions he used during the coronavirus pandemic to refuse asylum claims—it is not only legal to apply for asylum in the United States, but it is a guaranteed right under the Refugee Act of 1980—by claiming that immigrants bring infectious diseases like tuberculosis.
They plan mass deportations of unauthorized people in the U.S., rounding them up with specially deputized law enforcement officers and National Guard soldiers contributed by Republican-dominated states. Because U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) doesn’t have the space for such numbers of people, Trump’s people plan to put them in “sprawling camps” while they wait to be expelled. Trump refers to this as “the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.”
Trump’s people would screen visa applicants to eliminate those with ideas they consider undesirable, and would kick out those here temporarily for humanitarian reasons, including Afghans who came here after the 2021 Taliban takeover. Trump ally Steve Bannon and his likely attorney general, Mike Davis, expect to deport 10 million people.
Trump’s advisors also intend to challenge birthright citizenship, the principle that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen. This principle was established by the Fourteenth Amendment and acknowledged in the 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark Supreme Court decision during a period when native-born Americans were persecuting immigrants from Asia. That hatred resulted in Wong Kim Ark, an American-born child of Chinese immigrants, being denied reentry to the U.S. after a visit to China. Wong sued, arguing that the Fourteenth Amendment established birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court agreed. The children of immigrants to the U.S.—no matter how unpopular immigration was at the time—were U.S. citizens, entitled to all the rights and immunities of citizenship, and no act of Congress could overrule a constitutional amendment.
“Any activists who doubt President Trump’s resolve in the slightest are making a drastic error: Trump will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown,” Trump immigration hardliner Stephen Miller told the New York Times reporters. “The immigration legal activists won’t know what’s happening.”
In addition to being illegal and unconstitutional, such plans to strip the nation of millions of workers would shatter the economy, sparking sky-high prices, especially of food.
For a long time, Trump’s increasingly fascist language hasn’t drawn much attention from the press, perhaps because the frequency of his outrageous statements has normalized them. When Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016 referred to many Trump supporters as “deplorables,” a New York Times headline read: “Hillary Clinton Calls Many Trump Backers ‘Deplorables,’ and G.O.P.* Pounces.” Yet Trump’s threat to root out “vermin” at first drew a New York Timesheadline saying, “Trump Takes Veterans Day Speech in a Very Different Direction.” (This prompted Mark Jacobs of Stop the Presses to write his own headlines about disasters, including my favorite: “John Wilkes Booth Takes Visit to the Theater in a Very Different Direction.”)
Finally, it seems, Trump’s explicit use of Nazi language, especially when coupled with his threats to establish camps, has woken up at least some headline writers. Forbes accurately headlined yesterday’s story: “Trump Compares Political Foes to ‘Vermin’ On Veterans Day—Echoing Nazi Propaganda.”
Republicans have refused to disavow Trump’s language. When Kristen Welker of Meet the Press asked Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel: “Are you comfortable with this language coming from the [Republican] frontrunner,” McDaniel answered: “I am not going to comment on candidates and their campaign messaging.” Others have remained silent…
The Right’s draconian immigration policies ignore the reality that presidents since Ronald Reagan have repeatedly asked Congress to rewrite the nation’s immigration laws, only to have Republicans tank such measures to keep the hot button issue alive, knowing it turns out their voters. Both President Joe Biden and Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas have begged Congress to fund more immigration courts and border security and to provide a path to citizenship for those brought to the U.S. as children. They, along with Vice President Kamala Harris, have tried to slow the influx of undocumented migrants by working to stabilize the countries from which such migrants primarily come.

Stephen “Goebbels” Miller gets very excited when Glorious Leader talks this way.
LikeLike
Miller probably wrote the speech.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Miller, or some other fascist loyal to the traitor, had to write that speech. Trump’s communication skills are lower than a five year old. Every book that has his name on it was written by a ghost writer.
After saying that, if the traitor ends up winning the 2024 election through the Electoral College, since there’s no way he can “honestly” win any popular vote, I think the country will fracture and probably be plunged into Civil War Part 2 between Blue and Red states with battleground states turning into real bloody battlegrounds.
LikeLike
The Frontline documentary Zero Tolerance details how Jeff Sessions, Steve Bannon, and Stephen Miller looked around for an extremist who would carry their racist, anti-immigrant agenda forward and settled on Donald Trump. They approached him about running of the presidency and fed him the whole line about building the wall. HE IS THEIR RACIST CREATURE.
And, ofc, Sessions, Miller, and Trump should all be in prison for kidnapping the children of asylum seekers at our border. Kidnapping at a mass scale. That’s a crime against humanity.
LikeLike
Yes. Probably.
LikeLike
Yep. “John Wilkes Booth Takes Visit to the Theater in a Very Different Direction”.
Hitler had plenty of news coverage as he rose to power in the 1930s – in both German media and the US media (including the NYT). It minimized the fascism he promised and amplified the idea that Hitler was just a normal politician.
This story about the NYT coverage of Hitler is chilling, because we are seeing history repeat itself. Practiced by some of today’s NYT journalists who have special access to Trump and the Republicans and seem to specialize in normalizing them.
https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/history/articles/new-york-times-nazi-correspondent
LikeLike
Ah yes, our great enemy is: the New York Times!
The right wing does the same thing, except their 90-year-old example of why the Times can’t be trusted is Walter Duranty.
LikeLike
Our greatest enemy is complacency. And normalizing fascism.
Why can Republicans win with absurdly terrible candidates, but have our folks say it’s the Dems fault for fielding terrible candidates? Being aware of how we are all propagandized to do things like post links to right wing twitter feeds that demonize the far right’s “enemies” is the first step to addressing how to end this normalization. If you have stopped doing that, bully for you. Maybe my calling it out made a difference. I don’t care if you bully me, belittle me, demonize me, or attack me if my posts actually make you stop helping to amplify the far right’s fascist agenda.
LikeLike
Right, our greatest enemy is normalizing fascism.
The NY Times normalizes fascism.
Ergo, the NY Times is our greatest enemy!
My evidence is that I don’t like a headline that was up on the web site for about five hours and was then changed!
The NY Times normalizes fascism!
LikeLike
The New York Times Op-Ed page is the enemy, not the news section. The Op-Ed page is not reporting the news. Its publishing opinions. Some are written by individuals and some without a name that represents the NYT’s editorial view, meaning the CEO or managing editors.
“Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on wording and story selection that moderately favors the left. They are considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks were on Op-Eds and not straight news reporting.”
I want to suggest that no one should read the opinion pages to catch up on the news. That why major newspapers have sections.
One for the news
One for sports
One for features
One for opinions, et al.
LikeLike
I generally trust the New York Times, although their education reporting is often tilted towards the Gates’ view of the world.
LikeLike
“John Wilkes Booth Takes Visit to the Theater in a Very Different Direction”
LMAO!!!
LikeLike
Meanwhile the Dems are going to struggle to hold onto the Senate as Manchin leaves.
LikeLike
This is like Joe Lieberman leaving the Democratic Party.
I understood why Biden (and Democrat leaders) have treated Joe Manchin with kid gloves, bending over backward for he and his wife even as Manchin attacked them and obstructed good legislation.
I expect Manchin decides to run as a third party candidate because Biden is far too left wing. Or maybe because as our resident Trump/Putin defender says, Biden is far too right wing and a baby-killing warmonger? Can’t keep track of why Biden is evil. Oh right, he’s just “old”.
How much do you want to bet that from now on, Manchin harshly attacks Biden and the Democrats and barely says a negative word about Trump and the Republicans?
Since the chances that Manchin loses that seat were high anyway, not sure this will affect Dems at all. It may be better to put efforts into electing more viable Senatorial candidates in other states who won’t obstruct.
LikeLike
True, he probably would have lost the seat.
Control of Senate actually does matter though.
LikeLike
“The parallel between MAGA Republicans’ plans and the Nazis had other echoes this weekend, as Trump’s speech came the same day that Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman, and Jonathan Swan of the New York Times reported that Trump and his people are planning to revive his travel ban, more popularly known as the “Muslim ban,” which refused entry to the U.S. by people from some majority-Muslim nations, and to reimpose the pandemic-era restrictions he used during the coronavirus pandemic to refuse asylum claims—it is not only legal to apply for asylum in the United States, but it is a guaranteed right under the Refugee Act of 1980—by claiming that immigrants bring infectious diseases like tuberculosis.”
Look at Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman, and Jonathan Swan of the NY Times normalizing fascism by accurately reporting on his xenophobic policy proposals!
LikeLike
If the headline for their reporting wasn’t “Trump Is a Fascist: Here’s Why” then the NY Times normalized fascism.
LikeLike
Wait, your point is that because the NYT does have some good reporting (which I absolutely agree it does) that means that we aren’t allowed to criticize them when they don’t?
The NYT also ran some good reporting about Hitler in the 1930s.
Even Fox News writes some perfectly good stories on occasion. Since when does that mean they aren’t allowed to be criticized when they don’t?
LikeLike
^^And time will tell whether this is the usual one day story, or it is treated the way they treated Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal and HRC’s “emails” — constant coverage every day for weeks/months with every single story infused with it.
Or will it be like Obama/Rev. Wright — a story that runs and then disappears because there aren’t dozens of follow-ups about “questions raised” and “doubts” and “concerns”?
LikeLike
I think you’re over-criticizing and making way, way too much out of a headline that was up for a few hours. Obviously you’re free to criticize—you’re already doing that.
The NYT is not a threat, and it does not normalize fascism, and if it does normalize fascism, the headline of this article is not compelling evidence of that.
LikeLike
flerp!,
The headline was up for only a few hours because of criticism. Without it, that would be the entire tilt of their coverage. And the replacement headline was not much better as many people pointed out.
Proof? Lately, I haven’t seen you posting links to right wing twitter feeds that demonize people that the far right wants us to no longer trust, since the links show them or their ideas as dangerous.
Maybe you will start posting those links again, but I suspect that knowing that whenever you do you will be called out for it might give you pause next time you read some right wing twitter feed that demonizes a hapless teacher.
Only time will tell.
And Charlie Savage was the only reporter at the NYT who wasn’t reporting ONLY the highly misleading right wing narrative when John Durham tried to prosecute a hapless Democrat lawyer for a non-crime, the sole purpose being to “prove” that innocent Trump was victimized by an evil, left wing FBI. If I only read the NYT, I would have been certain it was a slam dunk guilty verdict. Just like folks believed it was slam dunk that HRC was guilty of doing bad things. But since I also read Marcy Wheeler, I know that Durham’s criminal prosecution of an innocent man who Trump saw as his enemy was a prelude to what Trump has promised to do to his enemies, and the NYT legitimized that prosecution instead of being outraged.
Thankfully, (if the judges are decent) we still have juries who listen to evidence instead of spin and Durham’s spin was rejected in short order.
Charlie Savage didn’t seem to cover the trial until after the not guilty verdict, and his sum up of what happened was attacked by the far right, of course, to make sure the NYT doesn’t let that happen. And even his analysis was a one day story and disappeared, and the NYT returned back to presenting Durham as the most upright and honorable prosecutor with his only critics being politically motivated partisan Dems.
LikeLike
“The headline was up for only a few hours because of criticism. Without it, that would be the entire tilt of their coverage. And the replacement headline was not much better as many people pointed out.”
What’s your proof that they wouldn’t have changed the headline if not for criticism? What’s your proof that criticism that motivated changing the headline didn’t come from inside the NYT? How are you such an authority on the timeline of the alteration of a headline when just a couple hours ago you were dismissively claiming that the Times didn’t even cover Trump’s speech at all, until I informed you that it actually covered it not just once, but twice? You don’t know any of the stuff that you pretend to know.
LikeLike
“I’m Nobody! Who are you?
Are you – Nobody – too?
Then there’s a pair of us!
Don’t tell! they’d advertise – you know!”
h/t Emily Dickinson
“In Veterans Day Speech, Trump Promises to ‘Root Out’ the Left
The former president said that threats from abroad were less concerning than liberal “threats from within” and that he was a “very proud election denier.”
“Ian Bassin, the founder of nonpartisan group Protect Democracy compared The Times headline to Forbes’, which reads “Trump Compares Political Foes to ‘Vermin” on Veterans Day — Echoing Nazi Propaganda.”
“One of these might save us from a nightmare; the other might help deliver it. Cmon NYT. Do better,” Bassin, a former associate White House counsel, wrote on X/Twitter.
“The Washington Post’s headline — late in arriving, but on the mark when it did — makes the original header at the New York Times sound almost surreal: ‘Trump takes Veterans day speech in a very different direction,'” New York University journalism professor Jay Rosen said, highlighting the Post’s “Trump calls political enemies ‘vermin’ echoing dictators Hitler, Mussolini” headline. “That’s quiescent.”
“I study the breakdown of democracy, and I don’t know how to say this more clearly,” Brian Klaas, a political scientist at University College London, warned on MSNBC. “We are sleepwalking towards authoritarianism.”
“NYT Keeps Downplaying Trump’s Past Retribution Tour:
Charlie Savage, Maggie Haberman, and Jonathan Swan keep teaming up to write the same story over and over: A second Trump term is going to be bad … really bad….
The series, thus far, skirts the language of authoritarianism and fascism.
At the core of the stories is that Trump is going to use a second term for retribution
…Yes, it’s important to warn about what Trump plans to do with a second term. But calling Trump’s past retribution “haphazard” is a journalistic cop-out, a way to avoid admitting that we don’t yet fully understand how systematic Trump’s past retribution was or — worse — don’t want to come to grips with our own central role in it…..For a warning to be effective, we have to show the human costs of all the past retribution —”
(none of the above are my words – they are all quotes from others)
LikeLike
Yes I have no doubt there is no shortage of people whining about headlines. That doesn’t answer any of my questions though.
Thanks for an engaging discussion. I’m logging off for the night soon.
LikeLike
Headline of this blog post:
“Heather Cox Richardson: Trump Embraces Fascist Language and Policies”
Here is perhaps the crux of our disagreement, flerp!:
“Trump Embraces Fascist Language and Policies” is not an opinion. It is a fact. There aren’t two sides to this. It’s not a “partisan Democrat opinion” that Trump uses Fascist Language. It’s not a “partisan Democrat opinion” that Trump embraces Fascist policies.
The NYT presents it at such, as if the jury is still out as to whether this is a fact. It was fact in 2016, and if anyone doubted that, then 2017-2020, and especially January 2021, should have left no question that it is fact
If one believes that the headline of this blog post is an actual fact, the NYT coverage should be reporting this as a 5 alarm fire or a Category 5+ Hurricane about to hit the entire east coast. Catastrophic damage WILL occur if the Hurricane hits.
If Hitler was magically brought back to life to run for president, and the NYT covered him the way he was covered in the 1930s, where the question of his fascist tendencies was left up in the air, and simply a partisan opinion, that would not be journalism.
The NYT’s normalizing coverage of Trump was bad enough in 2016. But after 4 years of spurning the Constitution, and especially after January 2021, covering Trump as anything less than a question of why the Republicans are nominating a fascist to destroy democracy, is inexcusable.
This headline is a fact. Not an opinion. And when a catastrophic category 5 Hurricane is about to hit, the NYT doesn’t simply say “Hurricane to hit, now let’s talk about the price of bananas.” And they don’t say “some folks say that category 5 hurricanes are not a problem and their destructive power is exaggerated, and other people say that they can cause serious damage – it’s a partisan question that no one knows the answer to.”
Of course those who truly believe Trump and his Republican enablers are not an extreme danger to democracy, and having them hold all power is no big deal, disagree.
I lived through many Republicans who were pushing policies that I believed were extremely dangerous (as well as repulsive). But I never imagined there would be a time where Republicans would spurn democracy itself. Very scary times. And authoritarians only have to win once and then they simply change the rules. Hitler, Putin, etc.
LikeLike
If the fellow ever had, that is, IF he ever had any sense of decency and wit to embrace the spirit of the US constitution he has long since parted company with those twin concepts.
LikeLike
This needs to get FAR more coverage than it has been getting. The mainstream media has treated this like “Ho-hum, more silliness from the silly man.”
It isn’t. It is Hitlerian, anti-American, and would require nothing less than the destruction of the federal government and the installation of a military dictatorship.
This isn’t saying the quiet parts out loud. IT IS SCREAMING THEM.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The promise he has apparently made to deport 10 million people harkens back to the Palmer raids on 1919-20. This would usher in an era like the 1920s, when the actual modern Klan was born (the old Klan having been suppressed, then mythologized).
LikeLike
It seems that instead of fretting over whether the NYT is “normalizing fascism,” we should be realizing that fascism IS normal.
LikeLike