The Washington Post published an article asserting that home schooling is the fastest growing sector on American education. I’m leery of the dramatic statistics, however, because a small number can grow by 70% and still be a small number. In the example on the article page, the D.C. home-schooling numbers are offered: “Washington, D.C.’s school district saw a 108% increase in home-school enrollment since the 2017-18 school year. There were 88,626 students enrolled districtwide in the 2021-22 school year.” But the number of home-schoolers declined from 1,126 in 21-22 to 977 in 22-23. That’s a very small percentage of students enrolled in the District. It would have been interesting to post the number in privately-managed charter schools (far larger than those home schooled) and the number who use vouchers.
My home district in Brooklyn enrolls nearly 20,000 students. The number of home schoolers grew by a whopping 216% since 2017. Sounds impressive, no? From 89 to 281. In the last year, the number of homeschooled students grew by 11. A little more than 1% of the students in this urban district are homeschooled. Not so impressive.
You will have to open the link to see the data in the article because I was unable to copy the numbers. Most are in the opening, not behind a paywall.
Home schooling is illegal in most countries in the world. Where it is permitted, there are often conditions, such as oversight by authorities.
For what it’s worth, I oppose home schooling. I believe it is important for students to be taught by a well-qualified teacher. Few parents are equipped to teach the full range of school subjects. I believe there is value in learning alongside students from different backgrounds and being exposed to different points of view. In this country, people have the right to home school, but I think they should entrust their children to professionals. They should get medical care from doctors. They should seek legal advice from lawyers. They should fly in airplanes with certified pilots.
The article in The Washington Post begins:
Home schooling has become — by a wide margin — America’s fastest-growing form of education, as families from Upper Manhattan to Eastern Kentucky embrace a largely unregulated practice once confined to the ideological fringe, a Washington Post analysis shows.
The analysis — based on data The Post collected for thousands of school districts across the country — reveals that a dramatic rise in home schooling at the onset of the pandemic has largely sustained itself through the 2022-23 academic year, defying predictions that most families would return to schools that have dispensed with mask mandates and other covid-19 restrictions….
The growth demonstrates home schooling’s arrival as a mainstay of the American educational system, with its impact — on society, on public schools and, above all, on hundreds of thousands of children now learning outside a conventional academic setting — only beginning to be felt…
The Post acknowledged how hard it is to get accurate data. “In 11 states, including Texas, Michigan, Connecticut and Illinois, officials do not require notification when families decide to educate their children at home or monitor how those students are faring. Seven additional states have unreliable tallies of home-schooled kids, The Post found.”
But it did collect data for 32 states and D.C.
Examination of the data reveals:
- In states with comparable enrollment figures, the number of home-schooled students increased 51 percent over the past six school years, far outpacing the 7 percent growth in private school enrollment. Public school enrollment dropped 4 percent in those states over the same period, a decline partly attributable to home schooling.
- Home schooling’s surging popularity crosses every measurable line of politics, geography and demographics. The number of home-schooled kids has increased 373 percent over the past six years in the small city of Anderson, S.C.; it also increased 358 percent in a school district in the Bronx.
- In 390 districts included in The Post’s analysis, there was at least one home-schooled child for every 10 in public schools during the 2021-2022 academic year, the most recent for which district-level federal enrollment data are available. That’s roughly quadruple the number of districts that had rates that high in 2017-2018, signifying a sea change in how many communities educate their children and an urgent challenge for a public education system that faced dwindling enrollment even before the pandemic.
- Despite claims that the home-schooling boom is a result of failing public schools, The Post found no correlation between school district quality, as measured by standardized test scores, and home-schooling growth. In fact, high-scoring districts had some of the biggest spikes in home schooling early in the pandemic, though by the fall of 2022 increases were similar regardless of school performance.
Because they do not cover every state, the figures cannot provide a total count of the country’s home-schooled children. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that in 2019 — before home schooling’s dramatic expansion — there were 1.5 million kids being home-schooled in the United States, the last official federal estimate.
Based on that figure and the growth since then in states that track home schooling, The Post estimates that there are now between 1.9 million and 2.7 million home-schooled children in the United States, depending on the rate of increase in areas without reliable data.
By comparison, there are fewer than 1.7 million in Catholic schools, according to the National Catholic Educational Association. About 3.7 million students attended charter schools in the fall of 2021, according to the most recent federal data.
It is a remarkable expansion for a form of instruction that 40 years ago was still considered illegal in much of the country.
Over the past three years, American interest in home schooling has soared. In this series, The Washington Post explores how that rise is transforming the nation’s educational landscape — and the lives of hundreds of thousands of children who now learn at home rather than at a traditional school.
Many parents say home education empowers them to withdraw from schools that fail their children or to provide instruction that better reflects their personal values. But there is little to no regulation of home schooling in much of the country, with no guarantees that kids are learning skills and subjects to prepare them for adulthood — or, for that matter, learning anything at all.
Home-schooled children have attended Ivy League schools and won national spelling bees. They have also been the victims of child abuse and severe neglect. Some are taught using the classics of ancient Greece, others with Nazi propaganda. What all share is the near-absolute control their parents wield over the ideas they encounter.
“This is a fundamental change of life, and it’s astonishing that it’s so persistent,” said Nat Malkus, a senior fellow and deputy director of education policy at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative-leaning think tank.
The rise of home schooling is all the more remarkable, he added, given the immense logistical challenges many parents must overcome to directly supervise their kids’ education.
“The personal costs to home schooling are more than just tuition,” Malkus said. “They are a restructuring of the way your family works.”
In most states examined by The Post, home schooling has fallen slightly from its peak, while remaining at highs unmatched before the 2020-2021 school year. In only two, Georgia and Maryland, has it returned to pre-pandemic levels. And in four — Florida, South Carolina, Louisiana and South Dakota — home schooling has continued to expand.
Celebrated by home education advocates, the rise has also led critics of weak regulation to sound alarms. Home-schooled kids don’t have to submit to any form of testing for academic progress in most states, and even states that require assessments often offer loopholes, according to the Coalition for Responsible Home Education, which urges greater oversight.
Many of America’s new home-schooled children have entered a world where no government official will ever check on what, or how well, they are being taught.
“Policymakers should think, ‘Wow — this is a lot of kids,’” said Elizabeth Bartholet, an emeritus professor at Harvard Law School and child welfare advocate. “We should worry about whether they’re learning anything.”
If there is a capital of American home schooling, it may be Hillsborough County, Fla.
The Gulf Coast county of 1.5 million — including Tampa and its orbit of palmetto-studded suburbs — is famous as a barometer of the nation’s political mood. Its vote results have predicted the winner in 22 of the last 24 presidential elections. Now it is a harbinger of a different trend: the widespread adoption and acceptance of home schooling.
There were 10,680 children being home-schooled at the beginning of the 2022 academic year within Hillsborough County’s school district, the biggest total in The Post’s home-schooling database. The county’s home-schoolers outnumber the entire public enrollment of thousands of other school districts across the country, and their ranks have grown 74 percent since 2017. Over the same period, public school enrollment grew 3.4 percent, to 224,538 students.
Just as remarkable is the infrastructure that has grown up to support home-schoolers.
Their instruction still happened at home much of the time when Corey McKeown began teaching her kids 14 years ago in Carrollwood, a Tampa suburb. Once or twice a week, parent-run co-ops offered a chance to mingle with what was still a small community of home educators.
Today, Hillsborough home-schoolers inhabit a scholastic and extracurricular ecosystem that is in many ways indistinguishable from that of a public or private school. Home-schooled kids play competitive sports. They put on full-scale productions of “Mary Poppins” and “Les Miserables.” They have high school graduation ceremonies, as well as a prom and homecoming dance.
The Christian home-schooling co-op that had about 40 kids in 2011 when McKeown joined it — a co-op she would go on to direct — has grown to nearly 600 students.
“Home-schoolers in Hillsborough County do not lack for anything,” she said. “We have come such a long way.”
Of the 10 districts with the most home-schooled kids in The Post database, nine are in Florida. That’s partly because of the state’s large school districts, but also because its elected officials have grown friendlier to home education as they saddle public schools with politically charged restrictions on what can be taught about race and gender.
Home-schooled kids in Florida aren’t required to sit through the same standardized tests as their public-school peers. But they are allowed to join the same high school sports teams, and are eligible for the same scholarships at public universities.
“It’s a tremendous imbalance,” said Hillsborough County School Board member Lynn Gray. After decades as a public and parochial school teacher, Gray taught history part-time for several years at a Catholic home schooling co-op. She said that experience left her worried about many home-schooled kids’ academic preparation and lack of exposure to diverse points of view, and she is convinced home education should not be most families’ first choice.
“I can tell you right now: Many of these parents don’t have any understanding of education,” she said. “The price will be very big to us, and to society. But that won’t show up for a few years.”
Some of home schooling’s immediate costs to society will soon be more directly measurable in Florida. Earlier this year, Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), following the lead of policymakers in other conservative states, expanded the state’s educational voucher program. Children who learn at home are now eligible if their parents submit instructional plans and they take an annual standardized test.
As a result, families in Hillsborough County may be getting their most powerful incentive yet to home-school: up to $8,000 per child in annual taxpayer funding.
Open the link to conclude the article.

I recommend anyone who claims that homeschooling is the best option in many cases to make a Franklin list. In one column list the requirements for a teacher to be certified in your public schools. Be sure to include educational requirements, certification requires, background checks, etc. The in the other column, list the qualifications of the home teacher. Compare.
This whole “movement” labors under the illusion that an education is to impart knowledge. Instead I insist it is a social process that involves learning how to learn and to work with others. The “others” involves other youths and other adults, aka teachers, with whom you do not have a deep relationship.
LikeLike
The widepread antipathy to a view of education as “imparting knowledge” has led to a generation of American adults who cannot freaking find Texas on a map but spent lots and lots of time in school “practicing their inferencing skills” (i.e., wasting time without carrying away any news they could use).
LikeLike
That may include the practice that knowledge retention has been devalued and facts have become malleable.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Silly me, I think that people should walk away from an intro Biology class with knowledge of intro Biology, and so on.
LikeLike
The Franklin list is a great idea for a lot of situations.
LikeLike
The anti-knowledge trend has also contributed to millions of people that have fallen for MAGA lies and misinformation.
LikeLike
exactly
“Well, I’m entitled to my opinion.” And now for some comment about epidemiology from Donald Trump.
LikeLike
What you say about the anti-knowledge trend is true, but that trend has for many decades dominated Schools of Education – which are decidedly left-wing in political orientation. A large percentage of people – including many people with college degrees – don’t know a lot of very basic facts about the world.
I read this morning that one recent survey found that a majority of young adults don’t know that six million Jews were murdered during the Holocaust. That six million figure has been widely disclosed in the news media for decades, and it’s a very basic historical fact. What are K-college schools doing that such a high percentage of younger people don’t know that fact? That same survey found that 2/3 of adults couldn’t name the three branches of the federal government.
Good grief. Once kids have “learned how to learn”, exactly what knowledge should they learn?
LikeLike
Jack,
In the 1980s, I worked on various state history curricula with the goal of making sure that every student learned basic facts about history.
LikeLike
Jack…..A college education now is an expensive joke! My 2nd is a soph at a very reputable state college and I am appalled at the lack of knowledge being imparted. He does very little work or studying while partying and playing a sport and still brings in good grades in a general business program….and he is NO boy genius!. When every child was told that they had to be “college and career” ready from the time they entered kindergarten, the curriculum needed to be dumbed down so that all those kids could “aspire” to college. As a result of those changes AND the implementation of the CC curriculum (with its stupid tests to prop it up), the colleges had to dumb down their curriculum as well. The best education my 2nd has gotten so far are the 4yrs of private HS that we paid for and it was far more rigorous and engaging than anything he got K-8 in public school OR his 3 semesters in college (so far).
LikeLike
Lisa,
New York used to offer Regents exams for college bound students. Some years back, a state commissioner proposed that ALL students take the exams. Their level of difficulty had to be lowered.
LikeLike
LisaM– I have a hard time empathizing with your POV, inasmuch as which college to go to is a choice the family makes. Surely you are not saying that every public college in your state is full of gut courses where one can party & do sports with minimal study & still get good grades. I am in NJ where it is perhaps easier to glean differences as we are much smaller than NYS, with proportionally fewer state colleges. It is well-known here that Rutgers is tops [& The College of NJ if anything top- per], while those state colleges where one can get by with varying degrees of lesser effort are also pretty well-known. The same was true even back in stone age when I was a teenager in NYS: some state colleges were prestigious because of higher stds, some lesser by degrees. One cannot from this draw some broad-brush conclusions that K12 public school sucks and therefore state college ed is dumbed down. Nor do you need to justify your choice of private for one child because your zoned school didn’t meet their needs– zoned schools differ vastly from one locale to another within a state.
LikeLike
Jack Safely—You jump from one thing to another here, trying to pull it into a rationale that confirms your bias. Schools of ed are “decidedly left-wing” [arguable]. Schools of ed are somehow to blame for some unnamed source claiming that a majority of young folks don’t know 6 million Jews were killed in holocaust. Or that 2/3 of adults [aged 18-90-something] cannot name the 3 branches of govt– all the fault of “K-college education.” Whole lotta potential factors missing from your analysis.
LikeLike
The annual Annenberg Constitution Day Survey for 2023 says that 66 percent of American adults can name the three branches of government but that 17 percent could not name any. This is up from previous years. 77 percent of Americans knew that freedom of speech was protected by the First Amendment, but only 40 percent could name freedom of religion and 28 percent freedom of the press as among those First Amendment rights. And again, these numbers are substantial improvements from those of previous years.
LikeLike
The Conference on Jewish Claims against Germany conducted a survey in 2020 of American young people ages 18-29. The findings:
“Almost two-thirds of young American adults do not know that 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust, and more than one in 10 believe Jews caused the Holocaust, a new survey has found, revealing shocking levels of ignorance about the greatest crime of the 20th century.
“According to the study of millennial and Gen Z adults aged between 18 and 39, almost half (48%) could not name a single concentration camp or ghetto established during the second world war.
“Almost a quarter of respondents (23%) said they believed the Holocaust was a myth, or had been exaggerated, or they weren’t sure. One in eight (12%) said they had definitely not heard, or didn’t think they had heard, about the Holocaust.”
Eleven percent said that they believed that Jews caused the Holocaust.
LikeLike
Oops. Correction: 18-39
LikeLike
I don’t have the current data at my fingertips, but I’ve read several articles that refute the widespread impression that the vast majority of parents who homeschool do so for religious reasons. That used to be true, but there is a much higher number of secular parents these days who regard homeschooling as better for their kid(s) compared to traditional public, charter, or parochial schools.
I’m uneasy about homeschooling as kids get older and the academic subjects get way more specialized. How can even highly educated parents teach Physics, Chemistry, Advanced Algebra, and other science? How many adults can do a good job with Literature, English Composition, World History, etc? There is much value in learning from a variety of knowledgeable subject matter experts.
But I can see great value in homeschooling in the elementary years. At those ages, homeschooling allows for a lot of one-on-one tutoring at a pace that can be adjusted according to each kid’s needs. A neighbor family homeschools their two oldest kids (ages 7 and 6) and those kids are very articulate, excellent readers, very well-behaved. And many parents found during the Covid era that homeschooling and Pandemic Pods worked very well for their kids, often much better than the regular schools that their kids had previously attended.
There is valid concern about many parents not being up to the task of homeschooling their kids well. Homeschooling would not have worked for my wife and me when our kids were growing up. But I’ve seen with my own eyes and also read about many other successful homeschooling stories. With all the problems that many schools currently have, it’s not surprising that homeschooling is more popular than ever.
LikeLike
I used to live next door to a Christian fundamentalist family with seven kids–so many that they bought an old schoolbus to get around in. They homeschooled their kids, and these kids were really bright and learned and did really well in college. It’s not really that hard for an educated adult to know all that a high-school kid has to learn in a given subject, and there are textbooks for homeschoolers (that’s a huge market) to pick up the slack where parental knowledge falls short. In addition, there is the whole homeschool pod concept, in which parents with specialized knowledge can teach what they know.
LikeLike
Bob,
Thanks for sharing your insight. I was being personally humble when I wrote “I’m uneasy about homeschooling as kids get older and the academic subjects get way more specialized.” Other parents have told me that their kids did fine with homeschooling in high school subjects. I imagine that there are both print and online materials that make homeschooling at all ages viable for many parents.
I clicked on the Washington Post article that Diane linked to. The WP has published several articles on homeschooling, including one that specifically notes how most homeschooling is no longer being done for religious reasons.
Here’s a question to ponder. There are many examples of exemplary success using homeschooling: how can regular schools use what homeschoolers do to achieve that same level of success?
LikeLike
The data on homeschoolers is sparse. Some states don’t collect it at all. My hunch is that the examples of gifted homeschoolers are not at all typical. If there were any trustworthy sampling test, like NAEP, we would know more. But homeschoolers don’t want any accountability to government.
LikeLike
“. . . how can regular schools use what homeschoolers do to achieve that same level of success?”
THE number one answer is “class size.”
LikeLike
Perceptive comment, Duane!!!! xoxoxox
LikeLike
Right on, Duane!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jack Safely– I agree with your analysis on the whole. But I differ with regard to the PreK-5 cohort, as academic learning there is about 40% or less academics, 60+% socialization. At that age, homeschooling could work well if it is in a locale with access to a homeschooling network, which pulls regional kids into a group of 30-50 multi-aged kids who learn together. Long ago, when starting my free-lance biz as foreign-lang specialist to very young kids, I had occasion to visit such a group [secular], & it was fine. Not much different from the rural one-room schoolhouse I attended back in 1950’s for grades 1 -3, or the 3-classroom school we moved on to [K-2, 2-3, 4-5] for the rest of elementary. They were good schools & prepared us well for in-town jr & sr high schools. But isolating kids aged 3 – 10 in the home for family-taught ed seems to me a bad idea—especially rural, where potential playmates are far-flung, perhaps only knowable if one is enrolled in the local school.
LikeLike
Home schooling that includes a voucher stipend may also encourage the unscrupulous parents to isolate and abuse children without the state or local authorities knowing about the abuse. Not all parents know what is best for their children. We’ve already seen parents that have used home schooling education funds for vacations or theme park tickets in Florida. Who knows what else may go on in a dysfunctional home?
LikeLike
I have a master’s degree in music education. There is NO way that I’d consider myself qualified to have taught my daughter ALL the subjects taught by professionals in public schools. Kids must learn socialization skills when attending school.
Ignorance is a large factor in promoting home schooling. This wasn’t a problem until recently.
Some parents are afraid to send their children to school. They don’t want their children to read books that should be banned or to socialize with ‘inferior races’ such as blacks or Latinos.
Politicians are causing the problems. They, especially the GOP, talk about the necessity of ‘banning books’. They are the ones saying trans and gay students might be attending schools and you certainly don’t want your child exposed to THAT! /s
I doubt that many parents are qualified to do home schooling. The future is bleak if we continue to have an uneducated population. What are the children of the far religious R going to teach? The earth is only 6,000 years old and children and adults could ride dinosaurs?
Unfortunately, some parents need more money just to survive. If they get money from home schooling, they might decide to do that out of necessity. [The economy stinks and the average worker is struggling to get by from one paycheck to another. The federal minimum pay is only $7.25 an hour.]
LikeLike
In addition to academics public schools also help students develop socially and emotionally. Children need to learn how to navigate our complex, diverse society. Public schools are great incubators for learning how to do this. They teach young people the value of friendships and team work, and they do their best to prepare young people to be responsible citizens.
LikeLike
I’ve met quite a few home-schooled students & families, and they have all been very bright & seemingly mature kids. However, as a general observation if home-schooling continues to grow—that will be the end of our democracy as we know it. Our Founders knew that a free public education, designed for the “public good”, at a local level, which would create equality for all, was the key to creating a free society vs the Monarchies/peasants systems of the past. If every family teaches/indoctrinates their own children according to their own beliefs, then only anarchy will emerge.
LikeLike
So true. Anything that replaces public education will result in tiered opportunities for young people based on socioeconomics and skin color. This is already true in public schools to some degree with the zip code argument, but public schools aspire to serve all students. Charter and voucher schools where the schools do the choosing exacerbate existing inequalities as these schools discriminate against those they consider “unworthy.” They do not address inequality; they make it worse.
I loved working in my diverse school district and saw what a quality education can do for poor students. If we believe in democracy, we should support decent public education as I think it helps to stabilize communities, by extension states and the entire country. Public schools are the glue that helps bind us together for mutual tolerance and understanding.
LikeLike
If more and more students are homeschooled, more and more will learn only what their parents know. That’s regress, not progress.
LikeLike
I still find in Canada, it gets the crank parents out of the schools so that we can concentrate
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
The two widest-reaching studies of homeschool graduates have had very different findings. In 2004, homeschooling parent Brian Ray recruited 5,254 homeschool graduates to participate in a study which he promised would show that homeschooling was effective; perhaps unsurprisingly, his findings were largely positive.
In 2014, Homeschool Alumni Reaching Out (HARO) conducted its own survey of 3,702 homeschool graduates; when we analyzed this data for HARO, we found much more mixed results. In the HARO survey, roughly 25% of respondents reported poor or very poor socialization; the quality of socialization respondents reported predicted how prepared they felt for the future. However, even this study is likely limited by whether respondents interpreted socialization to mean only social interaction, or also the development of a greater social fluency.
Only one survey of homeschool graduates has used a randomly selected sample: the Cardus Education Survey (2011). This survey, which compared and contrasted the educational experiences of adults aged 24 to 39 who grew up in religious homes, found that graduates of homeschools were more likely to report “lack of clarity of goals and sense of direction” and “feelings of helplessness in dealing with life’s problems” than conventionally schooled graduates. However, homeschool graduates were also more likely to report that they felt “prepared for relationships.”
LikeLike
Several unrelated comments:
1. “2/3 of adults can’t name the three branches of government” — This includes the distinguished third US Senator from Florida, Coach Tuberville (R-Santa Rosa Beach FL)
“Florida school districts have the most homeschooled students.” Fact: 5 of the 10 largest school districts in the country are in Florida. This is because 1)
Florida school districts are county-wide. 2) Florida counties were created later than in other Eastern states, so they are relatively large.
Georgia has 159 counties; Florida has 67. Florida has more people. Therefore, typically, a Florida county has more X than a Georgia county.
Percent would be a better measure. Otherwise, the article is saying that large school districts have more homeschooled students than smaller ones. Sloppy journalism.
I don’t know the current situation — it’s probably gotten worse, if anything, — but when I was on a school board in Iowa, the district received 0.1 Full-Time Equivalent for homeschool students who chose to take one or more courses from the district. Say Johnny wants to take AP Physics and AP Calculus — there’s 0.1 FTE. The fact that he’s 0.25 time is irrelevant for this calculation of state aid. Love to see an up-to-date analysis of how much money public schools lose this way.
I volunteer as a GED math tutor. I see home-unschooled students every year. They only point to their success stories, so who knows how many home-unschooled students there are.
LikeLike
Steve,
I would love to see a serious study of homeschooled students. We hear about the success stories, but I suspect those are outliers, not typical.
LikeLike
I wonder how many doctors, lawyers, accountants, physicists, engineers, etc will emerge from home-schooled backgrounds? As well as the more mundane aspect of socialization of children growing up only in the home environment.
LikeLike
OK, that was a bulleted list with four numbered points.
LikeLike
Yeah. WordPress does that. If you want to include a bulleted list in comments, you have to use HTML. I’ll see if I can do this here:
snips
snails
puppydog tails
LikeLike
Nope. WordPress did not read the HTML for numbered list.
LikeLike
I’ll try that again with an unordered list:
Donald Trump
Bowel Cancer
Parasitic Wasp Larvae
LikeLike
Is that list like “telephone. Man. Television.”??
Things Trump could memorize?
LikeLike
Nope. The unordered list HTML wasn’t read either.
You can type in separate phrases with an em-dash or double hyphen at the beginning and a line space between
–Vivek Ramaswamy
–Pit viper
–Necrotizing fasciitis
LikeLike
That Vivek is quite a piece of work. How did he get to be in the Final Five? What an arrogant and mean-spirited man he is!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. One scary person
LikeLike
good tip on the em-dash, my attempts to make lists in WordPress have been foiled over and over.
LikeLike
In my career, I saw two different types of homeschool kids.
One group was the group whose parents really cared about their child’s education and sought a unique way to gain it through homeschool. They wore themselves out taking the kids to various get-togethers for home-schoolers to solve the admitted problem with socialization. They often brought their child to participate in the activities available to them at public schools. Their children seemed balanced and successful, and they would often come to school for high school, where they would be successful.
A second group left school to “go on home school” after they were unsuccessful as members of the general body of learners in our traditional school. They were usually the products of dysfunction at home, and when their parents learned that life could be lived without teachers calling about Junior, they pulled Junior out. The student taken out of school would, of course, be the topic of conversation at school among the friends. They talked of the homeschool being easy.
More modern experience suggests a group of those who choose homeschool because of non-traditional careers. Musicians, artists who travel, workers whose expertise may last in a spot for half a year, and varied other unique situations seem to be fueling the interest in homeschooling.
All successful homeschoolers seem to share one characteristic: one of the parents invests all their time in the effort, to the end that the family is capable of living on one salary.
As for my own bias, I have been known to suggest that anyone who represents themself in court has a fool for a counsel, and similar fate awaits anyone who tries to educate himself without professional help.
LikeLike
I suggest anyone seriously interested in this subject read “Educated!” by Tara Westover. Very anecdotal and fringe in some respects, yet represents our many fringe populations who have long engaged in this endeavor—religious &/or survivalist types who live among us. There were a number of Westover kids; Tara and the older brother who secretly helped her educate herself way beyond the borders of the Mormon tracts taught by parents were particularly high-IQ; she herself got herself to Brigham Young and then to Oxford by hook or by crook.
LikeLike
Thanks for the suggestion, Ginny. I had forgotten about this book. Ordering a copy.
LikeLike
I read “Educated!” by Tara Westover quite some time ago. I ordered it because she was living in rural Idaho. [You probably know by now that I grew up in Boise and attended Boise public schools.] I have a thing against ignorance perpetrated by religious cults. Thank goodness she was able to escape the degradation of her home life.
LikeLike
Yeah, same here, Carol, ever since one of my best friends in high school was recruited into Scientology. Uggggh!
LikeLike