Frank Breslin, a retired high school teacher in New Jersey, wrote recently at Medium that critical thinking is the missing ingredient in high school, even though it is the most important tool that students need.
Breslin writes:
The following warning should be affixed atop every computer in America’s schools: Proceed at your own risk. Don’t accept as true what you’re about to read. Some of it is fact; some of it is opinion masquerading as fact; and the rest is liberal, conservative, or mainstream propaganda. Make sure you know which is which before choosing to believe it.
Students are exposed to so many different viewpoints on- and offline and so prone to accepting whatever they read, that they run the very real risk of being brainwashed. If it’s on a computer screen, it becomes Holy Writ, sacrosanct, immutable, beyond question or doubt.
Teachers continually caution students against taking what they read at face value, since some of these sites may be propaganda mills or recruiting grounds for the naïve and unwary.
Not only egregious forms of indoctrination may target unsuspecting young minds, but also the more artfully contrived variety, whose insinuating soft-sell subtlety and silken appeals ingratiatingly weave their spell to lull the credulous into accepting their wares.
To prevent this from happening, every school in America should teach the twin arts of critical thinking and critical reading, so that a critical spirit becomes a permanent possession of every student and pervades the teaching of every course in America.
Teaching students how to be their own person by abandoning Groupthink and developing the courage to think for themselves should begin from the very first day of high school. More important than all the information they will be learning during these four crucial years will be how they critically process this information either to accept or reject it, or to keep an open mind.
It is a rare high-school graduate who can pinpoint 20 different kinds of fallacies while listening to a speaker or reading a book; who can distinguish between fact and opinion, objective account and specious polemic; who can tell the difference between facts, value judgments, explanatory theories, and metaphysical claims; who can argue both sides of a question, anticipate objections, rebut them, and undermine arguments in various ways.
The essence of an education — the ability to think critically and protect oneself against falsehood and lies — is a lost art in America’s high schools today. This is unfortunate for it is precisely this skill that is of transcendent importance for students in defending themselves.
Computers are wonderful things, but, like everything else in this world, they must be approached with great caution. Their potential for good can suddenly become an angel of darkness that takes over young minds.
A school should teach its students how to think, not what to think; to question whatever they read, and never to accept any claim blindly; to suspend judgment until they’ve heard all sides of a question; and interrogate whatever claims to be true, since truth can withstand any scrutiny.

The most important word…..”WHY?” It’s not used or explored often enough.
LikeLike
“Who benefits” is a more specific version of that question that gets to the point.
LikeLike
But yet people on this blog accept anything fed to them by the mainstream media as if it’s gospel.
LikeLike
And Dienne, you believe everything published by your favorite sources. I trust the New York Times and the Washington Post far more than the sources you cite.
LikeLike
And therein lies the problem. NYT and WaPo have been repeatedly caught lying to us. When they’re caught, they “correct” their “mistake”, if at all, on the far back pages which get far less attention than the original lies. The sources I cite have no such record, and, in fact, many of them were created specifically in response to mainstream lies, distortions and omissions and have had far better track records over the years. And when they do make mistakes, they correct them with as much prominence as the original story. I tend to trust people until I know they’ve intentionally lied to me, then I stop trusting them. Guess I’m funny like that.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch,
Am I allowed to comment to request some examples to back up this statement: “And when they do make mistakes, they correct them with as much prominence as the original story” ?
I am always interested when news organizations own up to their mistakes prominently. The NYT has on occasion done this, albeit not nearly as much as they should. But I didn’t recall seeing corrections from the news sources linked to by this person, for example Caitlin Johnstone, who recently wrote:
“It will never stop being hilarious when westerners who live in the most propagandized civilization in history criticize China for not having a free press. Gets me every single time.”
[Really?? No “westerner” is allowed to criticize China for not having a free press because of “propaganda”?]
“Democrats supported Trump’s most evil actions and opposed his best ones. They cheered when he bombed Syria and supported his cold war escalations against Russia, and looked the other way as he targeted civilians with sanctions and blockades in Yemen, Venezuela, Iran, Syria, North Korea and Cuba. Meanwhile they screamed bloody murder whenever he talked about pulling troops out of Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq.
The two parties do not oppose each other, they egg each other on and push each other to be worse. It’s actually worse than a one-party system: it’s a system in which two parties not only align on all the most depraved agendas, but push each other to be more depraved than they otherwise would be.”
There is such a cognitive dissonance in listening to these so called reliable news sources, and their defenders who claim they always issue prominent corrections. These sources that supposed prominently acknowledged they were wrong about Putin’s and the Ukraine, where I apparently missed their prominent corrections.
But maybe these sources do issue prominent corrections, and I have just missed them. Or maybe folks like Caitlin Johnstone are always so dead-on accurate – as she is above – that she never, never has any need to issue any corrections!
LikeLike
Caitlyn Johnstone wrote:
“It will never stop being hilarious when westerners who live in the most propagandized civilization in history criticize China for not having a free press. Gets me every single time.”
If she lived in China, she wouldn’t be allowed to express her views at all. She would be censored. Very likely jailed.
LikeLike
Diane,
Her next paragraph speaks to that:
“People are like, “No no you don’t understand, we have a free press in the west, it’s just that any mainstream reporter or pundit who doesn’t say what their government wants them to say will be fired immediately and permanently destroy their career.”
First of all, even if it was true that people’s careers were permanently destroyed by being fired for supposedly not saying “what the government wants them to say”, that is not remotely comparable to what happens in China. Or Russia for that matter.
And furthermore, as long as the person is sufficiently right wing, there is a (often lucrative) soft landing at some right wing news organizations if that person steps over the line of decency so far as to get fired.
Not to mention they can always come onto Alex Jones and spout any conspiracy theory they want, as long as it makes people hate anything that isn’t sufficiently right wing.
Free press has nothing to do with getting fired. It has to do with someone being able to publish without being imprisoned. Or met with an untimely accident.
Not to mention “free press” means being able to criticize mainstream press which is exactly what Caitlin Johnstone does all the time. She would not be free to criticize Russian or Chinese leaders if she lived there.
LikeLike
If she lived in Russia or China, she would be in prison.
LikeLike
^^^https://caityjohnstone.medium.com/the-most-wall-street-journal-op-ed-in-the-history-of-wall-street-journal-op-eds-ab7baf6c8539
What is problematic isn’t criticizing a WSJ op ed. That is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. There is much to criticize.
What is problematic is taking a WSJ op ed that deserves criticism and then using it to push false narratives about how there is no difference between Dems and Republicans, and making ridiculous false equivalencies between the censorship of the media in China and the propaganda in the US.
FYI, Caitlin offers up evidence of her own self- “censorship” as she is clearly unwilling to say anything too negative about antisemites, including calling their views antisemitic!!!
She merely says that their worldviews are frozen “in a state of analytical infancy” and their perspective is “immature”.
But Caitlin makes it clear that their “immature perspective” is NOT THEIR FAULT!
Caitlin explains: “People blame “the Jews” because they are ideologically prohibited from examining the actual sources of our problems, like capitalism and imperialism.”
Maybe some day Caitlin will explain why her “immature” followers who she says are prohibited by evil censorship by the western press from examining the real sources of our problems are not blaming the Christians. Or the Australians. Or the white female non-Jews, like Caitlin.
The western media hasn’t propagandized them into choosing the evil Jews to blame. But Caitlin prefers that her most reprehensible followers not be blamed for their antisemitism — it’s all the fault of the western media and not their own deplorable beliefs, and that’s why she censors herself from ever naming what those beliefs are.
LikeLike
You are a breathe of fresh air dienne77 with common sense and solid critical thinking. Diane and 95% have been hoodwinked and lied to by the most untrusted cia networks as well as fauci. I haven’t watched fox since they called Arizona too early . Watters and gutfeld are great, Carlson too until they had to remove him for speaking too much truth.
NYC parent probably vaccinated her kids which is a shame and shows no critical thinking.
LikeLike
Josh, you are the poster child for “no critical thinking.”
LikeLike
You are a breathe of fresh air dienne77 with common sense and solid critical thinking. Diane and 95% have been hoodwinked and lied to by the most untrusted cia networks as well as fauci. I haven’t watched fox since they called Arizona too early . Watters and gutfeld are great, Carlson too until they had to remove him for speaking too much truth.
NYC parent probably vaccinated her kids which is a shame and shows no critical thinking.
LikeLike
Because, you can’t, fact-check the materials on the websites, those younger srudents run the risks of, getting, “infected” with the, untruthful materials they thumb across online. And, this awareness of knowing what we read is true or false, only comes with the, years. Unless the schools, the parents can, effectively, censor everything children touch, there’s, no way of, ensuring that what they’re reading in, factually, based, instead of just someone, inciting anger about something, venting about something or, someone. And, this would be, quite, dangerous.
LikeLike
Indeed!
LikeLike
Really true, need to research each and everything we learn to verify its authenticity.
LikeLike
No. That’s a cat chasing it’s tail. . . every now and again it will catch it but generally a waste of time and energy. A fool’s errand.
LikeLike
Thanks for your perspective, yes, it is, I agree, but can research for important knowledge at least.
LikeLike
The most bizarre and ridiculous and dangerous crap is what is sensational enough to float to the top of the memosphere. OFC.
LikeLike
“It is a rare high-school graduate who can pinpoint 20 different kinds of fallacies while listening to a speaker or reading a book. . . .”
“It is a rare COLLEGE graduate, MD, EdD, SURGEON, ECONOMIST, ETC. . ., who can pinpoint 20 different kinds of fallacies while listening to a speaker or reading a book. . . .”
Personally I don’t give a damn about “pinpointing” X fallacy. I care that someone can discern whether and why or why not a statement rings true and where to find legitimate sources to verify or contradict said statement.
LikeLike
Thanks, Duane! I realized that I cannot “pinpoint 20 different kinds of fallacies while listening to a speaker or reading a book…”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I really don’t care if kids remember the names of a very long list of logical fallacies, rhetorical devices, and types of figurative language, but I do care, A LOT, that English teachers know these and can teach how to recognize and understand and use or avoid them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Better late than never…
NoBrick
April 27, 2023 at 10:42 am
Effective propaganda or marketing,
begins where critical thinking ends.
If critical thinking WAS the key
measure of expertise, the faux
experts, captured by “cooked books”,
would be revealed as no more than
tools of the state.
Go figure, it’s the state that
wields its branding irons, defining
its experts…
LikeLike
NoBrick
September 8, 2021 at 12:12 pm
America’s children continue to suffer the effects
of “barking up the wrong tree”, the hamster wheel,
merry-go-round, that leaves you where you started.
While blaming the cretins and their propaganda may
be therapy, it doesn’t resolve the “issue”.
Effective propaganda starts where critical thinking
ends.
Sure, the “others” have been poisoned by “their”
fairy tales. Their propaganda/fairy tales is to
blame. As if they alone, poisoned the children
with fairy tales. It’s their “echo chamber”, they
are to blame.
All of a sudden, systemic racism, is called out,
as if IT wasn’t deeply embedded, since day one.
For the love of human-kind already, we ain’t
looking through a damn window, we’re staring at
a mirror…
Reply
LikeLike
Diane is brainwashed from mainstream, Fauci and years of brainwashing mixed in with more brainwashing. Bob is long gone but funny.
LikeLike
I think I am going to have to go in soon for an adjustment to my Covid-vaccine-installed microchip, Joy. Every time I go to write a post, I hear this voice saying, “Bill is Master of the Universe. I barely knew Epstein. ChatGPT will replace Reading teachers.”
LikeLike
Thanks, Joy. You are right. I go in for a regular brainwashing to rinse out the pollutants spewed by ignorant Trumpers. You know, people who willingly follow a con man. As Trump famously said, he “loves the uneducated.” Unlike him, I wish everyone were educated and could tell the difference between facts and lies.
LikeLike
We should acknowledge that DJT has an unsurpassed approach to job creation for lawyers. /s
LikeLike
HAAA! SO BEAUTIFULLY SAID, DIANE!
LikeLike
I admire Dr. Fauci. Many years ago, I got an honorary degree from Siena College in New York. Dr. Fauci also won the same award for his work in public health. He was modest and unassuming. I had no idea—nor did he—that even greater achievements lay ahead of him. It was my great honor to share the stage with him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He is a criminal and close to nazi Dr. Mengele so sad a jewish person like yourself admires him. So lost.
LikeLike
Lost, you are indeed Lost. Take your meds. Admit you are jealous of Dr. Fauci. He’s a great man.
LikeLike
nye parent probably vaccinated her kids which shows little critical thinking, watches can, believed Russia, and the plandemic, but knows what he/she is talking about lol. Called do research and question everything. Oprah now feels the heat to her bullshit as well.
LikeLike
Of course I vaccinated my kids! People like you who refuse all vaccinations for themselves and their kids have spread measles and mumps and chicken pox and polio and meningitis. You should be thanking parents like me for vaccinating our kids so that you can refuse all vaccinations for your own children without them being in serious danger of catching one of the many childhood illnesses that caused morbidity and death.
Although usually there is a lot of hypocrisy where the same people who say doctors are lying to them demand to be put in the front of the line when they or their kid gets sick.
Do you believe in getting medical treatment for cancer, or is the same medical establishment lying to you and you don’t need that either?
Although you have now posted here under multiple names and all the names have very poor command of English (but quite good for someone who is Russian or Eastern European) so don’t expect you to understand this. I’m very sorry for your situation.
LikeLike
I now have to log into wordPress before I can post, I think. This is the first time I have been able to post in a day or two. I’m not sure how I managed it, so if you miss me, (:))it may be because I can’t figure out how to comment. thank goodness I can still read!
LikeLike
Yeah. Same here, speduktr.
LikeLike
I’m sorry you are having trouble. Don’t give up.
LikeLike
Maybe I just have to click on that little WordPress icon that has all of a sudden appeared in the bottom corner of the reply box every time I post.
Sorry to bother you with my technical difficulties. Do we really need more hoops to jump through? Are they trying to save us from bots?
LikeLike
EXCELLENT post, Diane! Even colleges today rarely teach young people to think for themselves, to reason and apply logic. Too many are buying tinfoil hats and tuning into the likes of Fox “News”, OANN, and NewsMax without asking themselves if this makes sense, or doing a bit of research on their own. Our education system is failing badly these days!
LikeLike
Yes Jill because all these liberal colleges indoctrinate, lol you think its fox news wow. 90% teachers admin are liberals, no dissenting arguments, ban republicans from colleges to speak another argument. High schools do not allow critical thinking just liberal thinking, bahhh wake up baby sheep.
Keep watching fake CIA news like the rest.
LikeLike
Yes Jill because all these liberal colleges indoctrinate, lol you think its fox news wow. 90% teachers admin are liberals, no dissenting arguments, ban republicans from colleges to speak another argument. High schools do not allow critical thinking just liberal thinking, bahhh wake up baby sheep.
Keep watching fake CIA news like the rest.
LikeLike
Yes Jill because all these liberal colleges indoctrinate, lol you think its fox news wow. 90% teachers admin are liberals, no dissenting arguments, ban republicans from colleges to speak another argument. High schools do not allow critical thinking just liberal thinking, wake up baby sheep.
Keep watching fake CIA news like the rest.
LikeLike
Steve, make sure you send your children to a religious school where their purpose is to indoctrinate children. And teach that that the Bible is the only book they should read…if you delete all the sex stuff. No science. No history. Move into a cave.
LikeLike
“90% [of] teachers [and] administrators] are liberals.”
Lord, I wish that were even remotely true.
LikeLike
I do not disagree with you that religious schools have an agenda and try indoctrinate. Public schools and colleges censor and do not even want the other side , therefore, there is no critical thinking just one side and no discussions.
LikeLike
Steve, that’s not true.
There are 50,000 public schools. How many have you visited?
I’ve visited many and have never seen indoctrination of any kind.
Some people think it’s “indoctrination” to tell the truth about history; I don’t.
LikeLike
Steve, you evidently haven’t spent much time lately in either public schools or public universities.
LikeLike
Just what you wanted to hear another “Charvet Tale from the Trenches,” right? I never went along. Always stood my ground. Would often say, “Wait a minute this makes no sense to me.” That’s why the movie “12 Angry Men” was so good. And, if I was wrong, I would be the first one to admit it to everyone. I hated when I made a mistake in class and would immediately correct it (or better yet) know the mistake and see if anyone in class would call me on it. If they did, a “Way to go Charvet High Five” was in order. When I taught American Government, I told the kids, “You have to be an educated voter. You have to read everything. You have to find the contradictions. And even when you do, it is still very difficult to figure out if ‘no’ means ‘yes’ or ‘yes’ means ‘no.'” The point was that people’s brains get tired, they give up, and just want someone to “tell them what to do.” Nope, not going to happen in my class. In fact, there was one proposition that I couldn’t understand and it was on the ballot. I found out that a professor from University of Santa Cruz stated that the proposition was so “over the head” of many layman voters, that it should not be on the ballot. It made me feel better. Okay, one day in the “Charvet Way,” I decided to test independent “critical thinking” with all my classes. I held up a roll of masking tape and told the class, “This is a pitcher of milk.” It took all day until one kid in my last class said, “Seriously dude. Charvet why are you messing with us? That is a roll of tape. Are you whack?” I congratulated him and thanked him for disagreeing with me in a respectful manner. I went on to explore with the kids why they simply agreed with me on the masking tape. “Well, you are the teacher. And the teacher is always right.” I said, “Hold on. If I said 2 X 2 = 5, would you agree?” Most said yes. I went on to say, “You know it’s okay to disagree with your instructor. But we then have a discussion about the disagreement. For example, you could say, “Mr. Charvet as far as I know 2 X 2 has always equaled 4. Is there something that I am not seeing in your calculation?” I told them of a teacher-student discussion about the Statue of Liberty where the student told the teacher,(the teacher agreed with the book) “The book is wrong. The Statue of Liberty is made out of copper, not tin.” The teacher insisted that the student was wrong. The student went on to say, “I was just in New York at the Statue of Liberty and it tells you what it is made out of.” I would go on to tell them that people are out to manipulate you to behave in a certain way or “group think.” That’s why it is so important to find multiple sources, review them and then make a decision. In fact, the kids have so much CURRENT information in their phones that they can access quicker than their instructors, but how do they decipher the multitude of messages they get a day? They need a “tour guide” to slow them down and “think about it.” Someone said they are inundated with more than 300 messages a day. My grandmother always said, “Never believe what you hear and only half of what you see.” And now with AI, Holy Snikeys! Thanks for listening.
LikeLike