Peter Greene wrote in Forbes about the results of the latest Gallup poll about schools. Bottom line: The extremist plot to dismantle public education has bamboozled the public, but not parents. The absurd conspiracy to portray teachers as groomers and pedophiles is undermining public trust in one of our most democratic institutions, the one that teaches us to live with others who are not just like us. As the extremist Chris Rufo said in his infamous speech at Hillsdale College, the road to universal school choice requires sowing distrust of the public schools.
Peter Greene writes:
Parental satisfaction with their local school is at an all-time high, while Americans’ satisfaction with K-12 quality is at a record-tying low, according to newly-released poll results from Gallup.
Starting 1999, the pollsters have asked Americans every August about their views of K-12 quality. There has always been a gap in the results: parents think their own schools are better than the national system as a whole, and non-parents think the national system is even worse. But this year the gap is especially huge.
Of parents of K-12 students, 76% consider themselves completely or somewhat satisfied with their oldest child’s education quality. But when it comes to the U.S. system as a whole, those parents are only 41% completely or somewhat satisfied (14% for completely). Americans as a whole are only 36% satisfied with K-12 education (8% for completely).
Only 9% of K-12 parents are completely dissatisfied with their children’s education. For the system as a whole, both the parents and the full group report 25% completely dissatisfied.
Educators have long suggested that this disparity is the result of negative coverage. That theory makes sense; you know your own child’s school first hand, but beyond that, you only know what you’re told second hand.
Nor have opponents of public education been shy about explaining their intent. In an April, 2022 speech at Hillsdale College entitled Laying Siege to the Institutions, school choice advocate Chris Rufolaid out the strategy succinctly:
To get universal school choice, you really need to operate from a place of universal school distrust.
This caps forty years of pressing home the message that U.S. public schools are failing. There was a time when supporting public schools was as politically innocuous as babies and apple pie. Now criticism of public education is the political norm, with accusations that teachers are pedophiles and groomers and porn peddlers are not unusual. And groups like Moms For liberty push the narrative that the majority of parents are themselves up in arms about the many failings of their districts.
As the poll shows, that’s not true.
If your child is in school, you see first hand the efforts of the district and the results for your child. But if you have no children at all, or your children’s school days were long ago, all you know about school is what you hear second hand, and that second hand space is dominated by voices declaring that U.S. education is failing.
The poll findings reflect that long repetitive negative messaging, and little else. After all, what would be a better way to gauge the quality of a particular restaurant: talk to people who just ate there, or the people who do PR for a rival eatery?

Lots of folks do. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/sep/11/black-students-reparations-us-education-bettina-love
LikeLike
The whole “failing schools” narrative is a fraudulent claim lodged by extremists and opportunists. It is propaganda designed to undermine public education, and, unfortunately, uncritical thinkers accept this bunk as fact. As dispersed a public schools are, they are an easy target for naysayers and endless opportunists that want to get their hands on public dollars. If the narrative were true, there would not be so many parents that are satisfied with the public schools their children attend.
LikeLike
Addition/correction: “The absurd XTIAN THEOFASCIST conspiracy to portray teachers as groomers and pedophiles is undermining public trust in one of our most democratic institutions, the one that teaches us to live with others who are not just like us.”
We need to continue to pound the fact of that xtian theofascism until it becomes second nature for the media and others to comprehend and use it as a verbal weapon against the conniving, lying bullshit that it is.
LikeLike
Why do we continue to use the anti-public education shysters language without clarification and/or mockery? For example: “This caps forty years of pressing home the message that U.S. public schools are failing.”
Better said “This caps forty years of pressing home the FRAUDULENT message that U.S. public schools are failing [SIC].”
Sadly we continue to shoot ourselves in the foot.
LikeLike
The failing schools propaganda is intended to hide the fact that publicly educated workers create the GDP that the nation enjoys while Wall Street is a 2% drag on the economy. Politicians are primed with questions from media aimed at positioning them to criticize public education instead of priming them to attack/defend Wall Street and corporate exploitation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s the thing with these types of polls: going back to the 1960s when anyone was asked if their school was good, parents would say yes (who really would want to admit that they CHOSE to have their child attend a school that wasn’t a good school). Yet if asked about education in general their opinions would differ. I bet if you were to dig deeper with these parents on questions there would be some negative opinions about their children’s school. This does not condone the argument that public schools are failing, however let’s not kid ourselves and think that all is great in the world of education.
LikeLike
No school is perfect, even the fancy private schools, and there is always room for improvement. Considering the fact that so much of what happens with policy is out of the hands of teachers these days and the volume of students they serve, public schools generally do their best under challenging conditions. There may be a rotten apple teacher here and there, but the vast majority of teachers care about their students and try to do their best to meet students’ needs.
LikeLike
“. . . however let’s not kid ourselves and think that all is great in the world of education.”
Why might that be? Two main factors:
One is the discrepancy in funding for the various districts. For example, my rural poverty district we spend $8,000 per student per year whereas in the wealthy St. Louis County district of Clayton they spend $25,000 per student per year. Adding the cumulative effect over time for what that difference has bought in facilities, courses offered, staffing, etc. . . that’s not a big difference it’s a HUGE difference.
The second is the direct negative effects of the invalid, unjust and unethical standards and testing malpractice regime of the last almost quarter century, of which you, jlsteach, are a staunch supporter.
Get rid of the standards and testing malpractice regime and even out the funding issues so that all districts can offer reasonable smaller class sizes which we know will improve the teaching and learning process and all public schools can be good places to learn.
LikeLike
I agree. The way we fund schools enhances inequity, and the whole standards movement works well for billionaires that want young people to sit in front of screens all day making money for ultra-wealthy when they sell the data and disregard privacy.
LikeLike
To begin to understand why your, jlsteach’s, preferred policy for supposedly improving education is the invalid, unjust and unethical standards and testing malpractice regime I suggest that you read and understand Diane’s post and comments of 9/9/23 “Can You Quantify Aesthetics?”.
The teaching and learning process belongs to the realm of aesthetics (value judgements) not the scientific (quantifiable) realm. To confuse and conflate the two in evaluating the teaching and learning process, as the standards and testing malpractice regime does, is fraught with invalidities, error, and falsehoods which renders using the results of that regime for making judgements on the students, teachers and schools to be, as Wilson puts it, “vain and illusory” or as I put it ethically and morally wrong for all the harms caused to the most innocent of society, the children.
Are you satisfied with supporting such wrongs?
LikeLike
Moms Against Everything are a multi-car accident bringing highway traffic to a halt and keeping thousands of people from getting where they want to go.
LikeLike
The internet made it easier for some of those with deep pockets to spread lies that benefit what they think and want.
LikeLike
What could have been— : – (
The Akron Beacon Journal reported via quotes in a 1999 article that if vouchers had been identified as a Catholic movement it would have been a death knell for them. Gov. Voinovich who was Catholic promised tax dollars for some Catholic schools which would enable them to get wired to the internet before public schools. The condition that the bishops agreed to was that they would be silent about the pending legislation to create the voucher program. David Brennan who was Catholic was a major donor to Voinovich. Brennan later set up White Hat Management to manage charter schools.
The article concludes with corroboration that the parties involved
factored into their decision that a Catholic electorate could swing Republican if, “the right bells were wrung.”
The article title, “How school choice began in Ohio.”
LikeLike