During the last gubernatorial campaign, the Network for Public Education decided not to endorse Tony Evers. A friend in Wisconsin warned us that he would not be an ally. We endorsed a different candidate, our Wisconsin allies were disappointed in us, and Evers won. Now we know: Evers is not a reliable friend of public schools. He just agreed to a stunning hike in voucher spending.
Ruth Conniff, editor-in-chief of The Wisconsin Examiner, reviews the money and politics behind the campaign to fund private schools and defund public schools in Wisconsin. Despite the failure of school choice, the rightwing money keeps flowing to destroy public schools as the center of community life.
She writes:
Now that the new school year has started, I’ve been volunteering on the Madison East High School cross-country team, trying to keep up with 80 or so kids as they run through Madison’s east side neighborhoods and around the fields behind the school.
A former East runner myself, I’ve always been a Purgolder partisan. All three of my kids have been shaped by the down-to-earth culture of East High School, with its hallmark quirkiness, warmth and inclusive ethic that, to me, captures the social value of public school.
To be sure, there are glaring inequities among public schools in Wisconsin. These are on display to East kids whenever they travel for meets away from their school, with its aging facilities and World War II-era cinder track, to the groomed fields and gleaming stadiums of some of their competitors.
Still, the inequities among public schools in richer and poorer property tax districts are nothing compared to the existential threat to public education from a parallel system of publicly funded private schools that has been nurtured and promoted by a national network of right-wing think tanks, well funded lobbyists and anti-government ideologues.
For decades, Wisconsin has been at the epicenter of the movement to privatize education, pushed by the Milwaukee-based Bradley Foundation, a mega-wealthy conservative foundation and early backer of Milwaukee’s first-in-the-nation school voucher program. That program has expanded from fewer than 350 students when it launched in 1990 to 52,000 Wisconsin students using school vouchers today.
This year school privatization advocates scored a huge victory when Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, a longtime ally of public schools, agreed to a budget bargain that includes a historic bump in the amount of tax money per pupil Wisconsinites spend on private school vouchers. The rate went up from $8,399 to $9,874 for K-8 students and from $9,405 to $12,368 for high schoolers.
Not only is the amount of money taxpayers spend on private education increasing, in just a couple of years all enrollment caps come off the school choice program. We are on our way to becoming an all-voucher system.
This makes no sense, especially since, over the last 33 years, the school voucher experiment has failed to produce better outcomes in reading and math than regular public schools.
So why are we undermining our public school system to continue the voucher expansion?
School Choice Wisconsin would have you believe that vouchers for private school are an improvement on public schools. In a recent report the group claims that publicly funded private schools are more “cost effective” when you compare their academic results to the cost of educating each student. (Behind the scenes, meanwhile, the same group is pushing to prevent the state from publicly disclosing how much taxpayer money we’re spending on publicly funded private schools.)
There’s something fishy going on with the scientific-sounding document School Choice Wisconsin is promoting.
Using the word “report” to describe the document is “the kind of thing that drives school finance experts nuts,” Joshua Cowen, a professor of education policy at Michigan State University who has studied school vouchers for nearly two decades. told me on the phone after he read it.
“A serious version of this would give a range and talk about what would happen if you changed your assumptions,” Cowen said. For example, there are big differences in per-pupil spending across Wisconsin school districts, but the school choice lobby group came up with a “back of the envelope” ratio that doesn’t separate different areas with different costs. Nor does it make an apples-to-apples comparison between particular voucher schools and nearby public schools in the same district.
There’s a much bigger problem, though, says Cowen.
“If you took the report at its word,” he says, “it’s possible to achieve exactly what they’re describing simply by exiting the children who are the most expensive to educate.”
That’s significant, because Wisconsin voucher schools have a long record of expelling and counseling out expensive-to-educate students. The ACLU of Wisconsin called on the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Wisconsin’s school voucher program for discriminating against children with disabilities in 2011, pointing to the very low number of special needs students in Milwaukee voucher schools.
Last May, Wisconsin Watch reported on how voucher schools continue to discriminate against LGBTQ students and kids with disabilities by expelling them or counseling them to drop out.
“Forget cost-effective,” says Cowen. “they’re just able to reject kids that are more costly to them.”
Meanwhile, touting their dubious record of success in Wisconsin, pro-voucher groups are using Wisconsin kids to push forward vouchers nationally, Cowen says.
“The foot in the door created by the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program in 1990 with 350 kids — that’s what created vouchers everywhere,” says Cowen. He notes a that the School Choice Wisconsin report credits a study by Corey DeAngelis, Ph.D. — a researcher to whom the report attributes a long list of obscure academic journal publications. What the report doesn’t note is that DeAngelis is a fellow at right-wing billionaire Betsy DeVos’ American Federation for Children, a Michigan-based pro-voucher group that has dumped money into Wisconsin elections. His American Federation for Children bio adds his ties to a bunch of other right-wing foundations: executive director at Educational Freedom Institute, an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, a senior fellow at Reason Foundation, and a board member at Liberty Justice Center — as well as a contributor to National Review and Fox News.
The idea that public schools have failed and the free market is the solution has been the drum beat from these groups for decades.
The results have not been good.
“The roughly zero difference between voucher students and non voucher students in Wisconsin — that is about as good as it gets nationally,” Cowen says. As unimpressive as the school voucher experiment has been in Wisconsin, things are better here than in other states that followed Wisconsin’s lead, where Cowen describes the outcomes as “catastrophic.”
“We don’t often see programs that reduce student achievement the way vouchers have in Ohio, Indiana, Louisiana, and DC,” he says.
The learning loss caused by what Cowen calls “subprime” voucher schools in church basements and strip malls, where “academics is not their priority,” has had “roughly twice the effect of COVID,” in reducing academic performance, he says.
Please open the link to finish reading this excellent article. As Conniff points out, it’s absurd for a rightwing advocacy group to describe its advertising as a “report.”

They, the right-wing fascists, don’t care at all. As stated in the article, this isn’t about offering anything of value unless you’re a believer in isolating your children from the “other.” That is the fascism mindset in summary. First isolate your own type from everyone else, then ostracize and destroy the other. Inclusion is to be avoided at all costs.
LikeLike
Correction: “They, the REGRESSIVE right-wing THEOfascists, don’t care at all.”
LikeLike
Sarcasm alert! What’s wrong with this blog? Why can’t you show both sides? Sarcasm alert over. Crisis averted.
When one side of a debate is founded in dishonesty, where concern for all is just a feint, and good public policy is just a front, trying to be “fair to both sides “ gives the win to the side that does not really agree with the basic goal. In the debate over public education, the goal should be opportunities for all, regardless of economic condition. When modern conservatives remove even the veil of belief in this goal, as they have with the voucher proposals now headed for specific religious groups, there is hardly another side to the argument.
LikeLike
Regardless of what ideological tagline is applied to the process, the goal is always the same. These groups want to gain access to the billions of public funds allocated to public education, undermine public schools and the unions the teachers join.
LikeLike
Suppose the Republicans had nearly 100% control of teacher’s unions, with 90% of Republicans as teachers. Colleges are 90% republican. Would you all still be saying the same nonsense?
Why would Republicans help when dems control all the unions, indoctrinating the kids with their left teachers
Dems are doing great we have a country that cannot read or write or even do math, let’s blame the republicans, though, ohhh the sick hypocrisy.
LikeLike
“Colleges are 90%” what?
Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley (he went to a Catholic high school),
JD Vance (he converted to Catholicism when he became politically opportunistic), Gov. DeSantis (he’s a right wing Catholic who attended a Catholic school before high school) and Donald Trump, all went to legacy admission elite schools.
Charles Koch, huge funder of GOP candidates and, who is closely associated with the Catholic University of America in Wash. D.C. has dropped mega money on colleges to get his free market exploitation of labor vision adopted. Jefferson warned, in every age, in every country, the priest aligns with the despot.
If you want a nation that’s a theocracy married to oligarchs, make that case. Don’t waste words making other points.
Both the archdioceses in Ohio and Republican Uihlein from
Illinois were top funders of the anti-democracy issue on the August ballot in Ohio as prelude to forcing Ohioans to have the number of children the Catholic Church wants them to have. It’s a template for other states.
Just curious – do you know how much of the nation’s wealth is controlled by the richest 0.1%? Did you know that it was the combination of Koch-like economic views and the Catholic Church that brought death by starvation to 1,000,000 Irish during the Great Hunger?
LikeLike
All highly questionable statistics and troll-like, racially tinged usernames aside, why would Republicans help public education if educators tend to care about others more than do Republicans and therefore look in numbers to Democrats for a lifeline? Republicans should support public education because public education supports the republic, that’s why. An educated electorate is not your enemy. People who aren’t Paddy asses are not your enemies. People might poke a little fun here and there. It’s unavoidable. We’re e pluribus unum, though, one of many, and we are not at war with one another. We are not out to harm one another. Democrats are not out to harm you.
LikeLike
In the last few elections, some Democrats that were elected by telling voters what they wanted to her, turned out to be moles planted inside the Democratic Party pretending to be moderates or progressives, or even liberals.
Tony Evers seems to be one of this operatives.
LikeLike
Ruth Conniff’s piece is untruthful.
https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2023/09/08/op-ed-the-truth-about-school-choice/
LikeLike
I’ll check the data. I don’t trust claims by school choice lobbyists.
LikeLike
I will watch for your observations.
LikeLike
Have you checked the data?
LikeLike
I posted the response five days ago: https://dianeravitch.net/2023/09/22/josh-cowen-the-truth-about-vouchers-in-milwaukee/
You did not tell me you are the leader of School Choice lobby
LikeLike
Diane,
You asked Professor Joshua Cowen to respond to comments by Nicholas Kelly, President of School Choice Wisconsin. Kelly’s comments were posted at the online media site, Urban Milwaukee.
Kelly’s piece disputed two claims Cowen had made in a Wisconsin Examiner article by Ruth Conniff, an article that you highly praised.
You have received and posted a lengthy response from Cowen. It is noteworthy for not addressing either of the two items raised by Kelly.
In one instance, Cowen was quoted in the Wisconsin Examiner as saying schools in Wisconsin choice programs are “just able to reject kids that are more costly to them.” Kelly’s rebuttal pointed out this is untrue. Cowen’s response to you does not mention this issue.
In another instance, Cowen said in the Wisconsin Examiner that a School Choice Wisconsin report does not “make an apples-to-apples comparison between particular voucher schools and nearby public schools in the same district. Kelly’s rebuttal pointed out this also is untrue. Cowen’s response to you also does not mention this issue.
So, you sought Cowen’s response to a critique of two claims he made that are untrue. He addressed neither of those claims.
Did you seek Conniff’s response to the erroneous claims she made in the article?
Cowen says I sent him “angry” emails. Ask him for proof and judge for yourself.
By the way, Cowen’s response to you erroneously described the origin of a study of the Milwaukee voucher program. He says is arose when “groups like School Choice Wisconsin, the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, and teacher stakeholder groups came together to agree on a third-party review of these programs.” He cites 2005 Wisconsin Act 125 as evidence.
He is wrong, again. The study to which he refers was in the planning stages long before Act 125. Neither the DPI nor “teacher stakeholder groups” were involved. The relevant language in Act 125, which I help draft, facilitated the work of the study team by requiring schools to provide the team with test data.
In summary, Cowen did not address the two errors cited by Kelly and went on to make another one as it relates to the history of the study.
Diane, we met on a couple occasions when you participated in conferences at Harvard on school choice. We subsequently exchanged emails for a period of a couple years. You knew me as a supporter of school choice. I did not think to reintroduce myself.
George
LikeLike
George,
I asked Josh Cowen to respond and he saw no point in engaging in an exchange. Josh is not a voucher-phobe. He is an honest researcher who concluded that vouchers consistently fail, and that most kids who take vouchers are already in private schools.
I’m
Sorry I don’t remember meeting you. It was a long time ago, maybe 20-25 years?
LikeLike
Ruth Conniff won’t walk back her demonstrably untruthful claims./Users/georgemitchell/Desktop/Serving-All-?-Students-with-Disabilities- in-Wisconsins-Parental-Choice-Programs.pdf
LikeLike