This post is one of Jan Resseger’s best, most trenchant analyses of the robust and evil plot to defund public schools. She explains how the federal government—through No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top—drove federal Test-and-Punish practices and laws into the states. Even though those two vast federal programs failed, they remain alive in the states. Their “success,” if you can call it that, was in discrediting public schools and promoting privately-managed charter schools and vouchers.
The transformation of education from a civic obligation to a consumer good accelerated the passage of voucher legislation. Meanwhile the rhetoric of “saving poor kids from failing public schools” has quietly disappeared. Red states are lifting their income limits on voucher eligibility to make them available to all students, rich and poor. Despite research showing that vouchers are worse for poor students than the public schools they left, red state legislators are undaunted. Despite evidence that most vouchers are claimed by students already enrolled in private schools, red states continue to expand them. In effect, the rationale for privatization is no longer to fund a better alternative to public schools, but to hand public money to a clamorous interest group: private school parents.
Jan Resseger begins:
The federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), passed in 2002, embodied school reform premised on the theory of test-based accountability—the requirement of high-stakes standardized tests for all students and the application of sanctions for schools unable to raise test scores. The idea was that if you threatened schools with closure or threatened to turn them into charter schools or threatened to punish teachers if their students’ overall scores were low, you could make the teachers work harder and somehow raise an entire school’s test scores. It was an experiment whose proponents believed all children could be made proficient by 2014.
By 2013, those of us who support our nation’s public schools knew the experiment had failed. Even the Congressional supporters of No Child Left Behind knew it had not worked; they created waivers for the growing number of school districts unable to guarantee all students would be proficient in 2014. In 2015, when Congress reauthorized the federal education law as the Every Student Succeeds Act, the new law reduced federal punishments, while it still required the states to test students every year and create plans to turn around low scoring schools. Test-and-Punish school reform did not end, however. Its remnants remained in the state policies that had been mandated by NCLB and Race to the Top and had been enacted in state laws.
Today after two decades, it is clear that overall test scores have not risen; neither has the stated goal of corporate school accountability—closing achievement gaps—been accomplished. Diane Ravitch explains that test-and-punish school accountability, “overlooks the well-known fact that test scores are highly correlated with family income and are influenced more by home conditions than by teachers or schools. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of public schools were closed because of their inability to meet high test score goals. All of the closed schools were in impoverished communities. Thousands of teachers were penalized or fired because they taught the children with the biggest challenges, those who didn’t speak English, those with severe disabilities, those whose lives were in turmoil due to extreme poverty.”
State politics has now, however, made it even more difficult to push back against the forces attacking public schooling. The federal legislation was designed to drive a test-and-punish agenda into the state legislatures. No Child Left Behind began by mandating testing and sanctions. Then Race to the Top bribed states to enact their own sanctions for low-scoring schools and punish teachers by tying their evaluations to their students’ test scores. And ESSA continued requiring testing all students and required states to devise turnarounds for the lowest scoring schools. While under No Child Left Behind and the early days of Race to the Top advocates across the states could collaborate nationally to push back against the federal policy itself, the school reform battle in recent years has devolved to the state legislatures which enacted the federal requirements idiosyncratically into their own laws. Right now we are watching the state takeover of the public schools in Houston, Texas and Oklahoma’s threatened takeover of the Tulsa public schools, at the same time we are watching the consequences ten years later of the closure in 2013 of 50 public schools in Chicago’s poorest African American neighborhoods.
Test-based, punitive school reform has also dangerously discredited the nation’s public schools. The school accountability movement created the concept of “failing schools,” persistently condemned the schools in urban America, and accelerated the drive for school choice and privatization. Twenty years of school reform has culminated in the vast expansion of school privatization in the form of vouchers. This year, 12 states—by my count, and I may have missed some—have enacted or significantly expanded state-funded private school tuition vouchers at the expense of public school funding: Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, and Wisconsin.
Please open the link and finish reading this important post.

Dr. Ravitch, I wanted to share a piece I wrote on the Houston schools. The piece is posted on Academia.edu but I have attached it here so you can download. Thank you for your work. Dr. Bruce Katz
LikeLike
Thanks, Bruce. There is no attachment.
LikeLike
I don’t think WordPress accepts attachments. I’ll try academia.
LikeLike
I am sorry that Word Press does not accept files. Here is the link to my page on Academia ,I wish to bring to your attention the most recent post: WHEN POLITICS AND SCHOOLS COLLIDE:
Is it any wonder that students become the victims?
LikeLike
States that offer vouchers will find out the hard way that they are an expensive mistake that will end up costing much more than projected, and they offer very little educational return on this bad investment. The public will end up paying more in taxes, and their public schools will suffer the consequences of this reckless decision. Maybe that is the extremist goal anyway. The radicals intend to dismantle the public schools.
LikeLike
“Accountability” (aka blame, shame, and punishment) wasn’t–for it prime authors–a theory of action for achievement improvement, but rather a way to accomplish a goal the public didn’t want: Privatization of public education. Democrats bought a Faustian bargain, thinking they’d get increased funding that never fully materialized. Why? Because both GOP and Dems believed that inequity was normal and inevitable. All the talk about “data driven decision making” was window dressing for the victims of the policy that didn’t apply to its perpetrators. Voters need to organize and demand a change!
LikeLike
Amen, Arthur. TRUE! 👍
LikeLike
Meanwhile, rhetoric doesn’t save
kids from Test-and-Punish practices,
or add accountability to the
practitioners of said folly.
Decades of books, essays, or
statements, have yet to save
Public School kids
from test and punish or
stop the waste of funding
landing in the private
pockets of all the
complicit “actors”,
outnumbering voucher
users.
So when it comes to
wasting “Public” funds,
is the pot calling the
kettle black?
LikeLike
You know when many of our schools went into “program improvement,” certain schools became “schools of choice.” So, a family could say, “I want my child to go to that school” instead of sticking to the “neighborhood school.” If my memory serves me correctly, one middle school was the “school of choice.” All of a sudden its enrollment was about 1100 students and left the other two hovering around 400-500. Then the school district had to hustle to get more portables to house the new students (at that time portables were around $90K). I thought, “Now what? Are we going to play “musical portables” once the new “all that” school doesn’t make the grade? Teachers were working hard in a district that paid the lowest in the county. Even if a family from the east side of town wanted to go to the “new all that school,” most didn’t have transportation. At one point, our continuation school (per capita) outscored the comprehensive high school, so as Andy Warhol would say, “…15 minutes of fame…” Why? We had a lot of highly-intelligent kids who didn’t like doing homework, but tested well. I remember we were at a district staff meeting and they all cheered for the math scores. I asked my math colleague, “So, what did you do?” He said, “I am teaching math, the way I have always taught math. He said, “I just have different students.” And, as our town grew (we started getting Google families who could buy cheap and commute to Silicon Valley) the demographics changed (more college educated families) and BAMM! Wow, wee, proficiency levels were on the rise. There may have been some changes to the curriculum a tad (as typical), but overall courses were primarily the same; we just had different clientele. As always, just reporting from the trenches.
LikeLike
Wealth in America has been enhanced by privatized socialism. There are few with means into the millions who do not benefit handsomely from government largess. Whether it is in the form of tax breaks to direct subsidies, the rich in America have one significant goal. Not only do they want to keep all of their money, but they want to take a good portion of the American Taxpayers. Over this period of so-called education reform, state funds have not decreased, but more of state budgets go to the oligarchic corporate behemoths at the expense of the citizenry. Actors such as ALEC, the Federalist Society, and the Heritage Foundation seek total control of the means of production for their benefit. The dismantling of the administrative state will mean services necessary for everyone will only be provided for a few. The American people have the power to reject this corporate power grab, but our time is running short.
LikeLike