The Washington Post published the following editorial yesterday:
Alexei Navalny has spent more than 900 days behind bars — and nearly 200 in solitary confinement — for having the courage to speak critically of Russia’s despotic president, Vladimir Putin. Now, in addition to his current sentence of more than 11 years, prosecutors in a new trial have asked for an additional 20 years on ludicrous charges of “extremism.” And once again, Mr. Navalny refuses to be silenced.
Speaking at the conclusion of his closed trial in prison this month before 18 court officials — seven of whom wore black masks to hide their identity — Mr. Navalny showed he remains a powerful voice of conscience. And that is why we thought it worthwhile to share his words at length here.
“The question of how to act is the central question of humanity,” he said. “People have searched high and low for the formula of doing the right thing, for something to base the right decisions on.”
Mr. Navalny recalled the teaching of professor Yuri Lotman, who once told students, “A man always finds himself in an unforeseeable situation. And then he has two legs to rest on: conscience and intellect.”
“To rely only on one’s conscience is intuitively correct,” Mr. Navalny added. “But an abstract morality that does not take into account human nature and the real world will degenerate either into stupidity or atrocity, as it has happened more than once before. But the reliance on intellect without conscience is precisely what now lies at the core of the Russian state.”
Mr. Navalny recalled that Mr. Putin set out initially to use Russia’s energy and other resources to “build an unscrupulous but cunning, modern, rational, ruthless state.”
He summed up the rationale of those who rule Russia this way: “We will become richer than the czars of the past. We have so much oil that even the common folk will get something from it. By exploiting this world of contradictions and the vulnerability of democracy, we will become leaders, and everyone will respect us. And if not respect, then at least fear.
“And yet the same thing happens as everywhere else. The intellect, unconstrained by conscience, whispers: Snatch, steal. If you are stronger, your interests are always more important than the rights of others.”
Then came the invasion of Ukraine, in which Mr. Navalny said Russia under Mr. Putin had “slipped and collapsed with a crash, destroying everything around it. And now it is floundering in a pool of either mud or blood, with broken bones and the poor, robbed population, surrounded by the tens of thousands of victims of the most stupid and senseless war of the 21st century.
“Of course, sooner or later, it will rise again. And it is up to us to determine what it will rest on in the future.”
“It may seem to you now that I am crazy,” he told the court. “But in my opinion, it’s you who are crazy. You have one God-given life, and this is what you choose to spend it on? Putting robes on your shoulders and black masks on your heads to protect those who rob you? To help someone who already has 10 palaces to build an 11th?”
Mr. Navalny implored the court officials to join him in the fight for “a free and prosperous” Russia.
“When you’re tired of slipping under this regime, splitting your forehead and your future, when you finally realize that the rejection of conscience will eventually lead to the disappearance of intellect, then maybe you will stand on both of the legs on which every man should stand, and we will be able to bring the beautiful Russia of the future closer, together.”
These brave words, written from the cramped, miserable conditions of solitary confinement, are those of a man who possesses a vision for Russia and the high principles to lead it — unlike the brute who sits in the Kremlin.

Amen
LikeLike
Navalny, a brave prince among thieves!
LikeLike
Navalny has survived poisonings and numerous attacks that nearly left him totally blinded and almost killed him. I am surprised that his words and testimony from the trial were released to the public since it is a closed trial. He is a man of incredible courage and integrity, it’s a miracle that he’s still alive and fighting.
LikeLike
No doubt, the Russian people will be barred from hearing his extraordinary words.
LikeLike
After he was poisoned, he was revived in a German hospital. He could have stayed in Germany or fled to the US but he returned to Moscow where he was immediately arrested. His daughter is a student at Stanford.
LikeLike
Since Putin doesn’t seem to have any problem getting rid of (poison, bullets to the back of heads, entire families found dead after one member disagrees publicly with Putin, tossed out high rise windows) anyone for any reason, I wonder why Putin lets Navalany stay alive.
LikeLike
Navalny is isolated in a max security prison camp far from civilization. I don’t know how he communicates with the outside world. Maybe his prominence protects him from being murdered. And Putin can display him as an example of what happens to anyone who challenges his rule
LikeLike
Another similar case, Vladimir Kara-Murza, the journalist who bravely returned to Russia to be a dissident voice there and is now a political prisoner of Putin’s corrupt, autocratic, criminal regime
LikeLike
Also a dissident who called for free and fair elections. Also poisoned. Also returned to Russia despite this. Also arrested on trumped-up charges and sent to the Gulag.
LikeLike
https://open.substack.com/pub/cobaugh/p/texas-travesty?r=3ljjp&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
LikeLike
Im confused . Didnt he earlier in his Political life refer to Muslims as ” cockroaches ”
And Asians. As “sub humans ” who could ”
Overrun Mother Russia ” ?
And if he renounced these Ultra Right Nationalist views when did he do that and how public was his recanting ? Sorry but he doesn’t sound like a Democrat alternative to me !
LikeLike
Navalny is the leader of the opposition to Putin. Human Rights Watch designated him as a “prisoner of conscience.”
Compare him to the mass murderer, tyrant, and kleptocrat Putin. In comparison, Navalny is a Saint.
LikeLike
According to the New York Times in 2011 he stood shoulder to shoulder with ”
Skinheads and Neo Nazis at rallies ” where he referred to Muslims ”
As cockroaches who need to be exterminated “! It sounds similar to the white washing of the fascist Azov battalion in Ukraine. All to serve the interests of the New Cold War !
LikeLike
Stan, do you prefer Putin? Everyone else who opposed Putin is dead.
LikeLike
I would like to ask you what do you think of his statement that Muslims were ” Cockroaches ” that should be killed ! Also that Asians are ” subhumans ” !!! No A Fascist like him is not someone I would allied with under any circumstances. Do you really feel differently ?
LikeLike
Stan, those would not be my views, and I do not endorse them in any way. That was 12 years ago, so maybe he has changed. People do change.
Again, as between the mass murderer Putin—who is now bombing the grain that feeds poor nations—and a man who said distasteful things, I’ll choose Navalny. No question. Do you think that an insulting comment is worse than genocide?
LikeLike
Stan,
Do you approve of Putin’s attacks on food shipped from Ukraine to countries where people will starve without it?
This is from Heather Cox Richardson’s letter, just posted:
“Russia continues to bomb the Ukrainian port city of Odesa, targeting agricultural infrastructure. Putin seems to have decided that if he can’t have Odesa, neither can anyone else. On Friday, Russia destroyed 100 tons of peas and 20 tons of barley in Odesa. Russia’s attacks on Ukrainian grain facilities just as the wheat harvest begins have spiked global grain prices and threatened food exports to Africa, which Russia has suggested it could take over itself. Russia’s attacks on Ukraine have badly damaged the country’s agricultural capacity, a blow to global food supplies. Today, Klaus Iohannis, the president of Romania, said he “strongly condemn[s]” Russian attacks on grain transit after Russians hit the port of Reni on the Romanian border.”
Stan, do you approve of Putin’s attacks on the global food supply?
LikeLike
Stan W—Explain why you used the term “Democrat” instead of “Democratic” in your first comment.
LikeLike
History teaches us that the first casualty in war is the truth. It’s best to question everything and not be led by the nose of corporate propaganda, subsidized by the military-industrial complex.
LikeLike
John,
One thing is certain: Russia invaded Ukraine. Ukraine did not invade Russia.
LikeLike
nato playing games with russia, Biden blew up Nordstream pipleline, ukraine sent drones to Russia, Seems like we are setting russia up for a ww3. Ukraine is wicked, bio labs, human trafficking, money laundering, you name it, ukraine is a disaster
LikeLike
Truth is apparently a casualty before war as well. Navalny might be despicable. Putin certainly launched military operations against Ukraine and several other nations, including the Syrian engagement, which sparked the most massive population displacement since WWII. Free countries do not poison people because they are despicable.
LikeLike
Here’s two statements from Amnesty International: “Aleksei Navalny, a prominent Russian opposition figure and anti-corruption activist, was unlawfully detained and has been imprisoned for 11 years and 6 months. He is still in prison and suffers continual ill-treatment, including constant surveillance and psychological pressure. He must be freed immediately and unconditionally.” Here’s the other: “Authorities in the USA must drop the espionage and all other charges against Julian Assange that relate to his publishing activities as part of his work with Wikileaks. The US government’s unrelenting pursuit of Julian Assange for having published disclosed documents that included possible war crimes committed by the US military is nothing short of a full-scale assault on the right to freedom of expression.” I, unlike the Washington Post believe that both individuals are worthy victims who should be freed.
LikeLike
Why are we so willing to accept the rantings of right wing fascists trolls feeding on Russian disinformation. There is a reason amnesty reversed itself on the revocation of POC status only months after revoking it.
The story is far more complex then the bottom feeders would have you believe.
Diane you worked for the Bush Administration as an Under Secretary of Education. Therefore you are now a supporter of Standardized Testing and Corporate Education reform.
I was particularly struck by this.
“At the time, he told me that only a united front could overthrow the Putin regime, and only after that should pro-Western liberal democrats like him hash out their differences with the ethno-nationalists. Albats recalled that it was in this context that she told Navalny that he should attend the Russian March. They went together. “I wore a giant Star of David that I made sure could be seen from a distance,” she told me. “He took a lot of shit for walking with a kike.” Their efforts to engage people in conversation failed, and after three years they gave up.
Navalny has often said that he saw the Russian March as a form of valid political expression, that in the kind of Russia that he and his supporters are fighting for—a free, democratic society—the Russian March will be a festive annual event like the St. Patrick’s Day Parade. “He believes that if you don’t talk to the kind of people who attend these marches, they will all become skinheads,” Leonid Volkov, who runs the political-organizing part of Navalny’s organization, told me over the phone. “But, if you talk to them, you may be able to convince them that their real enemy is Putin.” Volkov, who is Jewish, lives in exile in Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania.”
When it is the Putin propaganda machine creating the narrative one need ask where is the independent media in Russia to investigate the claims?
The answer outside of Russia.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-evolution-of-alexey-navalnys-nationalism
LikeLike