Governor Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania announced that he would drop his support for vouchers in order to pass a state budget. Republicans who control the State Senate want vouchers. Democrats, with a slim majority in the House, are opposed to vouchers.
HARRISBURG — Gov. Josh Shapiro says he plans to scrap his push for private school vouchers in Pennsylvania’s state budget in order to close a deal with the commonwealth’s divided legislature five days after the deadline.
The Democrat issued a statement Wednesday acknowledging that talks had deadlocked over a $100 million voucher program, which he had supported and which state Senate Republicans passed as part of their budget proposal last week. Pennsylvania House Democratic leaders oppose vouchers and had refused to act on the Senate’s bill.
Shapiro’s solution, he said, was to promise state House Democrats that if they pass the Senate’s budget, he will then line-item veto the vouchers from the $45.5 billion spending plan.
“Our Commonwealth should not be plunged into a painful, protracted budget impasse while our communities wait for the help and resources this commonsense budget will deliver,” Shapiro said in a statement.
Spotlight PA had previously reported the existence of Shapiro’s plan to cut vouchers out of the budget deal.
In his statement, Shapiro said that over the weekend, state House Democrats requested a legal memo from his administration that confirmed that any voucher program passed as part of the budget could not be implemented without separate enabling legislation — legislation that House Democrats might be able to block.
“Knowing that the two chambers will not reach consensus at this time to enact [the voucher program], and unwilling to hold up our entire budget process over this issue, I will line-item veto the full $100 million appropriation and it will not be part of this budget bill,” Shapiro said.
In a letter to state Senate Republicans viewed by Spotlight PA, House Majority Leader Matt Bradford (D., Montgomery) wrote Wednesday that his chamber plans to take Shapiro at his word.
“With the Governor’s assurance that he neither has the legal authority nor intention to move forward with [vouchers] at this time, the House will consider [the Senate budget bill] on concurrence later today,” Bradford wrote.
The voucher program would fund private school scholarships for students in low-achieving public school districts.
The deal that included it, which passed the state Senate 29-21 on Friday, included key Democratic priorities like increased education funding, universal free school breakfast, and the commonwealth’s first-ever funding for public legal defense. However, Democrats viewed the vouchers as a poison pill.
When they passed their plan last week, state Senate GOP leaders made it clear that their support was contingent on vouchers being included, with Senate President Pro Tempore Kim Ward (R., Westmoreland) telling reporters that any plan that didn’t include vouchers would have to have “a different number.”
This new maneuver from Shapiro, assuming continued support from state House Democrats, would not require the proposed plan to go back to the Senate, thus circumventing Republicans there. Republican leaders did not immediately return a request for comment.
While Bradford has said House Democrats are on board with Shapiro’s plan, members of the caucus expressed doubts throughout the day Wednesday about any plan that would require them to approve a budget with vouchers and rely on the governor to then eliminate them.
“There’s not a lot of trust amongst [Democratic] members and the administration,” one House Democrat, who requested anonymity to discuss ongoing budget negotiations, told Spotlight PA.

Great news
LikeLike
Yes, I read the article this morning in my morning Philadelphia Inquirer, the most credible source in Southeastern PA. I was not happy at all with Josh Shapiro when I had heard about his agreement. Especially because I supported him and worked for his election. Aside from being a relentless advocate for public education, I am also a democratic committee representative for the Haverford Township Democratic Committee, a suburb of Philadelphia.
I thought that Josh knew and understood the issues of the privatization of Pennsylvania’s public schoolhouses and charter schools. I suppose our public school advocates need to raise our voices a notch or two or three.
At least he changed his mind a bit and I do realize the need to negotiate with our republican friends. But I support our true public schools. I do appreciate our local private schools and our catholic schools in our neighborhood. But as a local taxpayer, I should not have to pay for non-public schools or charter schools as they are not really public schools.
Yes, I got married in my local catholic church and St. Dot’s Catholic elementary school is a pillar of our neighborhood. I just heard the church bell ring as I am writing this.
But my grandson’s public school is Awesome and we are a very diverse school. My autistic grandson flourishes because of that diversity at Manoa elementary and his right to a free appropriate public education.
I am so thankful for the neighborhood I live in and my neighbors.
LikeLike
This is good news! Since you’re a PA resident, I want to ask you if Shapiro is a Democrat in the style of, say, a Rahm Emanuel? (I hope not, for the sake of his constituents.)
LikeLike
This is weird–it was my comment/question above (Retiredbutmissthekids) TO [1], & this is appearing as a comment FROM [1]. Word Press!!!
LikeLike
A “reliable source” told me that Governor Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew and he believes in vouchers. He may drop then now (to get the budget done) and bring them up in the future.
LikeLike
Pennsylvania’ s absurd payments to cyber charters have caused the commonwealth a great deal of fiscal harm. It makes no sense to further burden taxpayers with another layer of costly privatization that will undermine public education. Shapiro should do his homework on the cost of vouchers versus their benefit. Since there is little to no legitimate academic benefit, it is unsound policy to send more unaccountable tax dollars to private entities. Most voucher schools are unaccredited and offer subpar education. In state after state once vouchers start draining public funds, they continuously expand their demands. Pennsylvania can ill afford to shoulder such fiscal recklessness. A far wiser option is to improve public education and offer site-based community schools in high need communities.
LikeLike
Hear, hear!
LikeLike
Retired teacher,
I absolutely agree with you on every point!
We need a billion dollar school renewal program which includes new school buildings being built in Philadelphia and elsewhere so every child has a first rate real public school in every child’s neighborhood.
The charter school and privatization movement has not solved any of the issues in education. All it has done is drain the resources from our public schools in low economic areas.
It has diverted our children’s money into very private pockets.
LikeLike
Rich,
That’s the Finnish path.
Make every public school beautiful and welcoming.
It worked!
LikeLike
I grew up in what was a working class area of Philadelphia. My elementary school was older, but newly renovated, clean and well maintained. When I went to high school, my class was the second class to graduate from this newly constructed building. I doubt we had more money in the late 1950s and ’60s than we have now The difference is that now the city schools are majority-minority, and wealthy have lots of ways to escape paying their fair share. Shifting demographics has made Philly the poorest big city in the country. Maybe it is time to expect the commonwealth to contribute more instead of expecting privatization to address the shortfall. The main goal of privatization is profit which will always take priority over the needs of students.
LikeLike
Legislatures lose interest in big urban districts because they are majority-minority.
LikeLike
Privatization is not by, of and for the people. It is a wholly extractive scheme. Privatizers socialize the risk through tax dollars and privatize the profit.
LikeLike
Another small victory for democracy, but the evil forces that want to take away our individual freedoms and choices is relentless. The war will rage on. Hopefully, all the battles will only be fought in elections, the courts, state legislatures and Congress.
LikeLike
I know that this sounds very simplistic, but can’t a compromise be reached that would merge the benefits of charters as parents see it, with the public schools? There are benefits to both sides. Schools don’t want to lose their funding and the charters want better teaching, safety and discipline. I cannot see that teachers like what is happening in schools or having to conform to ever changing requirements. Parents certainly hate seeing their rights being diminished. Just what is the problem? Is the federal or state governments the cause or the Dept of Education? Is it school boards that feel they must follow the law without deviating when parents and even teachers are in opposition? Why can’t things change?
LikeLike
April,
The charter school lobby is funded by billionaires and Wall Street hedge funders. Their lobbyists write the laws that allow them to escape accountability.
LikeLike
The basic idea of charter schools was appealing, but they just ended up as a legal way to grab taxpayer’s money plus I don’t see why the public has to help individuals send their kids to private schools. If there is a problem with the local school, take this money earmarked for select families and reallocate it so improvements can be made in a way which benefits all.
LikeLike
Charter schools are a legal way to steal community assets.
LikeLike
April, the parents want their schools to be safe for their children and for their children to get a good education. There is no charter school in Philadelphia which outperforms the District’s schools. The only “high performing ” charter school is MAST which is located in the Somerton section of Philly. It is a high socio-economic area with a low number of students who live in poverty. Charter schools which serve the students well should be kept under the strict scrutiny and regulation of the School Board. The others should be taken back from the charter operators. That is done often by the Board of Education but requires a long legal process.
Even the good charters have schemes to put money into private pockets. A few years ago the Alliance for Philadelphia Public Schools, APPS, had a map showing how all of the privatizers and their organizations were connected. Jeffrey Yass and his wife are the biggest players. They are billionaires.
It is not about improving our schools. It is all about making a profit.
LikeLike
It is simply not sound to have two parallel, competing systems of schools fighting against one another for public funding. It doesn’t matter what any groups of people want (or have been misled by slick marketing into thinking they’re getting with a business model): With two systems operating under fixed costs having to weather market forces, everyone in both systems loses. Nearly everyone has her or his rights diminished with privatization and deregulation. Getting involved with a charter school you’re shooting yourself in the foot.
LikeLike
April
“rights diminished,” do you mean like when parents have no recourse at a private school whereas, in a public school they can go to board meetings and speak publicly, can elect board members?
“rights diminished,” do you mean like cherry picking students or counseling out students with low grades?
“rights diminished,” do you mean like when private managers can cut costs and quality, buy themselves Corvettes with public money and, there’s nothing a parent or the community can do about it?
LikeLike
Is there a reason why usernames are showing up as numbers in the Comments section?
LikeLike
A glitch, or we are all being replaced by ChatGPT so it doesn’t matter who we are anymore.
LikeLike
Reply to “A glitch…anymore” commenter who is ALSO NOT [1]–if that were the case, the horror!
LikeLike
Interestingly, actual Usernames are appearing under the Bell drop-down menu in WP, but [1] on the pages themselves. I have looked through the help and documentation in WP and have not found a cause for this. Neither could I find one online. I suspect that Diane will have to contact WordPress Support. I’m curious, though, what’s happening here. This might be something across WP sites, as the [1] phenomenon is happening on my WordPress site as well.
LikeLike
I checked some other websites. Seems to be happening all across WordPress.
LikeLike
I see names in comments, not numbers.
LikeLike
Odd. A bunch of us are seeing this:
[1]
July 6, 2023
I see names in comments, not numbers.
Name is replaced with [1]. Try this: go to my site, scroll down to the comments, and see if you see names or numbers there:
LikeLike
Hello Bob The below note from briefing@nature.com was in my box just before your note. The pictures wouldn’t translate here, but they are astounding. You can rest your case now. CBK
“Beautiful blob rewrites vertebrate origins”
“An exquisitely preserved 500-million-year-old fossilized sea squirt offers new insight into the evolution of tunicates, the sister group to vertebrates and a key to unravelling our own evolutionary origins. ‘It looks like a tunicate that died yesterday and just happened to fall down on some rock,’ says developmental biologist Nicholas Treen. The fossil resembles living tunicates that have two life stages: free-swimming larvae and adults that live rooted to the sea floor. This suggests that a crucial evolutionary moment — when sessile tunicates diverged from free-floating ones — happened 50 million years earlier than currently estimated on the basis of molecular clocks.
Science | 4 min read / Read more: An ancient link between heart and head — as seen in the blobby, headless sea squirt (Nature | 10 min read, Nature paywall. The regular “briefings” are free and ad-free) Reference: Nature Communications paper”
briefing@nature.com
LikeLike
You were a tadpole and I was a fish
In the Paleozoic time,
And side by side on the ebbing tide
We sprawled through the ooze and slime
LikeLike
Bob On Algorithms: Here is another timely “briefing” note from today’s (the same) “Nature” magazine. CBK
“How to take the bias out of algorithms
“Demographic-prediction algorithms can infer gender, race and ethnicity from people’s names on scientific papers, on social media or in political-donor databases. Comparisons with self-identification surveys reveal how flawed these tools can be: in one example, they misgender women 3.5 times more often than men, and racially misclassify 80% of Black people with highly educated parents. Sometimes, accuracy can be increased with tools hand-crafted with a particular population in mind. Often, researchers need to ask themselves whether it’s effective, justified and ethical to use algorithms at all. The good news is that imputation algorithms present new research opportunities. Because society’s biases are reflected in the way algorithms classify names, they could help with understanding name-based discrimination. Nature | 7 min read”
LikeLike
Omigosh–reading through the comments, EVERYONE is appearing as [1]– even Diane!!
LikeLike
If you click on Reply, WordPress tells you the username of the person you’re replying to, and then you can cancel the reply if you wish.
LikeLike
The glitch must be gone. I see names, not numbers.
LikeLike
Nope. I still see only numbers.
LikeLike
Sorry I was out to dinner with friends and was not watching the comments.
See, step away for a few hours and CHATGPT does a body snatch.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
Only I am #1 LOL
The Governor gets a pass on this for delivering in the end . As Biden should get a pass (in fact praise ) for negotiating the sick days the rail Unions wanted avoiding a catastrophe for these workers and the American Union Union movement (Identity hint) .
“After being roundly criticized for not offering paid sick days, the leading rail companies – BNSF, CSX, Norfolk Southern and Union Pacific – have granted many of their 93,000 workers four paid sick days a year through labor negotiations, with an option of taking three more paid sick days from personal days.May 1, 2023”
Negotiated after the mandated settlement. Politics is not always neat. It seems to me that Shapiro screwed the Republicans good. They never would have passed the budget with funding increases.
LikeLike
We are all Spartacus.
Uh, [1]
LikeLike
You are only pretending to be [1].
–#real [1]
LikeLike
Bob,
When I looked at your WordPress blog, every comment was addressed to a number, not a name.
On my end, I see only names, not numbers.
When you reply to a comment, the name of the person who submitted the comment appears.
LikeLike
There is some sort of glitch happening across WordPress.
LikeLike
I am still seeing [1] in lieu of the username for everyone’s comments. I just emailed WordPress about this. Awaiting their response.
LikeLike
Nope. When I reply to a comment, the username of that comment continues to be absent, replaced by [1]. So, for example, I just replied to a comment by Lloyd. I know it’s him because I see his picture. But his username is still replaced by [1].
LikeLike
What did the Dalai Lama say to the hotdog vendor?
Make me [1] with everything.
LikeLike
First they came for the usernames. . . .
LikeLike
Very funny, [1]…er, Bob!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on What's Gneiss for Education and commented:
I didn’t quite understand why Shapiro supported them in the first place.
LikeLike
Where Diane answered my earlier ? as to whether or not Josh is a Dem in the style of Rahm Emanuel, & she’d answered “A ‘reliable source’ told me that Gov. Shapiro is an Orthodox Jew & he believes in vouchers.” Uh-oh. Watch out for another Monsey, NY.
But we in Chicago also remember some kinda wheeling/dealing between Rahm & Cardinal, as well.
(Have at it, Linda!) So much for separation of church & state.
Some better news, though: one of our state legislators resigned, & appointed an Orthodox Rabbi (who promised he would keep his religious beliefs OUT of his legislative decision-making…& did not). When elections soon came up, voters trounced him.
LikeLiked by 1 person