Dan Rather and his friend Eliot Kirschner recently wrote about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s was against vaccines, which is either cynical or insane. You choose.
They wrote on the blog Steady:
When historians look back to analyze this era’s toxic irrationality, they may well focus on the anti-vaccine movement.
How tragic that we have to stand up and defend one of the most successful health innovations in the history of our species. Vaccines have saved hundreds of millions of lives and eradicated or greatly reduced scourges like smallpox and polio. They have protected millions from the worst effects of COVID and hastened a return to our pre-pandemic way of life, even though the dangers of the disease are not fully behind us.
Vaccines are also incredibly safe, especially when compared to all the other things people put into their bodies. There is no reputable scientific debate over any of this.
But none of these facts have dissuaded the instigators of ignorance, the cultivators of conspiracy theories, and the sellers of pseudoscience. They have whipped up their throngs of followers into a mania around vaccines that threatens the safety of this country and the world. And they have targeted doctors, scientists, and other medical professionals — the very people trying to keep us healthy.
This past weekend, we saw a particularly grave example of this destructive dynamic. Joe Rogan, the right-wing podcast host and frequent amplifier of conspiracy theories, welcomed notorious anti-vaxxer Robert Kennedy Jr. to his show. Kennedy is running for president as a Democratic challenger to President Biden, even though he sounds more like a MAGA Republican. Not surprisingly, he spouted his usual nonsense about the alleged dangers of vaccines, and Rogan ate it up.
That would have been bad enough. But the incident quickly escalated across social media and into the general press in a manner that speaks to our particularly troubled times. Pediatrician and vaccine expert Dr. Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, shared this article from Vice: “Spotify Has Stopped Even Sort of Trying to Stem Joe Rogan’s Vaccine Misinformation.” Spotify, the online music service, hosts Rogan’s podcast.
The response to Dr. Hotez’s tweet — which has now been viewed more than 28 million times — was a tidal wave of bananas. The doctor, a prominent voice on the importance of reputable science, was already a boogeyman for the anti-vaxxers and COVID deniers. They were ready to pounce. Rogan challenged Dr. Hotez to come on his podcast to “debate” Kennedy.
Then Elon Musk piled on and attacked Dr. Hotez on Twitter, which further empowered the legions of right-wing radicals. Dr. Hotez said he was confronted by anti-vaxxers outside his home. Scientists, journalists, and even business leaders like Mark Cuban jumped to the researcher’s defense against the onslaught of anti-science nonsense from Rogan, Musk, and their confederates.
There are many angles to this particular story that highlight the bad faith of the vaccine critics. They like to paint promoters of inoculations as tools of “Big Pharma.” But Dr. Hotez has developed a patent-free vaccine for COVID, which means neither he nor a big drug company will benefit financially from its use. Furthermore, going onto a podcast to talk about vaccines with Kennedy is not a “debate” — it’s performative nonsense. We don’t have NASA scientists debate flat Earthers.
And the idea that this is a matter of free speech is undercut when Musk uses the platform he bought to intimidate responsible voices by unleashing the mob (not to mention that we aren’t talking about government prosecution). In the wake of this episode, reports indicate scientists are (understandably) leaving Twitter in greater numbers because it has become an increasingly vile environment for mainstreaming anti-science harassment.
More generally, this episode represents another data point in a very disturbing trend, one exacerbated by, but not limited to, COVID or vaccines. Science is under siege from powerful players in American politics, business, and culture. It is largely a phenomenon of the modern Republican party and its reactionary allies, but not exclusively. It can be seen in our haphazard response to the climate crisis but also in a broad assault on data, expertise, and knowledge. This overall, general attack on science as a whole is a threat to our national security, health, and welfare.
Science can be a wonderfully encouraging and hopeful endeavor. It is a means for learning about the mysteries of life and the universe. It can lead to solutions for seemingly intractable problems. It is why cancer is not always a death sentence, why we can turn sunlight into clean electricity and take pictures of distant stars. Scientists aren’t perfect, of course. They are humans, after all. But science offers a way for us to arrive at important truths and then figure out where to go from there.
The likes of Kennedy, Rogan, and Musk are robbing us of this better future. By sowing discord and confusion, they are turning science and medicine into political footballs they toss back and forth at the public’s expense. But ultimately, the truth often wins out. Dr. Hotez and those who support him are standing up to the destructive bullying. In their courage and commitment, we can find reasons for hope.

A great man, Rather. He was canned for showing that the then emperor had no clothes. That was shameful.
LikeLike
His autobiography The Camera Never Blinks is a wonderful read, btw.
LikeLike
A slight edit
Science is under siege from powerful players in American politics, business, and culture. It is largely a phenomenon of the modern FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIAN, AMERICAN TALIBAN Republican party and its reactionary allies
LikeLike
The second sentence should read, of course,
THIS SEIGE is largely BEING CARRIED OUT BY the FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIAN AMERICAN TALIBAN, AKA THE Republican party, and its reactionary allies. Otherwise, the “It” at the beginning of the sentence incorrectly refers back to “Science.” Maybe some editor tinkered with Rather’s copy and inadvertently introduced this error, but all of us need editors, ofc.
LikeLike
Is RFK jr Christian taliban? Is Musk? Rogan? I think Rather’s point is that attacks on science are coming from multiple places. Of course, I am not denying the existence of anti-science Christianity.
LikeLiked by 1 person
MTG, Lauren Boebert, Ron DeSantis, Greg Abbott, Steve Bannon, Mike Huckster-bee, Sarah Huckster-bee, Mike Pence, Johnathan Stickland, Marcus Lamb, Eric Metaxas, Christopher Key, Al Mohler, Pete Ricketts, Greg Gianforte, Henry McMaster, Ted Cruz, Mike Parson, . . .
Evangelical antivaxxers. Orthodox Jewish antivaxxers. Rightwing Catholic antivaxxers. One could go on and on. But you get the picture.
There are strong correlations among positions like the inerrancy of the Bible, belief that we are in the End Times, opposition to vaccinations, belief that the Earth is flat, support for Donald Trump, and so on.
LikeLike
My response is in moderation, Roy.
LikeLike
MTG, Lauren Boebert, Ron DeSantis, Greg Abbott, Steve Bannon, Mike Huckster-bee, Sarah Huckster-bee, Mike Pence, Johnathan Stickland, Marcus Lamb, Eric Metaxas, Christopher Key, Al Mohler, Pete Ricketts, Greg Gianforte, Henry McMaster, Ted Cruz, Mike Parson, . . .
LikeLike
My note in moderation is a long list of Repugnican politicians and pundits who are both antivaxxers and Christian fundamentalists.
LikeLike
Yeah, you really can’t. Facts are Kryptonite to these fools.
LikeLike
Musk is a deranged fellow, and he is doing enormous damage.
LikeLike
Good morning Diane and everyone,
I don’t get it. It seems many anti-vaxxers are worried about what they are putting in their bodies. How many of these anti-vaxxers are on medication of some sort? How many of them run to the hospital/urgent care/doctor’s office when they or family members are ill and receive all kinds of chemical treatments? How many of them eat foods full of pesticides, hormones and carcinogens? How many of them know the chemical composition of the water they drink? When they go to restaurants, do they know where the food comes from and how it was prepared? What about the air they breathe? Do they know the air in their workplaces is safe? If you’re going to be worried about everything you put in your body, shouldn’t you be consistent and worry about it all?
LikeLike
Science-denying antivaxers like Kennedy and DeSantis and Trump and Rogan and Clapton and MTG and Rand Paul are responsible for people dying unnecessarily. They have blood on their hands.
LikeLike
Thanks, Mamie, for calling out this particular hypocrisy on the part of the antivax morons and/or opportunists. The former, MTG; the latter, DeSatan.
LikeLike
Thanks, Mamie.
You are right.
They are hypocrites.
LikeLike
What has Kennedy ever accomplished that anyone would want to pay attention to him? Apart from being born with a recognizable name?
LikeLike
He managed to parlay vaccine skepticism and phony science into a ton of money.
LikeLike
Rogan came from Planet Claire
And so did his millions of followers
LikeLike
such a great tune
LikeLike
Don’t ask what your country can do for you.
Your country will tell you what you can and can’t do!
LikeLike
“Spotify Has Stopped Even Sort of Trying to Stem Joe Rogan’s Vaccine Misinformation.“
Stopped? Spotify never even really started.
Anything Spotify has done in the past was nothing more than a charade.
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek loves Joe Rogan because he attracts millions of viewers. Ek cares about one thing ONLY: money.
LikeLike
There is no doubt that anti vax rhetoric is very harmful. Nor is there any doubt that casting doubt on science in general is, in this case, harmful to society. Moreover, the doubt with which scientific inquiry approaches itself is undermined by cynical doubt cast on its exercise by those who profit if people do not believe the science.
What is important is to understand why this is a modern phenomenon. When I was young, I thought I would see the end of superstition. It has not happened. Why not? I think the problem is more than just old superstition. Part of the problem rests with scientists being unable to communicate with laymen about matters that cannot be discussed without jargon. It is hard to explain the warming of the planet due to
Carbon, for example, because much of the situation involves probability and statistics.
Another problem for science is the degree to which it sells out to the production of profit. Many anti vax people believe companies understate the negative side effects of their vaccines to expand their profit. While I do not generally agree, I do think a government agency free of reliance on industry studies would go a long way toward assuring suspicions citizens that they are not being conned. As it exists today, drug manufacturers provide evidence to a government agency that reviews it. This may be as good as we can do, but it is not good enough for many suspicious people.
I must say that I am not sure what to do about this, but I do think it is a complex issue.
LikeLike
Roy,
We do have government agencies that review drugs and vaccines—the CDC and the FDA. Trump tried to corrupt them. Why should anyone doubt that they are not driven by profit.
LikeLike
He didn’t TRY to corrupt them. He actually corrupted them. It was INSANE to listen to how noncommittal the CDC was during the Trump years–hemming and hawing, issuing milquetoast guidelines, trying to have it both ways. It was truly disgusting how successful Trump was in watering down the CDC messaging. PEOPLE DIED UNNECESSARILY BECAUSE OF THIS.
LikeLike
Diane: I know we have those agencies, and I know there are corrupting influences in public institutions. This is why clear transparency is so important for all government agency and for private corporations as well. We cannot hope for trust in society when there is money in the picture. Vaccines have revolutionized medicine, and I take them all, but I would be lying if I said there was not some deep anxiety over whether I am doing the right thing.
LikeLike
It is hard to explain the warming of the planet due to
Carbon, for example
I think, Roy, that it’s a matter of poor communication by authorities and of the fact that many Democratic politicians (I’m looking at you, Joe Manchin), in addition to all the Repugnican ones, are owned by the fossil fuels industry. The fact is that the mechanism of Global Warming can be conclusively demonstrated by a fifth-grade science experiment. If the Democrats really wanted to do something about this, then the national party would be running infomercials that share stuff just like such a 5th-grade science fair project.
LikeLike
It’s very difficult to counter what has been a massive multi decade disinformation campaign from the fossil fuel companies who have also effectively bought countless politicians.
I’d say it’s actually impossible.
These companies actually turn one of the key elements of science — uncertainty — against the scientists in order to undermine their credibility with the public. It is a deeply cynical strategy, albeit highly effective.
LikeLike
“a deeply cynical strategy”
precisely. cynical and evil. Same thing happened with the tobacco companies that knew, based on their own testing, for decades that their product caused cancer but spent billions to deceive people about this.
LikeLike
I actually disagree that the main problem is poor science communication.
In fact, in the case of climate change, I think scientists have done an excellent job of conveying the basic facts.
But these efforts have been largely undermined by the massive disinformation campaign meant to sew doubt about the role of fossil fuel burning in climate change.
LikeLike
Agreed about the massive disinformation campaign
LikeLike
SDP, you make the precise argument Daniel Greenberg, one of the best science policy people ever, made in a book 22 years ago. As one who has worked in various ways to promote cancer patient education in the past 25 years, the biggest obstacle is not the clarity or significance of information scientists convey, but how the public can receive and process it. Less than ten percent of the American population is scientifically literate about basic concepts. As I have moaned here for years, you can’t have a free people without a broad understanding of the scientific method and know why it matters. It is very much analogous to the reason why education only gains traction as an occasional political football.
LikeLike
“I’m not sure what I think of what I think.”
–Paul Simon on religion
LikeLike
Another problem for science is the degree to which people in America cling to anti-scientific ancient Bronze Age superstition. Fortunately, our young people are moving away from that to a significant degree. But the older Americans–the ones who were suckled on fundamentalism, whether Catholic or Protestant or Orthodox–they can’t give it up. So, they go to their places of worship and there encounter antifax messaging from their extremely right-wing ministers, priests, and rabbis. Why? Because Trump politicized vaccination and because these religious extremists are right-wingers and support Trump.
LikeLike
cx: antivax messaging
LikeLike
Oh, there are plenty of young people who fall for it. It is a form of “insider knowledge”, of not being snowed by “the system” (I apologize for the dated vernacular, I’m an old guy).
People have always wanted to know the real skinny, the stuff THEY don’t want you to know. And education does not inoculate people from this.
LikeLike
Haaaa! Yes!!!! EXACTLY the mechanism!!!
I am referring, jsr, to the Pew Religion Studies that show a dramatic fall-off in religiosity among American young people, according to various measures of that.
LikeLike
I know a young man who graduated from the Colorado School of Mines, which some people compare favorably to MIT. (Not a good comparison: I grew up with MIT nearby, and I know enough about the School of Mines.)
But he was trained in scientific disciplines. And he has fallen for every bit of mysticism that floats before his eyeballs. Talking to him is useless.
The internet is a cesspool for some people. Particularly those on the Right.
LikeLike
Seriously, a grad of the Colorado School of Mines? Aie yie yie. That’s horrific.
LikeLike
Yep.
LikeLike
This is one of the most powerful mechanisms attracting people to cults. Imagine that you are a poorly educated and not-so-bright person, one who is always running up against people who know and understand more than you do and that suddenly, you encounter the promise of membership in a group that conveys to you the Secret Knowledge, the Gnosis, that sets you apart from and above the crowd. Very seductive, that. A tried-and-true technique among cult leaders, religious and political. Q Anon, New Religious Groups, fundamentalist Catholicism or Protestantism or Judaism–same phenomenon.
LikeLike
Then there are the Medievalist thinkers like me. Those Angels sure look good dancing on pinheads. And none of those thirds in harmony, either.
LikeLike
haaaa!!! xoxoxox!
LikeLike
Don’t know about Colorado School of Mines, but I’m not sure MIT is the “gold standard” on the thinking front.
After all many folks at MIT (including profs in Computer science, physics and high level administrators) “fell” for Jeffrey Epstein’s con.
(Or did they simply “overlook” his child sex predation conviction in order to get his money?)
LikeLike
You’re saying all these people knew about Epstein’s proclivities?
I find that unlikely.
LikeLike
Many of them, alas, flew regularly on Epstein’s Lolita Express, and some of them (quite famous people) did regular trips to his Manhattan mansion and to his island. Epstein was involved with the Media Lab at MIT. Epstein had his own office at Harvard. And all this happened AFTER he was convicted and given a breathtaking light sentence for procuring for prostitution a girl below age 18. Yeah, they knew. This was high profile.
LikeLike
There have been lots of brilliant folks at MIT over the years, SomeDAM. This institution has been home to Noam Chomsky, Morris Halle, John Nash, Claude Shannon, Norbert Weiner, and many other luminaries.
LikeLike
Bob You had me at Noam Chomsky. CBK
LikeLike
He is showing signs of age. His take on Ukraine, for example, is confused.
LikeLike
Bob Well about Chomsky . . . I know THAT feeling. CBK
LikeLike
Mois aussi, CBK
LikeLike
Moi aussi. Typo
LikeLike
He was always a terrible writer. LOL. But for a lot of decades, almost everything that happened of significance in linguistics was footnotes to Chomsky.
LikeLike
As a wise man (Forest Gump) once said , stupid is as stupid does.
And with at least one of MIT’s “brilliant” professors -computer “science” (sick) prof Marvin Minsky- it went further (much further) than simply “knowing about Epstein’s proclivities” (euphemism for “sex trafficking of young girls”)
https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/9/20798900/marvin-minsky-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-island-court-records-unsealed
LikeLike
SomeDAM Speaking of “stupid,” this morning on “Morning Joe,” they showed a clip of Liz Cheney saying that, first, unfortunately, people keep electing idiots; and second, that the question about which is right or wrong for us to say and do is not a partisan but a bi-partisan concern.
I paraphrase above, but I thought she captured a huge difference between (a) stupid elected politicians & cult-minded people, and (b) wise people like Forest Gump; or more to the point, between truth and lies.
And speaking of truth, lies, and belief, Trump says the papers he rattled in that tape were plans for a new golf course, or something like that. He did nothing wrong. CBK
LikeLike
Uncertainty plays a key role in science – and all good scientists always try to quantify the uncertainty they have about scientific knowledge.
Unfortunately, science deniers have glommed onto this aspect of science in order to create the perception in the nonscientific general public that any amount of uncertainty among scientists implies that scientists know nothing at all about a particular subject.
This is actually a strategy that has been employed quite effectively over the years.
This is precisely what Exxon Mobil and other fossil fuel companies have done in the case of climate change to create public doubt.
The same strategy was used by the tobacco companies to create doubt about the negative effects of smoking.
It’s hard for scientists to counter this strategy because scientists have been trained to actually highlight the uncertainty associated with their results and they are very reluctant to underplay such uncertainty.
LikeLike
And all too often, the following is the net result of the science denial by people like Rogan and Kennedy, who often have unhinged viewers.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/iowa-meteorolgist-quits-threats
Scientists get threats from zcience denying nutcases for merely reporting the facts.
After enough threats, some scientists decide it’s just not worth the risk to themselves and their families to continue presenting the facts.
LikeLike
“Unfortunately, science deniers have glommed onto this aspect of science in order to create the perception in the nonscientific general public that any amount of uncertainty among scientists implies that scientists know nothing at all about a particular subject.”
Exactly It is precisely this that science teachers must try to communicate. Unfortunately, the persistence of Medieval superstition among vast numbers of older Americans makes it impossible for teachers to contrast tentative explanatory models based on induction and abduction (science) with absolutist deduction from supposed received knowledge (religion). Contrasting the two would drive home the point, make it clear. In an ideal world, this would be part of the basic universal science curriculum–teaching people the difference between the two approaches to explaining things. But, alas, one cannot do that in a country that remains preacher-ridden. Perhaps one day, . . .
LikeLike
Consider, for example, what happened to poor Rebekah Jones.
LikeLike
Rebekah Jones made the mistake of crossing DeSatanist.
And we all know how much DeSatanists hate crosses
LikeLike
Imagine how DeSatanist would respond to holy water
LikeLike
DeSantis: “How do you get holes in water?”
LikeLike
That’s actually a strength of science.
Unlike religion, where it is anathema.
LikeLike
“When I was young, I thought I would see the end of superstition. It has not happened. Why not? I think the problem is more than just old superstition.”
Why not?
Tis simple. . . because the vast majority of Americans, 80% or so are brought up, no, I mean brainwashed with religious faith beliefs that defy logic. Not only that they are totally propagandized as such they are taught to glorify and respect such faith belief idiocies. . . what you call a problem of “old superstition.”
Faith beliefs lie behind the vast majority of stupid thinking such as the anti-vaxxers display.
LikeLike
Isn’t the term “faith beliefs,” in the context of religion, redundant? I think it sufficient to say, “religious faith” or “religious belief.”
LikeLike
No, it’s not redundant as the religiously inclined can believe in rationo-logical truths. The defining characteristic of faith beliefs is the belief in something that is absolutely not true, provable, not being disprovable. One can hold many types of beliefs with faith beliefs historically, even currently, being the most destructive of rationo-logical, scientific beliefs.
LikeLike
A belief, by definition, is a notion not known to be true with sufficient warrant to justify certainty.
So, for example, if you know that there is a beer in the fridge, you will say, “There is a beer in the fridge.” If you do not know that there is a beer in the fridge but consider this likely (that is, if you are not quite certain), you might say, “I believe there is a beer in the fridge.” In other words, you won’t say, “I believe there’s a beer in the fridge” if you are certain that there is (if, for example, you just put a six pack there a minute ago, and there is no one else in the house).
So, when people say things like, “I believe in ghosts,” they are admitting, by their choice of the word “believe,” to uncertainty with regard to ghosts. And when they say, “I believe in Jesus,” this is a TELL that they are not really sure about what they are saying, despite the certainty they might then go on to express about the proposition. The use of the term “belief” gives this away.
Taking something to be true based on faith rather than on evidence is ALSO an example of assertion without knowledge or evidence that provides sufficient warrant for reasonable certainty. That’s why there seems to me to be a partial redundancy in the expression “faith belief.” Consider:
I believe in my invisible friend in the sky.
I have faith in my invisible friend in the sky.
These seem to me to be making the same assertion, which would make
I have a faith belief in my invisible friend in the sky.
redundant. It’s also redundant because all items of faith are beliefs.
Of course, there are beliefs that are taken on faith, but I think these are best described not as “faith beliefs,” but as “faith-based beliefs.” The former is redundant because all items of faith are beliefs, as opposed to knowledge. The latter is not because some beliefs can be based on evidence rather than on faith.
LikeLike
Bob and Duane In my view, Bob makes a good distinction in his reflection on faith and belief. Just like any field of study, however, many who are involved in serious religious study make a further distinction that some here may already understand (so please chime in or just ignore); but that may shed some further light on the two terms.
Bob’s beer in the frig example about knowing and believing is spot on. The relationship between religious belief and faith, however, is sometimes portrayed as the concrete difference between (a) believing (again, as distinct from knowing), studying for understanding, etc., and (b) a faith journey, which means to many putting the principles of our specifically religious beliefs we have and hold into concrete action (sometimes by omission).
This kind of faith takes us way beyond beer (of course) and “mere” belief, and into how we actually act in the world about ourselves, others and, for instance, in the planet. This is daily stuff where we constantly try to find an attuned relationship between what we believe and hope for, what we actually know in the evidential sense (including the scientific journey and openness to it as SOMEdam talks about in another note), and what we undertake to actually do and say concretely.
This also may seem like small potatoes, and sometimes faith is just worked into easy habits (as you probably do with the principles you order your own life around); I’m thinking here of the many rituals and community events many religious people undergo regularly, like going to church or confession, or listening to the homilies on Sunday where we are reminded of our place in the world, or engaging in community service, etc. But as often as not, there are conflicts which are rarely easy to work through (like, for me, abortion–real life is filled with such conflicts or the handling of truth.)
Also, there is the complex distinction between how we relate to our understanding (or lack of it) of the God of beyond, so to speak, and how we put that understanding into practice in the familial/socio/political arena of concrete human relationships.
So, there are two distinct but interrelated “domains” to consider and to keep separate. But further, and to complicate the “other people” domains, there is the distinction between how we live with our family and friends and group affiliations (the principle of generation), and how we live in terms of the principles of intelligence and what we consider as excellent about what we do and say.
But, as you can probably see by the above, the principles of faith, though rooted in beliefs that, themselves, are always involved in cultural change, work their way into all other spheres of our existence.
I hope this at least provides you with some food for thought. If not, delete and forget about it. “Tomorrow IS another day.” CBK
LikeLike
into how we actually act in the world about ourselves, others and, for instance, in the planet.
Definitely not small potatoes. I have a good friend who is a devout Christian. And she walks her talk. When the crash of 2007 happened, she started doing evenings in which she met with people and edited their resumes (she is a highly skilled editor and the best copyeditor I’ve ever known) for free. She has for years done volunteer work for youth and women’s shelters and soup kitchens. A breathtakingly good human. And she is driven by her faith. So there’s that.
LikeLike
Bob Yes, and “there’s certainly that,” all over the world for centuries, and for any “faith.” CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
correction:
Consider:
I believe that there exists my invisible friend in the sky.
I have faith that there exists my invisible friend in the sky.
as opposed to
I have a faith belief that there exists my invisible friend in the sky.
LikeLike
Sorry, I had to revise my example because the statement
I have faith in the invisible guy in the sky.
is ambiguous. It could mean “I think he exists” or “I think I can depend upon him,” and I need the former meaning to be clear.
LikeLike
In other words, a “faith belief” is kinda like a “car vehicle.” Car is sufficient because a car is a kind of vehicle. Faith is sufficient because faith is a kind of belief.
LikeLike
And yes, I know that “kinda” is widely considered nonstandard. I am willing to mount a vigorous defense of the usage.
LikeLike
Bob About using “kinda” . . . typical response from a language arts guy. (And it works for me most of the time.) CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haaa! The language is constantly changing. It continues to provide, like those horns in Norse mythology from which you can go on drinking forever! My general rule: embrace the useful changes (like beginning sentences with conjunctions and ending them with prepositions, splitting infinitives); oppose the ones that blur careful thought (like confusions between except and accept, infer and imply, uninterested and disinterested, added bonus).
LikeLike
Bob “Sigh . . . ” . . . about language and grammar mis-q’s. But I am an avid reader of the New York Review of Books, and the writers there commonly use the “problems” you write about in your note, and include subject-less (incomplete) sentences, which always jump off the page at me.
Somehow, when they do it, however, it sounds like a Jackson Pollock painting looks like–it just works, and on so many levels. I think the point at that level of writing is to communicate, including the stream of consciousness stuff, and they rarely if ever disappoint. CBK
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sentence fragments are perfectly normal and natural. No reason not to use them. No reason. None. This, for example.
LikeLike
Bob . . . and this . . . but sometimes not that. CBK
LikeLike
And, totally agree about the Pollack. I’m a huge fan.
LikeLike
Development of any new medicine or food additives or whatever follow rigorous protocols and involve extensive testing. Medicines are tested through double-blind tests and control groups.
This is bog standard procedure, and the most effective way there is. Kennedy and his ilk squirt ink to obscure the facts of how this works. They invent “problems” which they never get around to proving exist. Andrew Wakefield is one of the biggest scammers, and he’s still pushing the “vaccines cause autism” even after he lost his license to practice, even after the fraud he perpetrated was exposed, he still gets over.
Every time Kennedy and his ilk are proven to be liars and frauds, they gin up the “She’s a witch!” and point at the government.
In the 1980s, I was present when one of the most infamous false memory syndrome cases began, though I didn’t realize it. I was in the courtroom when a woman came in to give up her children because she had learned, during therapy, that she had “been part of a Satanic cult and had been present for ritual murders and posed a threat to her children.”
I shouldn’t have to tell any educators here about the Satanic Panic. Kennedy and his confederates run a similar scam, but with vaccines.
We are a nation of fools who fall for it every time. We love to believe in witches and point fingers at those to be burned at the stake.
We never got past the Salem witch trials. We can’t stop looking for witches. We can’t stop burning them.
It’s so much more exciting than the truth. Just ask Anthony Fauci.
LikeLike
Wow, jsr! You were present for one of those early false memory cases? Fascinating. For other readers of this blog, the book Remembering Satan, by Lawrence Wright, is a gripping, edge-of-your seat treatment of this–of psychologists who planted false memories in their patients’ minds. This turns out to be shockingly easy to do.
LikeLike
If you want to expand the FDA’s budget by orders of magnitude, with the attendant tax burden that would necessitate, have at it and good luck.
New drugs and food processes are developed by hundreds of companies all over the world all the time. You want to pay the billions it would cost to do that in-house, have at it. Just don’t whine come April 15.
LikeLike
No doubt this is complex.
Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me again and again…
The FDA staff has proved
several times, that it
makes mistakes. We all do.
Demonizing, name calling,
finger- wagging-scolding,
doesn’t end suspicions,
it repells and divides.
Meanwhile the fat cats
are getting fatter…
LikeLike
The FDA does a far better job than people think.
LikeLike
Emphatically agreed
LikeLike
To truly understand why any serious talk of RFK Jr is hazardous to humanity’s health, I quote a paragraph of Siddhartha Mukherjee’s recently published Song of the Cell, finished at the beginning of the pandemic:
“Vaccination, more than any other form of medical intervention — more than antibiotics, or heart surgery, or any new drug — changed the face of human health. (A close contender might be safe childbirth.) Today there are vaccines against the deadliest of human pathogens: diphtheria, tetanus, mumps, measles, rubella. Vaccines have been devised to prevent infections by human papillomavirus (HPV), by far the major cause of cervical cancer. And we will soon encounter the triumphal discovery of not just one but several independent vaccines against SARS-COV2, the virus that released the Covid pandemic.”
Vaccines prevent disease. In plain English, the stop a disease before anyone could determine it existed, preventing countless savings in dollars from medical procedures that add up to multi-billions of years of cumulative saved life for humanity.
A new application of vaccines are largely unknown in the general public. Many clinical trials are currently being conducted in cancers to give certain vaccine formulations to patients who respond very well to treatments, the theory being the vaccine will make the remission stronger, more durable, and possible curative. This would not be for those who do not respond well to therapy, so it will not be a “last resort” option.
All talk about RFK Jr’s political future should have been over yesterday. Anyone who would support him is in another growing American political cult.
LikeLike
Excellently put.
LikeLike
To truly understand why any serious talk of RFK Jr is hazardous to humanity’s health…”
It’s a mistake to “debate”* science with people who either don’t know anything about science (which is usually very obvious) or who actually know something and are quite purposefully misrepresenting the truth (which is also usually very obvious)
It’s worse than a waste of time because it gives such folks credibility that they don’t deserve.
*I would differentiate between “explaining” something to someone who is genuinely interested in knowing and “debating” with them. After explaining something once, it becomes obvious when someone simply does not wish to know and after that, further discussion is useless “debate”
LikeLike
RFK, Jr. is deranged and extremely dangerous.
LikeLike
COVID may not be killing as many as it did the first couple of years… still, the threat of Long COVID lingers and there is no adequate defense against a virus that can strike repeatedly without end. Everytime someone gets COVID again, even if the illness isn’t as bad, the risk of ending up with Long COVID increases.
That and the idiots that still think vaccines a don’t work is the reason I’m still isolating myself as much as possible… and enjoying a lot less stress in my life while I’m doing it since driving is stressful.
The pressure is on though from a few people I know telling me I need to get out an be around people. It isn’t easy to avoid flipping them off or something worse, tell them what they can do with their head, when they try to pressure me.
Ha! Studies show that we get about as much benefit from online gatherings through Zoom like sites as we do face-to-face.
Before COVID, I didn’t belong to any Zoom type groups. Now I belong to four and combined, those four different online groups, gather about 12 times a month.
I prefer my new normal more than the old habits that involved a lot more driving, eating out, and filling up the gas tank a couple of times a month instead of annually. I think the benefits outweigh the losses. Less driving means I am not contributing to global warming as much. Eating out was expensive and I do not miss it.
LikeLike
Dude, it’s pretty much done. Really. You got to get out.
LikeLike
When I got Covid, I was seriously considering hiking the Pacific Crest Trail. I had long been a hiker, and I thoroughly enjoyed and was inspired by Cheryl Strayed’s book Wild. For months after I had Covid, I had to use a cane just to walk. I still have neuropathy from it and likely will have it for the rest of my life. My hiking days are over due to Long Covid.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse, “long Covid” is a euphemism for vaccine injury. You probably did not get this basic fact, however, all of the people who died despite getting these so-called vaccines died because of these so-called vaccines.
LikeLike
That is a bold statement. Vaccines have been lies. First, you can get covid if vaccinated=lie!!!!! You get vaccinated, you cannot transmit it… lie!!!!!!! Natural immunity is not more powerful…… lie!!!!!!!!!! Unvaccinated will get sick….lie!!!!! Ivermectin is horse paste and does not work to help cure covid or cancer…….lie!!!!
Phizer is one of the most corrupt companies on earth did people forget they paid 9 billion in 2009 for lawsuits? Chantix was a lie too.
Gullible fools here , 99.6% survival and you need a vaccine lol!!!!
LikeLike
And your degree in epidemiology is from where? Your M.D. is from where?
Where have you done postgraduate work in the relevant fields?
Josh, dear boy, if you make such claims, the burden of proof is on you to substantiate them.
We await your evidence.
LikeLike
Josh, did you know that more than 1 million people died of COVID?
Did you know that Donald Trump, Melania Trump, and Barron Trump are vaccinated? Not with Ivermectin.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch, this is dis-information. Remdesivir and the ventilators are what killed these people. You claim that vaccines save lives? Tell that to people who got vaccine as cause of death on their death certificate and see what they say.
LikeLike
I have yet to hear a fact our of you. Everything so far is either a lie or a delusion.
LikeLike
This particular troll is a complete nutcase. It would be funny to read his ludicrous comments if it weren’t so tragic that lots of other Americans believe the childish bs he posts. My neighbor’s father told me that he wouldn’t get the Covid vaccine because it contains microchips designed by Bill Gates. ROFL. There are a lot of crazy people in this country. Our troll is just another of these.
LikeLike
There was a time when facts mattered.
A society where facts have no importance is a society on the brink of collapse. This is Trump’s society.
It was also Hitler’s.
LikeLike
Exactly so.
LikeLike
My kids had gerbils with a more profound understanding of science than you have, Josh. Yes, some people who were vaccinated got Covid, but FAR, FAR FEWER. And so on. Where TF do you get your medical information? Oh. I know. From that those great epidemiologists Donald Trump, Marjory Taylor Greene, and Steve Bannon.
LikeLike
Over one million US deaths from Covid. Many, many millions more dealing with crippling Long Covid. Why? Because of a denialist president and denialist governors. Because of idiots online peddling Silver Solution and horse tranquilizer and injecting disinfectant and other horse shite magic elixirs. Idiots.
LikeLike
How about you research and see the thousands of people dying suddenly after posting their stupid “i got vaccinated ” crap. Jamie fox just had a heart attack, comedians dropping on stage, and athletes dying and retiring in soccer, wake up dude, sleep sheep.
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/study-confirms-link-between-covid-19-vaccination-temporary-increase-menstrual-cycle-length
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/coronavirus-vaccine-blood-clots
LikeLike
Of course, none of this is true.
You have to make a choice, if you’re still capable: You can dwell in the real world, where science and fact reign, and you would know the difference between good science and bad science.
Or you can choose the fantasy of the invented, disinformative lie, where you will swallow anything.
Alas, Grasshopper, so far you have chosen poorly.
LikeLike
Josh,
Why did the Trump family get vaccinated?
LikeLike
Who said it wasn’t saline? Trump said HCQ and ivermectin work, and they do, there wasn’t much of a need to be vaccinated. Listen to dumb ass Bill Gates or the WHO director who is not even a doctor and is so corrupt bought and paid for by china and others
LikeLike
Trump did not take Ivernectin or HCQ.
He got vaccinated with the COVID vaccine produced on his watch. Remember Operation Warp Speed? The vaccines should be called the Trump vaccine.
Watch what he does, not what he says.
LikeLike
Josh does research:
Gee, what did Bubba’s cousin and girlfriend Lucy Lou say in the comment section of that article on The Daily Stormer about CRT inventing Covid in the basement of a pizza parlor owned by Hunter Biden and about the magical divining rod cure?
LikeLike
Looney Deniro pulled his vax movie in 2016, wonder who has blackmail over him for him to not release it
https://www.today.com/video/robert-de-niro-i-still-have-mixed-feelings-about-anti-vaccine-film-668298819522
LikeLike
Damn that pesky science!
Do you have any idea how that works?
Thought not.
LikeLike
YES DIANE, TRUMP pushed Operation warp speed; otherwise the government would have had us in lockdown for 4-6 years, and the world would really go to hell. Dr Fauci is the real criminal. Idiots who took this bioweapon like the sheep you are best of luck. People dying suddenly left and right. Athletes retiring and dying on soccer fields from the vax
https://thelibertydaily.com/buried-bombshell-tennis-world-rocked-as-fifteen-fully-vaccinated-players-unable-to-finish-miami-open/
bob boosted blitz in his blood
LikeLike
Josh,
I took the vaccine that Trump funded.
So did Trump, Melania, and Barron.
I am still alive, so are they.
What do you know that Trump doesn’t know?
If the vaccine is so awful, why did he take it?
LikeLike
The stats, vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Dramatically lower death rates among the vaccinated. Of course.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status
LikeLike
Are you opposed to other modern medicine, Josh, and not just vaccines? Heart surgeries? Hip replacements? The wild theory that disease is caused by germs instead of by demons? The theory that malaria is caused by infection by mosquitos and not by “bad (mal) air (aria)”? How about phrenology and leeches cures?
LikeLike
Vaccines cause autism Bob, I do not trust the new vaccines,.I trust my immune system. Hip replacement and heart surgery is different than shooting yourself with a vaccine not around more than the others for last 70 years.
EVEN CRAZY DENIRO ADMITS VACCINES ARE PROBLEMATIC!
You were lied ti about the vaccines, you obeyed your people and they just lied to your face. Vaccines do not help lol. Good luck with your shitty immune system you all have VAIDS.
LikeLike
I haven’t seen a bit of science out of you. Not an atom.
See, in science they use science and technology. Things like facts, something you have no familiarity with.
Both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were thoroughly tested before they were allowed to be released. Controlled, double-blind tests. I don’t expect you to understand, because you don’t want to.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch, if it is the right vaccine for the right situation, I might agree with you. While you got the Moderna vaccine, what are your thoughts on the rest of them?
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch, I would not be surprised if you are correct. For me, the only vaccine I could not take due to having epilepsy as a preexisting condition is the pertussis vaccine for whooping cough. I remember being told that due to my having epilepsy that it was indicated that the risks were not worth it.
LikeLike
Diane Ravitch, Dan Rather is not a medical expert and by default has no business dispensing medical advice.
LikeLike
He can read. He knows how things work, and whom to trust.
Unlike you.
LikeLike
This character is a troll who sometimes posts here 10-12 times a day. Against vaccines. About how dangerous vaccines are. I usually delete his stupid comments but I was in a charitable mood.
LikeLike