Writing in The Progressive, Carol Burris raised an important question: Where are the 1.3 million children who didn’t return to school after schools reopened? Burris is the executive director of the Network for Public Education.
As she points out, the lobbyists for the privatizers claim that they must be in charter schools or voucher schools, but Burris shows this is not accurate. Some may be homeschooled; but the data on the number of children being homeschooled is inadequate to know how many children are being tutored at home.
Burris writes:
Between the fall of 2019 and 2021, 1.3 million children left the American public school system, according toEducation Week. For those who care about the welfare of children, this sharp decline is worrisome. We know that enrollment declineswere the steepest in large cities, where our neediest students reside and where COVID-19 was more devastating.
How many have dropped out, working in the underground economy or languishing at home without schooling? The honest answer is that there is no comprehensive accounting of where (or if) all of those 1.3 million children are now being schooled.
However, what should be a national concern centered on the welfare of children has instead become promotional material for those who wish to eliminate public schools. The libertarian right and its allies, including the Center for Education Reform, have chalked up the decline to a story of unhappy public school parents exercising school choice. But is it?
According to a 2020 report from the National Alliance for Public Charter Schools (NAPCS), “hundreds of thousands of families switched to charter schools during the first full school year of the pandemic.” On the surface, that is correct. But the report avoids the elephant in the room—the kinds of charter schools that gained enrollment during this period.
The 2020 charter enrollment spike that NAPCS reported was largely due to increased enrollment in low-quality online charter schools, as I detailed in an analysis for The Washington Post. Enrollment in these schools increased by 175,260 students during the 2020-2021 school year, representing more than 70 percent of the NAPCS’s reported enrollment growth.
The increase in enrollment in online charter schools that occurred during the early years of the pandemic is part of a long-term trend. In 2013, the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) started tracking the online school sector. In the pre-pandemic years, between 2013 and 2020, online schools accounted for 25 percent of charter enrollment growth, according to the center’s data.
In 2022, NAPCS published another report that presented a dizzying array of data, some of which contradicted the previous year’s report, to make the case that charters had retained the students they gained in the pandemic shift.
According to that report, in fall 2021, there were only 1,436 fewer students in charters compared to 33,308 fewer students in public schools than there were in fall 2020. The most recent NCES numbers tell a different story: According to that data, charter school enrollment dropped by 5,323 students in 2021, while public school enrollment increased by 83,323 students—small shifts but nevertheless important to note.
So, did charter school enrollment go up during the pandemic? Yes. Was this a seismic shift? No….
Leaders of the anti-public school movement promote bootleg homeschools and “micro-schools” as innovative alternatives to public schools, using declines in test scores as the rationale for abandoning the public system. Ironically, however, homeschoolers are not required to provide any evidence of student learning in most states. This includes Arizona, whose ESA voucher program is taxpayer-funded with no standards. Parents can awarda high school diploma based on any criteria they want. According to Ed Choice, the average Arizona ESA account value on January 17, 2023 exceeded $15,500 per year per student. (On January 18, the site updated that figure to $11,332.)
This is akin to an insurance company giving the parent of an ill child a payout to spend on a cure—with no stipulation that the parent goes to a licensed physician or that anyone reports back on the child’s health.
Certainly, there are responsible homeschoolers who have developed sound programs to educate and socialize their child. But without requirements to provide sound evidence of learning, a sudden spike in homeschooling should be a cause for alarm, not celebration.
While libertarian advocacy groups call for a “de-centralized network of schools,” to resemble what existed for American schooling in the nineteenth century, before Horace Mann, the truth is that before it became a universal system of “government funded and operated schools,” schooling in America was an uncoordinated, free-for-all that left most children undereducated, which is exactly where the contemporary school choice movement is headed.
Instead, what we should be concentrating on is locating those 1.3 million children and ensuring they are both educated and safe.
Anecdotal but here it is: before the Covid, we were already seeing children whose parents were upset with school. Some were accepting the increasing BS about schools ruining young minds. Others, by far the preponderance of their cases, were pulling their children from school because it was easier than helping them do their work. As in all the other aspects of society, the pandemic exaggerated the effects.
Also anecdotal, the students who transfer to my class from homeschool and online school are lost and need a great deal of extra support in every regard.
Options are no solution when they offer subpar academics or they endanger the welfare of children. Writing blank checks to parents assumes they all have the best interests of their children at heart. While this may be true for many parents, it is certainly not true for all. If this were the case, there would no need for CPS to intervene in so many instances. Pity the endangered, exploited children that can suffer abuse that goes unnoticed!
These reckless privatized “choices” have national implications if expanded on a larger scale. If one of the goals of common schools is to teach students to be responsible citizens and informed voters, how can this goal get accomplished if education becomes a personal commodity instead of a collective responsibility? How are we preparing young people for a complex, technological society when so many children can retreat to their own foxholes that offer minimal instruction? Another important social function of public education is to promote understanding and tolerance for individual differences. Isolation often breeds contempt instead of mutual understanding. We live in a divided nation, and public schools can help heal this divide.
The national and state teachers unions have been forced to except the insane concept of standards and the testing requirements that accompany them. I’ve seen my own grandchildren grow to hate reading and math because of the way common core has deformed the teaching of these subjects. All children deserve a curriculum that emphasizes joy, play, and cooperativeness. Can we find that anymore in American public schools?
I think in more rural communities where teachers can close their doors and ignore the stupid Common Bore curriculum, there are much happier kids attending school. Suburban and urban districts must follow “the rules” to get those test scores up no matter what (tons of deforms!)….and this is where the children are unhappy and are hating school. In my state (MD), all of the faith based schools are filled to the gills with former public school students and many of the teachers in these schools are former public school teachers. All the education gurus wonder why parents want vouchers? It blows my mind that parents are deemed as bad as satan for wanting their children to be happy and mentally healthy while attending school….. that parents have to pay for while their taxes are being used to support public schools where children are deemed nothing more than meat widgets or data points at the expense of a true and healthy education.
The standardized test prep debacle is worse in charter chains than it is in public schools. Teachers unions protect public school teachers like me who eschew the nonsense. Charter school teachers have no protection. They drill and kill to the test, or they get fired.
“This includes Arizona, whose ESA voucher program is taxpayer-funded with no standards.”
Can we ever get away from using the edudeformers’ language. . .in this case using standards when other words would say the same thing without reinforcing the concept that “standards are necessarily a good thing.”
In this case rule, law, requirement, criterion, code, ethical guide, etc. . . could be used. There are many others.
I agree. The word “standards” is the most most-used. Word in the education lexicon. Perhaps we should arrest those who use the word for word abuse.
Has anyone checked out the corn fields?
Don’t forget to check Bill Clinton’s closet.
Sorry, bad joke. But I don’t take it back.
Corporate marketing campaigns and careful study of facts are not exactly birds of a feather, are they. Thank you, Carol.