Thom Hartmann is a journalist and blogger who hits the nail on the head with this post. I would add one suggestion to his post, under the heading of “what can I do?” Run for your local school board. Don’t let wacky rightwing extremists buy it.
Former Tea Party congressman and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo recently put a bulls-eye on the back of the president of the 1.7 million-member American Federation of Teachers.
“I tell the story often — I get asked ‘Who’s the most dangerous person in the world? Is it Chairman Kim, is it Xi Jinping?’” Pompeo told Semafor’s Shelby Talcott.
“The most dangerous person in the world is Randi Weingarten. It’s not a close call. If you ask, ‘Who’s the most likely to take this republic down?’ It would be the teacher’s unions, and the filth that they’re teaching our kids…”
I’ve known, respected, and admired Randi for years and she’s been a frequent guest on my program: her number one interest is providing the highest quality education to as many American children as possible. Full stop.
So why would Pompeo, pursuing the 2024 Republican nomination for president, risk triggering an American domestic terrorist to train his sites on her? Why would an educated man have such antipathy toward public school teachers?
Public schools are on the GOP’s hit list, just as they were in Chile during the Pinochet regime, and for the same reasons:
— Fascism flourishes when people are ignorant.
— Private for-profit schools are an efficient way to transfer billions from tax revenues into the coffers of “education entrepreneurs” who then recycle that money into Republican political campaigns (just like they’ve done with private for-profit prisons).
— Private schools are most likely to be segregated by race and class, which appeals to the bigoted base of the Republican party.
— While public school boards are our most basic and vigorous form of democracy, private schools are generally unaccountable to the public.
— Most public school teachers are unionized, and the GOP hates unions.
— Whitewashing America’s racial and genocidal history while ignoring the struggles of women and queer folk further empowers straight white male supremacy.
Umberto Eco, who had a ringside seat to the rise of Mussolini, noted in his “14 indicators of fascism” that dumbing down the populace by lowering educational standards was critical to producing a compliant populace.
“All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks,” he wrote, “made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.”
Ironically, this very use of public schools to promote a political agenda was the foundation David Koch cited when, in 1980, he attacked American public schools during his run for Vice President on the Libertarian Party ticket.
“We condemn compulsory education laws … and we call for the immediate repeal of such laws,” proclaimed his platform. “We advocate the complete separation of education and State. Government schools lead to the indoctrination of children and interfere with the free choice of individuals. Government ownership, operation, regulation, and subsidy of schools and colleges should be ended.”
It was a stark contrast from the founders of our nation, who well understood the importance of universal quality public education. The first law mandating public schools paid for with taxpayer dollars was passed in Massachusetts in 1647: to this day, that state is notable for its historic emphasis on education.
As Thomas Jefferson, who founded America’s first tuition-free public college (the University of Virginia), noted in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey on January 6, 1816:
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.”
The American president who immediately preceded him, our second, John Adams, also weighed in on the importance of public education in a letter to his old friend John Jebb when, in 1785, Adams was serving in London as America’s first Minister to Great Britain.
He’d seen the consequences of poverty and illiteracy in both the US and England and was horrified:
“The social science will never be much improved, until the people unanimously know and consider themselves as the fountain of power, and until they shall know how to manage it wisely and honestly. Reformation must begin with the body of the people, which can be done only, to effect, in their educations.
“The whole people must take upon themselves the education of the whole people, and must be willing to bear the expenses of it. There should not be a district of one mile square, without a school in it, not founded by a charitable individual, but maintained at the expense of the people themselves.”
But the United States spends almost a trillion dollars a year on primary school education, an expense category just below healthcare and even more than the Pentagon budget: there are massive profits to be made if privatized entities can skim even a few percent off the top.
Those profits, in turn, can be used — with the Supreme Court’s blessing — to legally bribe elected officials to further gut public schools and transfer even more of our tax dollars to private schools and their stockholders.
This pursuit of America’s education dollars is nothing new. The first American president to put an anti-public-schools crusader in charge of the Education Department was Ronald Reagan.
At the time, our public schools were the envy of the world and had recently raised up a generation of scientists and innovators that brought us everything from the transistor to putting men on the moon.
Reagan’s Education Secretary Bill Bennett is probably most famous for having claimed that, “You could abort every Black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down.” And then aggressively standing behind his quote in repeated media appearances.
Reagan and Bennett oversaw the gutting of Federal support for civics education, cutting the nation’s federal education budget by 18.5%.
This lead to the situation today where the group that runs national exams of eighth-graders across the country, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, determined in 2018 that only 24% of US students were “proficient in civics.” It’s gotten so bad that the Lincoln Project is launching a K-12 civics program of their own called the Franklin Project.
George W. Bush continued the tradition, proposing an 8% cut to education and welfare budgets.
After initiating the privatization of Medicare in 2003 with the Medicare Advantage scam (a model for privatizing education), his Education Secretary, Rod Paige, calledthe nation’s largest teacher’s union, the National Education Association, a “terrorist organization.”
Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos then proposed cutting 12% or $8.5 billion out of the federal education budget, while allocating over $5 billion in taxpayer dollars to flow into the money bins of their private school cronies.
I started this article with Pompeo’s essentially calling Randi Weingarten a terrorist. Unions as saboteurs is a viewpoint widely held across the Republican Party and among rightwing billionaires.
But it’s simply not true: teachers’ unions have been a primary force in improving the quality of American education for almost a century.
Eunice S. Han is an economics professor and researcher at the University of Utah, and formerly was with Wellesley College. She did exhaustive research into the impact of teachers’ unions on teacher quality and educational outcomes: it’s the single-most definitive study done on the subject to date.
Her findings were unambiguous and rebut the GOP’s talking point that teachers’ unions “protect bad teachers”:
“[T]eachers unions, by negotiating higher wages for teachers, lower the quit probability of high-ability teachers but raise the dismissal rate of underperforming teachers, as higher wages provide districts greater incentive to select better teachers.”
Looking at the most comprehensive set of national data available on teacher quality and educational outcome from “the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES): the School and Staffing Survey (SASS) for three waves (2003-2004, 2007- 2008, and 2011-2012), its supplement Teacher Follow-up Survey (TFS) for each wave of the SASS, and the School Districts Finance Survey (SDFS),” she found:
“The data confirms that, compared to districts with weak unionism, districts with strong unionism dismiss more low-quality teachers and retain more high-quality teachers. The empirical analysis shows that this dynamic of teacher turnover in highly unionized districts raises average teacher quality and improves student achievement.”
But don’t bother trying to tell that to Republicans: they know that unions are terrorists, or at least give nightmares to bad bosses and poorly run businesses that exploit their workers. As Trump’s Education Secretary Betsy DeVos told an ALEC meeting of Republican state legislators and corporate lobbyists in July, 2017:
“They’ve made it clear that they care more about a system, one created in the 1800s, than they do about individual students.”
In other words, “Don’t bother me with facts.”
John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were right about public education, and privatizing it is as much a crime against the commons and our democracy as was privatizing our prisons, over half the Pentagon budget, and Medicare.
Rightwing billionaires are now funding “Liberty” and “Freedom” groups to attack and take over public school boards, seeking to ghettoize their schools, drive out unionized teachers, and impose a gender-bigoted, white supremacist, and anti-science curriculum. (Only 40% of our schools today even teach evolution, as that’s become so “controversial” again.)
Of all our democratic institutions, from Congress to state houses to city councils, the most on-the-ground, closest-to-the-people are school boards.
They’re the most vibrant and often most important of our governmental bodies, designed to express and facilitate the will of local parents and voters. And a great springboard to other elected offices: many members of Congress began their political careers running for a school board.
Private schools, of course, don’t have school boards. They’re accountable to their shareholders and CEOs.
Steve Bannon and other rightwing personalities have, for the past several years as part of their effort to destroy public education, been aggressively encouraging their followers to run for public school boards and, where they don’t win, show up at every meeting to make their members lives miserable.
It’s an area where Democrats and progressives have dropped the ball, big time.
If you’re a parent or grandparent, or even just a concerned citizen, there is no better or more crucial time to show up at your local school board than now. And bring your friends and neighbors with you.
The GOP couldn’t care less about public schools one way or the other — they have no principles but pimping for dollars — I doubt they even think once, much less twice about the effects of their sales pitches — they are simply hired ass-ass-ins and all-round prostitutes for anything the biggest bucks in the corporate churchstate pays them to do.
The GOP does care about public schools. It seems them as a failing government bureaucracy that must be replaced by private and religious schools
The GOP mostly cares about all the money attached to public schools. They want to transfer it into their donors’ portfolios, and others want to use it to fund segregated Christian schools.
Diane,
The GOP Leadership is pushing the Diversion Of Public Education Dollars Into Private Schools (DOPEDIPS), sure, but they are not doing that because they care about any brand of education or religion. They care about those things the same way Walker cares about fetuses. They sell it because the Monied Minority pays them to pitch it and it panders to the suckers who buy it.
As true as all this is, his conclusion is not helpful if the goal is to save some semblance of public education (that’s our realistic goal these days, folks, forget the “fund adequately” approach, it has failed). And as much as I disagree with some here about the amount of blame that should be foisted on Democrats, there is blame to be assigned. Until elected Democrats start admitting that the assault against public education is bipartisan, that many members of their own party are more than complicit, nothing will change. Blaming it only on republicans lets too many Democrats off the hook. Hartmann missed an opportunity to speak a complete truth.
Hakeem Jeffries’s advocacy for privatization should have disqualified him as a candidate for the minority leader. Yet not a puff of a hint of a rumor tainted the glowing stories about him. Not one Democrat has called him or others out. republicans deserve the lion’s share of blame. Democrats who claim to love public education–Rosa DeLauro comes to mind–need to call out their own and explain to the public why this is anti-democratic and anti-Democratic. That would be a Profile in Courage!
For Exhibit A, see the posting immediately before this one on John King.
Do you mean you too were upset when Obama declared National Charter Teacher Appreciation week?
🤬
Greg– I’ll admit to being a one-issue voter as recently as 2014, when I sat out the special election to replace Frank Lautenberg as US Senator from NJ. Even tho I admired much of what Cory Booker had accomplished as mayor of Newark, I was incensed at his pro-charter stand, enthusiastic participation in Zberg-funded One Newark plan, ties with B DeVos et al neoliberals. [Of course I knew rwnj Steve Lonergan had no chance of beating him: it was a symbolic gesture.] However, (a)that was before I saw how bad things could get [i.e., election of Trump & its suite], and (b)I have been pleasantly surprised with Booker’s stands & actions as US Senator. My present position: education is an issue most voters are confused [/misled] about; it doesn’t make top voting concern, even after 2 yrs’ GOP jawboning around it.
I don’t know as much about Hakeem Jeffries. [I was better acquainted with KIPP’s Shavar Jeffries (obviously super-pro-charter), who lost against Ras Baraka as Booker’s successor to Newark mayoralty– probably not even related.] What I’ve read of Hakeem re: education is just as bad as anything about Booker. I need to research his position on non-ed issues to figure out if he is just another neoliberal, or hopefully threads the needle between centrist & progressive w/o being full-fledged neoliberal. And also whether he can rally Dem House votes around liberal legislation, as Speaker must be able to do—has he evidenced the kind of leadership & negotiation skills reqd?
Sorry so long-winded. Just pushing back against the notion we have the luxury to disqualify Dem leaders on basis of ed position– there are very few who meet our preferred credentials. I look more for those who advance support for public goods in general. Full-throated support for labor rights, infrastructure, equitable tax policy, campaign reform et al can lead us to the same place.
I don’t know about Hakeem Jeffries’ views on other issues. I assume he is a centrist Democrat or Pelosi would not have embraced him. I do know that he is strongly pro-charter and a favorite of DFER, the hedge funders.
Yes, all well-said. What right-wingers and corporate profiteers don’t want are what I was told by one of my former students: “Mr. Burgess, you taught us to think.” Fascists and corporate money-hogs don’t want a thinking populace. Also, public schools–like Social Security, Medicare, etc.–are socialistic. Where’s the profit in that?
Tom
<
div>This might be too much but I find Ravitch to be a clear voice for educati
Thom Hartmann is the best, he’s the antidote to the far right ghouls like Sean Hannity, Dennis Prager, Tucker Carlson (what’s a tucker? Who names their kid Tucker?) and the ever acidic Mark Levin. Thom tries his best to get his facts straight and he’s up to speed about the attempts to privatize a common good, public education. Other good advocates for public schools are Sam Seder of The Majority Report and Chris Hedges (though I do disagree with Hedges on many other issues such as voting for Democrats).
The T was an error. It’s supposed to be an F.
And it was the folks who gave us TV dinners. Yup. Nasty pseudofood.
Hahahahahaha! That thought has crossed my mind more than once, Bob. Thanks.
“We are on the road to achieving my vision of matching every single one of our schools with a long-term corporate partner, and to reaching our fundraising goal of $15 million this year and $30 million over the next three years, to invest in innovation, redesign, and continued transformation in our schools.”
–Lisa Herring, Superintendent, Atlanta Public Schools
Diane, Greg, All …
I remember it was after the Kent State Massacre I quit caring about … pretty much anything involving politics and the state of the belovèd country I thought I once knew. I pinned my heart to my own Greensleeves and dug my nose back into my arts and my books. That kept me occupied for a goodly third of a century. I don’t think I ventured to give a fig again until that Michigan Spring when Dems and democratically-minded folks rose up to recall their GoverNerd and repeal the Emergency Mangler Act.
I learned how different the heart of the Democratic Party is from the heads on which various circumstances keep forcing it to pin its hopes. I learned the base of the Democratic Party has long been aware — since the aftermath of ’68, if not before — of just how compromised the mass of its so-called Leadership really is, and maybe always will be so long as our campaign financing laws remain in their current dysfunctional state, dysfunctional for the People’s interests, of course.
Still, what to do? The only way to redirect the pinheads in the “leadership”, that is, without shooting ourselves in the head, is to keep zapping the greater misleadership each and every time it pulls the body politic toward the abyss.
Democratic public schools are the common glue that helps to bind us together. Fascism thrives in chaos and uncertainty. If the right wing extremists can break those unifying bonds, they can more easily divide and conquer.
Yesterday, I saw a story on the news about the failed state of Lebanon. Regular citizens are attacking banks because they banks will not allow them to withdraw their own money. I used to think that will never happen here, but now I am not so sure. If the crazies keep putting kleptocrats in power, it could happen here.
Preach it, Brother Thom!
This is part of the larger project to instill learned helplessness in the working class. As public benefits are stripped away one after the other and placed into unaccountable private hands where they can be further slashed, the hope is that it comes to be seen as normal not to expect anything at all from the government, and instead that we should be grateful for whatever crumbs are provided by the ruling classes.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Why does today’s Republican Party hate OUR country’s public schools?
Because fascism flourishes when people are ignorant, and most of OUR public school teachers in the United States teach OUR children how to think critically, solve problems logically, and question/challenge liars like Traitor Trump that many elected Republicans still support even after the traitor called for terminating the U.S. Constitution and putting him back in the White House without an election.
What does that make voters that still vote for Republicans?
The various fractional cohorts of Rep party have one thing in common: they are backed by big $ interests. Doesn’t matter whether you are pro-individualistic/ anti-public goods because you are racist, anti-abortion, pro-school choice, want your personal religious freedom to trump that of other religions, side with corps against workers cuz corps are the job-producers, looking for a wannabe autocrat to tell you what to think, believe the poor [or ill] are malingerers undeserving of public support, believe in prosperity gospel, or just believe your 401(k) will benefit from laissez-faire capitalism policy. None of those positions favors democracy: if votes can be skewed to support issue-passioned voters, they’ll be for it. Nor do big $ interests lean into democracy: political polarization/ Congressional gridlock benefits big $ interests: no legislation passed means no regs to implement, means predictable status quo, giving speculation/ market-betting free rein.
Yes, Hartmann is right that elected school boards are the grass-roots foundation of democracy. Precisely why big $ interests have been entering that fray with deep-pockets campaign donations for at least a dozen years. Corruption is imbued even at grass-roots level these days. Is this about Rep concerns for what is taught in pubschs, or whether they think they’ll benefit from dumbed-down voters? Nah, I don’t think so. That is airy-fairy thinking projected into future & unproven by stats; Reps are transactional. They see opportunity to bust unions, cut pubsch overhead where they can, & privatize what remains. It’s supported by untrammeled corp funding of election campaigns, & policy via lobbying/ donations. The only way to turn this boat around is via election campaign reform & legislative workaround for Cit-United decision.
Hartmann goofs here: “the United States spends almost a trillion dollars a year on primary school education.” The link, of course, leads to expenditure for elementary and secondary schools.
I’d never before heard that quote by William Bennett (made on his radio program in 2005)– OMG!!!
And here I’d thought his best-known statement was “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.” Silly me– Bennett became Sec’y of Ed 2 yrs after 1983’s “A Nation at Risk” came out. But ANAR relates here, as it unleashed the last 4 decades of pubsch bashing. Just loved NPR’s 6/26/22 interview with 2 of the original members of the National Commission on Excellence in Education. They maintained the Commission was not trying to make an objective analysis of the state of the schools– just looking to find confirmation of concerns they already had… Isn’t that called cherry-picking data? (LOL). And let’s not forget the cherry-picked data on SAT scores was upside-down: they claimed a long incremental rise as a steady decline!
But it’s still sobering to realize the guy (Bennett) who said that, & never backed down, was US Secy of Ed for 3 yrs.
That quote caused Bennett to become toxic.
This post cleared up several things for me. It made it clear that the privatizers do indeed skim some money off the top of what comes to them. They also return a portion of it to their politicians to keep the privatization process in place. They then continue to acquire an increasing control over education.
Teachers do not speak about these problems, unless they do so in small groups. Books by Ms. Ravitch have helped me to get a picture of what is happening in public education. I did not understand why there was criticism of teachers, and it took some time to see why it was taking place.
The books which I used for textbooks in teaching did not speak of issues such as these within education. But NCLM prompted me to look for answers and slowly things cleared up. This post gives an overview which puts many parts of the picture in one place. It helps.
This article is spot on. In 2000 I became the Associate (Deputy) Superintendent of Richmond County, NC Public Schools. One of my duties was to manage the distribution of textbooks. At that time RCPS was allocated about $250,000 per year to purchase textbooks. By the time I retired in 2013 that allocation was gradually reduced by the Republican controlled state legislature to about $50,000.