Peter Greene wrote in Forbes about the bizarre decision by the Gates Foundation to give nearly $1 million to the Reason Foundation, a libertarian foundation that doesn’t believe in public schools and seldom believes in anything the government does on behalf of its citizens. They believe, I suppose, in a feral society where there is minimal government, minimal taxes, and everyone fends for him or herself. I remembered that the Gates Foundation once gave a grant of nearly $400,000 to the far-right American Legislative Executive Council (ALEC), which opposes public schools, unions, environmental regulations, gun control, and most every other government activity.
Greene writes:
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has awarded a grant of $900,117 to the Reason Foundation. The award’s stated purpose is “to ensure that State funding adequately and equitably supports the pursuit of improved educational outcomes for low income, Black and Latinx Students.”
The Reason Foundation is a think tank whose stated purpose is to advance “a free society by developing, applying, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law.” They use “journalism and public policy research to influence the framework and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders.” They favor limited government and market-friendly policies.
The Gates Foundation has long pushed policies in education, including the financing of the ultimately-unsuccessful small schools initiative and widespread influence in the creation and implementation of the controversial Common Core State Standards.
According to the Gates database, they have never before given a grant to the Reason Foundation. The two are not an obvious match; in fact, Reason was highly critical of the Common Core initiative that Gates spent millions to promote.
Reason’s approach to education has emphasized choice, particularly school vouchers. Over the years they have cranked out papers to support these market-based policies, though these papers have not met with enthusiasm from education policy analysts, who have used phrases like “carefully selected examples intended to support a particular perspective,” “off the rails,” “not a credible policy document,” “little more than a polemic,” and “reckless and irresponsible.”
It is not clear what the actual project behind this grant might be. Search the Reason website for “low-income students” and it turns up many articles about how school choice and voucher programs would improve school for these students. The same for a search for “Black students.” (”Latinx students” does not appear on the website at all.)
The grant language is also interesting in that it suggests that Reason’s program is not about establishing a program, but about finding ways to influence the path of state funding. The end result of this may not simply be about spending Gates money, but about spending taxpayer dollars as well.
This is a strange grant because Reason has never showed any interest in education other than to promote vouchers.
Billy boy could have done something positive by giving the money to Reason to be used in its ongoing fight against drug prohibition, which serves only as a jobs program for illegal drug cartels and requires the use for law enforcement funds that could go into treatment and prevention.
Reason only fights drug laws for selfish reasons.
They don’t give a damn about the property!d hooked on drugs.
Giving money to that organization is just throwing it down z fat hole.
People, not property!d
And rat hole
Agreed. I would not support them. However, I am an advocate for abolishing prohibition. Portugal decriminalized all drugs. Result? LESS drug addiction. For less crime. Far more efficient and just justice system.
And far fewer deaths from adulterated underground drugs. That is one horrific consequence of our insane, backward drug laws. Kids dying from taking what they think is ecstasy but is actually fentanyl, to give but one example of the type of thing that occurs because our laws create these underground manufacturers.
I agree our drug laws are insane, largely a result of the moralizing “religious” crowd who have done so much damage to our country.
Too bad tge native Americans did not kick tge Programs asses right back to England.
Pilgrims.
They should never have allowed tge Pilgrims to step off the boats.
And they should have held up a sign that said “Columbus, go to Hell or wherever it is you came from”
It is blatantly obvious that Gates and most of his billionaire buddies believe the myth that they built their empires all by themselves and simply providing money to institutions that promote the same gospel will allow the rest of us to join in (As long as they still get most of the booty). It is blatantly obvious that the billionaire class has become a stage four cancer on humanity.
It’s only obvious to some of us.
A large fraction of the American public view rooms like Gates and Music as completely self made and as the epitome of the American Dream realized.
They believe that folks like Gates, Musk, Zuckerberg, Brake, Buffet et so can do no wrong and that every effort to regulate their behavior is unAmerican and affront to freedom.
Folks like Gates and Musk!
A perfect example of how blind many people are us how they unquestioningly accept Soon Musk’s claims to be a backer of free speech. When tge fellow shuts down and/or simply fires anyone who disagrees with or criticizes him.
Yes. Too many believe this while they go into debt paying for healthcare, college, and exorbitant rent. Thus the sustainability for billionaires.
This is a battle for the future of civilization. If free speech is lost even in America, tyranny is all that lies ahead.”
Says Soon Musk, who just said he will support Ron DeSzntis for President.
Is it even possible to be more full of crap?
Musk believes in free hate speech, opening Twitter to Nazis and racists and others who deny free speech to their enemies. He also boots people he doesn’t like.
Elon Musk
Elon
Elon
Note to autocorrect: repeat that until you get it right.
I actually thought Musk was pretty smart until he bought Twitter and started spewing daily nonsense.
But he has convinced me that his success is due primarily to tge smart people his companies have hired. And i even have my doubts that he was tge one who hired them because he doesn’t like people who push back, which is what good engineers do.
Like Trump, he’s a narcissistic attention seeker.
Musk’s tweets reveal a narcissist with a strange affinity for rightwing extremists.
Who knows what the source is, but the affinity is definitely showing.
I don’t think he realizes it, but what he does daily on Twitter affects far more than Twitter.
One would think that he would at least be
concerned with how it might impact his other companies, but maybe he is just oblivious.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7zm9q/elon-musk-twitter-nazis-white-supremacy
Musk is now claiming there is a Democratic “coordinated attack” on him.
pS I’m in on it, but don’t tell anyone.
And Musk is now banning folks who investigate alt fight extremists and Musk is a outsourcing Twitter’s decisions about who goes znd who can stay to those very right wing extremists.
https://theintercept.com/2022/11/29/elon-musk-twitter-andy-ngo-antifascist/
I have always thought Twitter was a joke, but lately it has become a real clown show.
Where are the clowns
Send in the clowns
Don’t bother..They’re here!
Well, Gates can really show his true colors now. It’s clearly obvious that “Effective Altrui$m” (the giving pledge) has been a Ponzi like $cheme all along. The jig is up on the Billionaire class as the public/tax payers awake from their slumber. The rich got/get richer on tax dollars. Thank you SBF and the FTX crypto crash for exposing the dirty truth! Every sleazy “movement ” pushed by the Bully class grows its own seeds of destruction.
Gates’ decision to give money to a libertarian group is not surprising. As a self-entitled billionaire that is accustomed to using his wealth to buy policy, it is not shocking that he would align himself with other billionaires that do not willingly support investment in the common good and all public services or benefits. He personally has no need for any public services or democracy for that matter so his decision is in keeping with what other ultra-wealthy individuals believe. Gates and other like minded billionaires keep pushing our country towards corporatocracy.
Gates actually demonstrates that he believes in one public service. Perpetual tax cuts for the wealthy. He does actually know where his bread is buttered.
It’s not at all surprising. We know he’s willing to let people die so he can profit from covid vaccines instead of allowing the formulas to be shared. There’s no win-win with him; it’s always win for just him; it’s simply him beating on people for profit, racing against the ghosts of low self worth his parents instilled in him when he was a child — more of a child.
It’s also not surprising that “Neither the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation nor the Reason Foundation responded to emails requesting further details about the grant.” The money was clearly intended to be dark. (Excellent research, Mr Greene.) What is surprising is that Mr Greene forgot to ask the Secretary Cardona Department of Education for comment.
Why is the libertarian supporting Gates Foundation allowed to flood the U.S. Department of Education of a Democratic administration with its employees? Why is the Biden administration supporting Gates and therefore DeVos? Why is the president our frenemy?
Why is a fellow who met mulgiple times at the “palaces” of the infamous convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein allowed to have anything to do with education?
The Department of Education should have long ago severed all ties with the Gates Foundation and it’s employees.
The “gift” is only bizarre if one believes Gates is actually interested in improving public education.
The Gates Foundation has long pushed policies
inON education,”Fixed.
Pushing stuff ON people is the MO of the Gates Foundation.
Even if the policies are well founded (shi h they are not most of the time for Gates Foundation), it’s always preferable go ask people if they wNt what you are proposing rather than shoving it down their throats as Gates so often does.
I’ll hazard a guess that his pal Charles Koch persuaded Gates of the merits of this contribution.
Gates and his billionaire buddies seem to enjoy a kind of dues ex machina role. Of course, their solutions to problems seem to be of benefit only to them. I suppose that is in line with the way the Greek gods tended to operate, and today’s uberwealthy do seem to have god complexes.
Exactly. It all begins with their apotheosis in their own minds. Gates, Musk, Hastings, etc.
God damned complexes.
Dues ex machina. Perfect!
In other news:
Trump Schedule
Dinner with Ye and Nick at hate o’clock.
😂
Gates grates.
Depend on it, the aggressive touting of a pro-voucher organization based on its title–Reason Foundation, Heritage Foundation–signals an utter (utterly cynical) lack of the title quality.
“They believe… in a feral society where there is minimal government, minimal taxes, and everyone fends for him or herself.”
That’s it in a peanut shell but nicer than I’d say it.
They believe in a feudal society where they are tge kings and we are all their serfs.
Where life is nasty, brutish and short…unless you have a lot of $$$$.
Brutish is the perfect word. Nod to Thomas Hobbes. Unless you have $$$, nod to MLK. Socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for the poor. That’s ALL of us here, by the way, the poor.
The end result of this may not simply be about spending Gates money, but about spending taxpayer dollars as well”
Gates Foundation grants are ALL about spending OUR money.
And of course, taking a tax write off on Monday that would otherwise have simply been “lost” to tge IRS.
Common Core is a perfect example.
“ a think tank whose stated purpose is to advance “a free society by developing, applying, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law.” “
Libertarian principles are generally not to have laws at all governing the particular desires of the individual libertarians.