Election Day was once a joyful ritual, where people waited patiently in line to cast their ballot and perform the most important act of citizenship: choosing our leaders by vote. I remember when I was in junior high school in 1952, brewing coffee in the home ex classroom and selling it for 5 cents to voters on an unusually chilly day in Houston. My partner and I split $14 for a day’s work. There was no animosity, no anger among those waiting to vote.
Fast forward to 2022.
Here is what Politico predicts:
OFF THE RAILS — It’s time to talk about it out loud: This year’s election is going to be a train wreck. Not just Election Day, but the weeks and perhaps even months to come.
For starters, it might not be clear who controls the House for days, or longer. In the Senate, it could be weeks. In fact, if the polling averages are correct , we might not know who controls the Senate until after a potential early December runoff in Georgia.
But that’s the least of the trouble ahead. All the elements of a perfect storm are present: a rise in threats against election administrators and poll workers; outdated and overstrained election infrastructure; a brain drain of officials experienced with the complexities of administering elections; external cyber threats; and an abundance of close races that could extend long past Election Day as mail-in and provisional ballots are counted, recounted and litigated.
Then, there are the hundreds of Republican candidates up and down the ballot with a record of denying or expressing doubts about the 2020 presidential results — a few were even present at the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. At least a dozen candidates running in competitive Senate and governor and secretary of state contests refused to commit or declined to respond when asked whether they’ll accept the results of their races.
A blowout Republican victory might remove many of the most combustible elements. But short of a red wave Tuesday, we’re looking at an ugly finish.
If those prominent election-denying candidates lose, it will not be graciously — remember, these are candidates whose political brands are rooted in their refusal to accept the 2020 election results, and their own high-profile and extra-legal efforts to overturn them. For them, the traditional pain and disappointment of defeat will be amplified because of the high expectations of midterm GOP success. And there are no party graybeards who will be able to talk them down — in fact, the post-election recriminations will likely find backing from party leaders and elected officials who fear antagonizing a base that’s been primed to believe the 2020 election was rigged.
The wellspring of these false claims, former President Donald Trump, is already laying the predicate — last week, he sought to cast doubt on the integrity of Pennsylvania’s results by claiming the 2022 results there are rigged as well .
It is obvious that it undermines our democracy when prominent figures like Trump claim that elections are rigged. He predicted it in 2016. He predicted it in 2020. And he’s never stopped claiming that he won in a landslide in 2020. Most Republicans believe him, despite the lack of any evidence and the complete debunking of his claim by courts and his own cabinet members and advisors.
To make matters worse, Elon Musk tweeted to his 115 million followers that they should vote Republican because Democrats hold the presidency, and balance is good. What he doesn’t understand is that in the American system, balance means stalemate. No action on climate change. No effort to protect abortion rights. A mutual veto. Congress blocks the President’s proposals. The President vetoes Congressional acts.

By example, Elon Musk makes children and adults living with Autism look bad.
“The biggest difference between autism and Asperger’s syndrome is that Asperger’s is no longer a diagnosis. After 2013, Asperger’s is now considered an autism spectrum disorder.
“The other is that people with Asperger’s are considered on the “high” end of the autism spectrum, meaning they: …
“can more easily mask certain behaviorial patterns” …
“According to an article published in Slate and written by Sara Luterman, an openly autistic writer, Musk’s announcement was a “poor attempt at laundering his image as a heartless billionaire.”
“Also, Luterman feels that Musk isn’t accurately representing most autistic people, as many have difficulty with employment, financial disparities, and unstable housing situations.”
https://psychcentral.com/autism/elon-musk-opened-up-about-autism-heres-what-we-learned#diagnosis
So, is Elon Musk another malignant narcisistic like Traitor Trump?
According to this medicate, the answer to my question may be YES!
“Will Elon Musk’s narcissism be his downfall?”
“Sigmund Freud characterized narcissists as especially suited to be leaders and uniquely able to give a fresh stimulus to cultural development – but also prone to damage the established state of affairs.”
https://www.imd.org/research-knowledge/articles/will-elon-musks-narcissism-be-his-downfall/
LikeLike
Elon has assburgers syndrome, is a carcissist and is always trying to musk his behavior.
LikeLike
Wow, I love that first characterization, Poet!
LikeLike
Sigmund Freud knew all about narcissists because he was one.
But it’s not that they are uniquely qualified to be leaders, unless the ability to get people to blindly follow you makes one uniquely qualified.
Lots of people blindly followed Freud’s bullshit theories about this that and the other. And some still follow them.
I once read a book by Freud on the meaning of dreams and all I can say is that he must have been taking some very good hallucinogens (although it was before LSD had been synthesized so it must have been peyote or magic mushrooms or something)
LikeLike
One very funny thing about Freud (other than his hilarious dream interpretations) is that Freud was supposed to represent a “scientific” approach to psychology but nothing could be further from the truth. None of his ideas was even remotely grounded in experiment or even reality. Far from making psychology scientific, he set the field back by decades with his profoundly unscientific approach.
Today, most scientists would consider his ilk crackpots.
LikeLike
One political party works to limit who can vote, while the other endeavors to restrict who can become a party’s nominee for public office. The U.S. is not a functioning democracy!
LikeLike
James, I don’t think that is a fair characterization of the Democratic Party. The nominee of the party every four years is the person who wins the most delegates in the state primaries and caucuses. In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the most delegates. In 2020, Joe Biden won the most delegates.
What you are saying sounds like Trump’s line that “if I don’t win, the election is rigged.”
If your candidate didn’t win the nomination, that doesn’t mean the process was rigged. Biden was written off as a non-starter until he swept the South Carolina primary due to the African American vote. Until then, no one thought he had a chance.
LikeLike
In several states the Democratic Party sued to keep third party candidates off ballots. Ever-changing rules disqualified worthy candidates from participating in debates. The Clinton campaign’s agreement with the DNC unfairly gave Hillary Clinton an advantage in 2016. Superdelegates had too much influence in determining “winners” of state primaries (e.g. West Virginia in 2016). Donations from billionaires and corporations helped determine the outcome of several primaries. Trump and Russian interference didn’t determine who’d become Democratic Party nominees. Kamala Harris, among the least popular candidates in 2020, nevertheless became a candidate for Vice President. Explain how that happened!
LikeLike
Hillary won the most delegates without the Superdelegates. You don’t get the nomination unless you win the most delegates.
Joe Biden picked Kamala Harris because black voters in South Carolina were key to his victory. He selected the first black female Supreme Court Justice for the same reason. As it happens, his choice is far more qualified than any of Trump’s three choices.
LikeLike
One specific political party created a theocracy in the U.S. Jefferson warned that priests in all ages, in all countries align with despots. The despot is Charles Koch. So, if a person favors social Darwinism and national leadership by men like Jerry Falwell and Bishop Hebda who prohibited his priests from voting in the Democratic primary, one party in the USA is acceptable.
LikeLike
Yes, it’s a sad terrible time. But I’m old enough to remember the Dixiecrats, led by Strom Thurmond, bolting the Democratic Party to nominate him rather than Truman–the actual Democratic President and otherwise Party nominee. Truman’s name was not even allowed on the ballot in several Southern states. All this was because of Truman’s support for civil rights for black Americans. Some of the readers can remember, too, as I do, blacks being outright denied the vote in a number of states–and physically attacked when they tried to do so. I also remember when there was only one woman in the Senate and a couple in the House. In addition, we should remember the spectacle of the attempted removal of Pres. Clinton for bogus issues related to his private life. Before that, there was Watergate and the burglary of national Democratic headquarters. But these times are different and worse in that we can’t see light at the end of a Trump tunnel. If he or his minions run our governments, state and national, I don’t see how we recover. That’s especially so since Reagan’s FCC did away with media’s fairness doctrine, so that media channels are almost shameless in promoting what sells advertising, rather than what’s good for the nation. I’d say to all readers of this blog, make one last attempt to get one last vote for anti-Trump, pro-democracy candidates.
LikeLike
What Elon Musk doesn’t understand…”
Musk’s encouragement of people to vote for Republicans has nothing to do with understanding or lack thereof.
It is rooted in pure spite.
Musk hates Biden and anyone else who has the impudence and unmitigated gall to criticize him or his companies.
He’s a big baby.
Biden recently noted that Musk had purchased a platform that spreads lies around the world which , of course, is true.
And the hilarious thing is that Musk the brilliant businessman bought Twitter for a grossly inflated price.
He should have asked Fed Chair Jerome Powell to raise the interest rate to see if Powell could bring the inflated Twitter price down before Elon bought it (since Powell obviously believes that all inflation will yield to increased interest rates and that he can impact everything and everyone , including Vladimir Putin, with his rate increases)
LikeLike
I do love how Elon urges “independent minded people” to vote for Republicans, though.
If one is truly “independent minded”, wouldn’t that mean one would decide for oneself whom to vote for? Why would what a billionaire “urges” have any impact on that?
LikeLike
It does fit in with the whole Twitter theme,however.
Above all, Twitter is about mindlessly following the crowd.
LikeLike
“Vote Independent (Elon Musk)
Vote your conscience
That’s the plan
Show insouciance
For the man
Listen in
To only me
Vote for spin
For GOP
LikeLike
Musk says he is going to ban impersonators from Twitter.
Doesn’t that mean he will have to ban himself? — for impersonating someone who believes in political neutrality of social media
Musk just six months ago:
“For Twitter to deserve public trust, it must be politically neutral, which effectively means upsetting the far right and the far left equally.”
Musk today on Twitter: vote Republican.
I normally don’t pay attention to Twitter, but this is becoming very entertaining.
LikeLike
“Ban the Posers from Twitter” (wherein Elon Advocates banning himself)
Ban the posers!
Ban them all!
Ban the Bozos!
Build a wall!
Simply ban this
Biased cause —
Vote DeSantis
Vote for Oz
LikeLike
In 2016, the Barna Group conducted a survey that found the most likely influence on who people voted for in the presidential contest was their religious beliefs, above family, news media, friends and campaign ads.
Wikipedia has an entry for George Barna. His research findings which are listed make for an interesting read. His organization specializes in research about the religious beliefs and behavior of Americans. Barna reported that Trump received 57% of the Christian vote and Hillary received 37%. Barna was raised Catholic and has become engaged with evangelical Christianity.
LikeLike
“Balance is Good
Balance is good
Especially the kind
That’s under the hood
It’s hiding behind
LikeLike
Complete the outfit with New Balance shoes!
LikeLike
The new Twitter in the hands of Elon Musk is targeting accounts that provide unbiased information the day before the election. This is not more freedom of speech at all. I got this email notice today:
“As the Executive Director of the League of Women Voters of California, you can imagine my surprise to receive a notice that my Twitter account was suspended with no explanation or reason. That’s right. The day before a Midterm Election, I am unable to access a once critical platform to monitor and share election information.
Should I be surprised? Maybe not. I am, however, undeterred.
Because I was not provided any explanation, I am left to review what I know. The facts.
I did not violate any Twitter policies.
I did not post or share anything to justify or necessitate a suspension.
I am a member of the LGBTQ+ community. A community that has been experiencing relentless and targeted attacks for no other reason than our existence.
I am the Executive Director of an organization with the mission of:
– Empowering Voters.
– Defending Democracy.
– An organization that envisions a democracy where every person has the desire, the right, the knowledge, and the confidence to participate.
Over the weekend, 119,000 Californians accessed Voter’s Edge,* just one of the League’s unbiased election tools. In 2020, over two million voters used Voter’s Edge. These resources need full visibility. Unfettered access. At this very moment – over 4,000 people are actively using this site. Twitter’s suspension keeps me, the Executive Director, from amplifying these tools, stifling voter education.
We should all be concerned. Not for me, but for how this impedes access to democracy and silences a source of trustworthy election information. Let this be our rallying call in our resolve to stand up taller with the knowledge that we are, unquestionably, on the right side of history.
We need your support for the League’s relentless pursuit of progress. Progress Needs Protecting. Donate today and support the League’s critical role in empowering voters.
Suspended and Determined,
Stephanie Doute, CAE
Executive Director
League of Women Voters of California
Twitter suspends accounts that violate the Twitter Rules
*Voters Edge is a partnership of the League of Women Voters of California Education Fund and Maplight.”
LikeLike
Just got an email one minute ago to inform the account was reinstated after much public outcry.
LikeLike