The Republicans have made a big campaign issue of crime. They claim that Democrats are “soft on crime,” while they are “tough on crime.”
Don’t believe it. It’s a bald-faced lie!
Republicans oppose any legislation to limit access to guns. They vote against “red flag” laws, that seek to keep guns away from people who pose a danger to others. They oppose background checks. They oppose raising the minimum age for buying a gun from 18 to 21. They oppose laws that are commonplace in civilized nations.
The United States has the highest murder rate in the world. Could it be because we have so many guns and so few limits on guns?

Texas, for example, now allows anyone to carry a gun without a permit. Let that sink in: anyone can carry a gun without a permit.

Texas Goes Permitless on Guns, and Police Face an Armed Public
A new law allowing people to carry handguns without a license has led to more spontaneous shootings, many in law enforcement say.
HOUSTON — Tony Earls hung his head before a row of television cameras, staring down, his life upended. Days before, Mr. Earls had pulled out his handgun and opened fire, hoping to strike a man who had just robbed him and his wife at an A.T.M. in Houston.
Instead, he struck Arlene Alvarez, a 9-year-old girl seated in a passing pickup, killing her.
“Is Mr. Earls licensed to carry?” a reporter asked during the February news conference, in which his lawyer spoke for him.
He didn’t need one, the lawyer replied. “Everything about that situation, we believe and contend, was justified under Texas law.” A grand jury later agreed, declining to indict Mr. Earls for any crime.
The shooting was part of what many sheriffs, police leaders and district attorneys in urban areas of Texas say has been an increase in people carrying weapons and in spur-of-the-moment gunfire in the year since the state began allowing most adults 21 or over to carry a handgun without a license.
Far from an outlier, Texas, with its new law, joined what has been an expanding effort to remove nearly all restrictions on carrying handguns. When Alabama’s “permitless carry” law goes into effect in January, half of the states in the nation, from Maine to Arizona, will not require a license to carry a handgun.
The state-by-state legislative push has coincided with a federal judiciary that has increasingly ruled in favor of carrying guns and against state efforts to regulate them.
But Texas is the most populous state to do away with handgun permit requirements. Five of the nation’s 15 biggest cities are in Texas, making the permitless approach to handguns a new fact of life in urban areas to an extent not seen in other states.
In the border town of Eagle Pass, drunken arguments have flared into shootings. In El Paso, revelers who legally bring their guns to parties have opened fire to stop fights. In and around Houston, prosecutors have received a growing stream of cases involving guns brandished or fired over parking spots, bad driving, loud music and love triangles.
“Tough on crime?” Hardly.

If Republicans were tough on crime they would have impeached Trump.
LikeLike
exactly
LikeLike
Excellent point, Arthur!
LikeLike
Why is “Tough on Crime” a good thing anyway? All it ends up meaning is throwing more Black and poor people in prison. Why not enact measures that would drastically reduce crime in the first place? Jobs with livable wages, housing, healthcare (including and especially mental healthcare), education, etc.?
The only kind of crime we should be tough on is the kind that the politicians and their billionaire and corporate donors routinely commit, but of course that kind of crime is above the law, regardless of party.
LikeLike
“Tough On Crime” is just another Ripofflicen code word — more about dog whistles than police whistles. It always deftly whistles past crimes of white collar, corporate, and white sheet varieties, and somehow just plain fuhgettabouts the Really Big Crooks who have them on retainer to point their well-greased fingers in every other direction.
LikeLike
I think we need to lighten up this conversation, gun nut style (not Gangnam). A horror show posing as comedy.
LikeLike
Do you ever get to rest? ð³ I admire your dedication⦠vg
Youâll never find rainbows if youâre looking down. Charlie Chaplin
>
LikeLike
That’s not really true. There are lots of puddles, ponds, lakes, and parts of the Black Sea in sovereign Ukraine into which Russian war criminals have unleashed petroleum and other carcinogens. Anyone there can look down to see all sorts of eerie rainbows in them.
LikeLike
Of arms and the 15-year-old incel, I sing!
Opening line of The Inceliad, as told by Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley and modeled on The Aeneid.
LikeLike
My long response just vanished as I typed.
I will make it simple . Murders in NYC besides being far far down the lists of deadliest cities are as low as in 2012 . Bloomberg’s next to last year when he rightfully called NYC the safest big City in America . They are lower than every single year prior to 2012 dating back to 1960 when America was supposedly great. Starting in the mid 60s murders are 200,300, 400, and even 500% lower depending on the year .
How Democrats in NY are struggling with that message against a fascist seditious gun nut is Political malfeasance. There should be the equivalent of the daisy commercial running non stop .
LikeLike
Lee Zeldin is Trump’s mini-me. He was my Congressman in Suffolk County and Trump could always count on him to echo whatever Trump said.
LikeLike
I had the misfortune of having Suozzi in the 3rd CD. Of course my displeasure with Tom was on a completely different level. They did not stop me from voting for him 3 times.
Since the 2022 redistricting, I have have been relegated to Trumplandia the 1st CD that you were in .
LikeLike
You sure there is no edit button
LikeLike
The tragic shooting in St. Louis Monday has drawn detailed attention to safety and gun laws. Missouri is among the states with the weakest gun safety laws in the nation and has legislators well funded by gun advocate organizations.
(In case you missed it – on Monday, an individual shooter with history of issues (family did address them) killed a teacher who blocked the shooter from students and a student. School district officers reacted immediately and shot and killed him. Local police responded within minutes. Unlike other tragic school shootings, there was no delay in any law enforcement entering).
Because of the specifics of this shooting and details being released by police of background, tracing the weapon, and more – one outcome of this compared to others is gun-advocate legislators and their predictable after-the-incident rhetoric may not be able to defend their position on some gun safety measures. Although the Governor will argue differently.
This sums it up:
“Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on Thursday met in downtown St. Louis with the officers who responded to Monday’s shooting. He praised the officers, then after the meeting argued that red flag laws would not have stopped the shooting.
“You got a criminal that committed a criminal act, and all the laws in the world are not going to stop those things,” Parson said. (St. Louis Post-Dispatch)
Of the tragic incident, the news reports cite:
“The drills worked.” They did.
The shooter’s parents were aware of his issues, got treatment, and had the police remove a weapon they found from the home. Laws got in the way of police keeping it. No “red flag” law. (They gave it to a third party out of the home but shooter got it back).
Here’s Missouri
Missouri repealed laws requiring a permit to purchase a gun. Johns Hopkins reports that law has led to 49 to 68 deaths each year.
Missouri allows “open carry” – prohibits “red flag” laws – can fine officers who enforce federal gun laws – prohibits (with fines) police departments partnering with federal agencies’ firearm enforcement
LikeLike
Homicide rate Missouri 14 deaths per 100 k, NY 4.7 per 100k
St Louis 52 per 100k ,NYC 5.5 per 100k . That’s right Governor gun laws don’t work.
LikeLike
The Hill recently reported that the murder rate is 40% higher in states that voted for Trump. Other crimes are also higher because red states under fund all basic services including the police. The ratio of police to population is better in blue states because they value a safer, civil society. Red states tend to cut taxes sometimes to dangerous levels in a quest to return to the Stone Age. Kill or be be killed should be their motto. Once again, where is the Democratic messaging on this issue?
Why are blue states and the DNC not debunking the myth that the GOP is tough on crime? Sadly, polls show more people trust the GOP or crime and the economy, totally bogus. Where is the Democratic messaging to countermand this perception? It’s like they are trying to run a one legged race. Some of the progressives and a few others are fighters, but too many Democrats seem to be asleep.
LikeLike
Great point, RT. Plus the fact that red states have lax gun laws.
LikeLike
“lax gun laws” is an extreme understatement.
Places like Texas effectively have no gun laws.
You don’t even have to have a permit to pack a pistol.
And carrying a gun is now all the rage –basically a fashion statement. A bunch of fake cowboys who believe packing a gun makes them cool.
Texas is a good place not to live or even visit.
LikeLike
rt– answering you under general comments below to get more margin space.
LikeLike
I wish it was easier to reblog your posts!
LikeLike
My posts are free for reblogging. Just copy and paste.
LikeLike
I don’t have any problem reblogging- I just reblogged this post.
LikeLike
If the MAGA RINO Republican Party (in name only) controls the majority of states, wins the majority in Congress and takes back the White House, they will turn the United States into a failed dystopian country.
Anyone interested in knowing what it will be like to live in a failed country, only has to focus on:
South Sudan
Somalia
Yemen
Syria
Central African Republic
Democratic Republic of Congo
Sudan
Chad
Afghanistan
Zimbabwe, et al.
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/fragile-states-index
When that happens, the only people that will live without much fear of death will be the few that can afford to buy their own private armies.
LikeLike
& instead of tightening gun laws in TX, they are calling for DNA tags (better than “red flags,” right?)…so that future victims can be identified. Remember they were identifying Uvalde victims by their SHOES?
LikeLike
They are actually in the process o eliminating all gun laws.
Texas had stricter gun control back in the days of the Old West.
It is becoming a very dangerous place.
People risk their lives by vacationing there.
LikeLike
Of course, there should NOT be “future victims.”
But that’s not the American we live (& die) in.
LikeLike
DUNCE SCOTUS
The Supreme Court Of The United States exists to interpret the Laws passed by the Legislative Branch. When that interpretation becomes subject to peddlers of influence who warp the Will of the People then the Laws must be sharpened and sharpened again till the Supreme Court gets the point of the People’s Will though the folds of its thickly-walletted skulls.
There are of course influences which warp the Will of the People in the process of writing the laws themselves — and we begin to recognize more and more these days the lyin’s share of these distortions emanate from the very same sources.
LikeLike
“The People’s will” has got nothin to do with anything any more.
Ours has become a government by and for Lobbyists”, in which the Supreme Court “interprets” the Constitution so that it is consistent with the laws written by the corporate lobbyists.
The purpose of Congress is to rubber stamp the lobbyist laws.
LikeLike
Interpreting the Constitution so that it is consistent with laws written by lobbyists is called “Lobbyist review”, which has long since supplanted “judicial review”, which at least pretended to decide whether laws were consistent with the Constitution (rather than the other way around, according to Lobbyist review)
LikeLike
LikeLike
Members of Congress == Lobbyist lawyers == lawbyists
LikeLike
Legislaywhores
LikeLike
Reprehensatives
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Politicians Are Poody Heads.
LikeLike
rt– Responding to your Q up above, “Why are blue states and the DNC not debunking the myth that the GOP is tough on crime?” with another Q: Should Dem leaders wade into the entrenched, meme-laden public discussion on any platform you can name? Dems call out the violent-crime stats in red states, and Reps retort ‘those are blue areas in red states, and besides look at the violent-crime stats in blue-state cities, all run by Dems.’
The data is easily accessed: ony 2 of the 10 highest violent-crime states are blue– #10, AZ is “pink” (having voted for Biden), the other 7 red. Per FBI Uniform Crime Reporting Program, in descending order: AK, NM, TN, AR, NV, LA, AL, MO, SC, AZ.
Cities are run by Dems no matter where they’re located– all cities over 1million pop, nearly all 500k-1million, most 100k-500k, and many among smaller cities. The 10 most dangerous cities in descending order: Bessemer, AL (population 26k); East St Louis, IL (18k); Monroe, LA (47k); St Louis, MO (293k); Detroit, MI (623k); Baltimore, MD (576k); Memphis, TN (628k); Camden, NJ (72k); Flint, MI (81k).
They are all mostly-black, all have Dem mayors; nearly all are areas abandoned by industry. (The 9 states they are located in include 4 red [MO with 2 of them], 4 blue, 1 purple [OH]).
LikeLike