The Texas Monthly describes the takeover of the state Republican Party by evangelical Christians. The party freely uses the language and symbols of evangelicals. Their passionate commitment to freedom and religious Liberty is self-referential.
A recent article begins:
Late last month, Senator Ted Cruz stood beside a pulpit at the Texas Faith, Family, and Freedom Forum, hosted by Texas Values, a conservative policy group based in Austin, and made the case that liberal insanity in Washington was worse than he’d ever seen it. He took Trump-style potshots at the appearance and scruples of his opponents—in this case a handful of congressional Democrats. “Five years ago in the Senate there was one open and avowed socialist,” Cruz said, referring to Bernie Sanders of Vermont. “Crazy uncle Bernie, white hair standing straight up. By the way, would it kill the guy to use a comb? I mean he’s a socialist, he can just take one from someone.”
Calling Democrats lunatics is standard practice for Texas’s junior senator. But mixed in with his jeremiads were other signals more fitting to the setting, a stage at Austin’s Great Hills Baptist Church with a large cross adorning the podium beside him. “A revival is coming,” said Cruz, the son of an evangelical Protestant minister. And while he added that politicians like him were ready to lead it, he also reminded those gathered that much of the public still needs to be won over. “We need to do a much better job as evangelists,” Cruz said. “Evangelists for Jesus, yes, but also in the public sphere as evangelists for liberty, for our values.”
Cruz blended explicit biblical language and patriotic imagery throughout what was, at its core, a speech to rally the political activism of the “joyful warriors” convened that evening by Texas Values, which itself makes little distinction between Republican, Christian, and American priorities. The group’s website explains its position that “government is an institution ordained by God, with the purpose of punishing evil and rewarding good” and adds that “those who serve in government are God’s ministers.” A cross-shaped graphic accompanying the term “Religious Liberty” on the homepage makes clear to which religion’s God the group is referring….
After the Texas Supreme Court sided with cheerleaders in East Texas in August 2018 and allowed them to display a verse from the New Testament on their football team’s run-through banner, state attorney general Ken Paxton tweeted in support. “God bless these young cheerleaders for their faith in God and their fight to protect their religious liberties. Just like their banners said, ‘I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.’” The verse, taken from St. Paul’s letter to the Philippian church, references the apostle’s spiritual growth, which allows him to endure the unpredictability—including hunger and financial need—in his missionary work. The verse has become popular among athletes, politicians, and other competitors as a triumphalist blessing over their ambitions. It would be better applied as a way of saying “I’ll be fine, even if I lose, because God’s kingdom doesn’t depend on a football game or an election.” But that’s not the message Paxton is sending in the tweet. His public messaging and that of other top Texas politicians implies that the kingdom of God very much depends on who wins elections.

I am a Christian and the use and abuse of the Bible to inflict pain and get political gain makes me sick. Jesus is not Republican or Democrat. He is not in favor or against political views. These people need to get the basic concept of what love is and to know their own darkness to get light shine on them instead of pointing fingers.
LikeLike
Watch Cruz.
Watch Cruz ooze.
Texas news:
the more you ooze,
the less you lose.
The word cruz is, ofc, Spanish for cross. So, vera cruz means “true cross,” as in “Come to the Trump website and buy some red plastic Trump-branded splinters of the True Cross, only $200 plus shipping and handling.”
Crus is a cross we bear. Barely.
LikeLike
cx: Cruz is a cross we bear.
LikeLike
“Their passionate commitment to freedom and religious Liberty is self-referential.”
They are a Moebius group?
LikeLike
Evangelical Christians are not all the same.
“Evangelicals and fundamentalists both agree that the Bible is inerrant, but fundamentalists tend to read the Bible literally.”
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesus/evangelicals/vs.html#:~:text=Evangelicals%20and%20fundamentalists%20both%20agree,to%20read%20the%20Bible%20literally.
And that is the problem. The Bible cannot be interpreted literally since the original authors of the Bible (before it ended up being translated from Hebrew to Greek) belonged to a collective culture that did not communicate literally, but figuratively.
This media piece attempts to explain the different way of thinking between Jews vs Christians about the Bible.
https://time.com/5606942/jewish-christian-bible/
I challenged a former friend of mine (who voted for Traitor Trump in 2016) about this since he was translating the Bible literally and his favorite guru (one of many extreme right talk show hosts) was also translating the Bible literally.
This why we can’t budge most if not all fundamentalists, once they have crossed that one-way bridge to become dedicated fundamentalists.
My former friend’s defense was that when the Bible was translated from Hebrew to Greek to English, et al, hundreds of times over millennia, every translation, well at least the one he reads (I’ve read that in English alone there are 400 different translations of the Bible from the Greek version/versions), that this former friend was using for his fundamentalist MAGA literal bully pulpit, was guided by God’s hand, a form of Devine intervention.
LikeLike
The problem, Lloyd, is precisely the opposite. The Bible makes some statement that is, to us today, obviously untrue because that’s something that people then believed. And then modern-day believers deal with the obvious falsehood by saying that it was meant symbolically. It wasn’t meant symbolically, typically. It was meant literally. The exceptions to this are the allegorical writings that appear very late in Jewish/Hebrew history (parts of the book of Daniel and all of Revelations).
So, for example, when the book of Genesis says that the heaven is a firmament with waters behind it, this is NOT meant symbolically. Almost all the cultures of the ancient Middle East believed that the sky was a solid dome with the stars stuck in it like raisins in a pudding and that behind this dome are waters. Thus Genesis tells us that God separated the waters below (the oceans) from the waters above (the ones behind the firmament).
Modern believers, even those who say we must take the Bible literally, will claim that it didn’t actually mean that the sky was a solid dome–that this was simply symbolic or poetic language. It wasn’t. It’s what people, then, in that time and place, literally believed to be true.
LikeLike
Similarly, when Joshua commands the sun to stop in the sky and it does, this is something that the authors of the text believed to be literally true because they thought that the sun was a ball that traveled across the sky from one horizon to the other. We now know that not to be the case, so believers pretend that this is symbolic language. Again, it’s not. It reflects what people at the time actually believed.
The use of symbolic language in the Hebrew texts is a late phenomenon. If the text says that Adam and Eve were in a garden and that God walked to and fro in it, that’s what the people then actually believed. A literal garden. God literally walking back and forth. If the text says that a snake talked, that’s what they actually believed at the time. That an actual snake actually talked–not Satan in the form of a snake. This is a standard folktale motif from the era in which the text was conceived. It LATER got the symbolic interpretation.
LikeLike
When people describe themselves as literalists, they typically mean that big stuff as described in the Bible actually happened. Jonah was actually swallowed by a whale. Noah actually put animals on an Ark and saved them from a world-wide flood. God actually created the world in six days. And so on. But they still, despite their literalism, will employ the “oh, that was meant symbolically” argument to save the “inerrancy” of the text.
An evangelical is by definition someone who evangelizes–who goes out and spreads Christianity, attempting to convert others to the religion. A fundamentalist is someone who believes in what they think to be an original, traditional form of a religion, typically one that is really ancient and, being ancient, holds to scriptural inerrancy. So, fundamentalists and evangelicals are NOT separate categories. Many evangelicals are fundamentalists, though there are also nonfundamentalist evangelicals, such as evangelizing New Age Christians. Most fundamentalists are evangelicals–they actively go out and try to convert people, though there are some that are insular and stick to themselves and do not actively proselytize.
LikeLike
Broad brush bigotry under the guise of religion! GOP AND IRAN! Nuff said
LikeLike
On the evening news a tearful Texas judge was talking about failure of the state to find placements for teenagers in social services. Sometimes these displaced teens sleep in offices, or they are placed in juvenile detention centers. This judge managed to get some donations to create a small center staffed by volunteers. I would hope some good Texas Christians and other decent folks would demand that the state rectify this state failure to address this situation.
LikeLike
Texas Christians are too involved in protecting the unborn to spend time helping or saving the born.
LikeLike
Nailed it
LikeLike
Texas right-wing “christians” don’t need silly things like ethical or moral values or consistency.
LikeLike
If some Texas Christians started practicing Christianity, this would be a huge breakthrough.
LikeLike
Muito semelhante no Brasil
LikeLike
Alas!
LikeLike
“God, Fatherland, Family”: Bolsonaro uses the same Nazi-fascist motto in Brazil
LikeLike
It is always this with fascists.
LikeLike
LikeLike
❤
LikeLike