Carol Burris is the executive director of the Network for Public Education. She recently received a press release from Betsy DeVos’s organization, the ironically-named American Federation for Children, asserting that the drop in test scores during the pandemic was the fault of the unions. The purpose of the “American Federation for Children” is to promote vouchers, especially for religious schools, and it is always eager to criticize public schools and teachers’ unions. AFC much prefers religious schools where children are indoctrinated without apology and where discrimination against unwanted children is common. Maybe they should change their name to the American Federation for Some Children (who share our religious views).
Burris writes:
Walter Blanks, the Press Secretary of the American Federation for Children, got on the rickety old soapbox of Betsy De Vos to blame teacher unions for the recent drop in student performance on NAEP. Moms for Liberty then jumped on calling for parents to “fire teacher unions.”
Did children suffer a decline in learning progress during the pandemic? Of course. Anyone who has ever taught in a school, unlike Mr. Blanks, could have predicted a drop.
As a former teacher and principal, I know that the relationship between a student and teacher and the relationship among students is critical for learning. And I also remember all those students who, without my cajoling and watchful eye, would have been content to put their heads down or look out the window instead of at their books. That’s kids. The warm smile directed at them, the subtle tap on the desk, you can’t do that over the internet.
But are unions the culprit for the NAEP score drop? There is no evidence of that.
First, if union influence in keeping remote learning were to blame, we would expect to see a larger drop in city scores than suburban scores. Suburban schools, with or without unions, were far more likely to open. However, suburban scores dropped significantly more in Reading for both low and high achievers than for city students, whose scores barely budged. In Math, the point drop for high achievers was the same; suburban low achievers lost more ground than their counterparts in cities.
Second, we would expect regional differences depending on the influence of unions.
But there is only one point difference in the scores’ drops between the union-heavy northeast and the right-to-work dominated south. And western states, where unions are prevalent in the most populous states, saw much smaller score drops than the south.
Not content to blame unions in general, Walter Blanks singles out Randi Weingarten as a national villain. Ms. Weingarten, a woman and strong leader, married to Rabbi Sharon Kleinbaum, has become a prime target for the misogynist right. But the facts do not bear out his accusations. Even as Weingarten was listening to her members concerned with their own family and student health, she was quietly working behind the scenes to get schools safely opened.
As a New York City public school grandma, I know it. And I am thankful for those efforts. My granddaughter returned to in-person learning in the fall of 2020 as New York City public schools opened. There were bumps and starts, but they opened. Even so, the majority of NYC parents still kept their children remote.
Will Mr. Blanks blame those parents and hundreds of thousands like them who were fearful of sending their children back to school?
Covid 19 was a national tragedy. Over one million Americans died horrible deaths. We will feel the pain and ramifications for years to come. And yes, our children deserve all our efforts to repair the academic and emotional damage of the pandemic. But using that tragedy to push an anti-union agenda does not help repair the damage. It continues to enflame the anger of parents still reeling from the pandemic themselves.
Blanks ends his essay by touting how school choice is the answer. I am scratching my head to reconcile that with the American Federation for Children’s stalwart support for low-quality online virtual schools and homeschools. You can’t blame learning loss on a lack of in-person learning and then support virtual learning solutions. Will AFC now advocate for the closure of online charters and homeschools? Don’t hold your breath.

The coin of the realm, i.e., standardized test scores, is counterfeit, worthless, less than valid, false, absurd, etc. . . not to mention unethical and unjust.
LikeLike
What would Betsy know about learning loss?
You can’t lose what you never had.
LikeLike
That is what I was thinking. Betsy DeGrizzlies didn’t think to look at where the scores dropped before making a ham handed generalization akin to stereotyping. She’s not the brightest torch in the Klan parade.
LikeLike
So true
LikeLike
DeVos is a right wing ideologue and serial liar. There is no reason to believe anything she or her radical right wing colleagues present as fact. What they offer are biased judgments without evidence. Her agenda like most billionaries is to tear down a public institution and transfer the funds to private entities.
LikeLike
There are too many variables that can be attributed to scores. DeVos is absurdly wrong if she believes the score decline is due to unions. This article puts the scores in perspective along with an informed discussion of the many variables. https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/59856/6-questions-to-better-understand-math-and-reading-scores
LikeLike
Calling Betsy a right wing ideologue and a serial liar is redundant.
Right wing ideologue would have been sufficient.
Name even a single right wing ideologue who is not a serial liar
LikeLike
I’m pretty sure they would even lie about being a right wing ideologue and claim they were not.
LikeLike
Betsy’s probably pissed off about our pesky union fighting for closing the schools.
I retired 1/2/2020. The teachers were being forced to come in at the start of the pandemic. I was tending to my father in law who was/is severely immune compromised, at the time. If I’d still been working, he (and I) might have died.
I know someone who’s angry at the union/NYCDOE; saying that we “threw the kids under the bus”. But fact is that, had the schools remained open, there would’ve been MANY more deaths. There’s really no way of getting around that.
Blows me away how anyone from any affiliation can use a global catastrophe of this magnitude to further their own personal, ideological, or political advantage.
LikeLike
The people who were calling for the schools to remain open were doing it based on insufficient, incomplete and uncertain information about the spread of the virus in schools and the surrounding communities.
People like economist Emily Oster (who knows nothing about epidemiology or even about analyzing data and has a history of making unsupported claims –eg, about the safety of alcohol use by pregnant mothers ) were using cherry picked data based on highly uncertain COVID test results to conclude that the schools were safe –even in communities with a relatively high test positivity rate.
LikeLike
Two of my friends/colleagues died.
LikeLike
When they claimed “the schools are safe”, they were speaking with much more certainty than was warranted about a highly uncertain situation.
LikeLike
I am so sorry.
LikeLike
Thanks. Me, too.
They were trying to keep the system running. As was some political figure in Texas who was urging the elders to sacrifice themselves for the good of the economy and how it would effect the younger generation (note that he didn’t offer himself up to the alter).
Now we’re seeing a similar set of circumstances with people manipulating the facts and data to try and show where and how the educational system blew it. Some well intentioned, I suppose. Some in order to further their agendas.
The fact is very simple: people were dying and a lot more were going to die unless the current local, state, federal, and global communities shut it down, adjusted, and cooperated. Not so easy and especially difficult in a world that values profit and competition over cooperation.
LikeLike
The ones who call for risk taking and sacrifice are rarely the ones who have to take risks and sacrifice themselves.
They sit in their Ivy towers and assure everyone how safe schools are when the infection data are sparse, unreliable and sometimes nonexistent and chastise teachers for not wishing to teach in person before there is even a vaccine available (for teachers or anyone else).
LikeLike