In North Carolina, charter operator Baker Mitchell plans to go to the U.S. Supreme Court to appeal a court decision barring him from requiring girls to wear skirts to school.
The nonpartisan organization “In the Public Interest” reports:
A charter school which lost a case in federal court recently over its mandatory rule that girls wear skirts is going to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Baker Mitchell, the owner of the school, “said the ruling could change the landscape of charter schools. He said in the newsletter he believes it undermines the foundation charter schools were created on, taking away parental right to choose the education their children receive. Mitchell said he believes the ruling is creating a slippery slope, and in the future courts could allow states to govern what is taught in charter schools and how.” But “experts say dress codes can and do discriminate based on sex, and this ruling proves that. Wendy Murphy, an attorney and adjunct professor at New England Law Boston, said even though parents can choose whether to send students to charter schools, that’s not the point of the ruling: regardless, if a school receives federal funding, it cannot discriminate based on sex. ‘The statute itself is very simple,’ Murphy said. ‘You cannot discriminate on the basis of sex, period.’”
In 2014, Baker Mitchell’s for-profit charter chain was investigated by the U.S. Departnent of Education for financial issues. Mitchell, who is not an educator, won a fourth charter. “Mitchell has collected in the neighborhood of $16 million in taxpayer funds over the past five years for managing three other charter schools in southeastern N.C. Brunswick County Schools Superintendent Dr. Edward Pruden is locked in a battle with Mitchell, hoping to convince State Board of Ed members to scrutinize his management practices and hold off awarding him more charters to open up schools.”
North Carolina teacher-blogger Stuart Egan called out Baker Mitchell in 2019 after Mitchell wrote a defense of charters in the Wall Street Journal. Egan pointed out that Mitchell’s Roger Bacon Academies are highly segregated and do not outperform public schools.
ProPublica wrote a report about Baker Mitchell and his charter school profiteering.
Mitchell is a member of the board of the libertarian John Locke Foundation and sat on the state charter school advisory board.
Best of all the Baker Mitchell is the pledge that students recite daily, as reported by Charlotte Magazine:
“Try to forget for a minute the outrage of wealthy businessman Baker Mitchell using North Carolina’s nascent charter school system to funnel millions of public dollars through four Wilmington-area charter schools he runs to private companies he controls, as detailed in an outstanding piece of reporting by ProPublica this week.
“Set aside the obvious conflict of interest in that arrangement, and Mitchell’s none-of-your-damn-business attitude about it: “It’s so silly. Undue influence, blah blah blah.” (He actually said that.)
“Look past his service with Art Pope on the John Locke Foundation board, and the world of symbolism in this paragraph:
To Mitchell, his schools are simply an example of the triumph of the free market. “People here think it’s unholy if you make a profit” from schools, he said in July, while attending a country-club luncheon to celebrate the legacy of free-market sage Milton Friedman.
“Turn your attention to the pledge that students, faculty, and staff at his schools are required to recite every morning just after the Pledge of Allegiance. The pledge contains these lines:
I pledge to be truthful in all my works,
guarding against the stains of falsehood from
the fascination with experts,
the temptation of vanity,
the comfort of popular opinion and custom,
the ease of equivocation and compromise, and
from over-reliance on rational argument …
I pledge to be obedient and loyal to those in authority,
in my family,
in my school, and
in my community and country,
So long as I shall live.
“The stains of falsehood … from over-reliance on rational argument”? What? The philosophical basis for this bizarre statement—which, again, adults and children are required to recite every day—is the example of Roger Bacon, the medieval scholar and Franciscan friar who lends his name to the company that manages Mitchell’s charter schools.
“You can read here about Bacon’s extensive study of the science of alchemy, and here about his view of the relationship between insight and science: “Of all kinds of experience, the best, he thought, was interior illumination, which teaches many things about Nature which the external senses could never discover, such as the transubstantiation of bread.”
“Students are being taught this superstitious garbage, with taxpayer money, which then lines the pocket of the provider. What the hell have we let happen to education in this state?”
Get used to it. The whole point of the Espinoza and Kennedy decisions and others to come from this Medieval Magisterium Extreme Court is to clear the way for replacing public schools with Christian nationalist fundamentalist madrassas. If you have any doubt that you are dealing with the American version of the Taliban, look no further than this burkasation of schools funded with taxpayer dollars.
Why do the Extreme Court and other rightwing groups want taxpayer dollars to be spent on private religious schools? Because they see that the young people coming up are against them on every issue and that the demographics of the country are shifting toward POC who are also against them. So, they want to replace public schools with private fundamentalist nationalist madrassas to indoctrinate a new generation of true believers. Think the Young Pioneers, the Hitler Youth and German Girls’ League, and Robert Baden-Powell’s initial vision for the Boy Scouts (to create cannon fodder for British imperalist wars).
Schooling for Girls, the Alito Way
It’s just impossible to be charming if one’s figure isn’t under control. If one is female, of course.
And it’s really important for adolescents to learn walking!!!
This is my problem, ofc. I completely missed Charm School.
Country Club Free Market Creepy. More and more these perverse plutocrats are turning out to be predatory in all aspects of their behavior. Would not trust for one minute why girls in skirts is being mandated. Don’t trust your girls or boys to this sick sphere of influence.
Amen
And then there was the Nazi Lebensborn program, designed to train girls to be perfect Aryan mothers and wives, for two purposes: a) to provide spouses for young SS officers chosen for the Nazi eugenics breading program to produce the next generation of leaders and b) to act as mothers to children saved from occupied areas who met official “standards” for “racial purity.”
The Nazi breading program?
Was that for making wiener schnitzel?
Haaaaa!!!! Breeding program!!!!
Yes, you have to wonder whether the mandate that girls wear skirts also comes with a mandate that girls wear little mirrors on their shoes.
If he wanted girls to be “modest” seems like he would actually mandate long dresses.like the Amish.
I assume it is part of the extremist wish to turn the clock back about 75-100 years.
Exactly. It’s Archie Bunker nostalgia:
And you knew who you were then
Girls were girls and men were men.
Poll American young people on any issue, and you will find that they overwhelmingly oppose Republican positions on almost every issue. And, contrary to popular opinion, studies by political scientists have found that political leanings are remarkably consistent, on average, across the lifespan. So, reich-wingers know that unless they do something soon, their party will be history when these voters come of age. That’s why “school choice,” vouchers (or state “academic scholarships”), and a jingoistic “1776 curriculum” were MAJOR themes of the last Republican Convention and why these are being touted by almost all the Republican governors and candidates for national office. Unless they turn this around with young people and POC, they go the way of the Know-Nothings. This time, right now, is their last shot before that happens. The smarter Republicans (I know, I know, but I mean relatively) are quite aware of this. Even Trump the Dense, IQ45, has spoken about how, if this isn’t fixed, “you won’t have a Party anymore.”
Trump, ofc, lacks an internal editor and is dumb enough to say the quiet part out loud.
Wow. Imagine, esteemed colleagues, if you were the leader of a school planning for the next year in the interest in providing the best possible professional educational services for children, and this is what you came up with? I don’t know about you, but I think I would consider myself ripe for exploring another line of work.
The student newspaper at the University of Dallas (Catholic) posted May 4, 2022, “Modesty is empowering and not outdated.” The accompanying photo is of a woman’s dress.
30% of Catholic schools are single sex.
Amy Coney Barrett’s attire is viewed as the ideal feminine model.
Women who fund and support with their presence, churches that discriminate against women are complicit in the road to fascism- requisite, Bible and flag. One charateristic of fascism is the marginalization of women.
One of many noxious lessons learned at Christian and Catholic schools is that religious apparatuses should get tax dollars.
If this garbage is what taxpayers are being forced to pay for, the citizens should demand a refund. There is a big difference between a school that accepts all students and aspires to serve all to the best of their ability and a school that discriminates and teaches blatant falsehoods. Public money should not be used to forward discrimination, bias or any particular religious belief.
Florida has passed a number of restrictive laws on teachers in public schools. This story is from the local Pensacola paper. Michael James, a white 61 year old Alabama resident, was hired to teach special education in a mostly Black elementary school in Pensacola. He is experienced and has taught in two other states. He paid about seventy dollars of his own money to prepare his classroom for the school year. He put up pictures of famous Black Americans to inspire his students. The principal removed them. He took his story to the newspaper because he could not believe that anyone would do this. He also complained that the Black majority school was not well maintained and wondered if the neglect had anything to do with the color of the students. He then resigned from his position. Mr. James preferred to unveil this injustice instead of kowtowing to it.
Flor-uh-duh is also experiencing a huge teacher shortage. Who wants to teach under these conditions. But no prob. The governor has called for allowing anyone who has served in the armed forces to be able to teach without a teaching credential.
And who is this Rhonda Santis I keep hearing about?
Is it true that Ronda Santa’s is really his drag queen moniker? Does this guy lead a dual life? Perhaps being a prick is just a cover.
Shhhh. Don’t say gay. Or trans.
Not just without a teaching credential.
Without any sort of university degree.
Florida is going to get what they deserve.
Eventually everyone will be dumber then a sea urchin.
What to the Robber Barons and the Libertarian movement have in common?
“These extravagant characters (the Robber Barons) have been represented as exemplars of unrestrained individualism at its worst, fiercely competitive, practitioners of undiluted laissez faire capitalism. They were nothing of the sort. So far were they from wanting a genuinely free market economy that they bought up senators and paid off judges in order to stifle competition. They did not want a government that would let them alone; they wanted a government they could use. Had they been able to understand the original idea of laissez faire they would have opposed it. They were- not individualists; they did not believe in a fair field and no favor; they stacked the odds against their competitors.”
The members of ALEC are no different than those Robber Barons. They want a government they control and use to increase their wealth and power. If there is anything Traitor Trump has done through his apparent greed and dishonesty that could be considered good, he has torn away the façade hiding who ALEC’s so-called libertarian members really are because they are all just like him, except for his addiction to be dead center in the public, media spotlight all the time.
https://libertarianchristians.com/2011/02/11/the-robber-barons-and-the-real-gilded-age/
Exactly. It’s liberty for me and not for thee. Freedom to pollute, con, cheat, defraud, conspicuously consume, build those high walls around the estate, install that helipad and the yacht and the jet, send the youngsters off to vacation in Ibiza and Goa, have lots of staff, make one’s life into a kind of continuous spa treatment, while the poor are sucked dry and the middle class is eliminated.
Funny reason for voting for Trump in 2024, according to a Hedge Fund Manager, from The Onion, today: “Because a slight decrease in taxes for the wealthy is worth total national instability.”
2nd paragraph!!
Adding, in privatization- taking communities’ assets
Barely hidden in these types of dress codes is that they are ways to weed out people you do not want. Coaches do this all the time. They create a sort of hostile environment, making players question whether they want to be a part of the system or not. Players who buy into the system are willing to make the deal. I will play despite the way I feel about the coach because I want so much to play. Students and their parents who decide to passively put up with a stupid dress code will be more likely to not challenge any other foolishness.
Do they still sell skirts?
Haaaaa!!!!!!
I sent the pledge to my school email and I will be printing out, discussing and dismantling it with my juniors. CAN’T WAIT!!! 😀
……it’s scary and frightening what is happening in our society but boy, oh boy, is it supplementing my American Lit/American Culture curriculum or what? 😀
You’re awesome,Yossarian!
I try, man. I try <wink, nod> 😀
If this does go to the Supreme Court, I’m sure that Samuel Alito can find some applicable legal opinions from the 1340s-1670s.
I love your dating of Alito reference points!
No surprise there. If they can force females to birth foetuses they can probably prescribe the style of the birthing gowns they wear. How about making boys wear blue socks, in exchange? To maintain the illusion of respect, that is.
How about making the boys wear grey pants, white buttoned up shirt and a little red cross tie?
Yep, had to do that for eight years in Catholic grades school. I have hated any kind of “neckwear” ever since. The person who invented the tie should have been strung up by one.
“I pledge to be obedient and loyal to those in authority,”
If that doesn’t scare a rational human being I don’t know what would.