Joe Straus represented San Antonio in the Texas Legislature for fourteen years. He was Speaker of the House from 2009 to 2019.
He wrote in the Texas Monthly about the necessity of the state’s political leaders taking action against the crisis of gun violence. He believes that there is political will to take action. He believes that Texans want to see gun control. Let us hope.

This tragic moment in Texas—when fear is overcoming students, parents, and educators, and when so many Texans are feeling hopeless about the state’s efforts to stop the next mass shooting—demands the leadership and the political courage to finally consider any solutions that will help prevent gun violence in our schools and elsewhere.
All week, Texans’ grief over the loss of precious young lives in Uvalde has been compounded by anger and frustration that the state has not been able to stop another shooting tragedy. It’s not, I suspect, that Texans expect their government to provide absolute certainty that another mass shooting will not occur. Rather, Texans just want to see that this state is making its best efforts, regardless of political calculations.
It’s true that Texas has taken steps since the shooting at Santa Fe High School in 2018 to prevent such tragedies. The state invested hundreds of millions of dollars in threat-assessment training for educators, mental health training, additional counselors at campuses, and school infrastructure upgrades including alarm systems and metal detectors. While Texas has not historically been known for prioritizing mental health care, the state has made real progress in the past six years by investing in better care for more Texans, with one point of emphasis being early intervention for troubled children and teenagers.
However, there remains an unwillingness to give serious consideration to gun reforms that command broad-based, bipartisan support among Texans and other Americans. For example, June 2021 polling from the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin showed that 71 percent of Texans supported background checks on all gun purchases. The project’s polling in October 2019 showed majority support for a nationwide ban on semiautomatic weapons. Many hunters and other law-abiding gun owners understand the need for restrictions as well. Sure, these provisions are less popular among the 3.3 percent of Texans who determine the outcome of Republican primaries, which basically have been proxies for the general election for the past 27 years. At some point, however, isn’t there a greater cause than assuaging primary voters? Those in public office have a duty to represent all of their constituents.
This may be the rare time when Texas would be wise to follow the lead of Florida. Since 2018, a “red flag” law in that state has been used nearly six thousand times to remove weapons from those who are deemed to be threats. Despite some encouraging talk about a red flag bill after the Santa Fe tragedy in 2018, the idea has not gained serious traction here. But it should be at the top of the list of ideas our elected leaders consider as part of a long-overdue look at meaningful gun safety. Texas should also take a long look at whether someone as young as eighteen should be allowed to purchase the types of exceptionally lethal weapons that the Uvalde shooter bought—and the requirements that ought to be met before such a purchase can be made. Is it good policy to make it harder for an eighteen-year-old to buy a beer, or get a driver’s license, than to acquire a military weapon and outgun law enforcement?
Finally, given what we have learned about the fatal mistakes made by law enforcement during the shooting, the state should undertake a comprehensive review of the speed and effectiveness of law enforcement responses during mass shootings, so that we can clarify accountability and learn from mistakes.
Even in Washington, efforts have begun to find bipartisan compromise on gun legislation. I don’t know what will come of it, but I’m encouraged to see that our U.S. senator John Cornyn will be one of the leaders of those bipartisan talks.
As I argued after the 2019 shooting in El Paso, Texas can change the status quo if our elected leaders engage in a good-faith debate over gun safety. Now, like then, it is time for our legislators and our governor to listen to the fears and the concerns of Texans, as well as the views of experts who can provide serious, sober analysis of what will work, without the taint of politics. We are back at the same point where we were in 2019, but we don’t have to make the same choices. This moment calls for leaders willing to put politics aside and objectively consider every idea that might help prevent future tragedies—and they should start during a special legislative session this summer, before parents send their children back to school in August.
It’s been said that legislators act only when facing a crisis. Well, the epidemic of gun violence is a crisis by any measure. It’s past time to treat it like one.
Joe Straus represented San Antonio in the Texas House of Representatives for fourteen years, serving as Speaker of the House from 2009 to 2019.

“legislators act only when facing a crisis”.. in campaign funding
Fixed.
LikeLike
It’s not just Texas. Here in Chattanooga we had two “gun fights” this past weekend. One was a mass shooting. A mass shooting also happened two weeks ago. Tennessee has signed legislation allowing open unlicensed carry. This makes the Wild West look like a garden party…
LikeLike
Yes, a lot of towns of the “Wild West” actually had strict gun control within town. A lot required that visitors actually turn in their guns to the Sheriff.
And the famous gun fight at the Tombstone OK Corral was, among other things, over the refusal of the “Cowboys” to abide y the strict gun rules.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/gun-control-old-west-180968013/
LikeLike
Do you guess there is a reason they don’t allow guns at the NRA Convention?
LikeLike
The whole argument for free and unregulated guns is largely (if not wholely ) based on mythology.
LikeLike
Certainly not written in the Constitution.
LikeLike
Texas alone? The entire country is drunk with gun addiction.
LikeLike
Actually polls show that most Americans want gun control.
LikeLike
“Most Americans” sounds compelling until you remember most Americans live in densely populated metro regions, and don’t reflect the views of much more sparsely populated areas. The structure of our government (federal and even state) is under-weights the views of people in densely populated areas and overweights the views of everyone else.
Also, those polls are more tricky when you look at them state by state, and when you look at how specific proposals have fared on referenda. A week or two ago I brought up the example of a referendum in Maine that would have mandated background checks in sales or transfers between non-licensed gun dealers. It failed by a narrow margin. And that was a direct appeal to voters. My overall point being, it’s not clear if Americans support gun control as much as some national polls indicate. The NYTimes had a story about this the other day.
LikeLike
Most Americans want the government to provide a single payer health care program. But the Fascist Republican Party (FRP) of today, with support from ALEC, keeps saying no. Nixon was a Repulibican and he tried to enact a single payer health care program but failed. When Romney, a Republican, was governor of Massachusetts, he signed into law to bring a near universal health care program to that state, a program that was the model for what’s known as Obamacare.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/09/29/increasing-share-of-americans-favor-a-single-government-program-to-provide-health-care-coverage/
Most Americans want some form of legal abortion. With help from ALEX, the FRP is doing all it can to make abortion illegal and a felony. Even women with miscarriages may find themselves in court being tried for murder. In at least one Red State, if a pregnant women is caught using pain killers for headaches, she may end up in prison, even over-the-counter pain meds.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/06/about-six-in-ten-americans-say-abortion-should-be-legal-in-all-or-most-cases/
Most Americans want livable wages but the FRP with support from ALEC keep stopping that from happening.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/22/most-americans-support-a-15-federal-minimum-wage/
“Seven in ten Americans prefer a package of policy changes that increases Social Security revenues in two ways and improves benefits in two ways. Support for this package cuts across political parties, age groups, income levels, and race and ethnicity.”
Again, the FRP is responsible for gutting Social Security and resisting keeping the plan financially healthy. Some of those fascists have recently publicly advocated an end to Social Security.
A majority of American parents support the public schools their children attend, but once again the FRP with support from ALEC is working overtime to destroy those public schools and replace them with crap.
I read a recent Op-Ed in Al Jazeera alleging that the U.S. was on the bring of Civil War.
I think Al Jazeera was wrong. The US is already having a Civil War and it’s a political, shooting stage. And, the FRP with support from ALEC is responsible for that, too.
WTF!
LikeLike
Polls do not matter because too many prospective voters have given up on the system over run by lobbyists and wealth. Money is more important to politicians than good governance. Since Reagan took office there has been little resistance to greed.
LikeLike
This is the Times article I was thinking of.
LikeLike
Nothing will be done with the GOP standing in the way of doing anything worthwhile or substantive. One example of GOP goofiness and blind devotion to guns is Florida Republican Greg Steube who showed some of his guns at a Judiciary Committee markup hearing (via TV) for Democratic legislation to address gun violence. Rep. Steube, who appeared virtually at the hearing, says his guns would be banned if the legislation being considered became law. As he loads one of the guns, Texas Democrat Sheila Jackson-Lee says “I hope that gun is not loaded.” To which Representative Steube replies, “I’m at my house, I can do whatever I want with my guns.” This boob must have an arsenal of guns at his house and he stated that he walks around armed (and stupid, my addition) in Florida.
This clown also said that there is no such thing as assault weapons. This is what the gun nuts do, they play vile word games to obfuscate, delay and block any efforts at gun control. Steube doesn’t even want to limit the number of bullets in gun magazines. He offers nothing but the same old garbage from the ammosexuals.
LikeLike
Real gun control is hitting what you aim at.
LikeLike
So hitting and killing 19 children and two teachers is “real gun control?”
LikeLike
Hitting the music festival folks in Las Vegas, wounding nearly 1,000, killing nearly 100. A coward with AR15s perched in a hotel room high above his victims. Cowards need guns. Real men don’t.
LikeLike
Actually, real brain control is hitting what you aim at — and not simply repeating fatuous mantras like ‘real gun control is hitting what you aim at’ “
LikeLike
In his address to Americans on gun control, President Biden quoted from the Supreme Court’s Heller Ruling — a ruling which pro-gun advocates think was a huge victory for them…but they haven’t read the ENTIRE ruling: On pages 54-55 of their Heller decision, the CONSERVATIVE majority of the Court gave Congress and state lawmakers a guideline for presumptively constitutional gun control action.
Why hasn’t anyone previously focused on pages 54-55 of Heller on which the Supreme Court has provided lawmakers an action plan.
First, as President Biden noted in his address to our nation, in Heller the conservative Justices provide blanket approval for various kinds of gun control, declaring: “Like most rights, THE RIGHT SECURED BY THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT UNLIMITED…” [it is] “…not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
Next, the conservative Justices invite enactment of specific gun control laws by clearly pointing out which laws they would approve of, declaring: “Nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or on laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”
And, the conservative Justices additionally state: “We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller [an earlier case decided by the Supreme Court] said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those ‘in common use at the time’ [when the 2nd Amendment was written]. We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons’.” There were no automatic or semi-automatic guns “in common use at the time” the Second Amendment was written.
The CONSERVATIVE majority DID NOT HAVE TO write these things into their ruling — but they did in order to give lawmakers a clear path to constitutional gun control. The Court put the gun control ball into the hands of lawmakers.
[Please feel free to copy and share this information with your Friends and tell them to do the same because the more people who know about the Supreme Court’s ruling on constitutional gun control, the more likely it will happen.]
You can read the Court’s Heller ruling at:
Click to access 07-290.pdf
LikeLike
Heller high Water
Come Heller high water
We’ll break off the slaughter
Of son and of daughter
For mother and father
LikeLike
There’s a catch somewhere in there.
LikeLike
Junior high, right Mikey?
Let me guess: you’re a seventh grader.
Or is it sixth?
LikeLike
Here’s an article worth a read, by a person with 20 yrs in police, plus years in training both police and military, with even a couple of stints in gun sales, as well as being an avid hunter. He talks about why people say they want an AR15, why it shouldn’t be in civilian hands, why one might sensibly have certain guns, measures recommended to get this type off the streets. https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/05/opinions/guns-ar-15-uvalde-school-shooting-fanone/index.html
LikeLike
He’s the DC officer that got tased with his own taser and was threatened with death using his issued gun. He suffered a heart attack after Jan 6th. He is absolutely correct…especially about why regular police won’t rush a person armed with an AR-15. It explains the mystery about the long wait to crash the school room.
LikeLike
LikeLike
The killers in Uvalde and Buffalo bought their guns legally. They weren’t criminals. https://www.google.com/search?q=uvlade+buffalo+shooter+legal+guns&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS792US792&oq=uvlade+buffalo+shooter+legal+guns&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i546.13945j0j7&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
LikeLike
If guns were banned, only band would have guns.
Since the band Guns N Roses just has a handful of members, controlling guns would be relatively easy.
And if Guns N Roses were banned, our problems would be solved completely.
LikeLike
Except for florists.
LikeLike
But we could make an exception for them: the floral exception.
LikeLike