The Network for Public Education has just released a new report that ranks the states by their commitment to their public schools and their refusal to pass laws enabling privatization of public money.
Where does your state rank?
A NEW REPORT EXPOSES THE WEAK PROTECTIONS FOR TAXPAYERS AND WEAK PROTECTIONS FOR CHILDREN IN STATE CHARTER AND VOUCHER LAWS
America’s public schools, students, and families are under a near-constant attack from political special interests looking to privatize and profit at the expense of our children. The Network for Public Education (NPE) has released its findings in its latest report “Public Schooling in America: Measuring Each States Commitment to Democratically Governed Schools.”
Researchers examined laws and regulations in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to measure how well policymakers protect public funds from exploitative privatization through low-quality virtual and brick-and-mortar charter schools, environments without fully-vetted staff, and profit-centered systems. Most troubling were findings that expose how state laws allow charter and voucher schools to leave students behind, discriminating against the most vulnerable.
Diving into the world of school privatization led the report’s authors to some dark conclusions about the future of schooling in America. Reflecting on the school privatization movement, the report notes:
“It has achieved the full-throated support of the right-wing, which now controls many state legislatures. Conserving public schools and local control is no longer part of a conservative platform: destroying locally controlled public schools via privatized choice is.”
Some of the findings might surprise readers, as states like California lead the nation in charter school fraud.
“The reality is these voucher programs and charter school expansions being promoted in state capitols across the country are almost custom-designed to incentivize, legalize, and reward fraud, often coupled with minimal repercussions for misspending public funding meant for our students,” said Carol Burris, executive director of NPE.
The report notes that “the first step in stopping the privatization movement is to understand it.” To help the public understand the scope of the issue, NPE graded each state based on their willingness to turn public dollars over to privatized systems as well as the robustness of their protections against discrimination, fraud, student endangerment, corruption, transparency, and accountability.
At the top of the list are the schools where a commitment to conserving public schools and local control remains strong. Those states receiving an “A+” grade include Nebraska and North Dakota, where there are no voucher or charter school laws.
The details of what they found may be alarming to those working to hold states accountable to democratically governed schools. For example:
- 50% of states with voucher programs don’t require any background checks for voucher school staff in at least one voucher program
- 33 (73%) states don’t require charter students to be taught by certified teachers, or allow so many exceptions that any existing regulations are rendered meaningless
- 37 states allow entirely online charter schools that have been shown to be years behind public schools in academic progress
- 5 states have for-profit organizations running 30% or more of charter schools.
At the same time, the report is a celebration of those states like Nebraska and North Dakota that despite strong lobbying efforts continue to defend their public schools. Commenting on the highest-scoring states, NPE President Diane Ravitch said, “NPE salutes the states that have protected and cherished their public schools while fending off the siren call of privatization. They can and should build strong public schools that are open to the public and owned by the public.”
To view the full list of grades for each state and see how yours stands on protecting students and communities from the exploitation of privatization, view the report in its entirety here.
The Network for Public Education (NPE) was founded in 2013 by Diane Ravitch and Anthony Cody. Its mission is to protect, preserve, promote, and strengthen public schools for both current and future generations of students. We share information and research on vital issues that concern the future of public education. For more information, please visit: networkforpubliceducation.org
What!?!?!?!?! Flor-uh-duh is not dead last? Must we accept a penultimate position? Look out, Arizona! We’re coming for you! Swamp creatures are worth two of you hillbillies any day!!!!
hillbillies in Arizona? Maybe Zuni playing polkas on cactus violins. Trust me, that really was a thing
OOPS. I was thinking Arkansas!
Speaking of unusual instruments:
Bob, that’s beautiful and inspiring!
Diane
Yes! Blew me away. So, so wonderful! There is a full-length documentary on this, available on Amazon Prime and Youtube for $3.99.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/detail/amzn1.dv.gti.c4b0fda3-9bc1-f4d8-f17e-516d546db26f?autoplay=1&ref_=atv_cf_strg_wb
Bob,I can see how the strained instruments were made from garbage, but what about the horns?
Yes. Even the woodwinds and many of the horns. You can see this in some of the pictures on the orchestra’s website.
https://www.recycledorchestracateura.com/
Many years ago, Spike Jones would do concerts using instruments made from spare parts from hardware stores. And then there are the wonderful PVC pipe instruments of the Blue Man Group. I saw a video somewhere of a craftsperson constructing a flute for this orchestra using bent spoons for the keys!!!!!!
Some of the keys on the horns are made of bottle caps!!!!
https://www.recycledorchestracateura.com/gallery?lightbox=image9o8
It does look from the pictures as though some of the horns are purchased. Probably with funds generated from the publicity generated by this breathtaking innovation. THIS is truly great teaching!!!!
My old friend and amazing folklorist, Jim Griffith, recorded some Zuni playing Spanish Polkas on violins made from cactus. It was the weirdest thing I ever heard. Jim Passed last year
Bob: this is great! Eine Kleine Trash Misick
LOL, Roy!
Roy, I must see the cactus violins!
I could not find a pic. Years ago Jim played me a cassette tape he had recorded of this. I have never seen a picture. I googled Jim Griffith and could not find pictures, but there is quite a bit of written stuff on Jim. He passed last year
And it is not surprising that Ohio, home to Fordham Institute for Securing for Officers of the Fordham Institute Big Paychecks from Ed Deformer Oligarchs, is almost, but not quite, as awful as we are!
I am not really sure states can be judged with letter grades. I see the need for a simple message, and I do not fundamentally disagree with the points made in the site, but letter grades for states make about as much sense as letter grades for schools.
I thought about this, but here’s the thing: it’s quite likely that this report, couched in this manner, will be picked up by the press and thus bring attention to the ongoing attacks on public schools, so it makes sense, tactically.
Any rating or ranking system is somewhat subjective. Unlike algorithm driven websites from Great Schools and other websites, NPE lists how the decisions on ratings were derived, and the narrative further explains the decisions. The criteria included a consideration of privatization expansion, education quality, protection of student’s rights, accountability and transparency and safeguards for tax dollars. Public Schools have been unfairly pigeonholed by the media for years. At least NPE has attempted to explain how they derived their rankings. I agree with Bob’s view that it may force some states to consider their incoherent privatization policies.
If you can suggest a better way of expressing the difference between “dreadful” and “excellent,” let me know.
I agree with all these sentiments. Unfortunately D- means more to a reading public than “immoral” or “idiotic”. We Americans are all about ranking and scaling. So I understand completely.
This type of report is a mammoth undertaking. If even a few politicians or parents reflect on their decisions, it is a step in the right direction. I commend NPE for doing the “heavy lifting” in producing such a thought provoking document.
Yes it is. Each of Diane’s blog commenters should make sure the report crosses the desks of decision makers and it reaches more people in our communities.
New York comes in at 18th place. Well that’s not bad considering the NYC system is included .
Once again, the push for charter school and voucher expansion has nothing to do with improving education for students. After initial attempts at spurring innovation in the face intractable bureaucracy, it’s been all about providing opportunities to avoid “Them”, investment/profit opportunities, undermining unions and public investment in the common good, avoiding democratic participation and accountability,, and promoting various religious or social dogmatisms. The profit/non-profit contrast is ruse. The idea is rotten at its core, abandoning responsibility for the well-being of all to “save” a few.
Comparing the states is useful, but part off the report also compares the 2022 results with those of 2018. The U.S. is getting worse. States with good grades are fewer and states with poor grades have increased in number. That makes sense, as the wealth of the wealthiest skyrockets and their ability to buy state legislation increases. Capitalism is eating democracy for a midnight snack. I didn’t say for breakfast because I fear the hour is getting late for us.
The decline in support for public education follows the war on and disinvestment in public education.
Interesting report. The data suggests a general trend of lower charter scores as compared to voucher scores (e.g. California and Michigan) meaning the privatizers find charter expansion more profitable and/or more politically expedient.