I just watched a documentary about Mikhail Khodorovsky called Citizen K. It is streaming on Prime Video. He was one of the original oligarchs in Russia, said to be the richest man in Russia, with a fortune of $15 billion. He began to criticize Putin and to speak out for democracy, and no surprise, he was arrested for tax evasion and given a long prison sentence. He was then charged with embezzlement, and his sentence was increased. After 10 years in prison, Putin granted him and others clemency, as a gesture of mercy when opening the Sochi Olympics. Khodorovsky lost his billions, but still has a few hundred million that he was wise enough to hide in places like Ireland. He now lives in London and supports civil society efforts to build a democratic future for Russia.
The following statement was posted on Khodorovsky’s website.
The world is watching as Russian dictator Vladimir Putin’s war of choice on Ukraine becomes a slaughter. Unable to topple the government in Kyiv promptly, Putin’s forces are now bombarding civilian populations day and night. Humanitarian catastrophe is imminent as electricity and water supplies fail in besieged cities. A million refugees have left and many more are trying to escape. Urgent action is required.
Meanwhile, Putin and his propagandists continue to tell lies about “liberating” Ukraine. Russian TV spews hateful lies about Nazis in Kyiv while the regime blocks social media to prevent Russians from seeing the bloody truth. Ukraine did want liberation—liberation from the grasp of Putin’s dictatorship. They paid a price in blood in 2014 to eject his puppet ruler and move toward Europe and real democracy. This was unacceptable to Putin, who swore to either recapture Ukraine or destroy it if he couldn’t. He is now fulfilling this promise on a raft of spurious pretexts that barely show any effort to disguise his imperialist aims.
The world is not only watching. Sanctions against Russia and Putin’s oligarchs that would have deterred Putin years ago are being applied. Russians are being made aware that Putin’s dictatorship is a dead end for them and the country. Weapons that would have prevented Putin’s invasion are now being sent. It is already too late to save thousands of lives lost in the past week, casualties that are added to the thousands more from the start of Putin’s invasion and occupation of Ukraine in 2014.
It is not enough. It is too late for deterrence when bombs are falling. We know from the horrors of Grozny and Aleppo that Putin has no regard for human life. We know from his track record that he will not stop until he is stopped. NATO, the greatest military alliance in human history, sits on the Western border of Ukraine, a front-row seat to a modern genocide.
There is no gray area here, no room for doubt. Hundreds of international reporters all over Ukraine are documenting atrocities by the hour. Putin’s war is a rare moment of moral clarity, a case of good versus evil rarely seen outside of fables and fantasy novels. No competing ideologies or religions, no disputed claims—nothing but war for the sake of war. There is no NATO treaty obligation to defend Ukraine, it is true, but nor is there any prohibition from doing so.
The West already has Ukrainian blood on its collective hands. In 1994, Ukraine signed away its giant nuclear arsenal in exchange for territorial guarantees by the US and UK (and Russia). Putin’s 2014 invasion of Eastern Ukraine and annexation of Crimea received international condemnation but no action.
Had the international community rushed to Ukraine’s defense then, the nightmare unfolding today could have been avoided. All the sanctions and weapons shipments happening now could have taken place eight long years ago. Instead, we heard it was too risky to confront Putin, that it could lead to war. Now the war has come regardless, as was inevitable. Success emboldens dictators, a lesson from history that has been ignored.
Even as Putin’s army surrounded Ukraine over the past few months, the West did nothing but issue warnings. Instead of rushing to fortify Ukraine with armaments and showing Putin that this time sanctions would be painful, the free world again waited and watched until Russian tanks were rolling in.
Now we are witnessing the third betrayal of Ukraine, the refusal to intervene when the scope of Putin’s murderous intentions have become clear. Ukraine’s heroic president Volodymyr Zelensky, who has refused to flee Kyiv at great personal risk, has pleaded with the international community to clear the skies over Ukraine. NATO and member nations have refused, on the grounds it would be an escalation. Instead, they will wait until Putin escalates on his own terms, as he always does, while the Ukrainian death count grows.
Now more than ever, being pro-Russian and anti-war means being anti-Putin. Putin can only be toppled by Russians, as his mafia cronies, security apparatus, and ordinary citizens are forced to choose between their own lives and his. Russians do not want this war, or any war, but they must see the truth and act. We believe it can and will happen. But it will not be in time to end the slaughter in Ukraine.
Thrice betrayed and now sacrificed for the West’s sins of appeasement of Putin, Ukraine is a tragedy of Biblical dimensions. We call upon the free world to exercise its vast power and clear moral authority to save innocent lives.
Members of the Russian Anti-War Committee:
- Mikhail Khodorkovsky, public figure
- Garry Kasparov, politician, 13th world chess champion
- Sergey Aleksashenko, economist
- Yuri Pivovarov, historian, member of Russian Academy of Sciences
- Yevgeny Kiselyov, journalist
- Vladimir Kara-Murza, politician, historian
- Dmitry Gudkov, politician
- Boris Zimin, entrepreneur
- Yevgeny Chichvarkin, entrepreneur
- Viktor Shenderovich, writer
- Yulia Latynina, writer, journalist
- Elena Lukyanova, lawyer
I totally agree. It’s time to step up and send NATO’s military might across the border and after driving the Russian military out of ALL of the Ukraine, keep going until Russia is liberated from Putin and his thugs.
If Putin’s loyalists launches Russia’s nuclear arsenal on the West, then we erase Russia from the map, innocent and guilty combined, and hope that our deterrents stop most of those missiles before they reach their targets.
If Putin is left in power, there will be no stopping him anyway. Eventually the day will come when he’ll launch WWIII regardless of all the West’s words and lack of action.
So, you’re saying if we’re going to get nuked anyway, the west should just go ahead and provoke it?
You are saying if we are going to get nuked anyway, we might as well shut up and let Putin murder as many Ukraine babies and children as he wants? What is wrong wrong with you? I have heard you strongly condemn the Israelis for hitting civilian targets but when Putin does it you say it is justified because all those babies and children are nazis.
Did you ever hear of doing the right thing?
There were folks like you during WW II saying that we should let Hitler do what he wanted because the US did bad things in WW 1.
They were not good people. They were immoral and had no ethical core at all. They ranted against the folks they hated (Jews, or your case Israelis) while they excused far worse done by the ones they adored (Hitler or in your case, Putin).
I want you to be a troll because the alternative is too scary to believe.
Lloyd, I love you, my brother, but this is simply crazy.
Bob Shepherd
I am glad my keyboard is screwed up. Between dienne and Lloyd it would be a full time job today .
Haaaa!!!! Always enjoy your comments, Joel!
This is a bit insane, Lloyd.
US is in an extremely risky situation since an idiot Trump let the INF treaty expire and seriously undermined the bilateral relationship with Russia. Biden is right not to send US troops on the battleground.
This statement contains a pretty searing indictment of the west for its minimal intervention. Do you agree with this, Diane (and others)? If so, what specifically would you have the U.S./NATO do? Do you support direct military engagement with Russia? Do you support a No Fly Zone? If so, how do you foresee this working out?
I think President Biden is doing a great job. I trust his judgment. He united not only NATO but most of the world against Russian aggression. Thank God Trump is not in office. He would have congratulated Putin and let him do whatever he wanted.
A rather slippery answer, but I hope you are right to trust Biden. I don’t entirely agree with the framing of this article, but it’s a good warning about the dangers of calls to war with Russia: https://www.thenation.com/article/world/more-dangerous-cold-war/?custno=&zip=60804&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%203.18.2022&utm_term=daily
Why are you so indifferent, callous, to Putin’s unprovoked war against Ukraine?
Amen. Thank God that Putin’s dog, Trump, is not still in the office. I was doubtful about President Joe. No more.
There is nothing more sickening than watching Republicans who did Putin’s work to undermine Ukraine democracy now criticizing Biden. They are true traitors. It is one thing to criticize, but blatantly lying to weaken an American president to help the dictator whose billions and troll funds have propped up your political party is treason.
Those liars have no place ever being quoted anywhere on any subject in the NYT without an asterisk before every quote that says “coming from someone who you should consider to be as reliable as source as the grand wizard of the ku klux klan.
dianeravitch
Biden is doing a great Job. If we could only hack into Russian State TV and Fox News.
Some Russian soldiers reportedly see their ending. They are shooting themselves (minimal injury) with Russian made guns. Their plan is to get hospitalization in Ukraine and avoid the war, possibly resettle as refugees.
Might be disinformation but, avoidance of return to Russia would seem like a good plan. How many, total, Russians can Koch’s Guardian Glass hire?
There seem to be large numbers of Russian deserters–people who are simply abandoning their tanks and other expensive, working mobile equipment and disappearing into the woods. No appetite for the slaughter. Blessings and good fortune to these young men!
There are also Russian defectors at the Mexican border along with many Ukrainians. The Ukrainians are being admitted, but the Russians have not gained entrance so far.
The UN, not NATO, not the US, needs to send an overwhelming peacekeeping force to Ukraine to enforce a no-fly zone above the country and push back the Russian ground and sea forces, and it needs to do this not after countless outlying villages and even cities are reduced to rubble and countless more lives, including the lives of Ukrainian babies and children and hapless Russian conscripts, are lost. The General Assembly can legally do this under the “Uniting for Peace Resolution,” UNGA Resolution 337 A, which authorizes it to intervene when the Security Council fails to act to secure peace. This is a defining moment in history. The U.N. must act to fulfill its reason for existing. If it doesn’t, then it’s simply a bad joke.
You must realize that the creation of a no-fly zone will be considered an act of war, right?
Not if this is done by the United Nations General Assembly
Americans should also look inward to identify those who help Putin with their business operations continuing in Russia i.e. Charles Koch and Peter Thiel.
We should review Matthew Cawthorne’s backers in the Club for Growth PAC. Jeff Yass gave $43,000,000 to Republicans resulting in the election of people like Josh Hawley. Media report that 16 of the 19 House GOP that Club for Growth supported were elected. 12 of them voted against certifying Biden’s election. Two out of 4 of the GOP senators that Club for Growth backed, voted against certification.
Steve Schwarzman also gave big to Republicans. In 2016, “oil industry analysts (described) a sham transaction designed to move Russian state money to persons and places unknown” (WhoWhatWhy.org, 3/28/18, “Kushner, Russia – and the Blackstone Mystery.” Representatives of Schwarzman say he had “no involvement.”
Clearly, there are wealthy individuals who back candidates that don’t believe in democracy.
I posted this at OEN
What is OEN? Oregon Entrepreneurs Network, Ontario Education Number, a Norwegian Olympic swimmer who just died, are the first 3 things that come up when I google it, and I don’t have time nor interest to research further.
Please, posters on this site: Define your acronyms.
She posted it at the dead swimmer.
With all due respect! Starting a nuclear war is CRAZY!
A poem about the crisis in Ukraine. To understand it and this poem, it helps to be aware, as most folks sadly are not, of the allied invasion of Russia at the end of World War I.
“And we are met as on a darkling plane, where ignorant armies clash by night.” From “Dover Beach” by Matthew Arnold
Please, before we send anything to Holy Kiev, or flaming Donetsk–
defensive killing machines, or Adam and Eva’s boots on the ground–
before we smite the Rus, before we try that again—
remember our battles on the ice,
of the Great War, when Rus came out of the fog,
and buried our boys from Detroit.
Cossacks, Kulaks, murdering monarchs,
White and Red, hating us
after that grim fight in the snow.
Archangel looks down,
a half-remembered nightmare,
with tears that turned to steel and ice.
Long before that, Bonaparte marched east, to Moscow, to
destruction, and centuries before,
Tatars and Teutons, had faced off, not just rattling sabers.
Deutschland had three tries, and millions died.
Hearts heavy for the dead, again, again.
Our mutual fire balls can fill the sky,
Can sweep around the world—
Immediate global warming,
Duck-and-cover-time again.
And this fight would leave no
ballets, or Tchaikovsky’s.
Prokofiev’s music will be dead.
Mussorgsky’s Pictures
Will not be heard again.
Nor is there likely to be a
Slaughterhouse story, this time–
or anyone to read it.
Thank you. Beautifully, if tragically, written.
Dienne,
I post your pro-Putin comments. Why do you think I should not post other points of view?
I posted this once already, but an excerpt because apparently the point is lost here:
“It’s not okay to be a grown adult in 2022 and believe anyone who disputes the TV narrative about this war is defending Putin or thinks he is awesome.”
https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2022/03/18/its-not-okay-for-grown-adults-to-think-this-way-about-ukraine/
It is not okay to be a grown adult who says nasty and ugly things about the Squad not being trustworthy, but refuses to say one negative word about Putin.
Diane Ravitch, this troll who has posted endlessly condemning the evil Israelis for targeting civilians but she still won’t say one critical word about Putin doing anything wrong.
She did the same thing with Trump. Never a critical word except about his orange hair.
Read her posts carefully and you will see NOTHING that is critical of Putin! Any moral person would be critical of both Putin and the US, but her adamant belief that it is the US which is immoral but Putin is justified is scary.
dienne has to be a troll. If she isn’t, everything she posts should be labeled with a note that this comment is from someone who has no credibility at all.
I keep thinking I am wrong and she will have to say something negative about Putin — after all she said nasty things about the Squad just yesterday. But she will not. That is not normal
dienne77,
“It’s not okay to be a grown adult in 2022 and believe that anyone who disputes the tv narrative that Hitler did anything wrong is defending Hitler or thinks Hitler is awesome.”
Yeah, yeah, we’ve heard your very warped perspective from the neo-Nazis who won’t say one negative word about Hitler and spend their time saying that all negative things said about Hitler are lies.
Why do you act like a neo-Nazi who believes they are fooling us when they say “we aren’t saying Hitler is awesome, we are just saying he didn’t do anything that should be criticized.”
Do you think a neo-Nazi who says all the bad things about Hitler are lies is not a huge fan of Hitler even when they claim not to be?
Say something negative about Putin.
If you can’t, you sound just like those neo-Nazis and I can’t believe anyone falls for the hate you spread.
Caitlin Johnstone lives in some alternate universe light years from reality and what is actually going on in Ukraine.
From Dan Hanrahan at counterpunch, a left wing web site: It is in this spirit that I undertook an annotation of a recent essay by the Australian writer Caitlin Johnstone, who publishes frequently at the Russian state media outlet RT, as well as at Medium and substack. Manipulation and obfuscation are so egregious in certain texts, that they require close reading and even annotation in order to reveal their actual meaning. I have found that to be the case with the essays of Caitlin Johnstone, which unfortunately often garner a large following among certain segments of the online left. The primary essay I will be looking at is titled, “Ukraine Is a Sacrificial Pawn on the Imperial Chessboard,” published on March 6, 2022, on Johnstone’s substack. end quote
counterpunch, 3-11-22
The caitlin johnstone piece is deluded and moronic.
Caitlin Johnstone is very similar to those carefully dressed Republican women – often lawyers or businesswomen – who you constantly see on Fox News spewing their nonsense about how Trump won the election and “proving” there was voter fraud.
They sound one note over and over again. They are attracted to strong men like Putin and Trump – men who would throw them under the bus in a hot minute if they needed a scapegoat – and believe that telling the truth and having empathy or concern for anyone that the strong bullies don’t like is a sign of weakness. They have total contempt for anyone who isn’t “strong” like the bullies they admire. And they passionately hate everyone who criticizes those who they adore (Putin/Trump) and make it their mission to tell the world that their critics are the evil ones, not Putin, Trump or whatever bully they currently adore.
plain, not plane. The phrase from Arnold’s “Dover Beach” is darkling plain.
Finding of the International Court of Justice, 16 March 2022:
The Court considers that, with regard to the situation described above,
the Russian Federation must, pending the final decision in the case, suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine. In addition, recalling the statement of the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations that the “Donetsk People’s Republic” and the “Lugansk People’s Republic” had turned to the Russian Federation with a request to grant military support, the Court considers that the Russian Federation must also ensure that any military or irregular armed units which may be directed or supported by it, as well as any organizations and persons which may be subject to its control or direction, take no steps in furtherance of these military operations.
Russia is acting illegally, criminally. That’s the simple truth of this.
Would that the effort had not been so half-hearted and that it had successfully stopped the Bolsheviks from the reign of terror that they inflicted upon the people of Russia for 70 years!!!
There have been few evils in the history of the world as great as was the Soviet betrayal of the working-class people of the world.
It’s a beautiful thing to contemplate an alternate history in which the Bolsheviks went down, in which this evil was nipped in its cankerous bud. No Cheka. No NKVD. No Holodomor. No show trials. No purges. No Lubyanka. No exporting of national socialist-in-name-only fascism. No proxy wars. No murdering of Ukrainian children and grandmothers by that criminal, reptilian creature of this darkness, the little KGB man (using the term “man” extremely loosely).
Jack,
Putin is CRAZY! That’s why he plans to start a nuclear war.
Do you not understand that ALL terrorists are crazy?
Biden is doing a masterful job dealing with a TERRORIST who will launch a nuclear weapon if he doesn’t get what he wants.
How would you try to negotiate with a terrorist? Would you say “sure, kill all your hostages and we will also give you whatever you want because we trust terrorists to always stop when they are empowered?
The most difficult thing is dealing with a terrorist.
NYC public school parent
Putin is not crazy he is very cold and calculating. Sometimes the best calculations (laid plans) go astray. When faced with the trillion dollar a year American arms industry. There are some valuable military assets created along with $64O toilet seats.
Facing uprisings in Belarus and Kazakhstan in the last year a Russian speaking prospers Ukraine becoming a member of the EU likely (not ever !!!!!!!!!NATO) was the last thing he wanted at his doorstep. Biden is putting him in a box which he wont get out of . He may take Ukraine but it will be at a tremendous cost for as long as he is in office.
Who is next !
https://www.npr.org/2022/01/09/1071663590/russian-troops-have-crossed-the-border-into-kazakhstan-following-violent-protest
The poem is very well written, Mr. Burgess, but I’m not sure what the point is of posting it in this context. No one wants nuclear war, one hopes.
Putin is out of control and totally reckless, he does not care if he starts WWIII with nuclear weapons. Biden is doing the best he can at the moment, supplying Ukraine with the arms it needs to keep the Russians at bay. Putin probably regards the actions of the US and the EU as a casus belli. Will it provoke him to attack Poland or other neighboring states?
Nobody wins in a nuclear war. Talk about flash backs, I’m having flash forwards of ravaged cities and desolation in the US comparable to what is going on in Ukraine.
Biden is doing a masterful job because NO ONE knows whether appeasement works or doesn’t work until it doesn’t work. I think it is safe to assume that with leaders with absolutely no moral compass, appeasement just makes them worse.
On the other hand, Biden is walking the fine line between appeasing and provoking while he is also trying to help the people of Ukraine. I would rather have Biden walking that line than any Republicans who have shown their traitorous hand that they believe in party uber alles and power uber alles. Biden wants to achieve the best outcome of all the possible bad outcomes. There is no way to have a “good” outcome with a Hitler or a Putin. You can only have a bad or worse outcome and Biden is keeping it from worse.
From Khodorkovsky’s statement: “he will not stop until he is stopped”
exactly right
The Russian kleptocratic state instituted by serial murderer, war criminal, and autocratic suppressor of democratic elections and freedom of speech and of the press Vladimir Putin was supposed to have spent billions modernizing its military. But, of course, on the Putin model, the money was siphoned off to pay for yachts and mistresses and villas in London and Paris, and the vaunted new Russian military has turned out to be a bad joke, with tires that explode because the vehicles fitted with them were never exercised. And Russia is facing massive desertions from its military because it lied to barely trained conscripts and told them that they were just participating in exercises and because many of those conscripts aren’t interested in murdering their brothers and sisters in Ukraine. So, Russia has sent ground forces into villages surrounding the major cities, and these have bogged down under fierce resistance from brave Ukrainian forces and civilians fighting for their homes and freedom, and those ground forces have had to retreat while Russia tries to break the resistance in the surrounding towns and villages through aerial murder that is taking enormous tolls in the lives of civilians whose living relatives will be all the more determined to expel the murderers. There is not winning strategy for Russia here. It would take a million soldiers to hold Ukraine, even if Russia were able to “take” its key cities. Russia will fail, and Putin’s gamble will go down as one of the stupidest in history. Many books will be written about how Russia came to take this tragic, stupid, criminal course.
I hope you are correct about what happens. For now roughly three million people have left the country while the Ukrainians including military and non-military fight on.
Recently, Bulwark’s Tim Miller wrote an opinion about Peter Thiel. (Btw Thiel’s Rumble platform is perfect for Putin’s use)
“Peter Thiel doesn’t think women love their freedom like white bros do.”
And, that explains why Thiel said women voting in a capitalist democracy is an oxymoron.
Women who vote GOP are stupid for not “loving freedom” nor their right to vote.
International Paper and Reebok continue operations in Russia.
Reebok’s phone number is 1-866-870-1743 and, there is a live chat at the site.
International Paper has a on-line form for submission of messages.
How is Putin any different than a terrorist? He is threatening to blow up the world with a nuclear weapon if he isn’t allowed to kill folks with bombs.
It is very difficult to negotiate with a terrorism as there are no good outcomes. Putin is a terrorist.
yes!
Ukraine: The Lessons of History?
By Jack Burgess
As President Kennedy pointed out, “Things don’t just happen. They are made to happen.” So, events in Ukraine are the culmination of many events in the history of Europe and the world. As we pray for the Russian war on Ukraine to end, we need to look back at history—to figure out how we got here—and how to get out without blowing up the planet. Yes, we have to remember the Russians have thousands of nuclear warheads, as do we. Just one nuclear bomb could kill millions.
Some see the Russian attack as just an aberration of Vladimir Putin, Russian president. While that’s a part, it’s not that simple. If we’re honest about it, as world leaders we haven’t set a very good example in our own history. With our “Monroe Doctrine,” we’ve dominated our entire hemisphere. And when the Russian people revolted, in 1917, throwing off centuries of repressive Tsarist rule, we invaded Russia to try to abort their revolution—and to keep them in WWI against Germany. We failed. For those who doubt that happened, there are the graves of our “Polar Bear” doughboys near Detroit.
Who knows what kind of nation Russia would have become if we’d helped them recover from Tsarism, rather than trying to overthrow their government. During World War II, we did help Russia resist Hitler’s invasion, partly to keep Russian oil out of German tanks. But after WWII, Russia—having been invaded five times in the 19th and 20th centuries, worried about “encirclement” by capitalist countries opposing their socialism. So they dominated eastern Europe, establishing the infamous “Iron Curtain,” as Winston Churchill called it.
Meanwhile, following our lead, they developed nuclear bombs. Eventually, both Russia and the US, realizing neither side would survive a nuclear war, developed various treaties for their inspection and control—though the world came close to nuclear war when Russia tried to put missiles in Cuba, in ’62, to counter similar ones we had placed in Italy and Turkey. After both sides withdrew those missiles, we settled into a nuclear standoff known as MAD—mutually assured destruction. In other words, both sides had so many nukes that using them would literally be mad, crazy.
In the late ‘80’s, President Reagan realized nuclear war and the Cold War itself were bad ideas, and agreed with Russia’s Gorbachev to cut back on nuclear build-up. According to some sources, our government also agreed to not extend NATO “one inch” further toward Russia. But, after the Soviet Union was broken up in 1991, several countries that had been soviet joined NATO. Many Russians saw this development as a threat, especially when those countries then joined the European Union for economic purposes.
Our interventions in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Venezuela, and Syria—all having leaders who were Russian allies—alarmed Russian leadership.
Then, in 2014, after much turmoil, Ukraine overthrew its pro-Russian government—with their president, Yanukovych, fleeing to Moscow–and chose a government with strong ties to the West. There is pretty clear evidence that the US had a role in that overthrow, as American lawmakers and diplomats—including Sen. John McCain–were there making speeches at the time. Asst. Sec. of State, Victoria Nuland, was taped in a phone conversation seeming to help choose the Ukrainian government. That overthrow endangered Russia militarily, as their main warm-water naval and shipping port is in Ukraine’s Crimean area on the Black Sea. Many people there identify as Russian, so Russia moved in militarily to hold onto the vital territory.
The whole matter has been up in the air since 2014. We did not expect Russia to try to retake Ukraine by force. Now that they are, we must deplore the death and destruction, but also work through the UN and other channels, public and private, to limit and conclude the disaster of this war. Luckily, President Biden, experienced in foreign policy, seems to be following a strong, calm approach in reacting to the aggression. Let’s hope the sanctions work. Maybe, as JFK said in 1963, “If we cannot end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity.”
Jack Burgess is a retired teacher of American & Global Studies, and a member of Veterans For Peace. He also served as Chief of Arbitration Services for the State of Ohio.
(This is a column which appeared in the Chillicothe Gazette and elsewhere).
If only Bolshevism had been eliminated in 1918, millions of lives would have been saved. Do you know ANYTHING about Stalin’s reign of terror? Ever heard of the Show Trials of the 1930s, in which high-level Bolsheviks were forced to confess (falsely) and executed? Ever heard of the Gulag? Know anything about the camps in Siberia where dissenters were exiled?
In 2022, the U.S. imprisons more human beings than any country on Earth. Is Guantanamo Bay an American gulag?
There are no prisons or gulags in the US for writers, artists, and dissidents. You, for example, are not in danger. Can you say the same about anti-war protestors in Russia?
the U.S. imprisons more human beings than any country on Earth
In percentage terms, this is literally true. Almost 3 of every 100 American adults is under penal supervision, in prison, in jail, or on parole. It’s the highest incarceration rate in the world. But this isn’t political imprisonment.
And yes, Guantanamo is a national disgrace.
cx: are under
I heard, driving home from school this afternoon, someone on the radio say something that made sense and lifted my spirits. Putin wants to revive the USSR by invading Ukraine and his army is bogged down, losing lives by the thousands. The invasion of Afghanistan bogged down the Soviet army and was the beginning of the end of the USSR. This could be the beginning of the end of Putin’s Russia. Not to ignore the human tragedy, but the geopolitical outlook might be good.
One scenario is Russia becomes a vassal state of China.
Maybe I’m missing something here, but it seems this anti-war group is advocating some kind of violence to stop Putin? That seems a bit incongruous.
Excellent point. Here is my question to you:
Would you have supported assassinating Hitler in or would that be “incongruous” with your view that murder is wrong?
November 9, 1938, Munich: “Swiss theology student Maurice Bavaud posed as a reporter and planned to shoot Hitler from the reviewing stand as he passed through the parade. His view of Hitler was blocked by the unwitting crowd and he was forced to abandon the plan. He then attempted to follow Hitler but failed. On his way back to Paris he was discovered by a train conductor and turned over to the Gestapo. Bavaud was executed by guillotine at Berlin’s Plötzensee Prison on the morning of 14 May 1941. ”
A theology student tried to assassinate Hitler in 1938. Are you glad he was prevented from acting?
There were lots of German resistance fighters whose assassination plots against Hitler failed and they died. You glad about that?
No matter what your answer is, my reply will be “That seems a bit incongruous”.
So which is it?
Whether I personally would support Hitler’s assassination or be glad if someone had assassinated Hitler is not the issue. I would of course knowing what we do now.
Chuck Jordan,
Your answer seems a bit incongruous. I think you are saying you would have supported assassinating Hitler and you would not have supported assassinating Hitler. And you think your personal opinion is not relevant, but your personal opinion on this topic is also relevant.
I didn’t read that. I read that Khodorkovsky and his group are calling for an all-out economic squeeze on Putin. We’ve sanctioned 70% of the banks, Khodorkovsky says it needs to be 100%. Keep in mind this letter was written March 3. We’ve now done some of the things he and his group called for; we’re sanctioning individual oligarchs (but we need to do more). We need to widen the net around Putin’s circle. THEY’RE the ones we must leverage, Putin depends on their cooperation. Khodorkovsky calls for every “legal and financial tools” to be brought to bear against Putin.
Halliburton is reportedly the latest to leave Russia (Raw Story, 5-19-2022).
Tragically true. During the pandemic, the U.S. and NATO either forgot or ignored this wisdom — a stitch in time saves nine. Evil expands when good men fail to act. We must shoulder this burden — we are our brothers’ keepers. Ukraine is us. When Ukraine suffers, we are all under threat. Like it or not — we must face reality — there is a price to be paid. May the Good in humanity bring forth the moral courage and strength to stop this tragedy. Ah-men!
Friends,
In our real world, it’s not “good guys” vs. “bad guys.” This is not a Western movie. Of course, Stalin did some evil things. My question was how things might have been different if we’d helped the Russians–or at least remained neutral, as they threw off the Czar. Yes, people were assassinated or thrown to work in salt mines. But we must consider that during that time thousands of black people in America were working on chain gangs. Many were lynched. Etc. (In Appalachia, thousands of poor young boys–ages 7 to 12, etc., were working is coal mines). As Jesus is said to have said, “Let him who is perfect cast the first stone.” As we discuss this, 30,000 or so NATO troops are practicing war games on Russia’s border in Norway–in an activity planned BEFORE Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
And if we condemn Stalin–as I think we should–for the gulags, should we not be condemning Bush and others for the ruthless and yet unexplained “mistake” in Iraq? What about Libya? Yemen? On and on, our military or espionage groups have invaded other nations. And does anyone on this link deny American leaders were involved in Ukraine politics in 2014? Why would Putin and other Russian leaders not fear us? Did we really expect him to wait until there were missiles in eastern Ukraine, pointed at the Kremlen? This mess needs to be negotiated, compromised, mediated, arbitrated or whatever. It’s why we have a UN–and a Court (which we won’t join). A war between Russia and US & NATO would almost certainly escalate into unthinkable destruction–immediate global warming. Why would a Putin, backed into a corner by Western force, facing overthrow, disgrace, and possible execution, not use the nuclear arsenal? And China? They may see NATO’s moves to the East as of the same nature as the West’s tendency to view Taiwan and Hong Cong as ours. We shouldn’t expect China to side with us. They might mediate. Almost all wars end with a treaty, sometimes before final horrors, sometimes after. Let’s hope there’s a treaty, compromise, etc. somewhere, somehow.
Thanks for reading this far.
PEACE!
Btw, these views are shared by millions, esp. in groups such as Veterans For Peace (for which I do not speak but am a member).
Your arguments sound a lot like the appeasement arguments that pro-Nazis in England made when Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia. How’d that work out again?
No one wants war. Asking Putin to leave a country he invaded isn’t “backing down”. But maybe you think allowing Hitler to take over Czechoslovakia was a good idea because it led to peace and happiness for all?
I saw a play at Arena Stage in DC called “Kleptocracy”, it was written by Kenneth Lin (House of Cards) and it was the story of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the former oil mogul who was imprisoned by Putin for 10 years. Khodorkovsky is one to watch and to listen to. He knows.