Jennifer Hawes Berry of the Post and Courier of Charleston, South Carolina, wrote this account of a Charleston high school struggling to improve and raise its graduation rate, even as its enrollment dwindles in the era of school choice. The main effect of school choice seems to be the damage inflicted on the local public high school. The original story was published in 2015 and updated in 2020.
She writes:
Once a powerhouse Class AAAA school, North Charleston High can barely field sports teams anymore. Half of its classrooms sit empty. Saddled with a reputation for fights, drugs, gangs and students who can’t learn, middle-class families no longer give it a chance.
This is the unintended consequence of school choice.
Two-thirds of students in its attendance zone now flee to myriad magnets, charters and other school choices that beckon the brightest and most motivated from schools like this one.
But not all can leave, not those without cars or parents able to navigate their complex options. Concentrated poverty is left behind. So is a persistent “At Risk” rating from the state…
Berry writes about the senior prom. Before “choice” drained the school of students, the prom drew 250 graduates. Now only about 60 attend.
She writes:
Fresh from jail, the 17-year-old has been at North Charleston High for six days. Principal Robert Grimm fought enrolling the teen given he came with an armed robbery conviction.
A district official said: You have to.
So, the new kid walked into the glass front doors and down the cinder block hallways, bringing with him only a handful of credits and a rap sheet.
Six days later, as students surge into the hallways during a morning class change, he starts shouting and bumping into another boy on the third floor.
Assistant Principal Vanessa Denney responds to the call for help. An ebony-haired Jersey girl, this is her first year at the school. She rushes toward the teens, fueled by an instinct to protect.
But the new kid crosses an invisible and clearly understood line.
With both hands, he shoves her down onto the floor hard enough to leave bruises. Denney doesn’t top 5 feet in stilettos. He outweighs her by 50 pounds.
Other students hurry over to help. Rodrik Rodriguez, the school’s burly North Charleston police officer, barrels in. He orders the student to calm down.
The 17-year-old doesn’t calm down. Rodriguez arrests him.
Then the teen crosses another clear line: He threatens to come back and shoot the officer, Rodriguez writes in a police report. “Watch what happens when I get back. I’m going to straight drop you, brah.”
New charges accompany the teen’s return to jail: threatening the life of a public official and second-degree assault and battery. He faces prison time, if convicted, and expulsion.
So the 17-year-old who Grimm didn’t want to enroll, who arrived with few credits and stayed six days, may wind up counting as a non-graduate on North Charleston High’s critical graduation rate.
The numbers game
It’s Wednesday morning, when several North Charleston High staffers will gather around an oval conference table next to Grimm’s office to tackle an onerous task: scouring the list of students who will count as dropouts because they have vanished from these hallways.
Every name is critical.
When a graduating class has fewer than 100 students, each one is crucial to that all-important number on the state report card: THE GRADUATION RATE.
With the seniors set to cross the stage in a month, time is running out to find students who last enrolled here but might be going to school elsewhere — or who could be persuaded to come back and finish high school.
Denney sits in her office poring over a roster of students counted as enrolled at the school. An educator turned detective, she must track down those whose names show up on the list but whose bodies aren’t warming a classroom seat.
If she can prove the teens are enrolled somewhere else, North Charleston High can scratch them from its rolls — and boost its graduation rate. If not, they count.
Report in hand, Denney heads downstairs to a conference room beside Grimm’s office, joining Data Clerk Kathleen Luciano.
Grimm huffs in, radiating ire.
A parent scheduled to meet with him didn’t show up. For the seventh time. And he’s just learned that two new students have appeared on the school’s non-graduate list. Both enrolled here as freshmen, then never stepped foot on campus.
Because North Charleston High has become so small — school choice drained 700 students from its halls this year alone — every student who shows up on that roster but doesn’t graduate in four years drags the school’s graduation rate down more than 1 percent.
Now he fears they’ll look like two more dropouts on the school’s graduation rate this year.
Grimm grabs his cell phone, dials the school district offices and makes his case.
“But she never stepped foot on this campus!” he insists.
As of today, the school has 84 students who should be seniors and graduate this year.
Of those, 58 likely will cross the stage in a month. Another 12 are self-contained special education students who are unable to pursue traditional diplomas. Yet they will count as non-graduates on North Charleston High’s state report card because rules about treatment of children with disabilities require all students be calculated alike.
But it means that this school, which has the highest percentage of special education students of all high schools in Charleston County, can achieve at most a 77 percent graduation rate, still below the district’s goal, even if every other student here graduates in four years.
The state likely will give it closer to 66 percent.
That’s because, as of this meeting, 14 students who should be crossing the stage are God knows where instead.
Denney recently found one should-be senior on Facebook posting photos of herself partying at clubs, new baby at home. Another earned a GED — but will count as a non-graduate per state reporting rules. One is in a psychiatric hospital refusing to do school work.
Then there is the 17-year-old charged with assaulting Denney. Another new student just was arrested for two gun violations in his neighborhood. Both likely will be expelled. Both could spend time in prison.
A student peeks into the conference room door. He just arrived at school, an hour late because he relies on a CARTA bus. He just moved — again — this time to live with an older sister.
But at least he is here, heading to a classroom.
Then who?? are the ‘kids’ found in so many renowned US universities? All foreigners?
This is a well written article but its conclusion is naive. “This is the unintended consequence of school choice.” It is not unintended. It is done on purpose. It is designed to allow segregation and use a cheaper labor force. If you think politicians really care about all of our children, think again.
Your comment is spot on correct! You said exactly what I was thinking. My only addition would be that this is the next step in the privatization goal of eventually eliminating public education altogether.
I agree. The system appears to be rigged so that public schools appear worse than they are. An abundance of choices allows the public schools to be the schools of last resort, a school for the poorest, neediest and most expensive to educate. These students are the most vulnerable in the city. If states make the numbers work to the disadvantage of public schools, they will be easier to close.
I’m sorry, but public schools as they are right now are pretty bad. If teachers en masse decided not to proctor the standardized tests and to throw CC curriculum out the door and teach like they know how, things could change. I pay for private HS for my kid because it is so much like the public school of my own youth. The warehousing of children for the extraction of data is abhorrent and it needs to end. Yes, “the system” is rigged…so change the system in every single classroom.
LisaM, most parents don’t think their public schools are “pretty bad.” Polls show overwhelming approval by parents for their own child’s school.
I’m sorry, Lisa. This is just disingenuous. You realize that these very policies were massively supported by conservatives. The very people who are most responsible for the policies you noted are now saying that this is bad policy so we should close the schools?
I’m sorry that your comments are just contradictory. Why is this the fault of public schools and their staff? Teachers do the absolute best they can with the limitations imposed and frequently find ways to circumvent these very policies.
Your blaming the schools for something they cannot control.
The quality of public schools today depends heavily on where people live. While all schools are reeling from Covid, schools in most blue majority states are generally better off than schools in the South and some part of the Midwest and wherever the charter lobby is the strongest, particularly in minority majority urban areas.
Lisa’s points about the “standards”-and-test-driven curricula and pedagogy now so pervasive, given the Deformer Occupation of our K-12 schools, is well taken. The solution is not school “choice” but ending the Occupation. Decades of authoritarian micromanagement and failure is more than enough. Vive la résistance!
cx: are more than enough
Thank you Bob Shepherd! I wish that I didn’t have to pay for my 2nd child to attend a private school to get the education that he deserves. I fought the over testing, CC curriculum, the over crowding and many other bad deforms for long enough. Public school wasn’t going to change anytime soon, so I had to make my own changes for my child. People need to understand WHY rational parents want to leave public education for “Choice” schools.
How did anyone even wind up debating the quality of public schools? Is there a public school? Yes? That’s a good quality.
important point: NOT unintended…
Is the solution to this problem to force the 50 students in the Academic Magnet High and School for the Arts back into North Charleston High? Would that be better for them or treating them as a means to an end rather than an end in themselves.
It doesn’t matter what’s best for individual students. What matters is what’s best for public schools.
Don’t you mean what matters is what’s best for billionaires?
I can’t help pointing out that you have absolutely no concern about all of the students suspended and disappearing from charters, despite their parents desperate to enroll them.
Invoking “individual students” when you have absolutely no problem with charters that throw them under the bus if the school their parents choose for them doesn’t want to teach them.
Public education is about caring about the students who folks like you and Republicans don’t care about.
Just because some ed reformer tells you that those students deserved to be thrown under the bus, doesn’t make it true.
School choice for the students private and charter schools choose to teach, and let the rest rot. Sounds good to the folks who post lies on here and don’t apologize.
What matters is what’s best for the society into which individuals enter upon coming of age.
What’s best for individual students is what’s best for all students. Wearing a mask is not too high a price to pay to avoid getting an infectious disease. Getting vaccinated is not too high a price to pay to avoid being hospitalized or dying.
“Here in Tennessee, book bans are just a small but highly visible part of a much larger effort to privatize public schools and turn them into conservative propaganda centers.”
The worst part:
“…Gov Bill Lee announced at the State address last week, that he has approached Hillsdale College, a Christian institution in Michigan, to open 50 charter schools in Tennessee — Mr. Lee reportedly requested 100 — that would follow a curriculum designed to make kids “informed patriots”
I get a newsletter from Hillsdale college every couple of months or so—I don’t know why but I guess because of my age. It’s so damned evil, radical, wingnutty & filled with lies that I SHRED it instead of throwing it away.
It is full of dominionist, anti-democratic garbage & TN Gov Bill Lee wants Hillsdale to educate people in TN.
jcgrim: Hillsdale is not an ordinary college. It is a very-far-right college that refuses to accept any federal aid, not even scholarships for students so as to keep the hands of the government off its radical Christian curriculum.
Christian charters from Hillsdale clones may take a few kids with disabilities, provided their families are true believers and/or donate to the church, but they fail at every turn to influence broader society on removing barriers to full participation. In their minds educating kids with disabilities is charity. They offer nothing to the disabled community except perpetuating anti-inclusive, abelist, and discriminatory ideology.
Even worse news for TN public schools is the new BEP funding formula that essentially voucherizes all public school funding. Bill Lee not only will kill off TN public schools, he’ll starve to almost nothing our public school programs for students with significant disabilities. IDEA will never be realized as written in TN, in spite of the rhetoric of “more funding” in his “modernized” BEP formula.
Here is TN’s billionaire, dark money group, influence peddling, “non-profit” SCORE praising Lee’s budget killing plan:
“Governor Lee showed strong leadership and clear student focus last night when he called for a $1 billion recurring investment in K-12 education funding and committed to modernizing the 30-year-old Basic Education Program (BEP) funding formula. SCORE sees a legislative package emerging that addresses two of our recommendations for fixing the BEP: funding students rather than a list of resources and increasing the recurring state investment in a new formula. The governor’s leadership is moving the state toward a student-weighted approach to funding that we believe can drive greater success for students in public schools. We applaud the governor’s bold recommendations.
Other important higher education investments are fully funding the outcomes-based funding formula, increasing the value of the HOPE Scholarship, expanding research-supported completion strategies”
One more thing about TN: Hillsdale is not just evangelical; they are very extremist (& political). These will not be schools; they will be indoctrination centers.
What happens when the last public schools are closed and the charters, magnets and private schools are the only “choices”? Will those schools finally have to take the most troubled students and try to teach them? Currently, most find ways to remove those kids and keep their numbers better.
Look to Chile for your answer.
Great observation, Duane!!! There’s an existence proof for what happens.
Second.
That will never happen. There will have to be a place to put all of the kids who those schools simply won’t take or keep.
Under the Repugnican Fascist System, poor Prole parents will get a meagre voucher that they can use to send their kids to extraordinarily unresourced private, segregated schools.
School choice should be reserved for people who can afford to move to better school district catchments or pay for private school.
You asked in a recent post, Flerp, what systemic racism is. Here:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/it-upsets-me-black-man-reacts-to-white-friend-s-traffic-stop/vi-AATaSKi?ocid=msedgntp
Here’s another article that distinguishes structural and institutional racism:
https://theconversation.com/structural-racism-what-it-is-and-how-it-works-158822
“Institutional and structural racism work hand in glove. Institutional racism relates to, for example, the institutions of education, criminal justice and health…
Structural racism refers to wider political and social disadvantages within society, such as higher rates of poverty for Black and Pakistani groups or high rates of death from COVID-19 among people of colour.”
There’s a reason why parents of brown kids, like me, are so careful to explain to them, over and over and over, exactly what to do and say if they are pulled over or stopped on the street by police.
School choice should be reserved for people who can choose differing programs within their equally resourced public schools that best suit their children’s needs. You want your kid in Ms. Jones’s Montessori classroom? Fine. You want your kid in the Vocational Program? Fine. Your kid needs lots of structure and direct instruction? Fine. You’ll want her in Mr. Heap’s class. Your kid is highly intrinsically motivated and will flourish in a project-based environment with curriculum and assessment co-designed/co-planned by her and her teacher? Well, that would be Ms. Goody.
And schools need the funding and freedom from top-down, one-size-fits-all mandates to offer these alternatives.
As far as private schools go, is anyone calling for outlawing them? Not to my knowledge.
Bob,
Have we ever had equally resourced public schools? If the answer is no, perhaps it is time to think about the actual public schools we have as the ones we will always have.
On could have said in 1861, “Have we ever not had slavery in some states? If the answer is no, perhaps it is time to think about the actual systems in those states we have as the ones we will always have.”
The politicians might have said, Bob, that slavery is up to the individual. If you think it’s wrong, don’t own other people. If you think it’s okay, that’s your choice.
LOL! Perfect, Diane!
FLERP, the current “school choice” movement is funded by billionaires like Koch, DeVos and Bloomberg. The research after 30 years of charters and vouchers is strong: most charters are worse than the public schools that kids leave; the high performing charters like Success Academy have very high attrition and very small proportions of high needs kids. Voucher schools are low quality religious schools without certified teachers. Kids who take vouchers get a third rate schooling. Do you think that a voucher worth $6,000-8,000 will get a student into Sidwell Friends in DC or Lakeside Academy in Seattle or Brearley in Manhattan? Clue: it won’t.
I’m agreeing with you. School choice should only be available in the traditional ways: move to another school catchment, or spend your own money to attend private school.
There is more choice and more individual freedom in the average public school than in any no-excuses charter school or doctrinaire religious school.
flerp knows very well that NYC has had PUBLIC school choice for a long time.
It can be done without the reprehensible lies posted by people demonizing children and blaming them instead of acknowledging the failure of charters and private schools to teach them.
If charters didn’t lie, maybe those kids would benefit.
flerp, will you ever apologize for the lie you posted about Gov. Hochul, or are you doubling down like a good Republican?
NYCPP, as usual, I don’t know what you’re talking about. I’ve told you before that I tend not to read your long rants, so if you’re referring to something in one of your long rants, please understand that I wasn’t interested in deciding it when you wrote it and I’m not interested in deciding it now. History has shown that you and I cannot interact peaceably. So I think Diane and everyone else here would appreciate it if you didn’t spend so much time trying to get me to interact with you.
Your comrade,
Flerp
“Deciding” should have been “decoding” there, if it matters.
flerp,
You could have just said “I’m doubling down”.
flerp posted a link that falsely accused NY Gov. Hochul of being a hypocrite who was improperly unmasked during a school visit – using a photograph from last summer when it was perfectly correct for fully vaccinated adults to not wear masks inside because there were no variants raging.
If someone makes an error and doubles down on it, it is no longer an error but an intent to deceive readers.
And NYC has had PUBLIC school choice for years.
The anti-public school movement got the media to use their propaganda phrase “school choice”, when the movement did nothing to support public school choice.
The school choice movement was always the school privatization movement. That movement was clearly distinguishable from those who advocated public school choice — as we have in NYC — by their extreme dishonesty. Privatizers defend school choice with lies. Public school choice supporters don’t use deception.
With private school choice, the “choice” rests entirely with the private school. They have no obligation to teach any student they don’t want to teach.
There are lists that rank states by education levels achieved. On those lists, RED states dominate the top 10 most un-educated states. Blue states dominate the top10 most educated states.
Since RED states are moving the fastest to get rid of transparent public schools that are required to follow federal and state education laws and are replacing those schools with mostly opaque publicly funded private sector charters and vouchers, RED states will continue to dominate the most un-educated states until the day comes that there are no BLUE states that keep their public schools, anywhere close to the bottom.
The more uneducated the RED states become, the more fascist and anarchistic they will also become.
“I love the uneducated.” –IQ45
The idea of educational freedom sounds appealing but it doesn’t actually add any value to or improve educational outcomes. If it did, Milwaukee would have a huge lead on the rest of the nation in achievement. But that hasn’t happened.
School choice, like the so-called “opportunity scholarships”, are designed to pry taxpayers from public schools and into the hands of private organizations. The idea is to drain the resources from public schools to make them even less competitive.
With the teacher shortage being very real, I’m not sure who will staff these choice / voucher schools anyway. They will be non-union and their teachers will have low pay, weak benefits and draconian administrative oversight. Our reasonably resourced public school poaches from charters constantly. Why does those charter teachers just stay in those utopian educational academies?
Like everything else in the conservative landscape, this is just about destroying institutions. They know what will happen when market forces are available.
Besides, any poll that states that parent s who choose their kids schools have higher satisfaction rates is probably true. Largely because what parent will say that they chose poorly for their kids. That would be a crushing admission.
Education is very difficult to measure. But remember, North Charlotte High School is the school choice future Schools will ultimately decide who gets to come and who gets to stay. All the hard to teach kids will have to go somewhere. If parochial schools receive any funding through any mechanism that comes from taxpayers (or a third party that substitutes the cash for tax credits), those schools should then adhere to the same policies as all other schools. The idea is that market forces will determine the “better” schools but the playing field won’t be level so there won’t be any way to truly compare.
If we didn’t spend 3 quarters of a trillion dollars a year on the military budget and countless additional unbudgeted trillions to fund an endless stream of wars and foreign interventions (with literally nothing at the end to show for it — except enriched defense contractors, of course) we could go a long way toward “fixing” what is wrong with many of our schools, particularly in the inner cities.
For every $100 billion we took from the Pentagon budget, we could build 5000 brand new elementary schools at $20 million apiece or 1000 state of the art high schools at $100 million apiece.
Another $300 billion every year taken from the Pentsgon budget could pay 3 million teachers a $100,000 salary (pretty much every teacher in the US)
Make no mistake. We have plenty of money as a country to fix” schools — if that were the priority of those who set the agenda and pass the budgets.
But it is most certainly NOT — and I won’t hold my breath that anything will change because the military industrial complex has a death grip on our country from which we the people will NEVER escape.
The “defense” corporations are making far too much money and far too many Americans’ jobs depend (either directly or indirectly) on military funding for anything to change. Even Bernie Sanders who regularly rails against wasteful military spending has no problem continuing to spend money hand over fist on the trillion dollar F35 boondoggle (the plane is a piece of junk) as long as some of that money goes to his home state of Vermont.
There is actually a huge irony in squandering so much of our country’s taxes every year to “defend” a country that is literally falling apart and will eventually reach a point where it is just a hollow shell of its former self. At that point, what will be left to defend? The military industrial complex itself?
“If we didn’t spend 3 quarters of a trillion dollars a year on the military budget and countless additional unbudgeted trillions to fund an endless stream of wars and foreign interventions (with literally nothing at the end to show for it — except enriched defense contractors, of course) we could go a long way toward “fixing” what is wrong with many of our schools, particularly in the inner cities.”
Bingo, bango, boingo. We have a winner. Give that dam poet a Kewpie Doll!
So is the purpose of the public schools to help the students who have left with a better educational experience or is the purpose to help the worst student no matter how much it hurts the students who actually want to learn.
Maybe the real solution would be to make high school voluntary and concentrate on students who want to learn while showing the defiant non-learners out the door.
I get your point, but wouldn’t it be better if kids actually WANTED to go to school…period? As it is right now, HS is a pressure cooker filled with hormonal teens striving for the best grades in the top/best classes to get the best scores on stupid tests so that they can get into the best and most expensive colleges so that they can graduate into a world of debt….with no high paying jobs attached to the degree! That’s a recipe for disaster and it shows with the uptick in school shootings and behavior problems. If public schooling changed and became a kinder and more accepting/accommodating learning environment for the majority of students, more would attend and there would be less defiant non-learners.
We have to have plumbers, grocery store employees, farmers etc in order for the economy to run. Why not just accept that most children/teens are of normal intelligence and teach them the life skills necessary to function in life while also teaching them the academic basics. Kill CC and kill the standardized testing and school will become a more joyous place for kids again. Democracy is about “We”/Competition is about “Me”. Wonder why our country is in shambles?…. School has become a lot about “Me”.
Only about 85% of those who start high school are doing to finish high school. Only about 50% of those who finish school go directly to college and that couints two year colleges. Only about 50% of students who start college finish within six years. The rat race for admission to selective colleges only happens for about 10% of high school students.
A question to ask is whether the U.S. would be better off with a lower percentage of students finishing high school but having those students functional at the 12th grade level or having high percentages graduates but most of them performing at a middle school level?
I think having a high school diploma for most is a must, even if it means that “some” are only proficient at the middle school level. It provides more options later on in life if that low level student has at least a HS diploma.
Without a hs diploma, a person can’t get a job.
Giving high school students diplomas when they can only perform at middle school levels is a version of the “Scarecrow Solution”. The scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz movie did not have a brain so the Wizard just gave him a diploma and said that he was smart. Such diploma granting does not really help anyone (student or society) in the long run.
Diplomas for all just make college degrees more important since a high school diploma does not signify anything. And when too many people have college degrees then graduate degrees and certificates become more important.