Leonie Haimson, executive director of Class Size Matters, is one of the nation’s most persistent advocates of class size reduction. She is the voice of many parents in New York City, who regularly tell pollsters that their number 1 wish for their children is smaller classes. Now that the city’s public schools anticipate a new infusion of funds, Haimson and many parents are pressing to get a commitment from the city to reduce class sizes.
She writes in The Nation:
New York City public schools are often as crushed as the subway during rush hour, with literally thousands of students forced to learn in overstuffed classrooms—sitting side by side, elbows knocking into each other, or sometimes leaning against the wall or resting on a radiator. Even in the age of Covid-19, hallways are so jam-packed it can be hard for students to get to their next class.
It wasn’t supposed to be this way—and, if the city’s mayor and the City Council speaker would pass a crucial piece of legislation limiting class sizes in New York’s public schools, it wouldn’t have to continue. But as the end of the council’s term ticks closer, the two are standing in the way of a popular bill, adding a new and frustrating chapter to a drama that’s been playing out for decades.
New York City parents and educators have been calling for smaller class sizes since at least the 1960s. In 2003, the state’s highest court agreed with them. It concluded that class sizes were too large to provide students with their right, guaranteed by the state Constitution, to a sound basic education. It found that the plaintiffs, the Campaign for Fiscal Equity, “presented measurable proof” that New York City schools have “excessive class sizes, and that class size affects learning.” It concluded:“The number of children in these straits is large enough to represent a systemic failure.”
To remedy this and other inequities, the court ordered that the state provide more funding to high-needs districts, and in 2007, the state passed a law requiring New York City to use these funds to lower class size. But then the Great Recession hit, and the full state funding never materialized. Class sizes actually increased.
Today, classes in the city’s public schools are larger than they were in 2003—especially in the early grades. Before the pandemic hit in 2020, more than 330,000 students—roughly a third of the school population—were crammed into classes of 30 or more. On average, classes in the city’s public schools are 15 percent to 30 percent larger than they are in the rest of the state. While both Michael Bloomberg and Bill de Blasio, the city’s most recent mayors, promised to address this critical inequity during their campaigns, both failed to follow through once elected.
Now, the pandemic has brought the perennial problem of class size into sharper focus, as the need for social distancing has made smaller classes more critical than ever. At the same time, Covid-19 has helped bring unprecedented resources that could be used to address the issue: Over the next three years, the city is due to receive an additional $8 billion in federal and state funds for our schools.
The federal funds are meant to help the city improve both the health and safety of the classroom environment—goals that smaller classes could help achieve. The state funds—which amount to $1.3 billion in additional annual aid, due to be phased in over three years—represent the long-overdue fulfillment of the mandate of the CFE case.
Together, these funds represent a remarkable opportunity, one the City Council recognized when it proposed that a substantial portion of them be allocated toward reducing class size. But the mayor balked. So the council’s education chair, Mark Treyger, introduced Int. 2374 in July, a bill that would effectively phase in smaller classes over three years. It would do this by increasing the per student square footage required in classrooms, ranging from about 18 to 26, depending on the grade level and room size.
The legislation currently has 41 cosponsors out of 50 members—a supermajority that could overturn the mayor’s likely veto. Yet the vote on this bill has been delayed by Speaker Corey Johnson, despite the fact that there are fewer than two weeks before the council adjourns for the year and a new one takes over in January.
Read on to review the research supporting the value of class size reduction as the most important and effective reform that schools should enact.
Why is City Council Chair Corey Johnson blocking this crucial measure?

A contributing factor in larger classes is the ever increasing charter school expansion in NYC. Privatization is a zero sum game for public education. Every dollar going to a charter school is a dollar less in a public school budget even though public schools must continue to pay the same fixed costs for utilities, transportation and insurance. The public schools pay for the harmful political decisions of politicians. The result is fewer services and larger classes for students in public schools. As shown in the article smaller class size is a proven way to improve the education for the poor, special needs and ELL students. New York City has one of the greatest real estate tax bases in the world, if it didn’t give private companies so many tax breaks. There is no excuse for not having the money to deliver quality public education with smaller classes. I worked in smaller classes with very needy ELLs for many years, and I know it made a tremendous positive difference in outcomes for students.
Biden promised there would be money to repair the nation’s ailing public schools. Democrats quietly eliminated the targeted $100 billion from their proposal. Students and teachers that work in overcrowded classrooms and in unsafe or unhealthy working conditions should create a website as a pictorial essay on the dire conditions in the nation’s public schools as talking about it seems to have little effect. https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2021-11-05/democrats-quietly-nix-bidens-100b-for-school-modernization-from-infrastructure-package
LikeLike
Schools just got a massive payday from the federal government. Have class sizes been reduced?
LikeLike
“Even in the age of Covid-19, hallways are so jam-packed it can be hard for students to get to their next class.” This sentence describes to a T the Brooklyn school in which I currently serve.
LikeLike
Describes the last school I taught in as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have suspected for decades, since at least the 1980s. that someone has been deliberately trying to destroy America’s public education system to destroy the country, even if their original goals had nothing do to with ending the U.S.
The main culprits:
President Ronald Reagan and every president since him
The Koch network
ALEC
The Walmart Walton family
Bill Gates et al.
LikeLiked by 1 person
et al. ……
LikeLike
And “research”. Don’t forget the ever popular, can’t argue with it, yet can support any position with it, “research”. For example, Hattie, et. al. Explains class size, as having a small effect size on student achievement. Being a classroom teacher, my research identifies this as pure Bunk!
Simple math dictates reality: If I’ve got 30 students in my room for 60 minutes of math, I can only spend 2 minutes with each person. If I’ve got 15 students, that amount of individual time doubles. Of course, that’s presuming everyone sits in his/her seat and doesn’t cause a disruption, the likelihood of which increases with every student body shoved into another seat. Personally, I like no more than 10. I mean who really set the class size standard at 15, 20, 25, 30? Is it really – using a phrase that’s so past it’s expiration date – what’s “best for kids”?
It doesn’t take overpriced and overhyped “research” to identify this and many other advantages, such as providing social/emotional support, that can happen with smaller class sizes. We all know it. The problem lies, as always, with The DecisionMakers who don’t want to spend the money on staff, yet have no problem hiring another Data Worshiping Czar or Director of Important Fads. Being unable to identify solutions to problems is certainly a challenge. Being unwilling to implement solutions that are crystal clear is simply asinine.
LikeLike
Simple math dictates reality
Amen. When word first went out from the Gates foundation that the new mantra was “Class size doesn’t matter” (after all, you can have a class of 400 all sitting at computers doing Common Core exercises), I thought, well, that’s the stupidest thing I have read in a while. Same with the Gates mantra that “Teachers having advanced degrees doesn’t matter.” In both cases, there was little correlation between these and scores on standardized tests. But instead of saying to themselves, well, perhaps these tests aren’t valid, for predictions based on them end up being prima facie ridiculous, the well-remunerated Gates network of astroturf organizations and think tanks where thinking tanks went into parrot mode, which is what they are supposed to do. I thought of this while lifting my head from grading research papers. OK. I have 185 students. If I assign each of them a 10-page paper, that’s 1,850 pages of student writing to read and respond to. Roughly, one and a half copies of War and Peace written in Almost English.
LikeLike
Thank you, Subterfuge. “Smaller classes!” is blindingly obvious to parents, teachers, and most products of our pubschs (or anyone who can add/ subtract). In comment threads at ed-article, the only people who counter this position are boomers with faulty reasoning [I made it in classes of 40 kids– ignoring all those who didn’t, as well as long-gone career alternatives for drop-outs and low-GPA hisch grads]. The bogus “research” “showing” class size doesn’t matter et al ludicrous propositions (e.g. just identify Master Teachers [got an algorithm for that], they can succeed with 50 per class!) served mainly to sidetrack the discussion while society mulled over the strange & counter-intuitive ruminations emanating from Mount O-Gates-us.
Sometimes I wonder if a big part of the problem might be perception: folks google the teacher/student ratio of local schools & wonder who’s lying. Not realizing that a huge # of those teachers are specials of one kind & another required to address problems that are created by too-large class size.
LikeLike
The “I Am Not a Racist” Racist will throw everything but the kitchen sink at you to avoid reducing class size. He will say, “We need hard standardized tests to fight soft bigotry.” He will say, “Charter schools are the civil rights movement of the 21st century. He will say, “We can eliminate inequality with my new grading system. I call it equity grading.” Anything to pretend to solve the problem without actually solving the problem by taxing the wealthy to reduce class size.
LikeLike
John McWhorter has written a book about the insidious racism of white woke people. He vigorously defends standardized testing and says anyone who opposes them on equity grounds is a racist for thinking black kids can’t succeed on standardized tests.
LikeLike
McWhorter blames racism on Black people defeating themselves. I guess he thinks Jews were at fault for pogroms, too. What a genius.
LikeLike
Black and brown students can do quite well on standardized tests if they are middle class. It is not the color of students’ skin that results in low test scores. It is poverty, and poor students of all skin tones will generally have lower test scores. What we do know is that poor, special needs and ELL students learn better in smaller sized classes.
LikeLike
Retired teacher, you are right. Skin color is not the dependent variable. Poverty is. This is true in every country.
LikeLike
That’s right, retired colleague.
LikeLike
It’s a no brainer, class size matters and smaller classes mean that the teacher has more time to help each individual child. The selling point of elite private schools is low class sizes.
LikeLike
The truth is test scores are gate keepers. The worst demonstration of this is closing schools in poor neighborhoods due to “low scores.” Students need an education, not training to get high scores on bubble tests that are irrelevant in the real world. Some colleges have finally figured this out and eliminated gate keeping test scores.
LikeLike
retired teacher says: “The worst demonstration of this is closing schools in poor neighborhoods due to “low scores.”
Exactly. And think about what it says that this could even be the policy! How brainwashed our so-called liberal media is not to notice how idiotic it is.
Hey, there are very high rates of COVID in Republican states. Lots of people are dying. But I have the solution! We need to close hospitals in Republican states with high rates of COVID to make sure all those Republicans get healthier. If we close all the hospitals in places where Trump voters have high rates of illness and death, those very sick people will have the joy of traveling to some other hospital to get healthier.
I would like to see the NYT take that idea seriously, using the same laughable studies they cite to “prove” how wonderful charters are. Did you know that the very sickest Trump supporters often fare poorly in the hospitals that are being closed down, and that is not because they need more expensive health care that the hospital doesn’t have the resources to offer. It is because those very sick patients aren’t going to that charter hospital far away that is known for kicking out the sickest patients who don’t get better using cheap medicine. Absurd? Not to NYT education reporters trained to believe that good journalism means not questioning or looking closely at “data” that a very important person tells you proves that hospitals need to be closed where patients are sickest. NYT education reporters seem believe that it is a journalist’s job to assume this data is sound and report it and amplify it and legitimize it as if it is sound, but to include a tiny disclaimer at the end that “people who hate hospitals and don’t want Trump voters to get healthy disagree.”
Sure, let’s just keep closing schools and closing hospitals and closing every institution where privatizers can come in to serve only those who are profitable to serve and kick out anyone who makes their institutions look “unsuccessful”. Ed reformers and NYT journalists think that is a dandy idea.
Newsflash: Studies with lots of data show that a privatize organization can be 100% successful and garner great financial rewards if they only serve members of the public who make them look successful and dump the rest.
LikeLike
nycpsp– good one. Excellent parallel.
LikeLike
It would be irresponsible for anyone to allow this discussion to go without pointing out that the students who are hurt the worst by big classes are people ones who are about off. And the ones who are a bit off are the poor ones, whose parents are both in jail, or they have to work three jobs to make ends meet.
Hence the suggestion Diane makes above, that poverty explains test scores. Well, sort of. There is that thing about worthless testing.
LikeLike
It would be irresponsible for anyone to allow this discussion to go without pointing out that the students who are hurt the worst by big classes are people ones who are about off. And the ones who are a bit off are the poor ones, whose parents are both in jail, or they have to work three jobs to make ends meet.
Hence the suggestion Diane makes above, that poverty explains test scores. Well, sort of. There is that thing about worthless testing.
LikeLike
Weird. Posted twice. Sorry.
LikeLike
Regarding parental support for class size reduction:
It’s not quite as simple as it sounds. I haven’t seen a viable plan from those who want to reduce class sizes — do they have parents on board from affluent overcrowded zoned schools promising their kid will attend an underused high poverty school?
Nikole Hannah-Jones wrote a brilliant article a few years (before most people knew who she was) about what happened when Mayor de Blasio tried to alleviate overcrowding at a popular zoned school PS 8 in Brooklyn Heights — by rezoning and moving students to the high poverty very underutilized school nearby where Hannah-Jones’ child attended.
Suddenly a lot of parents seemed content with large class sizes as long as they were in the “right” school.
Parents may want reduced class sizes, but they seem to think that can be achieved by magically adding wings or floors to overcrowded schools where they can remain while other schools are underused.
I hope there will be a real effort to get parents to understand that reducing class sizes means being willing to move your kid to a different school.
I really haven’t seen that effort at all.
When a group of parents wanted to diversity public middle schools in District 15, they worked hard for years to come up with a viable plan. It took years to get parents to buy in and even then there was a lot of resistance. But they did it! It was an impressive, years long effort, but they did it.
Lots of parents support diversifying public schools. But that doesn’t mean that lots of parents are willing for their kid to be in a public school different than what they expected in order to make public schools more diverse.
Lots of parents want class size reduction. But that doesn’t mean that lots of parents are willing for their kid to be in a public school different than what they expected in order to reduce class sizes.
It’s the difference between the easy part – “hey parents support class size reduction” — to the far more difficult part — “are they willing to take their kid out of their overcrowded public school that they like, or do they just expect that other parents will do that so their kid gets to be in smaller classes?”
Bashing politicians for not doing this is fine, IF you have a viable plan.
Does Leonie support rezoning public schools? That has been quite controversial and I wasn’t sure what Leonie Haimson’s position was on that. Usually I see that question deferred by talking about charter schools taking up space, but there are plenty of very overcrowded elementary schools where there is no charter located there. Does Leonie support rezoning to move some of those students out?
It’s complicated. And to me, it doesn’t help to make it seem easy. What helps is coming up with a viable plan beyond “build more schools” or “evict charters” (both of which I support ) without making clear your position on rezoning schools.
LikeLike