There have been many reports in the media of teachers quitting their classrooms because of stress. This may be the hope of the groups funded by Charles Koch and other rightwingers, who would like to destroy public education and open new opportunities for private and charter schools.
Here is some sound advice from a retired teacher about how to restore teachers’ morale. Jennifer González writes in her blog about the basic problems and offers ways to solve them.
Here is what she says are fake answers to the problems:
PART 4: THINGS THAT ARE NOT THE SOLUTION
Before we talk about the things that will really make conditions better for teachers, here’s a list of things that won’t:
- Jeans day or other clothing-related “rewards.”For the love of Pete, we are pulling out of a global pandemic. Just let your teachers wear jeans whenever they want.
- Donuts, bagels, pizzas, etc. Food is always appreciated and enjoyed, so there’s no need to stop offering it; just know that it does nothing to fix the bigger problem.
- Surface talk about self-care without any structural changes. Encouraging teachers to meditate, do yoga, practice mindfulness, take bubble baths, get mani-pedis—none of that addresses the real problem. In fact, more than one teacher has pointed out how insulting it is to have leaders give lip service to self-care while upholding conditions that chip away at mental health.
- Surface-level invitations for teacher input. If a teacher is invited to participate in a focus group, complete a survey, or otherwise give input into school decisions, their input should actually carry weight. If a decision has already been made for all intents and purposes, or the teacher input has no impact on the outcome, then the teacher’s time has been wasted.
- Unpredictable or short bursts of free time. When it comes to doing challenging cognitive work, “free time” is not the sum of its parts. Five minutes here, another seven there and another 20 there is not the same as knowing you have a full hour of protected, uninterrupted time. Although it’s nice to randomly end a meeting 10 minutes early or show up in a teacher’s class to give them a surprise bathroom break, teachers can’t really make the most of this kind of free time. What they need is longer blocks that they know about in advance so they can plan for them and make good use of the time.
- Pep talks. Telling a room full of teachers that they are doing a great job will likely go in one ear and out the other of those who are worn out and demoralized.
That’s her list of what teachers don’t need. Read the post to learn what she believes will help teachers. She breaks it down into Time, Trust, and Safety.
Do you agree?

I totally agree. I have said for many years now that teachers nationwide should strike. The Red for Ed movement wasn’t enough to make effective change in the system. The parent Opt-out movement wasn’t enough to enact change. Change will only come when it becomes a nationwide stand for public education and the “reformers” banished from the system.
LikeLike
I agree with everything written here, but really, there is only one person in this whole country who can save us teachers and our students. His name is Miguel Cardona. He should have ordered a moratorium on testing and begun to guide Congress toward a reauthorization of the ESSA without testing mandates. That would take a lot of undue, counterproductive pressure off all of us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
sad reality that we see Biden’s lack of comprehension in his appointment of Cardona
LikeLike
Who is Cardona?
LikeLike
Good question.
LikeLike
In my view, there are two things that teachers want most: autonomy to teach their students as they think best, and recognition and respect.
The two are related of course. Classroom teachers are the experts on teaching and learning, regardless of the fact that so many people are pleased to tell them what and how to teach.
LikeLike
Good morning Diane and everyone,
I think Ms. Gonzales gives some excellent points regarding what schools can do to alleviate the stress teachers feel. But will the schools actually do it? Probably not. When the world won’t change just because you want it to, what do you do? One option is leaving the profession. I especially liked her Part 8, a “Call to Inaction” section. Teachers usually have a bit of a martyr complex. They sometimes think they have to give and give of themselves like mother birds. Teachers are NOT mother birds, and teaching is a JOB. It’s not your LIFE. If you feel that it is, it might help to broaden your perspective of how you view yourself. Teachers need to set boundaries. Your contract sets out the times you will work. Stick to those times. If you are working until 11:00 at night, ask yourself why. Could you give the students some seat work and correct those papers during class? They’ll be ok, really. Teachers can also be control-freaks and micromanagers. This can be a good thing but learning to let go of things is one of the most important things you can do for yourself. What can you let go of at your job? My husband always likes to say, “Addition by subtraction!” What can you subtract from your daily routine? How can you simplify? In Part 7 “An Apology,” Ms. Gonzales’ sister says, “So I end up feeling like a crap teacher because there’s this ideal out there that I’m clearly falling short of and I know I’ll never get there.” She might want to ask herself who thought up this image of the “ideal” teacher and why she has accepted that as her “ideal” to live up to. When we’re living according to an image of some ideal that is coming to us from an exterior source that is not in tune with our own image, it causes stress and illness. Teachers can also be perfectionists. I like Erich Neumann’s quote that perfection needs to be sacrificed on the altar of wholeness. I’m using this quote in a different sense than he meant it but it can apply on many levels. Are you living a whole life or is your life taken up with the job? It helps me to pinpoint where my stress is coming from and then see what I can do to change the situation, change my reaction to it or leave the situation all together. There are aspects of teaching now that are stressing me and making me feel that what I am doing is meaningless. This is my cue to really start delving into myself and to think about what really matters to me. A tough journey indeed.
LikeLike
tangping…..the lying flat movement in China is seen as justice.
LikeLike
I hope all the spewers of nonsense about accountability, testing, grit, resilience, rigorous instruction, segregationist experimental bell schedules, extended schooldays, extended school years, and Tiger Moms are paying very close attention to the Tangping movement.
LikeLike
Teacher Appreciation Day was when the principal dashed into the staff room, plopped down a giant Subway sandwich and left.
LikeLike
it’s really somewhat simple: If we do not begin to treat teachers with regard in all of the aforementioned areas, the public schools will essentially become babysitting institutions, if they aren’t all ready. One of my early epiphanies as an administrator was noticing that teachers should be left to focus on instruction. Nothing more. all other tasks from clerical to duty should be handled by well paid para-professionals. I used to wonder why tenured professors only taught a few classes a week. It is because it takes significant time to research, stay up on and prepare for content. Teachers need the same regard. All of the countries that are lauded for their schools allow at least half of a teacher’s time to be dedicated to preparation and planning. I also agree that leaders should regularly defer to teachers in regard to curriculum and pedagogy. The real irony all of the culture wars we are seeing now is that few of the courses being protested against are actually being taught. Teachers are not insurrectionists. Finally, I think it needs to be said that if we don’t begin to pay professional salaries to teachers then the attrition rate will only get worse. Pay, resources, professional autonomy and teacher driven professional development are critical if we want the mission of the public schools to be realized.
LikeLike
“It takes significant time to research, stay up on and prepare for content. Teachers need the same regard. All of the countries that are lauded for their schools allow at least half of a teacher’s time to be dedicated to preparation and planning. I also agree that leaders should regularly defer to teachers in regard to curriculum and pedagogy.”
Truth!
Dr. Bonner gets it.
LikeLike
Bravo, Dr. Bonner!
LikeLike
I guess I need to step in to say I do not have an ED. Just 13 years as a principal. Thank you, however.
LikeLike
Aren’t doughnuts (Gates, Walton’s, Zuckerberg, Laurene Powell Jobs et al) actually a big part of the problem?
LikeLike
Perhaps it would be a good idea to just take the doughnuts off the menu, regardless of whether they are appreciated and enjoyed.
LikeLike
“Teachers need doughnuts like a hole in the head”
Doughnuts aren’t needed
(Walton’s, Gates or Zuck)
Doughnuts should be weeded
Cuz doughnuts really suck
LikeLike
“The time lost in writing full, formal lesson plans every day is time that could be used to conference with a student, watch a video about an innovative technique, or restructure an activity that isn’t quite working. ”
Here is an author who understands that teaching is time-compromise. There is no other way. You can spend all your day on the intellectual advancement of one student, if that is a thing you want to do. Thus, by the definition of education, teaching is a thing that demands that a professional make time-oriented decisions. Having distant administration making these decisions for you is the most demoralizing thing a teacher ever experiences.
I will add a few more ideas:
If you think I am having trouble with my teaching, do not send me an academic coach without taking away some other duty. More than likely, the academic coach will just take more time away, which was the original cause of my distress to start with.
Do not tell me what is important to teach. If you have to do that, either I need to go back to school and get a degree or you (whatever level of administration)need to go back and get a degree. Leave me alone. If you are a parent, do not presume that you have a greater understanding than I do about my subject. It may be that you do, but it is very presumptuous of you to suggest that this is so unless you have been teaching the same class for a decade or so.
There are a few more ideas I have, but I am running out of time.
LikeLike
Writing full lesson plans is useful when you are starting out as a teacher, but after a while, you just start to incorporate the elements of a basic plan automatically without having to write them down.
I would argue that having a catalog of videotaped lessons would be much more valuable than written lesson plans because a sub with no subject expertise could use them on days when the regular teacher was out.
LikeLike
One of the insights I particularly related to in the [excellent] linked “Principal Center” paper: “Making those plans comprehensible to someone else, who doesn’t share the same knowledge of the curriculum, students, and the classroom…” You’re essentially explaining what you’re doing to someone who probably never visits your classroom anyway (because they’re too busy looking at hundreds of lesson plans?). The time involved subtracts from what you’re hired to do, and contributes nothing to it.
LikeLike
Every time I write detailed lesson plans and the lesson flops like a dead catfish, I think about the Robert Burns poem To a Mouse: “How oft it seem the best laid plans of mice and men gang oft aglay
LikeLike
Do others agree with me that academic coaches are a big part of the problem?
LikeLike
I always found the concept of an investment in coaching compelling. However, in my particular experience districts used the positions to micro manage principal and teacher decisions while collecting data to push underperforming teachers out. One of my districts simply gave marching orders to coaches that often countered principal leadership. So in this context, academic coaches can be a problem.
LikeLike
I taught at the beginning of my career, worked in educational publishing for decades and then returned at the end. I was astonished at the changes, and I am NOT talking about white boards. In the interim, teachers had lost all autonomy, and it seemed that throughout the intervening time, administrators had raced one another to load nonteaching duties on top of teaching ones.
It seems that every time some genius in administration got an idea–Hey, wouldn’t it be cheaper if teachers did the car line duty? Hey, what about having them submit 3-page lesson plan forms for every lesson? Hey, what about having them post those, with standard addressed, essential question, vocabulary, homework, and bellwork, for the lesson on their white boards? Hey, what about requiring that they write quarterly reflections on their teaching, with goals set for the coming quarter? Hey, what about having them maintain Data walls? Word walls? And do the bulletin boards in the hallways? And post all their assignments and handouts online? And hold Data Chats with all their students? And sit in on all IEP and 504 meetings? And how about having them document their teaching by compiling notebooks and videos to be evaluated? And having them be evaluated by the reading coach every semester? And do 300 hours of ESL training to retain their credentials? And complete forms for administration and parents every time there is a disciplinary action? And attend weekly “trainings”? And keep a log of every parent contact? And record their grades in a gradebook AND in the LMS? And proctor standardized tests on weekends? And give up prep periods to fill in as subs? And maintain class websites on the LMS? And onboard all their students’ parents to those websites? And act as sponsor for at least one extra-curricular activity? And coach students who have failed the state test after school? And maintain for each prep an up-to-date lesson plan book open for inspection at all times? And spend their 3 minutes between classes as hall monitors? And be formally evaluated four times a year, in addition to two informal evaluations each quarter, after attending the pre-evaluation meeting, submitting the lesson plan, attending the post-evaluation meeting, and completing forms related to these? And give practice/benchmark tests for the state exams and submit data analyses forms reporting the results?
And every time a duty was added, precisely ZERO time was freed up in teachers’ schedules.
The job had become, in a word, absurd.
LikeLike
But hey, no prob. Give them some doughnuts on Teacher Appreciation Day!
LikeLike
Gosh Bob, if you
(worked in educational publishing for decades)
couldn’t make a dent in what’s published,
WHO could?
LikeLike
I made many dents, but please understand, NoBrick, that publishing textbooks is VERY expensive, and as a result, publishers are VERY RELUCTANT to make substantive changes in pedagogy. As one CEO once told me, “Look at that parking lot, Bob. Think of how different cars could be, but that’s not people want. They want the same thing with some new bells and whistles.” I made pitches for substantive changes in pedagogy many, many times, but for the most part, these fell on deaf ears. But I did make some positive contributions. When I started in the business, the grammar and composition textbook market was dominated by Warriner’s Grammar and Composition, which consisted of hundreds of pages of traditional grammar exercises followed by one chapter on Writing the Paragraph, one on Writing the Composition, and one on Outlining. In my very first job, I outlined a new series that put the writing first and contained the first writing process and critical thinking chapters in a major basal textbook program. I created for another grammar and comp program the first materials on using rubrics to grade composition to be included in a major basal program, thus addressing the problem that kids need to write a lot more than teachers can possibly line edit. And, I worked on a lot of literature programs, which gave me an opportunity to drop in new pieces, here and there, that then were adopted by other programs and became canonical–Denise Levertov’s magnificent, beautiful “A Tree Telling of Orpheus,” for example. I did a complete revision of the first major supplemental program to introduce Bellwork to ELA curriculum. I wrote what became a best-selling textbook on writing the research paper. I created one of the most beautiful and comprehensive anthologies of African-American literature, music, art, and history–a big, four-color wonder. And much else over the years. However, many of my pitches to make substantive changes in curricula got no traction because publishers don’t want to spend many millions of dollars bringing to market something altogether new.
LikeLike
I thought often of getting a PhD and becoming a professor of education and trying to make change from that vantage, but I saw that I could make significant contributions as a relatively anonymous editor and writer of textbooks, though nothing like the changes that I wanted to make. To pick up a relatively unknown poem or story and put it into a major lit anthology series is to give it an official imprimatur that ends up with the thing being considered by millions of teachers and students to be part of the canon. That’s a kind of superpower. LOL. And there was the issue of taking the time and money to make that switch in professions while supporting a family. Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, . . .
LikeLike
Here’s a BIG issue with making significant changes in the pedagogy and curricula from within educational publishing houses: The big textbook adoption states tend to drive the market because when their adoptions roll around, they throw out their old texts and buy all new ones, in one fell swoop. That’s a very big payday, and publishers work toward that. But those states tend to specify in enormous detail what they want in those texts, and those specifications often preclude significant pedagogical and curricular innovation, and the whole system of state imprimatur favors, enormously, very large publishing houses with really significant resources to throw at a project. Almost no one outside the industry knows this or how it stifles innovation and competition in the textbook industry.
If textbook purchasing decisions could be independently made by individual schools rather than by big districts and from state-approved lists, then smaller publishers could do extremely innovative texts and pitch them school-by-school and have a chance to compete. But the current system locks in the big behemoths. During the time I was in educational publishing, there was enormous consolidation in the industry. The small, competing publishers were gobbled up and either killed or made into imprints of a bigger house. And the big guys weren’t going to spend 65 million to bring to their NATIONAL markets texts that were truly innovative, even if an innovation were eminently sensible and effective. Instead, the big publishers churn out the same old garbage with new slogans attached. Old vinegar in new wine bottles with attractive labels. In recent years, they have taken to putting legacy junk from old texts in databases by standard so that that material can be called up and thrown together to produce a “new” textbook. Try to pitch these folks on a truly powerful new pedagogical approach and you will be laughed out of the conference room/conference call.
LikeLike
Back when I started in the ed book biz, NoBrick, one could work for one of the many small houses and make some significant contributions. This became less and less possible over time, as the consolidation of the industry occurred and the markets grew to enormous size, requiring comparatively large investments of capital. All those earnest folks in state education departments churning out adoption “guidelines” for big state adoptions had NO CLUE that they were ENSURING that real innovation in textbook publishing would disappear and be replaced by the same old cheese whiz, repackaged, with new slogans and lots of marketing hype reflecting whatever was hot on the education carnival midway in a particular season.
LikeLike
Bill Gates, who vies with Bezos for being the preeminent monopolist of our time, pitched a single set of national “standards” as a way to drive innovation by creating a single national market. Of course, that’s utter bst. Frank Herbert says that “Fear is the mind killer.” Well, monopoly is the innovation killer.
LikeLike
Monopoly and scale are the innovation killers.
LikeLike
Gates was also undoubtedly behind the Common Core copyright, which ensured that textbook and software publishers could make just one version of everything and not have to change it — thereby keeping the profits rolling in year after year without additional development costs.
The claim that Common Core was a States’ Standards Initiative (TM) was always just a joke.
But looks like poor Bill is finally getting the negative attention he deserves. Many people are finally starting to realize what a deceptive 2-bit vacuum cleaner salesman he is under the facade of magnanimous brilliance.
In a recent PBS interview , he looked like a 🦌 in the headlights when Judy Woodruff asked him about his meetings with Jeffrey Epstein. He kept repeating the same canned statement that his lawyers had coached him on “My dinners with Epstein were a mistake. Nothing new to see here. Move along, Dorothy..”
LikeLike
One has to wonder:
What did Epstein offer for dessert at his dinners?
LikeLike
It saddens me that so many current teachers do not know what it is like to be treated like a professional. Teachers have always had to deal with a lack of time, and no public school teacher has total autonomy. The disrespect and micromanaging that so many teachers face today are a new low.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s really awful, retired teacher. I don’t see why anyone would want to subject themselves to this.
LikeLike
For some reason a story my father told me about his days in the 1930s as an agriculture student at University of Tennessee. He roomed with the relative of a friend who was an ag professor. One night, the man had to practice for his lesson the next day: caponizing a rooster.
The thought occurred to me that such a lesson would have some strange description in the modern template.
LikeLike
Bob, while your list seems embellished and borderline hyperbole, it is, in fact, precise and gospel. To that end, it’s got to be crystal clear to everyone by now why teachers spend their days wondering why they can’t get their work done with all these kids in the room.
LikeLike
This is simply reporting, but it sounds unbelievable, doesn’t it? This is farce become tragedy.
LikeLike
We’ve discussed the removal of “Civics” from the public schools curriculum on this site, over the years.
This assault on public education began in the 20th century, but it really hit full bore the past 2 decades, with the focus on reading and math test scores.
Two decades is plenty of time for someone to grow into a non-civics based mindset, join the work force, and end up in the role of determining policy.
Wondering if this might be factoring into the equation. If someone has little concept of community and the schools’ role in it…
LikeLike
And, Mr. Hale, I appreciate immensely the humor of your last line! Humor under fire. That’s impressive.
LikeLike
I just wanted to say, Diane, thank you for posting this piece by Jennifer González. It’s brilliant, thorough, borne of experience, and beautifully written. I hope that every reader of this blog will take the time to read it through. That the profession is losing people of the quality of Ms. González is heartbreaking and common and a freaking wake-up call.
I wish that it were read out in every city council meeting and state legislature in the country and copied to every school administrator.
Thanks again, Diane, for sharing this.
LikeLike
And I wish that it was required reading for every principal, vice principal, assistant superintendent, district superintendent and state superintendent. I completely agree, I have never read anything that so well expresses what teachers a red dealing with. As I read it I just kept saying “Yes! Oh my gosh – YES!!”
This woman gets it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, kgi!
LikeLike
“That the profession is losing people of the quality of Ms. González is heartbreaking and common…”
Very true. I would add that future teachers, the ones sitting in the seats of high schools everywhere, are voting with their feet when they avoid the education school, now in their second decade of declining admissions. My superintendent reported the other day that my old university, which enrolls 30,000 students a year, had exactly one student graduate in math education last year.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They aren’t dummies. As Neil Postman put it, “Kids have great crap detectors.”
LikeLike
FYI given our conversation today. Nana
Sent from my iPhone
LikeLike
I missed this post last night because I got home from work and needed to stare at a BLANK wall for a couple hours, ha, ha. That and vote and pick up my usual Tuesday night ‘spiedie sub’ (Upstate Southern Tier New York reference!)
Great article.
I often find myself wondering….how much of this MESS is school culture and how much of it is our culture in general, circa 2021?
I order stuff online and it shows up, like, the very next day. And, in one sense that’s cool. But then I think about the poor slobs running on a treadmill to get the “stuff” to me at the speed of light….
Slobs like ME, moving constantly all day long.
How fast do we need everything? And, what are we doing to each other making life move so quickly?
There’s a documentary about the birth of the assembly line 100+ years ago that I sometimes show to students. Ford Motor Company would turn up the line faster then faster again. And, when the workers started to scream, the management would turn it down a notch. (Only when a union emerged that could have some control over the line speed did anything change.)
I went to get my COVID booster last Friday evening and the pharmacist was five minutes late and was apologizing to me. And, I’m, like, no, no, that’s okay. It’s a life saving drug and people around the world can’t even get a first shot and here’s someone saying she’s sorry because I have to sit on my butt for a few minutes?
I’m not a Rhodes Scholar but luckily decades ago I fell into reading lots and lots about the history of science and philosophy of technology. And, most of what I read back then….it’s coming true. Right in front of me. Like, right in my own head
I have a broken kitchen faucet I can’t fix and the plumber who has worked on this house for 20 years hasn’t called me back for anything since the pandemic began.
The farmer who cuts the hay in in front of my house never came back and finished our fields this summer.
Students aren’t getting their work done.
And, I’m wondering, WHERE ARE THESE PEOPLE? Then, I realize, that’s ME!
Hey, despite it all, I hope you all have a great Wednesday.
Gotta go.
LikeLike
I worked in a bow 🏹 factory for two years and as with Henry Ford, the managers were always trying to make things more “efficient”, code for speeding up the production process.
But there is actually an irony associated with the focus on speed of delivery with Amazon.
It used to be you could just go down to the local hardware store or retail outlet to pick up something you needed (eg, for a repair). It might take you an hour or two but nowhere near the multiple days it normally takes with Amazon (even with Prime,).
A lot of the retail stores have gone out of business and even big ones like Home depot no longer stock basic items that you used to be able to get just a few years ago. A while back, I needed to get a trowel for tiling that had a nonstandard tooth size and I could not find it anywhere, not in Home Depot, not in Lowe’s, not even in a tile store. I had to order one online which took nearly a week to arrive.
And getting the tile is even worse if you want something particular because there just are not many places left that carry a big selection of high quality stuff. And ordering that sort of thing online can be very risky since you don’t know what you are getting until it arrives so you have to order samples, which means the whole process takes even longer than just the few days to get the product.
I have had this issue many times in recent years. Stuff that I used to be able to pick up locally is just no longer available.
Eventually, I suspect that you will have to order pretty much everything on line.
LikeLike
I also do work on my car and have encountered the very same issue of not being able to get the parts at the local auto parts store for things that used to be readily available.
And it’s not just a matter of getting parts for my specific make and model (an 18 year old Saturn).
In a lot of cases , you can’t even get generic stuff like test equipment
replacement filter baskets and orings for fuel injectors without going online.
Online is fine if all you want to do is buy the latest and greatest electronics, but it is really illsuited for the construction and repair businesses.
LikeLike
Years ago there were local people who would do small, odd jobs and they did good work. It seems like that source of help is drying up, at least where I live. Big corporate chains and the cost of doing everything is crowding them out..like mass of weeds killing off flowers.
LikeLike
“ Do you agree?”
Yes.
But I don’t think that the people who are setting the policies really care.
Or, in the best case scenario; they’re clueless and think that those really ARE a part of the solution.
LikeLike
Bob’s laundry list, plus the author’s link at “Principal Paper” (about submitting daily lesson plans) reminded me…
A lot of this crappola started affecting many different careers as a result of the digital revolution. The ability to crunch #’s super-fast gave birth to a lot of misguided management. There was a delusion that a bird’s-eye view of computer-cast trends– with their seemingly indubitable evidentiary backup of raw numbers– could somehow transform performance. This started in late ‘70’s in big companies that could afford a room full of main-frames, and spread like topsy with the transition to desktops, then laptops. I was doing office work mid-’70’s to mid-‘80’s. It seemed to me the ‘transformation’ simply ballooned overhead by adding a whole new bunch of bean-counters to the project mgt team— slowed the performance of tech folks in the trenches by adding data entry reqts– and added 15% unpaid overtime for the “exempt” level [supervisory & above]—with (just speculating) no particular change to performance.
I’ve had the advantage of a continuing view, as I married an engr in that co, & have seen how things progressed up to present, close-up. There was a truly terrible period ’95-’05, when overhead-slashing due to global competition meant secretarial/ data-entry jobs disappeared, and those in supervisory/ managerial positions found themselves typing/ sending all communications, tech people spent oodles of time on data entry & their bosses on reviewing it—meanwhile whole depts that used to do lower-tech work for the engrs [like my old dept, procurement] were reduced to the point where the engrs—and legal dept [$$?!] had to assume their duties.
50% of those difficulties remain, but they’ve been cut 25% by improved user-friendly data-mgt software [plus the deletion of paper copying/ filing], and another 25% by companies simply letting go of some of this illusory control that just, plain, costs too much.
It strikes me that schools—admin & teachers—are caught like flies in amber in the ’95-’05 paradigm. First, they’re not in a for-profit biz, and their “product” is poorly defined/ measured– so there’s no check on overweening overhead costs vs performance. Second, their funding changes haphazardly, responding to local economic conditions, not “performance.” Third, management methods respond to $clouty lobbyists influencing state/ fed policy-makers– but the funds provided at that level never translate to the school bldg level. So there’s simply no examination of what all these “accountability systems” cost [in unpaid hrs and burnout/ teacher-shortage, and shrinking the teaching/ learning experience] and whether folks should be doing it—at all.
LikeLike
No accountability for those running the “accountability” steamroller over the entire profession. Oh, the irony!
LikeLike
One of the best write-ups I’ve ever read about what we are experiencing.
LikeLike