Jan Resseger describes the crisis of early childhood education in this post.
The importance of early childhood education for healthy development has been repeatedly documented, most recently by the Learning Policy Institute. Yet the sector continues to be underfunded, teachers are underpaid, and they are in short supply.
She writes:
The kind of enriched child care envisioned by experts at the Learning Policy Institute does not exist, however, for most American families, particularly as problems have been exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Last week the Washington Post‘s Heather Long reported: “The numbers are staggering: The child-care services industry is still down 126,700 workers—more than a 10 percent decline from pre-pandemic levels, Labor Department data shows. While many industries complain they can’t find enough workers, the hiring situation is more dire in child-care than in restaurants right now. Young women in their late teens and 20s who are typically drawn to work at the day care centers are opting instead to take jobs as administrative assistants, retail clerks, and bank tellers… Veteran child-care workers are quitting… More than 10,000 workers have left the industry since June…. “
And for the NY Times, last week Claire Cain Miller provided examples from across the country: “At a Y.M.C.A. in San Antonio, 200 children are on wait lists for child care because of hiring problems. It raised average hourly pay for full-time workers to $12.50 from $10, but still can’t recruit enough teachers to meet the demand. In Ann Arbor, Mich., the school district had announced it was shutting down its after-school program. It managed to hire people to open at five of 20 elementary schools, those most in need, but that left out at least 1,000 children. And in Portland, Ore., preschool spots are few and far between, and elementary schools are running after-school care at limited capacity or have canceled programs altogether… Child care providers face challenges like those in many other service industries that are unable to find enough workers—low pay and little job stability. The median hourly pay is $12, and 98 percent of occupations pay more… Turnover is high in early childhood education, and jobs caring for school-aged children are only a few hours a day and often end in the summer… Some people are hesitant to work with unvaccinated children.”
Actually it is surprising to see major coverage of child care problems in the nation’s two biggest newspapers. The coverage last week was most likely a response to a new report released from the Department of the Treasury, published to push the child care investments—which President Biden has proposed and which Congress is currently debating—as part of the federal budget reconciliation package. The Treasury Department’s new report describes the problem clearly and concisely: “The child care sector is a crucial and underfunded part of the American economy. One in every 110 U.S. workers—and one in every 55 working women—makes a living in early childhood education and care. Parents of young children devote a sizeable share of their total income to child care. Children benefit enormously from high quality early childhood settings that nurture and support healthy development, all the while laying the foundation for future success by supporting early learning skills. An extensive body of research describes large potential economic returns to investments in early childhood education and care for preschool children, especially for children from less advantaged families… This report describes the existing child care system in the United States, which relies on private financing to provide care for most children, and documents how this system fails to adequately serve many families.”
Most childcare facilities are run by private agencies. Most American families cannot afford them. President Biden included a major boost for early childhood education, but the fate of his funding program hangs in the balance.

Relatedly, we are we the only country in the word that requires 2-year-olds to wear masks?
LikeLike
the world, that is
LikeLike
The xtian fundies would love to have this country in the word, their sky-daddy’s words that is.
LikeLike
“Relatedly” ??? really.
Ok.
LikeLike
It came to mind when I saw the words “value” and “childhood” together. Can any system that requires 2-year-olds to wear masks all day in daycare really purport to care that much about children? Can anyone who isn’t bothered by that purport to care?
LikeLike
You can’t argue with that logic.
LikeLike
The lack of affordable, quality childcare directly impacts the labor market, particularly for women. The pandemic hit working women disproportionately. Many of them had to stay home with children as schools closed. This was especially difficult for single moms and low wage working women. Many women continue to struggle as the economy is opening up, but childcare is still unavailable to many working families.
Compared to the EU, the US offers very little support to working parents. In France L’école maternelle offers free preschool for working parents from age three. In the US parents are on their own to figure it out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I also applaud Biden to bringing our lack of support for working families out into the open. It is unlikely Biden will be able to address our childcare crisis because he refuses to dump the filibuster, and he cannot get consensus between the corporate and progressive Democrats.
LikeLike
when legislators are out of touch….
LikeLike
Because children don’t need childhood “education”. Small children need babysitters/care givers that will love them, nurture them and take care of their basic needs. Small children should NOT be sitting at desks getting “instruction” so that data can be collected from them….for use by the government for funding (or other nefarious reasons). Children need free play with other children, arts/crafts, story time, naps and basic needs care by adults who love caring for children.
Yes, parents need to work. Many are working FOR that “early childhood education” ($$$) and little else (it’s sad!). A new “market” opened up in ‘childcare” and that required support to get the business up and running……an education/degree ($$$) in early childhood education so that adults could be paid to be glorified babysitters (but still make little income) outside of the home. The in-home daycare gig that allowed many women to stay at home with their own young children has been decimated because small children could be used “for profit” in the name of “education”.
We are a country that does not value children, does not value the lives of senior citizens and does not value family life and values. Our country is a capitalistic nightmare.
LikeLike
Agree with all especially, “Children need free play with other children, arts/crafts, story time, naps and basic needs care by adults who love caring for children.” and “Our country is a capitalistic nightmare.”
You are correct…. as a whole we do not show through our policies that we value our most important people – seniors and young children.
LikeLike
“Because children don’t need childhood “education””
Bingo, Bango, Boingo!!! Give that brilliant lady a Kewpie Doll!
LikeLike
“Children need free play with other children, arts/crafts, story time, naps and basic needs care by adults who love caring for children.”
FYI, that is exactly what those children get in well-funded preschools. Which is why most rich people who have full time nannies taking care of their kids’ needs put their children into preschools when they are young.
Even Prince William’s kids Prince George and Princess Charlotte were in nursery schools at 2 1/2! It’s not as if they didn’t have plenty of caregivers to play with them at home. But part of “education” is learning to socialize and play with other kids.
LikeLike
LisaM– I’ve been a visiting teacher to daycares/preschools for the last 20 yrs. What you describe as desirable is exactly what goes on there: “free play with other children, arts/crafts, story time, naps and basic needs care by adults who love caring for children.” Not “sitting at desks getting “instruction” so that data can be collected from them….for use by the government…” Are stay-at-home moms or dads “glorified babysitters”? Parenting involves a lot more than just keeping somebody’s kids from tearing up the house or each other while mom & dad go out for an evening. Is that the “glorified” part: teaching them how to do things for themselves, get along with each other, follow safety rules etc etc? [“teaching” = “education”]
LikeLike
“While many industries complain they can’t find enough workers, the hiring situation is more dire in child-care than in restaurants right now.”
It seems obvious to me that the pandemic has convinced many of the people who were in the work force that it is more financially sound to raise your own children than it is to pay someone to raise them. Thus the present labor shortage.
LikeLike
20 yrs ago, we made a decision that I would stay home and raise the kids (I still don’t work). Fortunately, my husband had/has a decent, stable job with benefits as a gov’t worker. We figured out that if I remained working what the costs of my having a job would work out for our family (daycare, clothes, gas, wear/tear on a vehicle, lunches, too tired to cook$$ etc). My measly $3-4 thousand dollar gain would have put us in a different tax bracket and we would wind up paying taxes…..and losing money! I went “old school” and learned how to spend less money for the things we needed and we budgeted well. I don’t feel like I missed out on anything AND I got to spend time with my kids. It can be done…..not always, but a lot of the time.
LikeLike
LisaM,
Did your children have any preschool experience, or was their first day of Kindergarten at age 5 their first experience walking into a room with other children but without you there?
Because most families I know where one parent can stay home almost always also send their children to some kind of preschool (not full time) at age 3 or 4.
As I wrote in a reply that seems to have disappeared, even Prince William’s son Prince George went to a Montessori preschool at age 2 1/2. That’s an opportunity I think even the most economically disadvantaged families should have. It isn’t formal learning at a desk, but playing and socializing in a nursery school is what “early childhood education” usually is (at least for privileged kids).
LikeLike
I don’t know about you, Lisa (and Roy) but I don’t see a whole lot of people having the option to stay home these days. When I started having kids (70s), I worked part-time for a bit, but day care options were extremely limited, close to non-existent. I was spending most of my income on childcare with which I became increasingly dissatisfied. For various reasons I stopped working, stayed home, and cut corners. None of my four children, all college educated, have that option. It is not a matter of cutting back; none of them lead extravagant lives, but none of them can count on a stable job if that is even a thing for most people. Fortunately, they are much better financial managers (thank you public education!) than I ever was. (I just knew how much I needed to pay the bills.) I would seriously question your assertion that staying home is an option “a lot of the time” now.
LikeLike
Lisa: I have a theory that enough people had enough time to actually sit down and do the complex math during the recent shut-down that they collectively caused the present labor shortage. That is why we see no obvious reaction to states that cut off covid benefits early vs states that kept them.
This does not, however, extend to professions like teaching. A single teacher will rarely produce enough income for a typical family. This also does not speak to the problems associated with being a single parent, which disproportionately falls as a burden upon working women.
It does, however, suggest a reason for the present dearth of workers.
LikeLike
Why should we value early childhood education (ECE)?
Why not allow kids to be kids, free from the overbearing structure of schooling? (Hint the vaunted Finns don’t start formal schooling until age 7)
Is not ECE just another attempt at the control of people’s minds at younger ages to normalize that control?
Or is it just a means to provide babysitting services so that the parents can work themselves to death on minimum and low wage jobs?
To hell with early childhood education!
LikeLike
But 70% of 3-5 year olds in Finland are in daycare.
I think there is some confusion in this discussion where “early education” is presumed to be academic education.
If we change the semantics, what children should have access to is early exposure to being in situations where they are in groups (without their personal caregiver or parent sitting there with them) and they are learning to socialize and play games with other kids.
When people like Jan Ressenger and others talk about “early education” I am certain they don’t mean 3 year olds sitting at desks learning how to read and write.
They are talking about the kind of preschool experience that kids who are the same age in Finland have.
That is the kind of preschool experience that rich kids in America also get.
LikeLike
Daycare is not “early childhood education”. Two different and conflicting philosophies of child rearing.
LikeLike
Then call the spade a spade, it’s babysitting and/or daycare. Now that doesn’t mean some teaching and learning isn’t occurring but it is radically different than the early childhood education I’ve seen extolled.
LikeLike
My point was that whether it is called “early education” or not, Finland has a great system that is similar to the kind of “early education” that rich kids in America get in their preschools.
This is from an article in The Guardian from Sept. 20, 2016: No grammar schools, lots of play: the secrets of Europe’s top education system
“It’s a warm September afternoon in the Kallio district of Helsinki. Out in the Franzenia daycare centre playground, groups of four- and five-year-olds roam contentedly. “Would you like an ice-cream?” asks one, having set up her elaborate “stall” on the edge of the sandpit. Kindergarten staff move among the children, chatting, observing and making written notes.
There is nothing outwardly distinctive about the centre, though with 200 children, it is the city’s largest. It is a tall, somewhat dour former university building, built in the 1930s and converted to its present role last year. Yet it is in places such as this oddly homespun centre with its strange echoes of bureaucracy, walls plastered with children’s art and piles of play paraphernalia, that the Finnish education “miracle” starts to take shape.”
“Indeed the main aim of early years education is not explicitly “education” in the formal sense but the promotion of the health and wellbeing of every child. Daycare is to help them develop good social habits: to learn how to make friends and respect others, for example, or to dress themselves competently. Official guidance also emphasises the importance in pre-school of the “joy of learning”, language enrichment and communication. ”
“Importantly, early years care in Finland is designed and funded to ensure high take-up: every child has a legal right to high-quality pre-school care. In Franzenia, as in all daycare centres, there are children from a mix of backgrounds. Fees, subsidised by the state, are capped at a maximum of €290 (£250) a month (free for those on low incomes) for five-day, 40 hours a week care. About 40% of 1-3-year-olds are in daycare and 75% of 3-5-year-olds. Optional pre-school at the age of six has a 98% take-up. Initially envisaged in the 70s as a way of getting mothers back into the workplace, daycare has also become, Marjoniemi says, about “lifelong learning and how we prepare young children”.
The time children spend in pre-school, with its emphasis on play and socialisation, are “the most important years”, says Jaakko Salo, special adviser to the OAJ, the Finnish teachers’ union.”
In Finland, as for affluent children in America, it is still called “early education” but it doesn’t mean that kids are at desks learning to read and write. They are socializing and playing.
LikeLike
Duane,
Also, my kid did universal pre-k in NYC (something that other cities don’t have), and it was mostly play and socializing. Not sitting at desks “learning”. That did happen in Kindergarten more, and it would be better if Kindergarten was not like first grade used to be. But pre-k and “early childhood education” is really not about formal learning.
At least, that is my understanding, and I think that is probably what Jen Ressenger is talking about. It is playing and socializing, like described in the article about Finnish early childhood “daycare” or whatever you want to call it.
LikeLike
Duane, you are being too binary here. Do stay-at-home moms “babysit” their kids? Parenting involves education. You read to your kids, you shepherd them into healthy activities, you teach them how to get along with each other, how to follow ever more complex instructions, how to dress themselves, what is safe and what is not, I could go on and on. Kids in daycare—and in preschool—are to a great deal being “parented”, not babysat.
LikeLike
Perhaps I should change my last line: To hell with early childhood schooling.
LikeLike
Are you still reading this thread, Duane? They get by me so quickly, & here I have experience to offer, not just opinion. I have a long reply to you at the bottom under general comments, so as to get more margin space.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve seen a variety of types of preschool/ daycares over the last 30 yrs, from my children’s experience in mid-‘90’s through the last 2 decades as a visiting enrichment teacher. There’s been a sea change in their staffing. For a long time the teaching cohort was drawn from mothers who began supplementing their breadwinner-husband’s salary once their kids were school-age. Pay was always low, but the responsible and rewarding nature of the job gave people a reason to stay in a job that paid PT wages for nearly-FT work.
As that cohort aged out, there have been few of the same economic profile to take their place. Spiraling housing/ health ins/ college tuitions have meant most couples need two full-fledged jobs. On one hand, the math says the 2nd job’s salary barely covers childcare. On the other hand, people who leave their careers while rearing young children will not be able to re-enter at the same level [if at all], and lose years of soc sec and 401(k) or other pension pay-in + employer share.
So today one normally sees one or two highly-educated staff – say a director, plus an asst helping with curriculum/ state regs/ IT et al—doubling as observers/ trainers for a squad of young teachers with fairly high turnover. These caregivers are often really green, having not had the experience of raising their own children; that factor alone weeds out the faint of heart. The job for many serves as a practicum while they work toward degrees in related fields, which means they’ll be there for maybe 3 yrs. At most places there are a couple of seasoned head teachers, but the system as it now works cannot replace them when they leave. Meanwhile the demand has increased many-fold for economic reasons, so staff is drawn from an increasingly less-qualified labor pool, requiring intensive training—but not enough staff to do that well– except in places (like Montessoris) with well-organized training; tuitions there are often too high for the hoi polloi. It’s a downward spiral. I hope a big part of Biden’s BBB plan for childcare gets passed…
LikeLike
“At a Y.M.C.A. in San Antonio, 200 children are on wait lists for child care because of hiring problems. It raised average hourly pay for full-time workers to $12.50 from $10, but still can’t recruit enough teachers to meet the demand.” [Sept NYT article]
According to payscale.com, as of Spring 2021 in San Antonio, regular babysitters (say for a parents’ night out) were charging $10/hr; a couple of other websites clock that at $12/hr. Nanny pay averaged just under $15/hr. TX child-care regulations for 2yo’s require 1 staff member per 11 children (group size capped at 22). Baby sitters are caring for just 2 or 3 children; ditto nannies. Why would anyone care for 11 2 yo’s at once for $12.50/hr in San Antonio?
LikeLike
Duane– Daycare and early childhood education are no longer two separate fields. They were very definitely separate for decades: long-day daycare for working class; for mid&up classes: 2.5hrs/day PreK—2 days for 2yo’s, 3days for 3’s, 4 or sometimes 5 days for 4’s, all predicated on a stay-at-home or at least only PT-working parent.
The childcare needs of both middle & upper-middle classes caused the two modes to meld in recent decades. As long ago as 2001 (when I started in the PreK field), classic PreK modes (Montessori and play-based) were already serving small groups with “pre-care” from 8-8:45am, afternoon [or am, for the afternoon kids] parent-paid enrichment classes until 4:30—and eventually a 4:30-6pm laid-back childcare handled by teacher aides. Soon, more parents signed on for the full PreK day taught by early childhood educators 5 days/wk. So by 10- 15 yrs ago, you already had “PreK” offered to 1/3+ of enrollees from 8am-6pm daily by those trained in early childhood ed (operating 8:45am-3pm), supplemented by well-educated enrichment teachers for another 2-3 hrs, plus 1.5 hrs ‘daycare’ via basic CDA [Child Devpt Associate]-certified aides.
That of course was a very pricey option, but meanwhile the former ‘daycares’ were beefing up training & curriculum, adding PreK [& ½-day K, for those in areas not offering full-day K]. Many of the daycares were taken over by commercial chains with pre-approved state curriculum [so as to include kids needing state-subsidized tuition]. Initially, the longtime staff tended not to be college-educated, tho run by highly-educated directors/ assts. Around 2010 [part of the stds movement in our state], there was a concerted effort to bring staff up to snuff via community-college/ onsite training/ online courses etc. Those places also serve the 0-2.5yo daycare which state stds hold to small groups with a CDA for every 3-4 infants (up to 6 toddlers).
So today in our area pretty much any parent can find long-day early-ed meshing with work/commuting schedule for ages 0-5, including daycare for infants/ toddlers & PreK/K—if they can afford it– and the “Early Childhood Ed” moniker applies, at least for director/ asst director even in the cheapest places. The more you pay, the more the whole place looks like “early childhood ed”….
The serious point to be made is that few can really afford this. Maybe they can do it today while kids are young, but that means they can’t save for kids’ college or a comfortable retirement. Hence, the childhood-ed part of Biden’s BBB plan. Your “to hell with early childhood schooling” is a nice fantasy conceit, but it has been decades since everyone except upper class requires two careers just to afford housing, health ins, college for kids…
LikeLike
Thanks for the response. I still stand by my statement:
To hell with early childhood schooling.
LikeLike
😀
LikeLike