Peter Greene writes here about the growing ferocity and viciousness of the rightwing crusade against “critical race theory.” Leave aside the fact that 99% of teachers have never heard of CRT, the crusaders are targeting teachers who are suspected of teaching about racism and social justice.
The crusaders operate on the assumption that teaching the actual history of racism, segregation, and Jim Crow is subversive and unpatriotic. Nothing negative ever happened in the U.S. It was all good.
Greene writes:
Anti-Critical Race Theory warriors are coming for schools, and for the teachers in them.
In New York City, the group Free To Learn is spending millions of dollars on ad buys to target NYC schools (including some private ones) who are accused of indoctrinating children. The group says it supports the basic principle that students should be free to ask questions, develop individual thoughts and opinions, and think critically–but not about that race stuff, apparently. It’s not obvious whose deep pockets are involved in funding this group, but it’s led by Alleigh Marre, who’s been in politics for a while, working on campaigns for Scott Walker and Scott Brown, as well as serving on Donald Trump’s transition team.
But Free To Learn is just targeting schools. Others are targeting individual teachers. I do believe there are people with reasonable, reasoned concerns about CRT and its influence on education, but they’re a small group, and their voices have been pretty much drowned out by the mob (and the GOP politicians trying hard to draw power from it).

Amy Donofrio found herself re-assigned and then held up as a target by Florida’s education commissioner. Misty Cromptom found she was being used as a campaign talking point in New Hampshire. On Twitter, a teacher reported to me that in her area, the No Left Turn group had taken screen shots of posts by teachers and administrators and used them in a presentation of evidence of indoctrination, with names highlighted and schools listed.
No Left Turn is another one of these culture warrior groups, this one spearheaded by Dr. Elana Yaron Fishbein, who pulled her children from school in Gladwyne PA because of a Cultural Proficiency Committee formed in the wake of the murder (she says “death”) of George Floyd. They set up lessons that were unlike “the wholesome teaching of MLK, Jr. The group wants to “revive” education’s fundamental discipline of “critical and active thinking which is based on facts, investigation, logic and sound reasoning,” but they also include on their list of objectives, “Restore American patriotism in the classroom, including presenting our nations as consistently forward-thinking in its elevation of individual liberty and democratizing traditional Liberalism.”
The Central Virginia chapter, the one that went Twitter hunting, has a Facebook page headed by an MLK Jr. quote. Facebook is apparently a nexus for many of these groups, and while this may seem like it’s coming together quickly, many of the connections were already in place. The woman leading the Virginia No Left Turn crusade against CRT was, just a short while ago, leading the charge against masking and school closures.
(Open the link and keep reading.)

For another perspective, read the linked essay about the reality of the CRT campaign in education.
P.S. To other commenters, try to respond to this essay without resorting to the ad hominem that is a staple of this blog. (Hint: terms not permitted include racist, white supremacist, right-wing, Koch brothers, etc.)
https://unherd.com/2021/07/the-fightback-against-critical-race-theory/
LikeLike
This is a real question though:
“This raises the obvious question: Why are so many members of the 1776 Commission — and the anti-CRT onslaught more generally — so closely tied to Koch network think tanks and political organizations?”
I don’t know that you can forbid anyone raising the question of who is funding this by announcing that the Kochs are off limits.
The funding is real and the various Koch entities where the Trump commission members came from are also real- it isn’t “gaslighting” to state these facts.
LikeLike
Both of the examples you rely on are elite private schools. You’re conducting the anti-CRT political campaigns at public school board meetings.
Shouldn’t you have examples in public schools?
LikeLike
Anna Lanson,
Try to respond to this essay written by a conservative private high school student whose high school was the victim of “ad hominem” attacks that are the staple of the people who you demand we read! I don’t understand your demand that we accept ad hominem attacks — and blatant lies — about schools but any attempt to defend them are not accepted.
This was published in the Harvard Westlake (private school) newspaper. When Anna Lanson doesn’t respond, I will assume that it because she prefers lies to the truth.
Guest Editorial: A letter to journalist Bari Weiss
Thomas Schramm
March 17, 2021
Hi Ms. Weiss,
My name is Thomas Schramm, and I’m a high school senior at Harvard-Westlake. I’ve been a huge fan of yours over the past few years, especially in your dealings with Jewish issues. I have immense respect for you and for all the work you have done for the Jewish community, and I’ve seen you as an inspiration for my own Jewish activism during my time in high school.
I’m writing to you in regard to the article you just wrote about “Wokeism” at major private institutions within the U.S., and more specifically, the activism Harvard-Westlake has undertaken over the past year. The parents you spoke to have grossly misrepresented the school’s efforts to be more inclusive with their curriculum, and their incendiary assertions have little to no factual basis. I serve as a member of the Prefect Council at HW, our student government, and have been watching the school’s activism from the frontlines.
The “wokeathw” Instagram account that you cited in your article has harassed and targeted specific teachers and students who have made attempts to make the Harvard-Westlake community more inclusive and welcoming to students of color. They have used intimidation tactics in an attempt to get the school to stop their crucial efforts of diversity, equity and inclusion. I would argue they mirror the “All Lives Matter” movement that was born out of reaction to the BLM movement, as the “wokeathw” account was created after the “blackathw” account had gained traction and exposed racial bias that existed within the school. Every post on their account lacks context and can quickly be disputed by any student who attends the school. I would caution against using them as a source for anything regarding Harvard-Westlake.
The school has made encouraging dialogue its principal focus, and through its anti-racism speakers such as Wes Moore, they have made “courageous conversations” possible among students. The goal of their revamped curriculum, schoolwide events and anti-racist commitment is not to indoctrinate students; it’s to provide spaces for conversations that would never have been possible a year ago. And we haven’t only hosted speakers dedicated to anti-racism. We just recently hosted political commentators John Avalon and Margaret Hoover, who shared their perspectives on political polarization and the importance of compromise. Earlier in the year, Prefect Council hosted a political debate among students where we had two conservative students and two liberal/progressive students discuss current political issues facing the nation. Nuance and conversation have been the center of every school event this year, and it’s been extremely successful in getting students to actually step out of their comfort zones and share their perspectives on major political issues.
I wanted to address a number of the assertions made in your article, as they were deeply concerning and, frankly, untrue. The assertion that the school is promoting the idea that capitalism is somehow evil is entirely misguided. The photo you cited was a submission in the yearbook, a resource the school administration generally has little to no involvement in, and in no way communicated the position of the school. I would hope you agree that a student submission in a yearbook hardly equates to Harvard-Westlake “teaching students that capitalism is evil.” In fact, the school has a program called HW Venture which is entirely focused on promoting capitalism and entrepreneurship. Students may share their disdain for capitalism but that in no way makes the HW community at large a hostile environment to the ideology. It seems as though the parents you spoke to made a hasty generalization that doesn’t reflect the perspectives of the student body or the school administration.
The parents you spoke to have also created a false dichotomy, suggesting they have to entirely agree with the ideas put forward by the school or they will be hailed as racists. I can assure you that students have been challenging the ideas brought forward by speakers and by the members of the school administration all year long, and not only have they avoided the title of “racist,” but they have also been praised for their willingness to take part in such difficult conversations. Parents are also encouraged to come forward and take part in dialogue regarding the school’s curriculum and activism, but it seems as though the parents you spoke to lacked the courage to do so.
The other preposterous assertions that the school was somehow suggesting that “America is a bad country” and that white students must “bear collective guilt” hold no water. The school curriculum makes a concerted effort to provide nuanced perspectives when discussing the U.S. (the main example of this is the reading assigned in the AP United States History course, where students are assigned the works of both Zinn and Hofstader to ensure that multiple historical perspectives are included), and though they justly criticize actions taken by the United States, our country should never be immune to criticism. In regard to the collective guilt claim, the school has never suggested that white students bear any responsibility for systemic racism in the U.S., nor has the idea been entertained by any school-wide speaker we have had. What the school has done has allowed students of color to express their lived experiences, which white students (like myself) will never be able to fully comprehend. Just as non-Jewish students struggle to understand what it is like to grow up as a Jew in America, white students will never fully understand the lived experiences of students of color. We can’t just blind ourselves to skin color and all “just be wolverines”—that would undermine the equity the school is striving for.
I will admit, I was hesitant at first about the school’s devotion to anti-racism. Over the summer, I had multiple altercations online with friends who used “anti-racism” and “wokeism” as a cover for their own anti-Semitism. I was worried that the same issues may arise, and early on they did. Our first anti-racism presentation included a slideshow that celebrated the work of Tamika Mallory and Linda Sarsour. Immediately after the presentation was over, I sent emails to the Dean of Students along with the organizers of the webinar, and the school made sure to not only issue a public apology to the faculty and students but also had the presenter who praised Ms. Mallory and Ms. Sarsour return to the following anti-racism presentation and explain why their praise was offensive and wrong. They were unaware of the long history of anti-Semitism both of these figures had and were entirely willing to make amends. The school made it clear that mistakes will be made along the way, and they encouraged students to call them out if they were ever in the wrong. The school wants to make sure every single student feels safe and valued at the school, even if they disagree with the anti-racism work being done.
I’m sure that the parents you spoke with have good intentions and just want what is best for their kids, but they have little understanding about the reality of Harvard-Westlake’s work over the past year. It’s natural for people to fear what they don’t understand, and in such a time of political polarization, it’s easy to make oversimplifications that misrepresent situations. My intent is not to gaslight the concerns of these parents but to merely provide my perspective as a student at the school. The status quo at private schools around the country, where white students once dominated all aspects of life, is changing, and that’s a great thing. I am a white, centrist, capitalist, Jew; I should feel like an outcast, according to the parents you spoke to. Yet not only do I feel valued at the school, I feel as though I have a deeper bond with my fellow classmates because I’m now having conversations that let me understand more about my peers.
I was disheartened by your lack of student perspective in the article and wanted to share my own experience with “wokeism” and anti-racism on campus. I know Harvard-Westlake has had article after article written about the ‘radicalizing socialists’ who are indoctrinating the ‘elite of LA’ and I wanted to actually dispel the misinformation. I felt comfortable emailing you because you’ve been so instrumental in my development as a young Jew, and I see you as the Queen of Nuance who is always aware that there is another side to every story.
I would be willing to talk more about the reality of life on campus and even have you speak to other HW students about how the administration’s activism and efforts have impacted the on-campus culture. I can also provide speaker transcripts, emails and photos that back up my claims in this email.
I want to also make sure that you know that all of my opinions voiced here are my own and have absolutely no connection to the school whatsoever. I wanted to avoid making a comment on your website directly, partly because I didn’t want to make it seem as though I was somehow making a comment on behalf of the school and partly because I have a general rule not to make online comments to protect myself.
Hope you are staying safe and healthy, and thank you again for all of the inspiring work you have done!
Thank you,
Thomas Schramm
Harvard-Westlake ’21
End of letter.
I’ve looked very carefully for a response from Bari Weiss to this thoughtful letter and i couldn’t find it.
Anna Lanson, I am positive you will be able to find Bar Weiss responding just as thoughtfully to Thomas Schramm. If you can’t, you just made the pooint that you know that thoughtful replies to the anti-CRT view are met by people like you with silence or ad hominem attacks. Where is Bari Weiss reply?
Are you going to cancel Thomas Schramm for writing a thoughtful response?
LikeLike
Wow. This student should have his own column!
LikeLike
Anna is an authoritarian. Oops, a violation of Lanson rules.
LikeLike
Not content with the lunatic fringe in this country , you had to import an Islamophobe from the the UK. Whose organization peddled the same nonsense about British institutions of Higher ed.
Notice I did not say.
“racist, white supremacist, right-wing, Koch brothers,”
LikeLike
Good choice of link, Anna. Who funds the white faces at Unherd?
Douglas Murray, who a critic described as having the “bizarre fantasies of a right wing provocateur, blind to oppression”, is a grad of Eton, he’s white and male. Wikipedia quotes a NYT review of his work, “…Murray defends a German nationalist, anti-Islam, far right group, Pegida…”
LikeLike
Douglas Murray is also a senior fellow at the National Review Institute. Oh what a shock, he’s a right winger, a UK tighty righty.
LikeLike
Joe,
Anna Lanson… Jonathan Turley…what’s the difference?
LikeLike
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
LikeLike
I disapprove of your hair style, but I will defend your stylist to the death.
LikeLike
Actually, yes. Hair is part of personal identity and cultural identity.
LikeLike
read the linked essay [at Unherd] about the reality of the CRT campaign in education.
To other commenters, try to respond to this essay without resorting to the ad hominem that is a staple of this blog”
That’s called a plea for Unherd immunity.
LikeLike
Clever
LikeLike
I didn’t find the essay itself particularly perceptive: Murray perhaps because he’s across the pond (or just because he’s a crank) does a lot of cherry-picking & repeating stale media tropes to support his mighty-slim thesis. However, following the links in the essay back through related articles revealed what I have been looking for, one solid example of where in the K12 establishment CRT (or derivative/ imitator) has shown its face. [Sorry, one short-lived experiment in one 3rd-gr Cupertino CA classroom isn’t ‘solid’– & 2 or 3 parental laments re: ‘woke’ elite privates are sketchy at best, & regardless are irrelevant to the hoop-la taking place in red-run state legislatures.]
And here it is! Previous NYC Chancellor Richard Carranza in May 2019 using a risible power-point on “White Supremacy Culture,” “part of mandatory training sponsored and funded by the department’s Office of Equity and Access and recently administered to principals, central office supervisors and superintendent teams”: https://nypost.com/2019/05/20/richard-carranza-held-doe-white-supremacy-culture-training/
The power-point is a 20 yr-old excerpt of the far-from-scholarly work of ‘expert’ [read: busy consultant & equity gigger] Tema Okun. Matthew Yglesias delves here into the peculiar frequency with which it keeps popping up in non-profit trainings https://www.slowboring.com/p/tema-okun You can see it in either of these links. Hope they keep this kind of garbage at the admin level!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s a selection of video featuring the increasingly popular use of “affinity groups”—groups of people who are the same race or ethnicity—in K-5 education. Call it a facet if critical race theory, or social justice, or intersectionality, or wokeness, whatever. Do people think this ok?
LikeLike
FLERP!,
This video is 8 years old. Just imagine the harm that has already been done to those children! The 8 years of damage to those precious little minds. OMG they probably grew up to be those teenagers peacefully marching for BLM. If only they had been taught what superior white people wanted them to learn — that it is racist to mention racism in society because no one — and especially not police – see race in society and all Americans are treated exactly the same regardless of their race. And Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves and didn’t have a racist bone in his body. If you don’t agree, you are cancelled.
Don’t you want to post some more links to demonize more female educators?
Imagine this going on right under our noses for the last 8 years! No wonder there is still racism America. It’s the fault of anti-racist educators! Thanks for letting us know what you feel is very, very important. These precious children from 8 years ago. The real victims of racism in this country are white folks, right?
LikeLike
“Do people think this ok?”
It’s kind of stupid. Is it offensive? I guess I’m not as much of a snowflake as you are.
Do you think Dr. Seuss is okay? “One illustration shows an Asian man with bright yellow skin, slanted eyes, a pigtail and conical hat, holding chopsticks and a bowl of rice over the words “a Chinaman who eats with sticks.” Another depicts three Asian men in wooden sandals carrying a bamboo cage on their heads with a gun-wielding white boy perched on top, next to the rhyme, “I’ll hunt in the mountains of Zomba-ma-Tant / With helpers who all wear their eyes at a slant.”
Is that excerpt from Dr. Seuss okay?
Are you really more offended by some white students talking about affinity groups than by the racist content in Dr. Seuss that you demand remain in school libraries for the good of children?
Instead of linking to anti-CRT twitter feeds that demonize educators and specialize in manufacturing outrage, why don’t you try having a real discussion?
If that excerpt from Dr. Seuss more offensive than this video? If you don’t think so, that speaks for itself.
LikeLike
The increasingly popular use of infinity groups — groups of numbers which are the same level of infinity — among mathematicians is even more insidious (or is it infinitious)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yikes, FLERP! Everyone in this video – kids & their teachers – seem confused about what they’re trying to accomplish here. Looks like another example of importing experimental [& perhaps already obsolete 😉] corporate fads into the ed sphere (here, a private independent dayschool in Cambridge MA]—and also pushing down possibly-OK goals for late teens into age-inappropriate early grades. The kids seem to be ‘all right,’ but what a shame to waste early exploratory years promoting identity affinities.
LikeLike
Anna: it was remarkable that your editorial did not challenge any of the assertions of CRT, only questioning its motivation.
Historians do not talk like that. They question a specific or an interpretation.
Talk to me about facts. Talk to me about o interpreting those facts. Or just be silent.
LikeLike
Again, Ms. Lanson, before Repugnicans latched onto this phantasm with which to scare the morons in their base, pubic school teachers in the U.S. weren’t teaching “Critical Race Theory.” Almost none of them had even heard of this abstruse theoretical stance taken by a tiny, tiny number of people in academia. This concerted attack on CRT in state after state after state is very like the McCarthy attack on the supposed communists behind every doorway in the United States in the 1950s. It’s total BS being used to score political points and arouse the rabble, and you seem bright enough to know this. However, ideology before breakfast sticks to the eye, the modify Wallace Stevens’s wise observation.
This CRT stuff would be a nothingburger if it weren’t for the fact that Repugnicans have taken a nonexistent CRT curriculum around the country as an excuse to exercise Thought Control over curricula and pedagogy, making any honest account of the history of our country in our schools forbidden and requiring, instead, jingoistic indoctrination of the kind that one associates with totalitarian states.
Song of the Repugnican Legislator
As I was coming out of my lair
I met a curriculum that wasn’t there.
It wasn’t there again today.
We need the Thought Police, I say!
This making up of fake stuff to be worried about–George-Soros-backed caravans of murderous rapists, Jewish space lasers, Biden the Socialist (for crying out loud–this guy has been the bankers’ friend throughout his political career), Antifa, has become the standard modus operandi of the Trump Limbo Party, formerly the GOP. They learned all this from Glorious Leader Who Shines More Orange than Does the Sun, who was constantly talking about bogeymen–Socialists everywhere, fake news. The master of BS. In that, he actually is The Best. He is the Beethoven of Bllsht. And now the entire party is sounding like him.
Better watch out for that CRT!!! And that Antifa!!! CRT hogged the remote! Antifa ate the last of the Girl Scout cookies!!! George Soros is paying for space lasers!!!! Obama put chemicals in the water to make high-school kids transgender!!! CRT slept with my wife while I was out of town! (this last, not mine; I don’t remember who said it)
You know, Antifa, the organization that actually consists of TWO WHITE BOYS IN PORTLAND who like to dress up like Neo in the Matrix and go to protests and break things.
Now, it seems, ANY discussion in K-12 schools of race and the history of mistreatment due to race has suddenly become “CRT Theory,” which would be a surprise to CRT Theorists. LOL.
But that’s what the Repugnicans want. The goal is not actually removal of CRT from U.S. K-12 schools. It never was there in the first place. The goal is to drive out real education and replace it with a jingoistic fascist curriculum to offset the demographic changes and changes in the attitudes of young people that are in the process of making Repugnicans, at long last, the long national nightmare from which we soon will have awakened. The smarter Repugnicans (yes, there are a devious few) see the writing on the wall. That’s why they are working so hard to change curricula and to keep people from voting.
LikeLike
To the radical right wing “CRT” is like waving a red flag in front of a bull. Unfortunately, some individual teachers will likely be victims of potential witch hunts. Under the guise of patriotism “rooting out CRT” gives the right more reasons to attack public schools.
Truth gets lost in the midst of a culture war. The fact of the matter is that public schools are far more patriotic than most private schools. All major patriotic holidays are observed with respect in most public schools. Teachers are not teaching young people to hate our country as per #45’s bogus claim. Public schools strive to teach facts and critical thinking.
The reality is that despite all our flaws, bigotry and failures, we are still such a great nation that so many people are literally dying to get here. Whenever my children complained about an injustice in our country, I always told them that they were lucky just to have been born here. If laws are unjust, then we have to work to make them better and more just. Happy 4th of July!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make up a bogeyman to frighten the rubes. This is the lesson that Goebbels and Hitler taught and acted upon. And it’s what the Repugnican Party is doing now, on several fronts, using several bogeymen–CRT, Antifa, immigrant caravans, Socialism. I would venture that very, very few (three?) teachers in the United States had ever even heard of Critical Race Theory before all this nonsense started.
The same is true of the “Soros caravans” and Antifa. In the former case, nonexistent. In the latter, almost nonexistent (I joke that Antifa consists of two white boys in Portland who like to dress up like Neo from the Matrix and go to protests and break stuff).
But it gives professional rabble rousers of the ignorant like Tucker (with an F?) Carlson and the Late, Grating Rush Limbaugh raw meat for the beastlings.
LikeLike
Ooh-ooh that smell
Can’t ya smell that smell
Ooh-ooh that smell
The smell of Rome burning around us
Pin the tales on the donkeys
Blame, name, and shame
Stir the plot
It’s all for not
The factor max that distorted the facts
Is melting down
Ooh-ooh that smell
Can’t ya smell that smell
Ooh-ooh that smell
The smell of Rome burning around us
We can do the innuendo
We can prance and sting
When we’re done
We havent changed anything
Finger wag, loathe, and scold
Execrate, abominate, and hate
A fools garden fate
Ooh-ooh that smell
Can’t ya smell that smell
Ooh-ooh that smell
The smell of Rome burning around us
LikeLike
This is nothing more than a phony made up issue, red meat for the resident chauvinists and a campaign ploy for the GOP/Trumpists. Oh, those terrible teachers indoctrinating the kids with mathematics, language skills, the arts, music education, history, science, physical education, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s just so cynical that they decided to launch this right as public schools were grappling with post-covid.
They cannot be telling themselves that this benefits students. Spending the summer screaming at school boards about the phantom menace of critical race theory is a productive use of the 10 weeks schools have to prepare for next year?
I swear, it’s bad enough I could believe it was launched to actively harm schools and students as part of the continuing “public schools suck!” campaigns these folks run.
If they’re teaching “critical race theory” in elite private schools – and I don’t know that they are- why aren’t they attacking those schools? Why are public school students once again the losers in these political tactic games?
LikeLike
and on the public dime! We cannot have that….
LikeLike
Next thing you know they will be attacking teachers for teaching Critical Math Theory (1+ 1 = 2)
LikeLike
Click to access 1_STRIDE1.pdf
LikeLike
oops that was supposed to be just a link!
LikeLike
bethree,
That teacher education book has been cited so many times — if this is the most dangerous teacher training, it certainly doesn’t scare anyone who reads the whole thing.
There are some problematic sentences mixed in with some interesting and different perspectives for teachers to think about. I can find problematic or ridiculous sentences in all sorts of teacher training materials over the last 2 decades.
The double standard is that the other side doesn’t go perusing every textbook and teacher training manual used to find the ridiculous language (which frankly, can be found almost anywhere).
It took me 2 minutes to google to find the “UNICEF TEACHER MANUAL OF School-based and Classroom-based Activities to Support all Learners” from 2017.
On page 9: “Children are seen as rights holders, not as duty bearers.”
Page 40:
“School Activity 1: We and the world – working with preconceptions
Why is this important? Children reflect on ethnocentrism and eurocentrism ”
How long before the anti-CRT folks demand that we cancel UNICEF. How long before someone here posts a twitter link demanding that UNICEF be ended, all of their programs ended, because some powerful white right wingers say that their white children of European descent whose teachers are exposed to UNICEF are already being irreparably damaged! They will pass laws banning UNICEF. They will cancel UNICEF.
One side wants to have a conversation and the other side posts twitter links that demonize educators using misleading innuendo about how dangerous they are and how they need to be cancelled right now to save white children from a terrible fate.
Did you read all 183 pages of that manual that is simply a perspective that teachers can use to teach math that has the same kind of problematic language commonly found in those kinds of manuals – in this case it is about race but it could be about anything and often is.
LikeLike
No, didn’t read it, nycpsp. And didn’t realize this was already a hackneyed trope – just came across it myself & thought the idea of race-conscious math was hilarious (maybe not?) I don’t know that this item is actually being used anywhere, & it has nothing to do with UNICEF. It was developed by a group of CA math teachers/ consultants with equity-training experience/ interest, ESL, SEL. Have to admit my cynical reaction was, here we go, another intellectual fad requiring another slew of textbooks et al ed-industry materials to replace last year’s re-write per a different agenda.
LikeLike
Alleigh Marre quoted about a decade ago (MetroWest Daily News) – “Sen Scott Brown is simply fighting to make sure that religious organizations are not forced by Obamacare to violate their most deeply held beliefs.” As Rep. Ted Lieu recently pointed out, the “deeply held beliefs” include denial of women’s rights but, hypocritically, don’t stretch as far as the death penalty.
A reminder that Catholic organizations are the 3rd largest U.S. employer. The conservative Catholic SCOTUS ruled one segment of workers in Catholic organizations are exempt from protections provided in civil rights employment law and ruled taxpayers have to pay for Catholic schools.
The most recent SCOTUS ruling denies voting rights. The greatest impact is on the demographic that votes Democratic.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
I think Traitor Trump and his MAGA minions are behind the Republican “1984” style campaign to censor and silence teachers to control what children learn about racism had social justice. I think this is another attempt by Traitor Trump to hold on to political power and the flow of political contributions that he uses for other purposes, like his legal defenses against all the lawsuits coming after him and his criminal business enterprise.
LikeLike
Little-known fact: Joe Manchin was a garden gnome before becoming a U.S. Senator.
LikeLike
I thought he was the Manchinurian candidate
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Manchinurian Candidate!!! OMG! ROFLMSAO (the “S” is for “sweet”)
LikeLike
Have no fear.
La Man from la Manchin is here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are using the term “man” very loosely, I see.
LikeLike
Hahahahaha! I knew it. And this goes some distance to explaining the global garden gnome shortage. Thanks, Bob, for edifying my mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It takes one to gnome.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mark, just returning the favor. Readers of this blog, check out Mark’s SUPERB “Mark’s Text Terminal”–resources for teacher of English and special education
LikeLiked by 1 person
Make up a bogeyman to frighten the rubes. This is the lesson that Goebbels and Hitler taught and acted upon. And it’s what the Repugnican Party is doing now, on several fronts, using several bogeymen–CRT, Antifa, immigrant caravans, Socialism. I would venture that very, very few (three?) teachers in the United States had ever even heard of Critical Race Theory before all this nonsense started.
The same is true of the “Soros caravans” and Antifa. In the former case, nonexistent. In the latter, almost nonexistent (I joke that Antifa consists of two white boys in Portland who like to dress up like Neo from the Matrix and go to protests and break stuff).
LikeLike
These paranoid right wingers will do anything to stay in minority power. Eric Prince has been paid to infiltrate left leaning organizations. Shades of McCarthyism. https://www.npr.org/2021/07/01/1012107432/how-a-former-spy-trained-conservatives-to-infiltrate-progressive-groups
LikeLiked by 1 person
I saw the story about this prince of a guy. Aie yie yie!!!
LikeLike
I am continually mystified by how the WordPress algorithm decides to place something into moderation.
LikeLike
Could it have been the word “Goebbels”?
LikeLike
I don’t know. This is a great mystery, like the mind/body problem or why Trump is not in an institution for the criminally insane.
LikeLike
Kavanaugh?
I like beer?
LikeLike
Kavanaugh?
LikeLike
I like beer?
LikeLike
Nope, not it.
It’s definitely the mentioned of the K guy who likes beer that brings on moderation .
LikeLike
I apologize for exposing this blog’s readers to ideas that don’t conform to what they already believe. But the college-credentialed white liberals who comprise almost the entire audience for this blog will benefit from reading this takedown of CRT by a fierce critic of Donald Trump. Once again, try to respond with hurling the usual ad hominem.
https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/dont-ban-crt-expose-it-2d9
LikeLiked by 1 person
correction: WITHOUT hurling the usual ad hominem.
LikeLike
We’ll leave the ad hominem attacks to people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Kevin McCarthy, Jim Jordan, Lauren Boebert, Matt Gaetz, Paul Gosar, Louie Gohmert, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Mark Levin, the Trump clan, the ghost of Rush Limbaugh, etc., ad nauseam. Anyone who dares to disagree with a right winger is immediately labelled as a socialist, commie, Marxist-Leninist, America hater.
LikeLike
I apologize for exposing Anna lanson to ideas that don’t confirm to what “she” already believes. But the high school grads who hate everyone who attended their local state college will benefit from reading articles that aren’t written by famous conservatives who have frequently gotten in trouble for espousing racist views.
Anna lanson, are you more inclined to believe the racist view of someone because that person is a “fierce critic of Donald Trump?”
Why does being “a fierce critic of Donald Trump” make someone who promotes racist views okay in your book? That’s not an “ad hominem attack”, it’s a real question.
If decline to answer as to why you think that racists are okay as long as they are critics of Trump, then that speaks for itself. We don’t.
You are a fan of a “college-credentialed” white man who has espoused racist views, but you hate “college-credentialed white liberals”? I don’t get it. Do you only like those with “college credentials” if they espouse racist views? Do you also believe that some races have lower IQs, like Andrew Sullivan?
Funny how you hurl ad hominem attacks at college-credentialed people who aren’t racist, but admire college-credentialed folks who have racist views.
LikeLike
I believe the Latin phrase you are looking for is “ad Qanoninem”
LikeLike
Again, quite clever.
LikeLike
Too funny!
LikeLike
Are you absolutely sure you understand the concept of the ad hominem argument? Or the logical fallacy it describes? It doesn’t really look like it, you know?
LikeLike
LOL, Ms. Lanson, this is hilarious indeed. Before Repugnicans latched onto this phantasm with which to scare the morons in their base, pubic school teachers in the U.S. weren’t teaching “Critical Race Theory.” Almost none of them had even heard of this abstruse theoretical stance taken by a tiny, tiny number of people in academia. This is so like the McCarthy attack on supposed communists behind every doorway int he United States in the 1950s. It’s total BS being used to score political points, and you seem bright enough to know this.
LikeLike
Bob,
I usually write that 99% of teachers never heard of CRT. Your term—“almost none”—is even better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, you have been, throughout this, a consistent voice of sanity and insight. Thank you, Diane!
LikeLike
My teachers in the 1950s were silenced by extremist “Minute Women.” They would sit in the back of the classroom to take notes and make sure the teachers were “patriots.” The Minute Women were the female version of the John Birch Society. Sometimes they won control of the school board. .
LikeLiked by 1 person
My Lord, Diane! First I ever heard of these Minute Women in the classroom!!!!
LikeLike
I bet most teachers have heard of CRT, but they probably think it means old “TV” or “Computer monitor”
Ie, Acronym for Cathode Ray Tube
They might even wonder why the heck Republicans are up in arms about teaching about old screens.
LikeLike
Critical Race Theory in the public schools is as real as George-Soros-organized caravans, Jewish space lasers, and the wondrous heath effects of injecting disinfectants.
LikeLike
Anna: the reason you’re getting pounded on replies is because your tone is insulting.
Sullivan is wrong in supporting this kind of legislation, period. Politicians need to stay out of the classroom. The public conversation needs to be at the local board of ed level. However, I agree that liberal commentators (like conservatives) are framing this thing all wrong. Sure, CRT itself is a grad-level theory that doesn’t belong in the K12 classroom, but that characterization allows them to categorically deny it’s in the pubsch classroom now— sans research– which converts the argument to “conservatives inventing red-meat to rile up their culture warriors.” Exhibit A has already shown up for the K classroom in my town [will be posting about this separately below].
Sullivan’s parallel with early-grade religious-school curriculum is right on the money: they’re not teaching advanced theology to 5yo’s: “impenetrable academic discourse at the elite level is translated to child-friendly truisms, with the same aim — to change behavior.” CRT-based anti-racism concepts can be very binary, wrong-headed, and preachy when re-processed for young children, just like certain fundamentalist religious concepts, and equally have no place in a public classroom.
LikeLike
“the crusaders are targeting teachers who are suspected of teaching about racism and social justice.”
I believe it.
Recently, someone on this blog kept posting links to anti-CRT twitter feeds with perfectly nice educators talking about anti-racist teaching who were “caught on video”, with the twitter feed introducing the posted video with wildly misleading innuendo to attack those individual educators.
I doubt that they expected anyone to spend the time watching the entirety of the video of what these educators are saying (the videos are always excerpts chosen for maximum impact). The idea is that whatever out of context quotes the anti-CRT person posting the videos presents are supposed to manufacture outrage (and even violence) against these supposedly dangerous educators. After all, don’t our children need to be protected from them?
I actually took the time to watch what these educators said that was supposedly so dangerous and outrageous that they must be publicly attacked and silenced. It was mostly perfectly nice and thoughtful women educators explaining how they were going through the materials students were assigned to read to see what biases there were (like teaching students that the founding fathers – and especially Abe Lincoln – weren’t racist at all!) and add additional materials. There was really nothing at all scary about what these folks said. Nothing that made these ordinary women worth demonizing to get people to hate them. But that’s what the posts were designed to do.
It was the opposite of having thoughtful dialogue. It was what people do when they have no argument to support their racist views and just want to provoke outrage and hate. None of the women educators were “anti-white” nor were they trying to teach “all white children are to blame for historic racism”.
So given that I saw someone who posts on this board linking to those kinds of nasty anti-CRT crusaders’ twitter feeds that were clearly about demonizing individual teachers (none of whom had any real power), I can certainly believe that the idea is to make teachers scared. The real cancel culture has always been those on the far right and those who profess not to be on the far right but work hard to normalize and legitimize their view.
Is it at all credible that posting links to anti-CRT crusaders demonizing individual teachers wasn’t intended to demonize the teachers?
LikeLike
^^And we have more teacher demonization!
LikeLike
Copernicus brought the sun out of the dark, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium. Darwin brought humanity out of the dark with the theory of evolution, The Origin of the Species. George Floyd brought us out of the dark regarding racism, shedding light on the theory of critical race. All these events were historic markers of the progress of the human mind. They were revolutionary events, and revolutions do not take place without a price. I call to the stand Henry Drummond from Inherent the Wind:
In a child’s power to master the multiplication table, there is more sanctity than in all your shouted “amens” and “holy holies” and “hosannas.” An idea is a greater monument than a cathedral. And the advance of man’s knowledge is a greater miracle than all the sticks turned to snakes or the parting of the waters. But, now, are we to forgo all this progress because Mr. Brady now frightens us with a fable? Gentlemen, progress has never been a bargain. You have to pay for it. Sometimes I think there’s a man who sits behind a counter and says, “Alright, you can have a telephone, but you lose privacy and the charm of distance.” “Madam, you may vote, but at a price. You lose the right to retreat behind the powder-puff or your petticoat.” “Mr., you may conquer the air, but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will smell of gasoline.” Darwin took us forward to a hilltop from where we could look back and see the way from which we came, but for this insight, and for this knowledge, we must abandon our faith in the pleasant poetry of Genesis.
We must abandon our faith in the pleasant fiction of American idolatry. Until we do, George Floyd’s breath crying out for his mother will reverberate from sea to sea, rising in strength to become forever the blasting gale against our face.
LikeLike
The Desent of Man
It’s always desenter
From “Man at the center”
Who ends misadventure
Of human indenture
LikeLike
Beautifully said, SomeDAM! One of your most artful pieces!!!
LikeLike
Thank you, leftcoast, of reminding us of this extraordinarily appropriate passage from the GREAT play Inherit the Wind. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. So moving.
LikeLike
This has nothing to do with CRT. It’s about an elite-driven mob that just needs any vehicle whatsoever to use and “justify” whatever the grievance of the day is. And they do it under the guise of “education” because “education” has no effective, vocal, consistent constituency which can be rallied and speak effectively, grassroots or otherwise. CRT fits the bill.
LikeLike
They tried Dr. Seuss and that flopped. CRT is working well to in inflame white rage. Takes the mind off the GOP refusal to raise taxes on the 1%.
LikeLike
When Dr Seuss fails, you know you are grasping truffula trees.
LikeLike
Other than red meat for the base, it appears that at one point, there was a plan to tie CRT to teachers unions- the landing didn’t stick.
I’m guessing that Randi is getting more savvy at avoiding opportunities for the Koch network to smear by association.
LikeLike
The Daily Wire, a radically conservative American news and opinion website, has compiled a state-by-state list by of teachers who pledge to continue teaching about diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI.)
In OHIO, an Astroturf group called Parents Rights in Education (PRIE) is sharing the names of Ohio teachers and their districts.
Why are these misguided crusaders against diversity, equity and inclusion?
LikeLike
The sheriff of Sheffield Lake in Ohio is on video folding a coat to look like a KKK hood, writing KKK on a paper and placing it on the desk of a black employee who was relatively new to the department. An American Legion officer in Ohio cut the microphone of a speaker when his speech got to the part praising Black people for their role in the inauguration of the Memorial Day holiday. The Ohio Senate chair’s first cousin who is also a senator made racist comments in Senate hearings which led to his private employer firing him.
Many Ohio citizens have drifted toward greater racial prejudice. It was flamed by Trump and is regularly enflamed by Fox and right wing radio.
Why would religious radio networks provide airtime to the ed reform groups succeeding in the enactment of privatization policy first proposed by racist Georgia Gov. Talmadge? Why would the state conference of Sen. Huffman’s religion promote privatization?
LikeLike
teachers who pledge to continue teaching about diversity, equity and inclusion
Teachers have a strong ethical obligation to do precisely what these teachers have pledged to do
LikeLike
Based on the photo array, if the approximately 60 members of the Princeton Political Science Department were present at a meeting, Wilentz would only encounter 4 colleagues who are Black. The ratio of White professors who are at the associate or full professor promotional level compared to the assistant level, suggests little opportunity exists for new hires of any race, assuming variables remain constant.
LikeLike
The impenetrable wall that’s been erected to protect conservative religion by pretending opposition to CRT, public education, LGBTQ and women’s rights aren’t linked to right wing church organizations is counter productive.
Focus on the Family posted at Daily Citizen, 12-14-2020, “Schools Embrace Critical Race Theory”, “protect your child in the classroom”. The article references the Koch’s Heritage Foundation.
The public policy partner of FOF, the Family Policy Alliance, is in 38 states. The Family Policy Alliance posted about its “Statesman Academy…equips (the members) with foundational Christian world view training…essential skills for being effective in office.” FOF declared itself a church thereby gaining disclosure advantages.
Sourcewatch, in its Focus on the Family entry, describes a $50 mil. Koch expenditure on the Themis data base. It mentions James Bopp and the link to the Citizens United case (decided by a conservative Catholic majority on SCOTUS). The article identifies ties to the DeVos family
LikeLike
A large part—like 99.9%—of the CRT ruckus is funded by privatizers who want parents to distrust public schoools. Jennifer Berkshire said Twitter that the states where privatizers were most successful are the same states that are passing laws against CRT.
LikeLike
Nat’l Review reported yesterday that the NEA is spending close to $60,000 to learn about ant-CRT organizations.
One organization that is clearly anti-CRT is the Koch’s Heritage Foundation which was co-founded by Paul Weyrich who also co-founded the religious right. (Theocracy Watch)
Politically, CRT is bundled with cultural issue campaigns like the ones behind denial of LGBTQ rights and denial of women’s rights to control their own bodies.
Those who want to learn more about the attacks on public schools should read, “The new official contents of sex education in Mexico: laicism in the crosshairs”, at the Scielo site. The article is much broader in scope than the title indicates. It was written before the CRT controversy but, the same type of players are active in CRT opposition (e.g. Catholic Vote). The religious influencers matter because they have the structural organization and the conservative religious voters to convince legislators.
LikeLike
The birthers, the truthers, the climate deniers, and the CRT deniers all have a lot in common with the character that wrote “Springtime for Hitler” in The Producers. Actually, the real Hitler had his legal scholars studying United States law and state laws as models for the Nuremberg Laws. The U.S. was the place to look for laws permitting the subjugation and murder of Black, Native, and Asian Americans, starting in the 1790s. https://indiancountrytoday.com/opinion/nazi-germany-and-american-indians We really need to face up to the past.
LikeLike
Absolutely. And here is a great history of the stuff that Hitler consciously modeled from the U.S.:
LikeLike
IF Effective propaganda/marketing starts where
critical thinking (true vision) ends…
THEN Neutralizing the ‘merican NOT-SEE might
end the blind blundering.
Is the darkness lifted by regarding “them” as
intellectual and moral inferiors?
Does marginalisation promote the solidarity
needed to overcome stupefaction, secular stagnation,
or injustice?
Does slamming the ones that, sing out of tune, negate
the systemic political dysfunction?
POINT: Division, by any means, is a gift to the
ruling class.
LikeLike
I emphatically DO NOT agree. No change ever comes about except via negative social sanction supporting negative political sanction.
LikeLike
Example: when I was a kid back int he 1960s, it was COMMON for whites to tell racist “jokes.” Now, these are rare. Why? Because people started expressing their shock and horror and outrage, in no uncertain terms, when people said such stuff.
LikeLike
When I was a kid, racist jokes and derogatory references to Black people were common. Then there were Polish jokes, Italian jokes, Jewish jokes, gay jokes, jokes about disabilities. Begone with any mockery of people for who they are. Treat everyone with respect.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Young people don’t know how common these garbage was. The country was awash in it.
LikeLike
I was raised with those jokes, and I wasn’t even born until the 1970s. They were prevalent among my students when I became a teacher too, until just the most recent few years. The good news is that my students are changing for the better now, dropping the jokes from their conversations, and they are teaching me to change too. Virtually no young person in Los Angeles wants to be like Former President.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Everything having to do with race is now CRT. THis would be hilarious if it weren’t so freaking tragic. Those who don’t know history end up repeating it, and that’s just what the Repugnicans carrying out this charade want. They are scared out of their Klan suits by the facts that the demographics of the country are changing., and young people think that they are barely semi-erect. So, they have invented a ubiquitous CRT bogeyman–made it up–to try to effect erasure.
And it is our DUTY as educators to meet this attempt at thought control by doubling down, with our students, on precisely the stuff they don’t want us teaching.
LikeLike
leftcoast, I recently taught in Southern Florida, and I was really pleasantly surprised to find that my students almost all detested racism, had friends of other races, and thought that racists were just backward and stupid. This was true even though some of their parents were racist good ole boys or Karens and Chads. This was a truly inspiring experience, and I miss those great kids.
LikeLike
As noted above, CRT is poking its head up in my town’s K curriculum, now. Per local newspaper it appears parents were given a description of the book and a permission slip first, and there’s an ongoing discussion with an objecting parent that was reported late the night before the BofEd meeting, so they’re gathering info. Based on the timing [meeting held after last day of school], this appears to be a proposal for summer reading or perhaps Fall curriculum. I’m glad the schdistrict is asking parents first, and that Bd of Ed will broaden discussion to the community.
The book in question is written for ages 2 – 5: “Our Skin: A First Conversation about Race” by Megan Madison and Jessica Ralli (Isabel Roxas illustrator). There’s plenty of parent feedback at Amazon comments. Lots of high ratings, & all the negative ones can be nutshelled thusly: on the whole an excellent age-appropriate book except for a very unfortunate 2-3pp., causing those reviewers to advise against it entirely. About half of the negatives were from mixed-race families, various people of color, and residents of other countries. The pages most often cited/ photographed:
“A long time ago, way before you were born, a group of white people made up an idea called race. They sorted people by skin color and said that white people were better, smarter, prettier, and that they deserve more than everybody else.” Illustration is a lab with posters of different-shaped skulls and some bottles of chemicals, then a 19thC-looking white man hugging a skull-trophy with plaque “Most Beautiful Skull” and caption “Caucasian.”
“Racism is also the things people do and the unfair rules they make about race so that white people get more power, and are treated better, than everybody else.” Illustration shows white children running upstairs laughing, while an excluded black boy is crying at the base of the stairs, being hushed by a teacher [sign posted “Silence Please” – I guess this is the ‘rule’ being applied only to POC].
LikeLiked by 1 person
p.s. forgot to mention… You can see the toxic racist/ anti-racist discussion in some of the highly-positive reviews, where the writer advises others, if you object to this book then you’re a racist.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The danger of censoring any discussion of racism , Bethree, is far greater than CRT. Many states have passed laws banning the discussion of racism and sexism. History can’t be taught honestly with such censorship in place. Can a history teacher discuss slavery, Jim Crow, the Tulsa Massacre, de jure segregation, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Seneca Falls—without fear of prosecution? The Red states that pass these laws are emulating the Soviet Union and China. Can’t wait to see the new textbooks. They will be far shorter than current ones.
LikeLike
Diane, I absolutely feel politicians—legislature– have no place in this discussion whatsoever. And agree that censoring any kind of discussion of racism is more harmful than CRT: the teacher is there to choose, frame & guide topics for discussion. That doesn’t mean we can’t as educators talk about what makes for a good or bad selection.
This one bothers me perhaps inordinately as someone who has taught the 2-5 age group for 20 years in various PreK/K’s. Popular selections for pubsch K make their way right into the PreK’s. And it’s been my observation that kids don’t notice or differentiate by skin color until age 3 earliest, let alone use the word/ concept “race.” The illustration of kids laughing at [& teacher remonstrating] a crying boy will attract immediate attention & tons of Q’s from 3/ 4yo’s. Smart PreK teachers will move on w/a simple ‘it’s not nice to laugh at others’ or some such… others may belabor/ explain the accompanying text– yikes! Highly age-inappropriate. The page on how whites invented race to get power will mercifully fly right over PreK heads, but to me looks like a narrative for discussion by 13+, not a pronouncement for little kids.
Not sure how to view the potential that this becomes a public Bd of Ed discussion. I said I ‘liked’ it above, but I’m having 2nd thoughts. Mainly I’m disappointed that our smart and excellent faculty would have chosen this item.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you. Teachers should decide on what and how they teach. The department chair or principal can call them out if they go off the rails. Politicians and legislatures, however, are passing laws banning discussion of race at any grade level. That’s censorship.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly, Diane. This is an attempt to institute, in the United States, education and political indoctrination of the kind that one finds in totalitarian states.
LikeLike
bethree, you are right that it is important for educators to be able to discuss what makes a good or bad selection and point out when it seems problematic.
But it often seems to me that materials that in any way can be associated with CRT are often held up to standard that other materials don’t have to meet. Do educators peruse all the books that they have been using for the last 5 years in their pre-k and kindergarten classrooms for any references or pictures or content that is silly or problematic?
I’m not an educator, but as parents, we read one of Dr. Seuss’ more problematic books to our kid (Mulberry Street) and I was completely blind to how offensive some of the content was until years later, when someone pointed it out to me.
I think there is tons of content that is taught in schools or is part of teacher training that isn’t gone over by a fine-tooth comb and held to a near-impossible standard. Many books or teacher training would never live up to that standard. People who complained about Dr. Seuss years ago were ignored or belittled. Just like people who were offended by Billy Crystal’s impressions were ignored.
So yes, maybe some laughable or questionable content can be found in childrens’ books that attempt to deal with racism, or in teachers’ manuals that attempt to deal with racism, but similarly ridiculous content can very likely be found in many books we all read to our kids that we still haven’t noticed because those books aren’t perused for any possible imperfection. It should be talked about, but I rarely see discussion that isn’t infused with the undertone of “see, we told you CRT is bad”. (You aren’t saying that, but there are others who like to find some ridiculous example and use it to undermine all teaching about racism.)
LikeLike
“Do educators peruse all the books that they have been using for the last 5 years in their pre-k and kindergarten classrooms for any references or pictures or content that is silly or problematic?”
My experience is limited to a 10mi radius of central NJ, but it includes a about 15 schools [all PreK, many including all-day K] and 50 or so teachers. The schools ranged from urban to suburban, lower-mid-class to doctors’ & chemists’ kids [at a couple of employee daycares], nearly all well-mixed racially. And my answer is yes. Of course I can’t know their specific habits on book review, but the priorities I observed were universally #1 physical safety, #2 emotional comfort, #3 decorum/ rule-following– & rules emphasized kindness to others as strongly as ‘use your inside voice,’ ‘hands on your own body’ etc.
In this type of school, teachers are with kids for very long days, usually year-round, often for more than a year, so the bond tends toward maternal and protective. Reading materials are continually renewed and updated to retain interest. Early-childhood reading features mostly non-human characters, which leans toward universal content. Religious content was considered painstakingly (policies ranged from wildly inclusive to secularized Halloween plus Christmas/ Chanukah/ Kwanzaa). By the time I retired (June 2020), some were introducing S Asian & Chinese holidays (mostly via visiting parents). Racially: ‘visuals’ posted around the classroom featured all the races represented among students (or more); reading material seemed to have long ago been scrubbed of any dubious images [e.g., Seuss supposed no-no’s].
To summarize: all these schools were operating on the diverse/ inclusive premises of recent decades; none were promoting a racial message other than a subliminal ‘let’s all get along together.’ IMHO, this is the way to go for PreK through 2nd grade.
In 3rd one might want to begin sticking toe into water on racial discrimination as a phenomenon here that we’re trying to overcome. By 7th-gr & after, American and World History (unless whitewashed) will automatically raise issues of colonial slavery, white privilege, post-colonial/ post-Reconstruction racial oppression. Preparing teachers for those discussions may be necessary. CRT per se may well have a place in the 11th-12thgr history class as a historical narrative among others [like enlightenment, pragmatism, Marxism, post-modernism, American exceptionalism], depending on the level of history under students’ belts– at minimum for papers/ research.
LikeLike
BOth SIdeS!!
“maybe some laughable or questionable content can be found in childrens’ books that attempt to deal with racism, or in teachers’ manuals that attempt to deal with racism, but similarly ridiculous content can very likely be found in many books we all read to our kids that we still haven’t noticed because those books aren’t perused for any possible imperfection”
LikeLike
FLERP!,
Maybe think about taking your own advice and commenting less incessantly (but perhaps re-think your position that fewer words are always better. “BOth SIdeS!!” — really?)
FLERP, at least when you were incessantly posting links to Mythinformed MKE’s anti-CRT twitter feed, your disdain for educators trying to teach about racism was very clear.
Now I have no idea what point you are trying to make. Making snide comments – regardless of how few words you use – isn’t participating in a conversation. And that’s what this blog is supposed to be.
LikeLike
bethree5,
Thank you for the informative reply. And the schools you describe sound like they have already done a lot of work. If they are the norm now, it bodes well for public education! I haven’t been in a pre-k class in many years, and I didn’t realize so much careful consideration to make the curriculum more inclusive had been done already. Makes me happy to hear it.
LikeLike
So, any discussion of race is now CRT?
That is exactly what the know-nothing Repugnican Thought Police want to achieve.
LikeLike
Bob your comment has been sticking in my head asking for a reply. Of course I don’t think this yet my post conveyed that to you. So perhaps I like Republicans have been throwing a bunch of unrelated stuff into a mental CRT bucket, which can be a step toward censorship. I will get it sorted out as I learn more. What got my back up over this book was picturing my little students getting hurt feelings. One of the best features of these PreK/K’s is that the serendipity of location close to parents’ work cuts through our residential segregation: they spend earliest years with a broad mix of races/ cultures, many of them starting there as infants/ toddlers. These are their first friends. I hate the idea of their being introduced to seeing themselves in color groups before they really register it themselves, and especially that they would be told that certain colors act certain ways. Kids of 2-5+ think in very concrete terms and take everything personally.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I hate the idea of their being introduced to seeing themselves in color groups before they really register it themselves, and especially that they would be told that certain colors act certain ways.
Totally understandable, Ginny!
LikeLike
And thank you for the elaboration!
LikeLike
“Illustration shows white children running upstairs laughing, while an excluded black boy is crying at the base of the stairs, being hushed by a teacher [sign posted “Silence Please” – I guess this is the ‘rule’ being applied only to POC].”
That’s not a bad way that might help kids start thinking about privilege in a way that takes adults a long time to recognize. This is the kind of thing that happens all the time, not necessarily intentionally but because of implicit bias.
It’s really what BLM is all about. I remember the video of the 17 year old white kid who had just killed someone at a BLM protest walking down the street with his assault weapon and the police driving right by. He didn’t look dangerous at all to them. Even holding an assault weapon.
I remember the video of a teenager and younger child who had broken into someone’s house, raided their assault weapon stash, and were actively shooting at police. Police acted admirably, with amazing restraint despite having a teenager actually firing weapons directly at them. Even when they finally had to shoot the gun-wielding teenager, it was a shot to wound. Was I surprised the teen turned out to be white? Not really. That’s privilege.
Teachers always have favoritism, and often overlook bad behavior of kids they perceive as “good” and notice it when it is a kid that they perceive is “bad”. That isn’t racist per se. But denying the reality that those perceptions are influenced by race is as dishonest as denying the reality that the perceptions teachers may have of girls are influenced by their gender. Perceptions are also influenced by a lot of other factors but it seems to deny reality not to recognize how pernicious implicit racism is. Too many people seem to prefer to deny it rather than try to address it by talking about it.
LikeLike
Everything I write these days goes into moderation!!!
LikeLike
Interesting, isn’t it, what gets the undies of Repugnicans in a wad. When someone points out an example of racism or sexism or homophobia, this drives them CRAZY, and they go on and on and on about it. But when a black child is murdered for playing in a park with a squirt gun, SILENCE or, at best, “thoughts and prayers.”
What gets them riled up is a real TELL, isn’t it?
LikeLike
The most egregious racism means nothing to them, but any attempt to address the problem with racism, well that is just UNACCEPTABLE. That’s when they start doing their imitations of puffer fish.
LikeLike
OK. Yes. It was a toy gun, not a squirt gun, that got 12-year-old Tamir RIce killed.
LikeLike
The smarter Repugnicans (I know, in the age of the Trump Limbo Party, this is sort of an oxymoron, but there are many with a sort of low cunning) looked at the BM protests and these scared them half out of out of their robes made of bed sheets. Here’s the thing: the protests were almost entirely peaceful. They were nationwide. They were almost universally supported by young people. They attracted many millions of people of every station, race,ethnicity, etc, including suburban white Moms in yellow T-shirts.
And they realized that they had to do something to turn things back around., That;’s when someone in their ranks hit upon elevating this extremely obscure academic theoretical framework promulgated by a few scholars most folks had never heard of into some kind of omnipresent menace.
Purest fabrication of the “Jews are poisoning the wells” variety. But this kind of propaganda has always worked with a certain element of the population–the uneducated rabble of the kind that made up Hitler’s brownshirts.
LikeLike
cx: BLM protests
LikeLike
The CRT curriculum in U.S. K-12 schools is as imaginary as are Jewish space lasers.
Entirely fabricated.
The moral panic on the self-parodying right is simply the latest Repugnican Emmanuel Goldstein. The right-wingers of the Trump Limbo Party are always in need of a new subject for their two minutes hates.
For examples of those, see any outtake from any speech by Vlad’s Agent Orange, Donnie Dumbo,; any speech by House Hearthrob and Flor-u-duh Man par excellence Matt Gaetz; or any segment of puffer fish imitation by Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity,
LikeLike
I thought I might pull together my various blurbs about this CRT nonsense into one statement. I hope no one objects to my having done this.
The smarter Repugnicans (I know, in the age of the Trump Limbo Party, this is sort of an oxymoron, but there are many with a sort of low cunning) looked at the BLM protests and these scared them half out of their white bed sheet robes. The protests were almost entirely peaceful. They were nationwide. They were almost universally supported by young people. They attracted many millions of people of every station, race,ethnicity, etc, including suburban white Moms in yellow T-shirts. They called for change, real change, for a freaking change.
And the Repugnicans realized that they had to do something to turn things back around., What’s an oligarchical white supremacist to do when people are becoming educated? That;’s when someone in their ranks hit upon elevating CRT, this extremely obscure academic theoretical framework promulgated by a few scholars most folks had never heard of into some kind of omnipresent menace.
This was purest fabrication of the “Jews are poisoning the wells” variety, but such propaganda has always worked with a certain element of the population–the uneducated rabble of the kind that made up Hitler’s brownshirts.
The CRT curriculum in U.S. K-12 schools is as imaginary as are Jewish space lasers.
Entirely fabricated.
This latest moral panic on the self-parodying right is simply the current Repugnican Emmanuel Goldstein. The right-wingers of the Trump Limbo Party are always in need of a new subject for their two minutes hates. If you don’t get this allusion, go read Orwell’s 1984. I mean it. Go read 1984. Now.
For examples of those two minutes hates, see any outtake from any speech by Vlad’s Agent Orange, Donnie Dumbo,; any speech by House Hearthrob and Flor-u-duh Man par excellence Matt Gaetz; or any segment of puffer fish imitation by Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity,
Make up a bogeyman to frighten the rubes.
This is the lesson that Goebbels and Hitler taught and acted upon. And it’s what the Repugnican Party is doing now, on several fronts, using several bogeymen–CRT, Antifa, Soros-funded-caravans of rapists and murders, Biden the Socialist (LMAO). I would venture that very, very few (three?) teachers in the United States had ever even heard of Critical Race Theory before all this nonsense started. Now, every freaking Repugnican state is passing Thought Control legislation to stop CRT (actually, any discussion of the sad, sickening history of race in America) in our schools.
What’s true of CRT in U.S. K-12 schools, that it never existed there, is true of the “Soros caravans” and Antifa. In the former case, nonexistent. In the latter, almost nonexistent (I joke that Antifa consists of two white boys in Portland who like to dress up like Neo from the Matrix and go to protests and break stuff).
Song of the Semi-erect Repugnican Legislator
As I was coming out of my lair,
I saw a curriculum that wasn’t there.
It wasn’t there again today.
Thought Police we need, I say!
LikeLike
Revised:
Song of the Semi-erect Repugnican Legislator
As I was coming out of my lair,
I saw a curriculum that wasn’t there.
It wasn’t there again today.
I wish smart people would go away.
Thought Police we need, I say!
LikeLike
BTW, if you are part of the Repugnican crowd making a Big Deal of the totally imaginary teaching of Critical Race Theory in our K-12 schools (no one, or almost no one, ever did that), and if you also claim not to be a racist, ask yourself, why does THIS particular issue, of all possible issues, get you all riled up?
Also, consider the fact that in making a Big Deal of this, you are keeping company with racists–with actual, overt, unapologetic racists, and with Nazis–actual, overt, unapologetic Nazis. You might want to be asking yourself why you and the Nazis have common cause.
LikeLike
” Ye shall know them by their fruits.” –Matt. 7:16, KJV
LikeLike
On CRT:
LikeLike