Lelac Almagor teaches fourth grade in a charter school in Washington, D.C. The following article appeared in the New York Times.
She writes:
Our prepandemic public school system was imperfect, surely, clumsy and test-crazed and plagued with inequities. But it was also a little miraculous: a place where children from different backgrounds could stow their backpacks in adjacent cubbies, sit in a circle and learn in community.
At the diverse Washington, D.C., public charter school where I teach, and which my 6-year-old attends, the whole point was that our families chose to do it together — knowing that it meant we would be grappling with our differences and biases well before our children could tie their own shoes.
Then Covid hit, and overnight these school communities fragmented and segregated. The wealthiest parents snapped up teachers for “microschools,” reviving the Victorian custom of hiring a governess and a music master. Others left for private school without a backward glance.
Some middle-class parents who could work remotely toughed it out at home, checking in on school between their own virtual meetings. Those with younger kids or in-person jobs scraped together education and child care — an outdoor play pod or a camp counselor to supervise hours of Zoom classes. With schools closed, the health risks and child care hours didn’t disappear. They simply shifted from well-educated, unionized, tax-funded professional teachers to hourly-wage, no-benefit workers serving only those who could afford to pay.
The families with the fewest resources were left with nothing. No child care, only the pallid virtual editions of essential services like occupational or speech therapy.
If they could work out the logistics, their kids got a couple of hours a day of Zoom school. If they couldn’t, they got attendance warnings. In my fourth-grade class, I had students calling in from the car while their mom delivered groceries, or from the toddler room of their mom’s busy day care center.
Home alone with younger siblings or cousins, kids struggled to focus while bouncing a fussy toddler or getting whacked repeatedly on the head with a foam sword. Others lay in bed and played video games or watched TV. Many times each day, I carefully repeated the instructions for floundering students, only to have them reply, helplessly, “I’m sorry, I can’t hear you,” their audio squealing and video freezing as they spoke.
Even under optimal conditions, virtual school meant flattening the collaborative magic of the classroom into little more than an instructional video. Stripped of classroom discussion, human connection, art materials, classroom libraries and time and space to play, virtual school was not school; it was busywork obscuring the “rubber-rooming” of the entire school system.
Some educators sneered that the parents who complained just wanted free babysitting. But I’m not ashamed to say that child care is at the heart of the work I do. I teach children reading and writing, yes, but I also watch over them, remind them to be kind and stay safe, plan games and activities to help them grow. Children deserve attentive care. That’s the core of our commitment to them.
I am still bewildered and horrified that our society walked away from this responsibility, that we called school inessential and left each family to fend for itself. Meanwhile nurses, bus drivers and grocery workers all went to work in person — most of my students’ parents went to work in person — not because it was safe but because their work is essential. Spare me your “the kids are all right” Facebook memes. Some children may have learned to do laundry or enjoy nature during the pandemic. Many others suffered trauma and disconnection that will take years to repair.
I don’t know the first thing about public health. I won’t venture an opinion on what impact the school closures had on controlling the spread of Covid. What I do know is that the private schools in our city quickly got to work upgrading HVAC systems, putting up tents, cutting class sizes and rearranging schedules so that they could reopen in relative safety. Public schools in other states and countries did the same.
More of our public school systems should have likewise moved mountains — repurposed buildings, reassigned staff, redesigned programming, reallocated funding — to offer consistent public schooling, as safely as possible, to all children.
Instead we opened restaurants and gyms and bars while kids stayed home, or got complicated hybrid schedules that many parents turned down because they offered even less stability than virtual school. Even now, with vaccinations rising and case rates dropping, some families remain reluctant to send their kids back to us in the fall. I can’t help thinking that’s because we broke their trust.
Does virtual learning work for some kids, in some circumstances? Sure. So does home-schooling, or not attending school at all. But I am profoundly relieved that most districts, including my own, plan to shut down or restrict the online option.
I hope this means that we are renewing our collective commitment to true public education. Just as before, we will have to fight to make our schools safer, more equitable and more flexible. Just as before, coming together will be messy and complicated. Children, families and teachers will all need time to rebuild relationships with our institutions.
But we’ll be back together, in the same building, eating the same food. We’ll find that the friend who helps us in the morning might need our help in the afternoon. We’ll have soccer arguments at recess and patch them up in closing circle. We’ll sing songs, tell stories, plant seeds and watch them grow. That’s schooling in real life. That’s what public school is for.
Lelac Almagor (@MsAlmagor) is in her 18th year of classroom teaching.
The pandemic uncovered inequities in the system, no doubt, but this article skirts over the issue of public health with a simple disclaimer. Very few of us who work in public education have degrees in public health, but it doesn’t take a research scientist to understand that schools are viral super-transmission sites even without a potentially deadly airborne virus. This article is obviously short-sighted when it come to the POV of the families that lost people to COVID. Many inner city schools that fit the description of parents who struggled to make virtual learning work for their children were also in communities ravaged by the virus. It is possible for both sides of the issue to be taken into account, but it did not happen here.
I agree wholeheartedly with you. My wife and I are retired educators. We have two grandchildren living in our home – one who attended kindergarten online and a 2 year old with a heart condition who we absolutely need to keep protected. There was no way we weee sending one to sit in a classroom and be exposed to a deadly virus that is airborne. Classrooms are notorious for having poor circulation and are disease spreaders even in. normal times. Our kindergartner went the whole year without so much as a sniffle – something far different than his year in preschool. Although I understand where this teacher was coming from, she certainly did overlook, or dismiss, a large segment of society.
“disclaimer” — a word likely to describe much in the coming years
It’s a passionate defense of public education, which is sorely needed, because there’s a huge and well funded “ed reform movement” who not only don’t defend public education, they don’t even know the value of the existing system that they’re throwing away.
Here’s an ed reform plan for “reinventing public education”:
“Charter teaching: States could turn the economics of public education on its head by allowing teachers to operate in private practice. Certified teachers could apply to states or school districts for the right to do what some learning pod leaders did during the pandemic: Market their services to groups of families online, and operate classes in living rooms, public buildings, or rented spaces. These teachers could receive a flat funding rate for students who enroll—say, 90 percent of the state’s average per-pupil cost. The state and the school district could retain a portion of the funding for oversight and other overhead. Local school districts could still offer some support, like special education services, and receive funding accordingly. Existing district curricula or free online resources like Khan Academy (which often provided crucial support to teachers leading learning pods) make it easier than ever for teachers to go it alone and still plan lessons aligned to widely used curriculum standards.”
The plan is everyone take their individual “90%” of funding and purchase educational products and services for their individual child. It’s yet another voucher scheme. They’re all voucher schemes, because privatizing public education won’t work unless funding is changed into vouchers.
The only thing “public” about ed reform ideology is the funding. It’s public dollars. That’s the only public part.
“Even under optimal conditions, virtual school meant flattening the collaborative magic of the classroom into little more than an instructional video. Stripped of classroom discussion, human connection, art materials, classroom libraries and time and space to play, virtual school was not school; it was busywork obscuring the “rubber-rooming” of the entire school system.”
But ed reformers tell us over and over that schools are just “buildings” and we need to fund “students instead of systems”. You’ll all take your low value voucher and craft a “school experience” from an “Amazon marketplace” of edu-product.
They’ll “unbundle” the best teachers and then show videos of the best teachers to class sizes that number in the hundreds. This is called “scaling”.
If we continue to allow this echo chamber to run public education we deserve what what we get- and we will get gimmicky junk that didn’t come out of “education” but instead came out of 1990’s business management theory.
We would literally be better off if we let the teacher who wrote this op ed set education policy- she at least understands what schools are and the basic concept of “public education”.
These libertarian ideals seek to turn teaching into a gig like Uber or Lyft. Why any skilled and trained teacher would settle for such a small return on their education investment is beyond me. Many powerful people want to trash teaching as a profession, and they have been nibbling away professionalism for years through TFA, Relay and other “alternative” preparation programs. Alternative is not equivalent, but those that endorse it don’t care. These schemes are designed to turn teaching into a low wage, low value gig. The wealthy do not care about quality as their own children will continue to get a world class private education, but taxes for the rich will be even lower.
While COVID has shown that in-person learning is far superior, there are plenty of groups including politicians that continue on the path to dismantle public education. DeSantis is mandating hybrid instruction in Florida despite the fact there is no evidence behind it.
Follow the $$.
You are right that deprofessionalization of teaching is the Common Core of pretty much all deform .
Bill Gates and others have always envisioned a (de)personalized system in which the teacher is first reduced to software technical help and then eliminated altogether.
Not sure why anyone ever bought all the other diversionary claims made by folks like Gates.
From Lelac Almagor’s article: “They simply shifted from well-educated, unionized, tax-funded professional teachers to hourly-wage, no-benefit workers serving only those who could afford to pay.” end quote
Lelac’s charter school is unionized? Very unusual and rare. Wasn’t the charter school experience different from the real public schools? Just wondering.
I live in MD (just outside of DC). Yes, Charter schools in the MD/DC area are unionized and hire professional teachers. They also use TFA (I believe that they can only have a % of TFA working in the schools?). The Teacher’s Union maintains a control here that other states don’t have. It’s a very strange arrangement.
Thank you for the facts. Amazing and quite different from the situation in the states and here in NJ.
The charter schools in Baltimore City are unionized too. There is still a lack of transparency & accountability. Still the same problems when they started, more marketers than educators. For example, inflated salaries of “founders” show up for anyone who cares to look at Pro-publica’s Charity Watch database. These edu-preneurs have long since moved away, like carpetbaggers usually do, yet are still paid A LOT, with their hand-picked boards just shrugging it off, I guess.
“Wasn’t the charter school experience different from real public schools?” They haven’t done better, no. A distinction without a difference. I’d ask the author of this article to ask her school, shouldn’t we have done better?
Let’s not forget that charter schools claimed they’d be more agile, free of the burdensome oversight of a central office. They, like the private businesses they are, took BILLIONS in PPP money to pad their bottom line.
Actual public schools have had to make do, & mend.
Where’s the innovation we were promised?
The big “innovation” is that the public lost democratic control over their schools. The ownership was transferred from being a public asset to privately owned entities that ship boatloads of cash out of their community. The schools and students are monetized in order to generate profit for privately owned corporations. If strip mining the public schools was the primary goal, then it’s “mission accomplished.”
The problem is that the other option, taken in my state, was to just open everything up and expose teachers and students to a deadly virus for months on end. So many students and teachers got sick. A few died. Many others are dealing with Long Covid. Families were exposed and got sick. No option was good in this mess.
My grandkids thrived during the remote learning period, but they had a tiger Mom-type mother deeply involved in what they were doing from moment to moment in their online classes and offline homework who supplied them with books and continual enrichment, and they had me to come to for homework help and tutoring. A lot of kids didn’t. This has been tragic. I mean as tragic as state standardized testing has been, and that crap has brought about a dramatic devolution in U.S. curricula and pedagogy. Really, really bad.
But having a lot more people die because we kept schools open would have been pretty terrible too, n’est-ce pas?:
From the beginning, this was the case: We needed to use the Defense Production Act to create N95-style masks for ALL kids and universal testing for everyone in schools and under those conditions and ONLY UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS, reopen. This could have been done fairly quickly, but we had a parallel epidemic of CLUELESSNESS and a strutting, ignorant moron–the Orange Idiot–in charge of everything. His malfeasance cost a lot of lives.
cx: a parallel epidemic of CLUELESSNESS and MAGICAL, WISHFUL THINKING
And as usual in America, ofc, the bulk of the burden of this pandemic was born by poor folks and by members of racial and ethnic minority groups
Yes. It took money and resources to keep schools open this year. I was fortunate to work in a district that was able to come up with the resources to do so.
This is a well written plea for the need for, and purpose of public schools. But as others have mentioned, schools can be super spreaders. After the first months of the pandemic (which were horrible for many hospital staff)… nurses and doctors had proper PPE and knew when a Covid case was in their midst.
Workers at grocery stores do not interact directly with people for more than 5 minutes. They are able to be socially distanced in a very large space.
Working in-person last year, even with everyone masked up and class sizes reduced, we had a few scary months with cases popping up all around our school and not knowing whether or not the children (who it was impossible to stay distanced from) were infected.
If all schools, even those that were not able to provide the resources to reduce class size and provide PPE, were forced to be open – there would have be more spread and serious illness.
I do not ever want to hear another person tell me I should do “blended learning”. That putting class online is not acceptable practice must be one of the many lessons of the pandemic.
We need to stop buying laptops and start buying new, culturally relevant books for school libraries. If we don’t, we learned nothing this year.
Mandating blended learning is one more impingement on academic freedom. Teachers did quite well before all this technology was available. I’m not against using technology, but it should be teachers that decide when and how it is used.
Blended Learning
Stick the students in the blender
Blend em till they’re really tender
Give to them a Google task
Better than in person class
I’m a traveling school nurse in a city that was solely virtual over the winter this year and hybrid at other times . I technically work for the health department. While kids weren’t in school, I was either contact tracing, doing phone triage, vaccinating or testing. We were back at work for any school that opened as the city is obligated to cover both private and public schools.
You know what I saw private schools that “successfully” remained opened dining differently? Lying and denying. There was no extra mitigation or fixed ventilation. Like the public schools, they just opened the windows in appropriate weather. There was no routine testing. Parents were taken at their word while their children spoke of going out of state over the weekend, parties they attended, and the cousins who slept over. Tuition was more important than spread. While some classes were quarantined at times, administration went to great lengths to keep the school from closing no matter how defeated and worried teachers were.
I’m not saying public schools were perfect. They weren’t, though I truly believe our administrators put health foremost in their buildings and badgered central office out of their bubble to do the right thing when necessary. A small few private schools were methodical in favor of remaining open, but most simply didn’t want to know who had positive or exposed family members. Avoid, ignore, turn a blind eye.
The author is correct that inequities were exposed in the pandemic and this could be a time to figure out what we can do better. But like many charter and private school supporters she is blaming the wrong people. The schools didn’t break the community’s trust. Teachers in public schools know very well from experience not to trust bean counters in central office, self-interested politicians or hostile BOE members. Yet here they are getting blamed again for stuff out of their control by frustrated wealthy parents and snake-ish privatizers.
Also, I will not spare you “the kids will be alright” mantra. In the grand scheme of things, they will be great as long as we take care of them. Maybe we should ask ourselves what kind of society we are if kids are being so damaged by staying home with their families.
Thank you for your insight and your unique perspective seeing both private and public school situations in your area. You should write an op ed about your experience. Although I know that would be putting yourself out there.
“Maybe we should ask ourselves what kind of society we are if kids are being so damaged by staying home with their families.” ~ spot on.
I like this paean to public schooling. It’s nice, after so many low-info politically-slanted NYT ed articles, to get a peek into a regular classroom from a regular teacher. DC is 50% charter schools (and they actually serve the same+ % of SpEd/ poor), so we’re hearing from someone within that particular city’s mainstream. Especially welcome, after so many bitter comments that teaching is ‘just baby-sitting’: “I’m not ashamed to say that child care is at the heart of the work I do… Children deserve attentive care. That’s the core of our commitment to them.”
I wish we heard this more often: “With schools closed, the health risks and child care hours didn’t disappear. They simply shifted from well-educated, unionized, tax-funded professional teachers to hourly-wage, no-benefit workers serving only those who could afford to pay.” Her examples gave the ‘health risk’ part context: kids logging in from Mom’s essential-work location which was often as not a risky place to be.
“… we called [in-person] school [i.e. child care] inessential and left each family to fend for itself… we opened restaurants and gyms and bars while kids stayed home…” “We”– not teachers unions, not liberal covid wimps. “We” is govt—its lack of social vision and political will. The opening of inessential in-person services in densely populated cities while keeping school buildings closed: this deserves a whole different close look than it has been getting in the media and in the government
This, I think, is wrong, re: some families reluctant to send kids back in the fall: “I can’t help thinking that’s because we broke their trust.” Poor and black/ brown families (a significant % of DC residents) were hit much harder by covid, and this reluctance is reported nationwide, with only 20-30% willing to return even when community spread dipped below 5/100k. If she means we, society/ govt, broke their trust, I doubt if they had any to begin with.
Kids are resilient.