Other nations have figured out that the best way to reduce gun violence is to impose many barriers to buying a gun: background checks, registration, waiting period, training, proof of a locked safe where the gun will be stored, as well as restrictions on when the gun may be carried.
Texas’ Republican leadership has decided to do away with all those obstacles that interfere with the citizen’s right to bear arms (they always forget the part of the Second Amendment that says, “as part of a well-regulated militias”)
The Texas legislature has passed a bill that allows anyone to carry a handgun without registering it.
NPR reports:
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas is poised to remove one of its last major gun restrictions after lawmakers approved allowing people to carry handguns without a license, and the background check and training that go with it.
The Republican-dominated Legislature approved the measure Monday, sending it to Gov. Greg Abbott, who has said he will sign it despite the objections of law enforcement groups who say it would endanger the public and police.
Gun control groups also oppose the measure, noting the state’s recent history of mass shootings, including those at an El Paso Walmart, a church in Sutherland Springs, and a high school outside Houston.
Texas already has some of the loosest gun laws in the country and has more than 1.6 million handgun license holders.
Supporters of the bill say it would allow Texans to better defend themselves in public while abolishing unnecessary impediments to the constitutional right to bear arms. Once signed into law, Texas will join nearly two dozen other states that allow some form of unregulated carry of a handgun, and by far be the most populous.
The National Rifle Association was among those supporting the measure, and a spokesman called it the “most significant” gun-rights measure in the state’s history.
“A right requiring you to pay a tax or obtain a government permission slip is not a right at all,” said Jason Ouimet, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action.
Texas already allows rifles to be carried in public without a license. The measure sent to Abbott would allow anyone age 21 or older to carry a handgun as long as they don’t have violent crime convictions or some other legal prohibition in their background. But there would be no way to weed them out without the state background check currently in the licensing process.

Maybe the idiots will all shoot each other.
LikeLike
The Texas cowboys are living into their past as glorified in the movies of my teenage years long ago! They are as deficient in wisdom and the capacity to care about providing a safe and civilized life space for fellow citizens. They need to get out of public “service” through the work of voters. Guns must be controlled and taken out of the free reach of those who shoot up community after community – over 230 mass killings so far this year in our Nation. The 2nd Amendment does not support these lawless and dangerous decisions. Down with them and down with the NRA. Maurice
LikeLike
All my hexes live in Texas.
That’s why I hang my hat in CT.
LikeLike
No joke. Say what you will about us, but I bless my lucky stars that I was born, raised, and reside in the NE US.
I am still waiting though for the obituary for the failed Libertarian state of Texas.
LikeLike
The right wing is conducting a red state “smash and grab” to institutionalize narrow minded, regressive laws. Ridiculous gun laws are part of their plan. Laissez-faire lunatics are leading the Republican party.
LikeLike
I like that phrase “laissez-faire lunatics.”
LikeLike
This week, Lebanon, Ohio, passed a local law prohibiting abortions within the city limits. An attorney told the city commissioners that it was illegal. Republicans, the “rule of law” party, didn’t care.
In Ohio, a few years ago, anti-abortionists with views like those in the Capital on Jan. 6 began to run for local office and won e.g. local school boards. But, don’t form the wrong conclusion, it was all about billionaires and nothing to do with religion.
LikeLike
Dear Diane,
I liked you better when you were a Historian, not an opinionist.
Nor can I argue in favor of the political faction running rampant in Texas.
But, I did find the link below more interesting and informative than your personal opinion, which appears to have intentionally left out the rest of the story.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt2-1/ALDE_00000408/
And you are wrong about Texas forgetting “a well-regulated militia,” see: https://tmd.texas.gov/
LikeLike
This blog represents my personal opinion in almost every single entry. I decide what to include and what to ignore. That’s a personal opinion. It’s my opinion that Texas is making a horrendous mistake by removing background checks and every other form of gun control. Texas is my native state. I am ashamed to admit it when the state is led by fools like Greg Abbot, Dan Patrick, and Ted Cruz.
LikeLike
Quote: The Gun Lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word fraud, on the American People by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies – the militia – would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires. end quote – Warren Burger, Conservative Supreme Court Chief Justice
Will we ever have sanity in this country as regards guns? Not with the GOP and the gun nutters who love their guns more than life itself. It’s sickening and disgusting beyond words.
LikeLike
Actually the real purpose of the Second Amendment was to insure that the slave states would have control over their militias . The constitution called for a standing Navy but not a standing Army. In place of a standing Army Madison originally called for a Federally Controlled Militia.
This was unacceptable to Patrick Henry and George Mason and the Southern Colonies.
“If the country be invaded, a state may go to war, but cannot suppress [slave] insurrections [under this new Constitution]. If there should happen an insurrection of slaves, the country cannot be said to be invaded. They cannot, therefore, suppress it without the interposition of Congress. Congress, and Congress only [under this new Constitution], can call forth the militia.”…
“I see a great deal of the property of the people of Virginia in jeopardy, and their peace and tranquility gone.”
It is at this point I start cursing .
I did get a 90 day sentence in Facebook jail for commenting” the damn Mexicans had to lose that war” Implication leaving us with Texas .
LikeLike
I think several other states have similar laws, although Texas is by far the biggest.
LikeLike
Wow, the list of states (20) is a lot longer than I thought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_carry
LikeLike
I’m 54 years old – was born and raised in Canada – and now reside here. I have never once in my life ever even touched a gun making me quite the minority in today’s America.
LikeLike
To the contrary you are in the large Majority. Only 40% of households own guns. Only 22% of individuals . Of those many own simply a hunting rifle or shot gun . A small minority own vast amounts of hand guns and Military assault style weapons. I’ll stop there as to what should be done about that.
LikeLike
Why doesn’t Texas just secede and spare the rest of the country their endless nuttery?
LikeLike
I for one would not object.
LikeLike
There are lots of good, decent, smart people in Texas, but those in power are not those people. Many northerners and Californians are moving to the state for job opportunities. It is a matter of time before Texas becomes a purple and potentially a blue state. The “good ole boys” network is making a Hail Mary attempt at stopping progress. Their days are numbered, and they feel it. That is why they are pushing their regressive, anachronistic agenda so hard.
LikeLike
Texas has been talking about seceding almost since the Constitution was ratified.
Or maybe they are just talkers, not doers. They do seem to do a lot of talking. That’s for sure.
LikeLike
Every state has its nutty people. Texas is a gigantic state that probably more than a few crazies. A group made up of former “moonies” and good ole boys that worship guns bought a 40 acre compound in Texas. https://www.vice.com/en/article/y3dp8j/gun-church-that-worships-with-ar-15s-bought-a-40-acre-compound-in-texas-for-its-patriots?utm_source=vicenewsfacebook
LikeLike
Unfortunately the crazies in Texas control state government.
LikeLike
There is a reason people like Dumbya Bush, Toad Cruz and Rick Perry get elected (and reelected) Sane people don’t elect crazies.
LikeLike
What could possibly go wrong?
LikeLike
Imagine the road rage incidents.
LikeLiked by 1 person
OMG yes
LikeLike
Funny you should mention it, Diane: when I saw this post for the first time, for some reason, I thought of a road rage incident in Florida involving George Zimmerman, the murderer of Trayvon Martin. As Raymond Chandler once had his surrogate Philip Marlowe say in “The Big Sleep,” “My my my, such a lot of guns around town and so few brains.”
LikeLike
Texas is off of my list of states I’d like to visit one day. I’ve already been there a couple of times a few decades back, and now I do not plan to return. In fact, I will not step foot in any state that has stand-your-grown firearm laws allowing people to legally commit murder in public with a defense that they feared for their lives even when the person they murdered didn’t have a firearm.
Until the republicans lose Texas and sanity returns to the state’s elected government, I will think of that state as another country ranked up there on a no-go list with North Korea ranked #1.
As long as red states like Texas with stand your ground laws exist, I don’t think it will be safe for someone from a hard-core blue state to drive through them unless you fly into the red state and rent a car.
If Traitor Trump avoids prison and poverty and runs for president in 2024 and for sure loses the election, Texas may join with some of the other MAGA-led red states that may leave the union to fall in line behind their Deer Leader Traitor Trump and they will call their break-away kleptocratic dictatorship Trumpistan.
This is how insane the Republican Party has become: A stand-your-ground law (sometimes called “line in the sand” or “no duty to retreat” law) provides that people may use deadly force when they reasonably believe it to be necessary to defend against deadly force, great bodily harm, kidnapping, rape, or (in some jurisdictions) robbery or some other serious crimes (right of self-defense). Under such a law, people have no duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense, so long as they are in a place where they are lawfully present. Stand-your-ground laws cannot be invoked by someone who is the initial aggressor or otherwise doing something illegal. The exact details vary by jurisdiction.”
“38 states are stand-your-ground states, 30 by statutes providing “that there is no duty to retreat from an attacker in any place in which one is lawfully present”: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, TEXAS, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming; Puerto Rico is also stand-your-ground.
“Of these, at least eleven include ‘may stand his or her ground’ language (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and South Dakota.). Pennsylvania limits the no-duty-to-retreat principle to situations where the defender is resisting attack with a deadly weapon.”
LikeLike
The primary difference between North Korea and Texas is that Texas isn’t developing nuclear tipped cruise missiles to target the US and its allies.
But they do have Ted Cruz, so maybe it’s a distinction without a difference.
LikeLike
And being targeted by Ted Cruz is quite arguably even worse.
LikeLike
The link below takes you to an animated image showing the evolution of “carry” laws across the country over the last 35 years. It’s interesting. In 1986, only one state had an unrestricted “right to carry”–Vermont. Today it’s about 20 states. Along the way, the number of jurisdictions with “no issue” regimes (which bar private citizens from carrying a concealed handgun in public) has dwindled to a small scattering in California and the Northeast. A radical, national shift over a single generation.
LikeLike
That’s an amazing graphic, FLERP.
LikeLike
“Stand your Ground”…. What a pile of RepubliQan 🐂💩. Should be called “License to Kill”. And if the history of inequality, segregation and racism have any effect, you can pretty quickly figure out who’s more likely to be “standing their ground” against whom. Even so, such “protective” laws didn’t help Breonna Taylor much…
LikeLike
Rick Santorum’s patron, Foster Freiss, bought the farm. Foster funded Charlie Kirk’s Trump-supporting, Turning Point U.S.A.
LikeLike
I loved the Onion’s take on this stuff. A paraphrase of their headline:
Nothing to be done to prevent mass shootings says only country with routine mass shootings
LikeLike
I feel that the constitution was certainly intending for every citizen to own a tactical nuclear warhead.
LikeLike
Such foresight, those founding fathers!
LikeLike
It was called the “Philadelphia Project” headed up by nuclear physicist Benjamin Franklin.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LOL
LikeLike
A well regulated thermonuclear explosion.
LikeLike
…being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear thermonuclear warheads, shall not be infringed.
LikeLike
“and one evening in walks Dinsdale with a couple of big lads, one of whom was carrying a tactical nuclear missile. They said I had bought one of their fruit machines and would I pay for it.
2nd Interviewer: How much did they want?
Vercotti: They wanted three quarters of a million pounds.
2nd Interviewer: Why didn’t you call the police?
Vercotti: Well I had noticed that the lad with the thermonuclear device was the chief constable for the area. So a week later they called again and told me the cheque had bounced and said… I had to see… Doug.
2nd Interviewer: Doug?
Vercotti: Doug (takes a drink) Well, I was terrified. Everyone was terrified of Doug. I’ve seen grown men pull their own heads off rather than see Doug. Even Dinsdale was frightened of Doug.
2nd Interviewer: What did he do?
Vercotti: He used… sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor, pathos, puns, parody, litotes and… satire. He was vicious.”
The slippery slope from thermonuclear devices to satire.
We must be vigilant!
(Thanks to Monty Python]
LikeLike
Great!!!
LikeLike
Wonderful
LikeLike
NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch defined “Well-regulated militia” as anyone who “could operate and service their firearm.” https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/21/us/tallahassee-protests-gun-control.html
The most ironic thing about this whole mess is that gun laws in the fabled “Wild West” were actually far more restrictive than those in many of those same locations today.
“The laws of Tombstone at the time required visitors, upon entering town to disarm, either at a hotel or a lawman’s office. (Residents of many famed cattle towns, such as Dodge City, Abilene, and Deadwood, had similar restrictions.)” https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/gun-control-old-west-180968013/
LikeLike
You’re completely wrong, and spreading disinformation shouldn’t be taken so lightly. Background checks have not been removed, and will not be removed under HB 1927. It will still be illegal for felons to own or purchase a firearm after this bill is signed.
The idea that increased gun control measures will help anything at this point is absolutely ludicrous. Stricter gun control laws will only make it where good, law-abiding people can no longer defend themselves. Criminals don’t care about the law; that’s why they’re criminals. No law will keep them from getting guns and using them to hurt people. Look at Chicago as your example. That city has the strictest gun control in the country, and yet still has the highest number of gun deaths. Open your eyes.
LikeLike
Total bunkum and baloney. Laws against machine guns have drastically reduced slaughters and mass killings by machine guns. This country is AWASH in guns, saturated with guns, stop spreading pro-gun lies, obfuscations and misinformation. No law is perfect, no law can eliminate all crime. There are laws against bank robberies and yet we still have bank robberies. Well, it would be even worse without the laws. Beefing up gun laws will not deter legal, law-abiding people from owning guns if they so desire. We must do something to stop or at least reduce the frequency of mass killings (by gun) in this country. If we were a sane country, we would have banned semi-automatic guns long ago. When it comes to guns, we are not a sane country. Does anyone remember when the gun lovers said that Obama was going to confiscate your guns? Never happened, not even close.
LikeLike
Chicago has the misfortune of being adjacent to Indiana and Wisconsin, where loose gun laws allow these dangerous weapons to proliferate.
LikeLike
exactly
LikeLike
Chicago has the misfortune of being adjacent to Indiana and Wisconsin
Enuff said.
LikeLike
Jim: the United States does not exist in a vacuum. We have before us the existence proofs on this: those countries with strict gun control laws have low violent crime rates and very few or no mass shootings.
THIS OUGHT TO BE OBVIOUS and is to sane people.
LikeLike
Well, the US may not exist in a vacuum, but the Earth and it’s atmosphere do.
But any intelligent extraterrestrial species that survived long ago outlawed Texas.
LikeLike