Dana Milbank believes that Republicans are terrified of restoring civics education for fear that the younger generation will learn how our government is supposed to work.
He wrote in the Washington Post:
Pretty much everything the Trump-occupied Republican Party has been doing these days violates the basic tenets of democracy that American schoolchildren are taught.
But the Trumpy right has come up with an elegant remedy to relieve the cognitive dissonance: They want to cancel civics education. If the voters don’t know how the government is supposed to function, they’ll be none the wiser when it malfunctions — which has been pretty much all the time.
First, Republican officials indulged President Donald Trump’s four years of sabotaging the rule of law and democratic norms.
Then, a majority of Republican lawmakers voted to overturn the election results and President Biden’s victory.
Then, they voted to excuse Trump’s role in fomenting a violent insurrection against Congress.
Then, some moved to whitewash the insurrection itself, pretending the deadly attack was just a “normal tourist visit.”
And, finally, they purged the No. 3 House Republican, Liz Cheney of Wyoming, for refusing to embrace Trump’s “big lie” about a stolen election.
How do they get away with such fundamental violations of America’s democratic traditions? Well, maybe it’s because only a quarter of U.S. students are proficient in civics, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress. And apparently, the right wants to keep it that way.
A bipartisan bill in Congress sponsored by Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas and Republican Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma (Disclosure: My wife’s stepmother, Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, is one of the bill’s Democratic sponsors), would authorize $1 billion a year in grants to pay for more civics and history programs that teach children “to understand American Government and engage in American democratic practices as citizens and residents of the United States.” It’s as American — and as anodyne — as apple pie.
But, as The Post’s Laura Meckler reported over the weekend, “Conservative media and activists are pelting the Republicans who support the bill to abandon it. They call the grant program a ‘Trojan horse’ that would allow the Biden administration to push a liberal agenda.”
Conservative writer Stanley Kurtz told Breitbart News that the bill would promote a “woke education” and a “Marxist-based philosophy” in which “teachers are forced to indoctrinate students with ideas like ‘systemic racism,’ ‘white privilege,’ and ‘gender fluidity.’ ” Kurtz wrote in National Review that the civics bill will promote a curriculum “built around radical Critical Race Theory.”
In reality, the civics bill does no such thing. The “Civics Secures Democracy Act” specifically states that it doesn’t “authorize the Secretary of Education to prescribe a civics and history curriculum.” That’s up to state and local leaders.
But the plain text of the bill didn’t stop Kurtz and his allies from spinning a conspiracy theory, based on their objections to another, unrelated grant program. (For that program, the Biden administration cited the New York Times’s “1619 Project” in touting the importance of teaching about the consequences of slavery.) So, now, it’s a safe bet that congressional Republicans will in large numbers oppose a bill promoting nothing more nefarious than civil discourse, voting, jury duty and volunteering.
Perhaps the Republicans would look more favorably on a civics bill if it mandated a curriculum that better reflects the way they’ve been governing. To assist them, I’ve combed through the civics questions for fourth-graders asked by the National Assessment of Educational Progress, and substituted answers more consistent with recent events than the outdated, “correct” answers.
Which event is Rosa Parks associated with?
Strike “A boycott of the buses in Montgomery, Alabama,” and substitute: “An ANTIFA plot to destroy the suburbs.”
July 4 is a national holiday that celebrates the day when . . .
Strike “the American colonies declared their independence” and insert “the Continental Army took over the airports.”
The purpose of the United Nations is to . . .
Strike “promote international peace and security” and insert “lead a takeover of the U.S. government by globalist pedophiles.”
Usually United States citizens elect a President by . . .
Strike “secret ballot on Election Day” and insert “Storming the Capitol and bludgeoning police officers with flagpoles.”
Which of the following ideas is in the summary of the Declaration of Independence?
Strike “People in the United States should have some control over the government” and insert “People in the United States should not wear face masks.”
What are the two main political parties in the United States?
Strike “Democrats and Republicans” and insert “Republicans and Far-Left Radical Socialists who are Against God.”
Who decides whether a law follows the Constitution or not?
Strike “The Supreme Court” and insert “Rudy Giuliani.”
Who is currently the President of the United States?
Strike “Joseph Biden” and insert “Donald Trump.”
Two decades ago, George W. Bush spoke the immortal words, “Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?” The survival of Trump’s Republicans depends on the answer being a resounding “no.”

All the Republicans screaming and yelling about what is taught in public schools are ed reformers in Ohio. It’s the exact same people who push charters and vouchers and attack public schools, to a man or woman.
Ed reformers have some strange bedfellows, I must say. So many of them claim to be “Democrats” or “liberals” but on issue after issue they’re completely aligned with the Republican Party.
Just to clarify the ed reform position on public schools- I’m supposed to accept directives and bans on what can be taught in public schools by people who didn’t and don’t attend public schools, lobby AGAINST public schools, don’t send their children to public schools, and oppose the existence of public schools.
Why would I do that?
I oppose private school vouchers. Would ed reformers accept my directives on what should be taught in the private schools they’re all lobbying to fund with public money?
They don’t support our schools! They work to eradicate them. Why should we accept their agenda for our schools?
LikeLike
Let’s review what the “ed reform movement” has accomplished on behalf of public schools and public school students in the last year.
They mandated testing
They started a ridiculous political war in our schools over some exaggerated nonsense about “critical race theory” that every public school is supposedly indoctrinating students with.
They’re a net negative for public school students and families. They deliver no positive value of any kind. Year after year after year, all of their work ends up as a loss for public school students. They’re great for charter and voucher students! But public school students and families? Net negative.
I you’re hiring or electing these people for “public education” you are harming students who attend public schools. There’s no upside.
LikeLike
Jeb Bush declares victory on vouchers:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/05/the-year-of-school-choice/
I urge all public school families and supporters to read within the ed reform echo chamber because they’re all lockstep behind Bush and you know what you won’t find in any of their victory speeches on “choice”?
A single accomplishment that benefits any public school or public school student.
They simply don’t do any work on behalf of students in public schools. Bush actually depicts all public school STUDENTS as low performing because smearing our students helps him to sell the agenda. It’s appalling. Not content with devoting whole careers to bashing public schools they now bash public school students.
Anything to push the agenda. If it means throwing every public school student under the ed reform bus they’ll happily do it.
LikeLike
They are happy to see kids going to schools in strip malls without certified teachers or principals
LikeLike
“Foundation for Public Education” – gag me.
“let adults be the priority in how you run your schools, students will always come second, at best.” – what total nonsense is that?
That’s like saying – “if you make let the doctors be a priority – the patients will always come 2nd.” Let’s slash doctors pay, force them to work in untenable circumstances and then pretend that we are doing it for the sake of the patients.
Maybe he should try taking up a painting like his brother and meet with, listen to the stories of and spend time in public school classrooms – and then paint what he sees.
LikeLike
Oops – “FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION.” is the Jeb Bush foundation.
Not sure why I typed, “Foundation for Public Education.” – yikes. Wishful thinking I guess that these “Richie Rich” types would support public education.
LikeLike
Incidentally, now that the ed reform “movement” have successfully pushed thru vouchers and expanded charters in all of these states we should be seeing the proof of their ideological redesign soon, right?
They got their whole wish list on privatization. According to the dogma, scores should skyrocket.
Now that they’re directing public education in 29 states and most of those states don’t allow labor unions, they’ll be asked how the project is going, right? We’ll get real analysis on whether privatization “works”, right?
They can’t blame public schools in states they privatized. They designed and set up these privatized systems. They should be held accountable for how they work out.
We’re at 40 and 50% charters in a lot of cities. At what point are ed reformers held accountable for “public education” now that they’ve privatized half of it?
LikeLike
Being an Ed reformer means never apologizing.
LikeLike
Nor being accountable.
LikeLike
This and the U.S. Postal Service . . . so Orwellian . . . . CBK
LikeLike
Milwaukee is packed with charters and vouchers. Why are ed reformers still blaming public schools and labor unions for “public education” in Milwaukee?
They’ve privatized half of it. According to their own dogma the problems should be solved.
We won’t have any indication of how privatization is superior to public systems until they close the last public school? We;ll always need one more charter or voucher program to prove the ed reform thesis? At what point are they held accountable for the privatized systems they designed and lobbied for?
LikeLike
Yup. I lived in a Milwaukee for a few years and still have a few friends there. When I talk about school choice and public schools the reply is “well they have to do something…. the public schools aren’t working.” This is from educated, informed people who have bought the narrative … hook, line and sinker.
What’s not working is the impact of the cycle of poverty that is entrenched in many areas.
LikeLike
The President of a religious organization (mailing address, Minnesota) that identifies its goal as school choice initiatives (across the nation) was formerly employed by the Minnesota Legislature. After that job, he was paid to advocate his church’s policy agenda in the public square. He lists, concurrent with his current job, memberships in American Enterprise Institute Leadership Network and, the largest lay organization in the world (an organization led by by a former legislative aide to Jesse Helms).
In at least two states, the state religious Conferences’ directors (same religion as the guy described in my first paragraph) took credit for school choice legislation.
LikeLike
(advanced apology for a too-long comment)
Education like just about everything else is collateral damage of the EX president’s presence. And, until there is bona fide hair-on-fire lives-depend-on-it outrage, the enabling elected enablers in state houses and boards and Congress can get away with murder (literally and figuratively) and 21st century intellectual cleansing and revisionist history and revisionist nightly news prevail.
From the moment this man berated every GOP candidate in the 2016 primary debates and they said and did nothing, it was down hill from there. Most people thought it was a joke. He’s a reality tv shyster. A joke. His “15 minutes.” We complained, “oh gee, if a kid said that in school s/he’d be suspended for bullying.” But No outrage, no denouncing.
Then came the way he eerily hovered over Secretary Clinton in the debates. And, then the Access Hollywood quotes. People complained, “oh gee, Any person in the workplace who did or said that would be ostracized and and ousted.” No outrage. No denouncing.
Then he coined “fake news” to cast doubt on anything that could be used to rile up his “we’re not going to take it anymore” rally goers. He berated disabled reporters. No outrage. No denouncing.
We were brainwashed. “TRUTH” and “FACTS” and “EVIDENCE” are now meaningless in America. The real media and even his media willingly used the words “lies” in news broadcasts and most of his were on video, recorded. By then NO ONE CARED. Gaslighting of America 101. No outrage.
All one had to do was put the word “YOUR” in front of Truth and Facts and you could say anything you wanted – regardless of evidence. “That person was choked to death on video? That’s your truth.” “Those thousands of scientists declared a pandemic. That’s your truth.” HOW DO A MILLION PEOPLE DIE of a preventable situation and we just get on zoom the next day as if nothing is happening? But we do.
The 1619 project? Cutting any reference to race and inequality and inequity? Those are small potatoes of the damage done.
This man and these men (and conspiracy spouting women in Congress) have done more than claim stupid conspiracy theories and ignored evidence right in front of them – – they have perpetuated the most heinous acts in this country just notches short of how Hitler mesmerized and falsified a nation to scapegoat millions of people and the truth.
We analyzing “root causes” – – well, the “root cause” of censorship, rewriting history, convincing billionaire publishers to cower to Texas’s version of history, and the brainwashing of America is one person and the millions including people elected to check and balance who enabled him.
How often do we read, “Where’s the outrage?” Maybe it takes internment camps rounding up the scholars, scientists, and doctors – and real fences around impoverished neighborhoods before the enablers see what lines they crossed. And, still, most won’t care.
LikeLike
George Orwell wrote about this distortion of facts and history by thee Nazis. Before their rise, he wrote, there was a field called “science.” When they came to power, there was”Nazi science” and “Jewish science.” Daniel Patrick Moynihan once said that you are entitled to your own theories, but not your own facts. In the Trump era, “facts” are subjective.
LikeLike
It began well before Trump, as evidenced by Paul Weyrich’s training manual posted at Theocracy Watch. Leonard Leo and the Federalist Society predate Trump. Rick Santorum, who CNN cut loose today over racist comments, said in an interview with NCR that JFK had done great damage to the U.S. when he called for separation of church and state.
As long as Americans refuse to admit that the advent of conservative church politicking in this century is a “root cause” of the “rewrite of history and the brainwashing”, there will be continued flailing about to identify a cause for a nation forced to fight to defend facts as facts.
As long as Americans refuse to admit Charles Koch and Murdoch enable conservative religious leaders to get wins for the GOP, why should anyone think that the goal on Jan. 6 won’t be attempted again?
LikeLike
For all the damage education reform has done, I still believe research needs to be done into the civics education given to people who are now age 50 and older, as that group supported Trump 52% while only 31% of 18-24 year olds voted for Trump.
Despite the lack of civics education, 18-24 year olds understood what was at stake in this election. Not so much for their grandparents.
To be fair, this might reflective demographics more than age — white voters are a higher percentage of voters in older age ranges.
LikeLike
Maybe the fault lies with whitewashed history, not civics.
LikeLike
That makes sense. I am impressed at how the young aren’t falling for the myths. I can recall in the early 1980s being in an enormous crowd of young college students at a midwestern flagship state university, where the students were adoringly cheering on Reagan, and feeling as if I did not understand how they could be so enamored of him. I don’t think there are many colleges today where right wing Republicans are showered with adoration by high percentages of young students.
LikeLike
Not so much the whitewashed history as the desire to hold onto the fiction they were taught. In spite of the irrefutable documentation to contrary. I suspect they know they are wrong and don’t care.
And closer to home 3 right wing lunatics were elected to the Smithtown School Board . Running with PBA union backing, on a platform of opposing “critical race theory.”
LikeLike
In older groups (and all groups), the college educated vote Democratic.
Older GOP voters likely dropped out of school, paid no attention to high school classes or, are too racist and sexist to learn not to be.
LikeLike
Great, funny and oh-so-scary column.
The Common Bore and the Race to the Flop hobbled history and civics education, that’s for sure.
What if the Trumpsters are able to deliver the coup de grace?
I had dinner last night sitting outdoors on a beautiful May evening. For a few minutes, all seemed better in our upstate village. For the first time in more than a year lots of people were without masks, legally. It’s a hip restaurant started by people from NYC. I was ready to relax and eat pad thai.
Then, right across the way I spotted a sign in the window of a defunct small town car dealership (now a can recycling place). The sign reads “Fuck Biden and Fuck Everyone Who Voted for Him” or something to that effect. (Excuse the language.) There’s also a big Trump poster in the rancid window.
I believe the man who owns the business is an elected town official.
Wow! And, six months after the election, still.
How many kids have seen those words? And, what kind of business delivers that sort of message to potential customers?
I know some conservatives who pine for a return to a sort of quaint world of the past -a world that never really existed.
Meanwhile, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a picture of a rural town in America from the 1950s boasting a sign with the word “Fuck” in big, fat letters.
Some of the Trump people I know have moved on.
But some, well, they seem to be enraged and deranged.
Civics presumes civility. It’s a lesson they either never learned or have chosen to ignore.
LikeLike
John, I saw that same message on a window decal on the back of an oversized pick-up. As I passed the truck, I slowed down to look to see who would put such a ignorant sticker on the back of their truck…. expecting someone who looked like one of the insurrectionists. Instead, there was a 60 something bobbed-hair cut soccer grandma looking type driving. She laughed – as she knew why I was looking at her in disbelief.
I looked online and Amazon has a whole variety of this type of merchandise – classy site, Jeff Bezos.
The decal I saw filled the whole back of a pick up window – this one is much smaller.
LikeLike
Oops – I thought just the link would show so others could click the link to get to the Amazon sticker. Yikes – not the actual sticker.
Sorry. Please remove.
LikeLike
John and beachteach,
Not to sound Pollyanna-ish, but I’m taking a small amount of comfort in the fact that this offensive sign actually acknowledges that Biden won because people voted for Biden! They are angry at the people who voted for Biden, instead of claiming those people don’t exist and everyone actually voted for Trump.
I guess living in reality makes them very, very angry, which probably explains why the majority of rabid Trump supporters like them simply refuse to live in their mythical Trumpland.
LikeLiked by 1 person
^^^oops, typo:
“… which probably explains why the majority of rabid Trump supporters like them simply CONTINUE to live in their mythical Trumpland.
LikeLike
I didn’t think of it that way, but, yeah, I guess. Though the sign only says “voted” not elected Biden.
The hipster restaurant where I was trying to relax is another, small-sized former car dealership that also went under. Both places are the size of gas stations, actually, and separated by only an alley-way sort of road that dead ends by the river..
Maybe the two businesses are having a beef? (Or is it vegetarian?)
Thing is, it wasn’t Republicans or Democrats that sunk small town car dealerships and the families that owned them. Big business and change…technology closed that deal, and not with a handshake.
Family farms, small schools, rural communities…left in the lurch…fertile ground for a demagogue.
But I went to a Friday night football game in town and they ran out of decent country songs and started to play rap. Lots of kids were digging it, too. That pretty much sums it up in a song.
LikeLike
Civics (sic) education is about much more than understanding the processes, intent and historical precedents of governing. It is about having a foundational base of common assumptions from which the art of representative government can be expressed and implemented. That no longer exists in the United States and I think it is open to serious debate if it ever will again. Republicans now live by Narcissus’s admonition to Pallas in Handel’s Agrippina, “The first thing in any intrigue is to trust each other.” There is no room—only intense disdain, derision, and dismissiveness—for those who are not participants in the obvious subterfuge that only values raw political expediency and power.
Perhaps, like extreme trauma surgery, the only answer is to kill the patient in order to save his or her life. Recently I read comments made by CNN anchor Don Lemon that Democrats must begin to act as ruthlessly as Republicans have under the regimes of Gingrich and McConnell. Say what you will, Republicans always act with the urgency of getting as many spoils as possible within each two-year congressional cycle. Democrats never have. They are undermined by their own, as they are this year by Manchin and Sinema. They argue for the mirage of bipartisanship when the other side never has any intention of getting on the boat. They claim that the results of “going it alone” will be a lack of legislative/legal permanency. I would ask them to refer to the Bush and the Idiot’s tax cuts for a substantive counterpoint.
And please don’t fall back on the rhetorical pablum of “the moral arc of the universe…” Tell that to black men and women whose municipally sanctioned murders are and aren’t on video…to the Americans who are suffering because they can’t afford healthcare, housing or escape…to the women who continue to bear the brunt of economic inequality…to, well, you get the point. That trope does not wear will with time or empiricism.
Many of us have drawn parallels between our recent and current predicament and Weimar. While many are focused on the end of Weimar, the real lessons are to be found in its beginning. That’s where the ages become synchronous. A lack of civic education and the norms it inculcates has consequences in all parts of society. This was best articulated by Kurt Tucholsky when he observed,
Tucholsky observed this most tellingly in the early days of Weimar judicial system, for its leniency towards the Right and severity against the Left. As he noted Tucholsky noted in a 1922 essay, “For 314 murders by the Right, 31 years and 4 months in prison sentences, plus one life sentence. For 13 murders by the Left, 8 death sentences, 176 years and 10 months in prison sentences.” And note the similarity between today’s justifications of insurrectionists who relied on their cult love of the Idiot and a Weimar-era defender’s opening statement about one of the two defendants, “[He] wanted to rehabilitate himself to his family through the murder! He wanted to make his dear father happy!!” We can extrapolate out this sentiment today in the political reactions of Republicans to issues of, among others, climate, gender, health and public education. They can all be traced back, in my view, to the death of civic education and the common purpose that undergirds it.
It might well be too late to actually teach civic education anymore. Perhaps students should just recite the opening verse of William Butler Yeats’s poem The Second Coming and then disband, since there is no better summary of our unfolding national demise:
At least they’ll be better prepared to live in the real world, free of unrealistic illusions.
LikeLike
GregB Democrats “argue for the mirage of bipartisanship when the other side never has any intention of getting on the boat.”
This fact is what makes Charles Schultz the spiritual center of the universe.
Also, I think that the 20th century (and before, of course) offers enough examples of what it’s actually like NOT to live in a democracy, not to mention the present situation in the Middle-East. I say that because my own experience of high school civics was the most boring of my life; and if it weren’t for a good friend and classmate, I would not have graduated, having been “passed along” and passed-over, for years.
My point is that, looking back, I think civics without history is horribly abstract, especially for an unmotivated teenager. But to teach civics in unison with actual events that occur in OTHER kinds of political situations, and keeping the connection in mind between democratic civics and those other forms of government, would give it the kind of life and STORY that would have captured my interest at the time and, perhaps, made me more politically aware earlier on in my life.
Perhaps such experiences of boredom and its potential cure have been generalized by many over the years (since 1963-4), or can be generalized, at least for some curricula.
And BTW, the 1619 Project differs a bit, but it does just that. It makes civics education come alive by integrating/combining it with the dynamism of history that students are already experiencing. It tacitly acknowledges that we aren’t a perfect union, but are on the way to becoming: “A More Perfect Union.” CBK
LikeLike
Oddly, unlike so many comments like yours about how boring civics was, I was incredibly fortunate to have a teacher who brought it to life for us. It was far and away my favorite and most memorable class in all of my schooling. Perhaps why that’s why I loved teaching government so much and why I still regret having to leave civic education 23 years ago.
Teaching in unison with other events is so key. In my high school class, we had a weekly team, Jeopardy-like, current events contest. We also read literature. When I taught, I used novels, the newspaper, music, film, and no textbook. I would copy excerpts from other sources (I didn’t worry about copyright laws, which I told my kids was my act of civil disobedience). And when big events happened, I had the freedom to pause my curriculum and delve into the issue of the day. In retropect, probably the greatest gift I had was no parent or administration meddling. They trusted me. It is truly a sad state of affairs today and, I fear, I am relatively hopeless that things will get better.
LikeLike
GregB I think there is hope, but how long will it take for the disease to kill the beast . . .
Like with 1940’s Nazism, even if the allies had not won as they did, Nazism in its then-form would have dissipated from its internal rot. But then, of course, it or something like it rises again.
But your point about trust is essential . . . we are in an age of skepticism, pessimism, and even nihilism, all of which are sinkholes in human thought and life. If so, then restoring trust–not blind but reasonable, and so what flows from thoughtful and critical minds . . . is essential to the restoration and maintenance of a vibrant democracy.
In my own experience of high school civics, . . . apparently no reason to trust was on the docket, as it was with yours. CBK
LikeLike
Perhaps the problem is not that Democrats seek bipartisanship. Perhaps they are not undermined by a few in the party . Perhaps the lack of progressive policies is because many of them simply aren’t progressive. Relying on the same corporate donors as Republicans and representing those interests over the interest of working class Americans.
You mention Sinema, check out the paid Corporate Boards Kelly has sat on. You wouldn’t then be shocked that he was against raising the minimum wage to 15 . Or that he has not signed on to the PRO act yet .
How many moderate sounding Democrats are merely as corrupt as the Republicans . The Party lost it’s economic footing decades ago with too many taking the bait the Republicans gave them in the culture wars. For some not being Republicans has substituted for delivering real economic progress, since Reagan.
There is as well a degree of extreme cowardice. Republicans never care if their economic policy is grounded in reality . Never care that like ground hog day we see the same results each time they cut taxes. They know exactly who they serve and what the mission is.
Last months unemployment report was phenomenal 266 k thousand jobs added under any circumstance would be an excellent jobs number.
Before being pulled down by other sectors the 331 k added in Leisure and Hospitality alone , would surpass all but two months of Job creation in the last decade (minus the pandemic ).
That is the lowest wage sector in the economy . Yet how many Democrats are ducking for cover buying into the manufactured conventional wisdom that lazy workers are sitting home collecting more on unemployment than they would get working . Even Biden felt compelled to issue a warning to those lazy workers sitting home that doing so was unacceptable.
The fact that the Jobs numbers were compiled between March 12 and April 12 when shutdowns were still widespread, when the vast majority of Americans were not vaccinated yet . And when Layoffs as measured by first time claims of unemployment were higher each week than any month prior to the Pandemic in 50 years. That seems not to make it through the ether. Unlike Republicans who never had a doubt that trickle down was gospel even when the working class got “pissed on”
Yes in the spirit of bipartisanship Biden will cut 600 billion out of his infrastructure plan. And Democrats will worry that they are spending too much. As their base tired of the failures sits out the midterms and we sink into fascism.
LikeLike
Joel Cannot remember his name, but I heard in passing a Congressman talking about the “sitting at home collecting more” argument. He put forward that, if workers, especially low paid workers, were being paid a living wage in the first place, the argument would disappear along with the disparity.
I thought it was a good point he was making. CBK
LikeLike
Catherine King
I’m a labor activist and I wish the story were true . As Baker, Krugman and Leonhardt of times explain it is conventional wisdom and conventional wisdom is often group think and wrong.
If there are labor shortages “Capitalism has solved that” . Wages rise significantly as workers a commodity, leverage their service between employers . It isn’t showing up in the numbers .
As Dean Baker Leonhardt point out there were 3 studies done last summer when the supplement was 600 and they found very few workers taking advantage, so why would 300 entice them to do so. This is not to say that no workers did not .
https://cepr.net/are-those-300-weekly-supplements-making-it-impossible-for-employers-to-get-good-help/
There are plenty of other explanations for why certain low wage employers can not find workers. Including workers moving into slightly better paying jobs like warehousing during the pandemic.
The same with skills. Those with skills use the hot market to leverage higher wages . Of course employers could do something novel . They could provide training. I forget the exact percentage of employers providing training, according to a once a decade DOL survey. But training has dropped dramatically .
LikeLike
Joel We’re in the “weeds” now. Every story is different. But that also allows for the argument that, even in more-than-a-few “weedy” circumstances, having a better minimum wage would make a difference for those some/or/many who make less at work than they do getting unemployment. CBK
LikeLike
Joel ADDENDUM: It seems to me that the
bigger the disparity in pay between wages and
unemployment, the more it can be referred to as
more of an baked-in moral hazard than a sign
of a despicable work ethic on the part of “lazy”
workers. And if you are trying to support
children, the disparity becomes even more so.
(This is the stuff of a basic 101 Ethics class.) CBK
LikeLike
I am not arguing that the minimum wage should not be raised . The question is are those claiming that they can not get employees correct.
Are employees holding out for higher wages , especially when if called back to an employer in many states they risk losing benefits if they do not. . Both Yellen and Powell think this is not the case. .As well as the economists I cited.
It was Yellen who pointed out the phenomenal growth in low wage workers in the Leisure and Hospitality sector the day of the release. Actually doubling the numbers from the previous month.
Noam Chomsky would say someone is “Manufacturing Consent” those of us on Diane’s blog should be especially sensitive to group think.
Here is the chart of first time claims for unemployment . Find me a time outside of the pandemic where the number of layoffs was higher in the last 50 years than the weeks of 3/12 -4/12. Do employers lay off workers when there are shortages. In fact what has actually happened is many of the same workers are repeatedly being laid off and rehired with the opening and closing of the economy.
There was once a college level course called Logic and Statistics. Economics while not an exact science,is still supposed to be based on both.
LikeLike
In case I forgot the link . When the comment gets out of moderation
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/ICSA
LikeLike
My secular deity! That is the most astounding graph I’ve ever seen in my life. Thanks so much for sharing.
LikeLike
Quoting Greg- the only value- raw political expediency and power.
A former national politician homeschooled his younger children and the older boys attended a private school associated with Opus Dei (7-8 kids in total). The politician, a favorite son of the conservative religious, said that JFK had greatly harmed the U.S. by calling for separation of church and state. Today, CNN cut the politician for racist comments. Prior to his current setback, the politician said that his deeply conservative religious culture influenced his life as a politician. The reasoning that led CNN to find it more objectionable for the public to hear from a politician who makes racist comments than from one opposed to separation of church and state speaks to the erosion of a common understanding about the foundation of the nation and, the “trust’ required for American democracy.
Nine years ago, the politician “spurred a conversation about religion in the public square”. In 2020, the bishop of a midwestern city, on the advice of his state religious conference, prohibited the Americans in his employ as priests from voting in the 2020 Democratic primaries.
Anyone who reads the Paul Weyrich training manual posted at Theocracy Watch (Weyrich co-founded the religious right, the Koch’s Heritage Foundation and ALEC), and ignores its implications, has slim reason to expect to live in a democracy.
LikeLike
Linda Wasn’t JFK Catholic, as is Biden, and where both reflect in their politics the import of the distinction between Church and State for a democracy.
Also, I’ve been hearing and seeing (videos) the last few days on CNN and MSNBC from evangelical preachers who are speaking out to their parishioners against Q-Anon and the fact that a Christian flag was flown at the Capitol on January 6. Billy Graham’s granddaughter actually said this week that, in some of today’s Churches, Jesus himself would not be welcome.
Also, see the online Catholic journal of more liberal thinkers and writers: The Commonweal. Though the right-wingers in the Churches presently put forward a powerful front . . . one that is far from Christian by any way you look at it . . . they are not the monoliths you make them out to be.
I’m writing this for others because Linda has said she doesn’t care what I write . . . she’s sort of not such a good listener in that respect, insisting on holding her ears and cherry-picking rather than on engaging in reasonable dialogue.
I do think our present oligarchs are more afeard of dark skin, women, poor people, taxes and regulation than they are religious, by any stretch of the imagination. The Church is to them as useful idiots are to Putin and his band of destroyers. CBK
LikeLike