Joel Westheimer is a professor of education at the University of Ottawa. He wrote this article for The Ottawa Citizen and shared it with me. This is a good time for me to mention that I strongly believe in content. In the mid-1980s, I was involved with a large committee that wrote the California K-12 History-Social Studies Framework. We realized that whatever we wrote had to be feasible from the point of view of teaching and learning. We selected the key events and developments that teachers would focus on. When we finished our draft, we sent it to teachers across the state. We received more than 1,000 reviews and read each one carefully. We made many changes. We sought in-depth learning, not a swift canoe ride across the centuries. Depth matters more than breadth.
Westheimer wrote:
Three essential lessons COVID-19 has taught us about education
During the pandemic, we rediscovered what teachers and students have always known: that schooling is about relationships, learning is a social process, and a deep-dive into a topic of interest is worth more than a stress-filled endurance swim in the shallows.
When did the Assyrian empire’s reign over Mesopotamia begin and end?
If you don’t know, you have a lot of company and you’re about to have even more. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, countless nine- and 10-year-olds missed lessons about one ancient civilization or another this past year.
History and geography aren’t the only subjects affected. Some middle school students won’t learn the three functions of mitochondria. High school math teachers may have skipped lessons in differential equations. And who knows how many missed the opportunity to read Paulo Coelho’s brilliant allegorical novel, The Alchemist.
So what?
The first lesson parents, educators, and policymakers should draw from our collective school experiences during the pandemic is this: content matters much more than coverage. For more than three decades, the school curriculum has become increasingly consumed with all the things students should know before they graduate. That has resulted in an unprecedented global obsession with micro-managing teachers’ work to ensure the right information is taught and with standardized testing to find out if they’re succeeding.
Every day we read about children falling behind, but the curriculum is bursting at the seams. Falling behind what? Behind whom?
Research in teaching and child development tells us that learning how to think analytically is much more important than cramming in material that students won’t remember weeks or years later. We live in an age of instantly accessible information in an infinite number of domains. Living well in the 21st century does not require more information but rather the knowledge and skills needed to sift, understand and assess the quality of information. Teaching content matters, but covering every possible historical event and scientific or mathematical concept does not.
Let’s turn our concern over learning loss during the pandemic to focus on what was gained. We rediscovered what teachers and students have always known: that schooling is about relationships, learning is a social process, and a deep-dive into a topic of great interest is worth more than a stress-filled endurance swim in the shallows. What matters are the connections that teachers make, both to students and their families and between subject matter and the outside world.
A second lesson for education I take away from the pandemic is that inequality undermines the work educators do. This shouldn’t be a new lesson, but it was a wake-up call. COVID-19 has functioned like an x-ray, exposing already existing fault lines: poverty and economic inequality, unequal access to high speed internet and computers, and inadequate resources for those most in need.
Calls during the pandemic for parents to make sure their children don’t fall behind only increased these already existing inequalities. Some parents have the time, resources and education to demand their kids follow the curriculum, maybe even get ahead. Other parents are front-line workers, or holding down two jobs, or working at home with little time for other activities.
School cannot solve all of society’s problems, but they are a place we can acknowledge them. For example, some teachers brought new scrutiny to how they assign grades. Could the way we evaluate students’ prospects reflect the fact that students come from such different starting points? As children return to classrooms, let’s try — both within and outside of schools — to address inequality in meaningful ways.
A third lesson from the pandemic is that teaching is essential work. Remember those amusing memes from last spring when schools shut down?
- Homeschooling, Day 1: And just like that, teachers were appreciated again;
- Homeschooling, Day 2: We should double our teachers’ salaries;
- Homeschooling, Day 3: I must apologize to the teacher for insisting that Suzie was “gifted.”
Funny, yes, but also revealing. Psychologists tells us that good humour often points to truths that everyone knows but nobody admits. I hope that we learn a newfound respect and admiration for the difficult and vital work teachers do. Will it be a little bit harder to claim teachers are lazy or have too much time off or that class size doesn’t matter? Teachers’ working conditions are children’s learning conditions and we should do everything we can to assist their efforts.
There are other lessons to take away. At the University of Ottawa, colleagues and I started the research collaborative CHENINE (Change, Engagement, and Innovation in Education) to make sure these lessons don’t get lost in the shuffle back to brick-and-mortar schooling. Already we’ve learned that educational technology can enrich good teaching but can’t replace poor teaching; that we could give students less homework and fewer tests; that the outdoors is a vastly underused resource for teaching and learning; and that trusting teachers’ front-line judgments is crucial.
When school returns to full swing, let’s give teachers latitude in what, how and when to teach any particular subject matter. Their primary job should be to restore a sense of safety, nurture a sense of possibility and rebuild the community lost through extended social isolation.
By the way, the Assyrian empire fell in 609 BC. I had to look it up.
Joel Westheimer is an education columnist for CBC Radio and professor of education at the University of Ottawa. His most recent book is What kind of citizen: Educating our children for the comm
“…content matters much more than coverage…Falling behind what? Behind whom?”
Such an insightful article! I was involved in publicizing and promoting the National Standards on Civic Education. They were never intended to dictate to teachers what they should teach. They were supposed to be a helping hand, so to speak, something teachers could refer to in order to give them ideas teach and as a reminder if some lessons they would have liked to use were unintentionally neglected or forgotten. It gave them ideas about other sources of information they might consider using to supplement their lessons. They were never about what and when one had to cover. They treated teachers as professionals who never stopped learning.
Thanks for these insights Greg – Yes, I’ve heard that from a number of people.
Joel
http://joelwestheimer.org
By the way, after expanding on technological advances in warfare, the Assyrian empire’s reign over Mesopotamia ended in 609 BC. Yep. The empire just grew too big to be maintained.
By the way, after expanding on technological advances in marketing, the Neoliberal Billionaire Boys and Girls Club’s reign over America ended in 2020 AD. The greedy Club just grew too all-powerful to be put up with any longer.
Billionaires using test scores to blame the poor for poverty was never sustainable. But Bill Gates’ overinflated ego will not go down without a fight. We must learn lessons, even when Gates cannot learn a thing. This: “We rediscovered what teachers and students have always known: that schooling is about relationships, learning is a social process, and a deep-dive into a topic of great interest is worth more than a stress-filled endurance swim in the shallows. What matters are the connections that teachers make, both to students and their families and between subject matter and the outside world.”
Test and punish is a strategy to undermine public education. Content matters far more than coverage. With an emphasis on punitive testing, meaningful content takes a back seat to covering mostly reading and math topics that will appear on standardized tests. A narrow curriculum diminishes deep, rich content and creative expression. It is the enemy of real teaching and learning.
Schooling is about building social relationships in a trusting environment. Standardized testing violates that trust, which is particularly true for the most vulnerable. poor students. There are other more humane and affirming ways to meaningfully assess students progress without wasteful, punitive standardized testing. Teachers need to be given the latitude to effectively do their jobs instead of being treated like rats in a maze.
Well said!
Joel
http://joelwestheimer.org/
Very strange that the value of in-person school wouldn’t make the top three lessons we’ve learned from the pandemic.
Silicon Valley has made tons of money from the pandemic. Computer companies are pushing for many jobs to remain remote jobs where people will work from home. In education we need to face up to the fact that cyber learning is an inadequate replacement for in-person learning that promotes social interaction. Computers are useful tools, but they are not a substitute for in-person learning.
Very strange that you can’t see that the value of teachers–therefore in-person school is strongly implied–in each of the top three lessons. Guessing you didn’t read to the end of the article, “When school returns to full swing, let’s give teachers latitude in what, how and when to teach any particular subject matter.” Does that statement not include valuing in-person school?
Nothing like a strong implication at the end of an article to drill an important point home!
Ahh, there’s that lawyerly distractive precision! Note I also wrote “in each of the top three lessons.” If you can see the value that Westheimer places on in-person learning in virtually every sentence he wrote, there truly is no way out of the cesspool of self pity.
Nothing like a strong implication at the end of an article to drill an important point home!
Excellent. Although, to be fair, this describes the kind of education that is the norm for the most privileged students whose parents pay $50,000+ annually for a private education.
It seems to me that most of human history is about, “How have conflicts about how people would live together gotten resolved, by whom, and for whom? And how has the resolution affected human wellbeing?” Maybe, that would be a better essential question than, “What happened?”
I’ve read a lot of history over the decades and have been exposed to a lot of dates and names and don’t remember most of them, but I know enough to look up a specific historical date or name if I want to see it AGAIN for some reason. Hell, I’ve looked up the exact dates of this country’s revolution dozens of times because my memory does not hold on to the exact number no matter how many times I’ve seen it.
Testing memories with multiple-choice tests is BS, pure BS, and greed. Every power-hungry billionaire and the minions that work for them are filthy guilty of child and teacher abuse and racism when they support high-stakes tests as a way to “MEASURE” learning.
The day an angry, heavily armed mob goes after the billionaires where they live and work (instead of a fake, lying billionaires’ minions attacking our elected government), I will support that mob.
Reopening now means incurring preventable deaths. A safe return will soon be possible. Vaccinations could begin before the start of the next academic year for middle school and high school students, and for elementary school children not long after.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/31/health/pfizer-biontech-vaccine-adolescents.html
Thank you for an interesting read.
One statement got me really thinking: “Could the way we evaluate students’ prospects reflect the fact that students come from such different starting points?”. As a primary educator I do not officially evaluate students’ prospects and neither would I like to do that. It would feel to me like classifying my students in certain boxes. Individual’s prospects depend on so many variables and change over time. However, I do consider student’s progress in my class when I assign grades. I also believe that a student’s progress in my class might be a partial indicator of their prospects.
Could you, please, elaborate on your statement? Thank you.